Trial-Tested Property Litigator Kimberlee Martin Joins Ball Janik LLP's Orlando Construction Defect Team
October 06, 2026 —
Ball Janik LLPORLANDO, FL, September 30, 2026 — Ball Janik LLP has added Kimberlee A. Martin to its Construction Defect Practice Group as an associate in the firm's Orlando office. For more than a decade, she has litigated matters in the fields of criminal defense, first-party property, and insurance disputes, taking cases and claims from inception through jury trial. It's the same path many of Ball Janik's clients face when construction goes wrong, and her arrival deepens the firm's trial bench in Central Florida.
"Florida property owners are dealing with complex building problems and less time to act on them. That puts a premium on attorneys who can take a case the distance," said James C. Prichard, Managing Partner of Ball Janik LLP. "Kimberlee has carried property and insurance claims from pre-suit all the way through trial, working hand in hand with experts along the way. Community associations and commercial property owners need exactly that combination, and she brings it to our team on day one."
Most recently, Kimberlee served as Litigation Director, where she oversaw homeowners' property claims in pre-suit and litigation, managed a substantial caseload, and guided associate attorneys on litigation strategy. Her civil work includes jury trials, summary judgment and dismissal motions, expert and witness depositions, mediations, and site inspections, along with close coordination with contractors, consultants, and other experts.
That skill set maps directly onto construction defect and insurance recovery litigation, where cases often turn on site evidence, expert testimony, and a credible readiness to go to trial.
"I've seen firsthand how much is at stake when a building has problems: owners' investments, residents' homes, and everyone's peace of mind," said Kimberlee. "Ball Janik is focused on exactly those clients, which made this a natural next step for my practice. I'm excited to join this team and help property owners hold the responsible parties accountable and get their buildings repaired."
Kimberlee earned her J.D., cum laude, from Florida International University College of Law and her B.A. in political science, with a minor in legal studies, from the University of Central Florida.
About Ball Janik LLP
Ball Janik LLP is a Florida-based law firm offering construction defect, construction law, insurance recovery, and commercial litigation counsel, to its local and national clients. The firm was founded in 1982 and has expanded its capabilities, professionals, and geographic footprint. What started as a small firm focused on real property, land use, and litigation (known then as Ball Janik & Novack) has grown to a team of 70-plus attorneys and paralegals in five offices in Florida, with centuries of combined experience and capabilities. The firm has been recognized by Chambers USA, including for its construction law capabilities in Florida, U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®, The Best Lawyers in America©, Super Lawyers, and Corporate International. Read more at www.balljanik.com.
Legal 500 US Ranks Hunton’s Insurance Coverage Team Among Top Policyholder Practices in 2026 Guide
July 06, 2026 —
Hunton Insurance Recovery BlogHunton’s insurance coverage practice was once again recognized among the nation’s top policyholder insurance practices, receiving a Band 2 national ranking in the 2026 United States Edition of The Legal 500 for Insurance: Advice to Policyholders. The Legal 500 recognizes firms solely based on merit through numerous factors including client feedback and peer input.
Bolstering the team’s national recognition, several coverage lawyers received individual accolades: special counsel
Lorelie “Lorie” S. Masters was named to The Legal 500’s Hall of Fame; team head
Syed S. Ahmad and partner
Michael S. Levine were named Leading Lawyers; and partners
Andrea DeField and
Latosha M. Ellis were named Next Generation Partners. In addition, partners
Walter J. Andrews,
Lawrence J. Bracken II, and
Koorosh “KT” Talieh were recognized as Key Lawyers on the team.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
Sometimes a General Damages Assessment is Enough. . .
July 06, 2026 —
Christopher G. Hill - Construction Law MusingsIt has been a while since I last posted here at
Construction Law Musings. Life, law practice, and “blogger’s block” have taken their toll on the posting schedule. Hopefully this will be one of several upcoming posts now that the litigation schedule has lightened a bit over the summer.
Today’s post is about damages. Specifically damage to a homeowner’s roof and her legal damages therefor. That last is of course a sentence that only a
construction attorney (or other litigator) could possibly craft and have it make sense. Now, on with the case. . .In
Hardesty Construction, Inc. v. Weedon, the facts are as follows:
Ms. Weedon had hail damage to the roof of her home. She hired Hardesty Construction to repair and replace the roof. After the first roof was installed and failed inspection, a second roof was installed. The issue was that the first roof had a warranty and the second roof, installed similarly to the first (and allegedly with the same construction issues according to Ms. Weedon’s expert), was not provided with the promised warranty. As one may expect, Weedon sued Hardesty and Hardesty Construction for fraudulent inducement and breach of contract. At trial, Weedon testified, without objection, that her home was worth $40,000 less because of Hardesty Construction’s work, which was based partially on quotes Weedon received to fix the roof. The Circuit Court granted Hardesty Construction’s motion to strike Weedon’s fraudulent inducement claim, but not her other claims. A jury awarded Weedon $30,253.30 on her breach of contract claim. Hardesty Construction appealed, arguing the Circuit Court erred in (a) allowing the jury to consider Weedon’s valuation testimony because it was not based on her personal knowledge and (b) denying its motion to strike based on insufficient evidence as to damages. Weedon assigned cross-error in the Circuit Court’s decision to grant the motion to strike her fraudulent inducement claim against Samual Hardesty.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
The Law Office of Christopher G. HillMr. Hill may be contacted at
chrisghill@constructionlawva.com
What Is the Independent Tort Doctrine? New Case Explains…
August 24, 2026 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesFlorida’s Sixth District Court of Appeals in Atout v. HHM Land Trust Dated October 29, 2013, 51 Fla.L.Weekly D1569a (Fla. 6th DCA 2026) recently included an extensive discussion on Florida’s independent tort doctrine. The independent tort doctrine is an important legal doctrine, particularly when parties are in contractual privity. This doctrine stands for the proposition that tort claims must be independent of any breach of contract. See Atout, supra. The Sixth District’s extensive discussion analyzed the indicators to determine this “independence,” which may arise from the source of the duty, the asserted conduct, the damages sought, or even public policy:
Unlike claims that rely on contractual relationships, an “independent” tort is often characterized by a duty imposed by law rather than by agreement. As to this consideration, United States District Court Judge Steven Merryday has explained that the independent tort doctrine honors the same divide as the economic loss rule, but rather than looking at the nature of the loss, it focuses on the source of the duty allegedly breached. “If a contract imposes a duty, and the defendant breaches that duty, the plaintiff must sue for breach of contract. If society imposes the duty, the plaintiff must sue in tort.” Following this reasoning, courts should consider whether the alleged breach of a duty in tort coincides or overlaps with a duty imposed by a contract. If the duty at issue is within the scope of a contract, and the relationship of the parties that led to the creation of that duty stems from a contract, then that duty’s source is from contract and any alleged tort claims based on a breach of those duties may not be “independent.”
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin NorrisMr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
Supply Chain Is a Legal Exposure—Not Just a Force Majeure Problem
September 08, 2026 —
Owen Newman - Construction ExecutiveThis is not another force majeure article. The supply-chain related legal exposure that contractors are carrying today—in sanctions risk, specification non-compliance, warranty exposure and regulatory volatility—extends well beyond what even a well-drafted force majeure clause protects.
An engineering, procurement and construction contractor on a gas-fired power plant discovers during commissioning that transformer oil in a critical unit contains Russian-origin naphthenic base oil, which is a prohibited source under Office of Foreign Assets Control sanctions. The contractor didn’t source it. A subsupplier two tiers below made the substitution when disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz tightened the primary supply chain for this specialty product and no one in the purchase-order chain flagged it. The procurement decision is long done and the documentation trail that should have caught it doesn’t exist.
Reprinted courtesy of
Owen Newman, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved.
Read the full story...Mr. Newman may be contacted at
oknewman@duanemorris.com
Lewis Brisbois Welcomes Clients and Community Leaders to New Garden City Office Opening
July 27, 2026 —
Lewis BrisboisOn July 15, Lewis Brisbois hosted a ribbon-cutting event for its new Garden City office, which opened in April to serve the Long Island community and beyond.
The event was attended by more than 100 people, including Lewis Brisbois attorneys and staff as well as clients, local business and government leaders, Nassau County Supreme Court judges, and members of the press. Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman delivered remarks and cut the ribbon for the office.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Lewis BrisboisCan General Contractors Make Subcontractors Pay for OSHA Violations?Designer of World’s Tallest Building Wants to Turn Skyscrapers Into BatteriesDamron Agreement Questioned in Colorado Casualty Insurance v Safety Control Company, et al.The Future of Airport Infrastructure in a Post-Pandemic WorldNo Global MDL for COVID Business Interruption Claims, but Panel Will Consider Separate Consolidated Proceedings for Lloyds, Cincinnati, Hartford, SocietyLEED Certified Courthouse Square Negotiating With Insurers, Mulling Over DemolitionNew Braves Stadium Is Three Months Ahead of Schedule, Team SaysCommitteewoman Requests Refund on Attorney Fees after Failed Legal EffortsWater Damage: Construction’s Often Unnoticed ThreatAmanda Mathieu Named to Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly 2026 “Top Women of Law” ListDesigning a Fair Standard of Care in Design AgreementsJobsite Safety, Workforce Shortage Drive Innovation in Machine AutomationInsurance Attorney Gary Barrera Joins Wendel Rosen’s Construction Practice Group Colorado Legislature Considering Making it Easier to Prevail on CCPA ClaimsPayne & Fears Secures $1.9 Million in Defense Costs for Homebuilder Client in Summary Judgment Win Against InsurerWashington Court Limits Lien Rights of Construction Managers<
The Future of Airport Infrastructure in a Post-Pandemic WorldWhat Is the Best Way to Avoid Rezoning Disputes?Considerations in Obtaining a Mechanic’s Lien in Maryland (Don’t try this at home)In Personal Injury Actions, Prejudgment Interest on Costs Not RecoverableLatin America’s Biggest Corporate Crime Gets a Worthy EpicSinking S.F. Tower Prompts More LawsuitsRebuilding in Fire-Damaged Los Angeles One Year LaterNew OSHA Regulations on Confined Spaces in ConstructionCalifornia Supreme Court Endorses City Authority to Adopt Inclusionary Housing OrdinanceBailout for an Improperly Drafted Indemnification ProvisionDon’t Sign a Contract that Doesn’t Address Covid-19 (Or Pandemics and Epidemics)Testimony from Insureds' Expert Limited By Motion In LiminePowering Goal Congruence in Construction Through Smart ContractsHome Prices in U.S. Rose 0.3% in August From July, FHFA Says2019’s Biggest Labor and Employment Moves Affecting ConstructionWilke Fleury and Attorneys Recognized as ‘Best Law Firm’ and ‘Best Lawyers’ by U.S. News!Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (5/22/24) – Federal Infrastructure Money, Hotel Development Pipelines, and Lab Space ConstructionI’m Sorry Ms. Jackson, I [Sovereign Immunity] am For RealRestrictions On Out-Of-State Real Estate Brokers Being Challenged In NevadaApartment Construction Increasing in Colorado while Condo Construction Remains SlowWaiving Consequential Damages—What Could Go Wrong?Adaptive Reuse: Creative Reimagining of Former Office Space to Address Differing DemandsHe Turned Wall Street Offices Into Homes. Now He Vows to Remake New YorkSan Diego County Considering Updates to Green Building CodeWildfires Threaten to Make Home Insurance UnaffordableWow! A Mechanic’s Lien Bill That Helps Subcontractors and SuppliersFlorida triggerInsurance Company Prevails in “Chinese Drywall” CaseNaples, Florida, Is Getting So Expensive That City Workers Can’t Afford ItA Race to the Finish on Oroville Dam Spillway FixReports of the Death of SB800 are Greatly Exaggerated – The Court of Appeal Revives Mandatory SB800 Procedures…More on Delay Claims and the Burden of Proof Substantiating DelayFederal Arbitration Act Preempts Pennsylvania Payment ActIssues to Watch Out for When Managing Remote WorkersRegister and Watch Partner John Toohey Present on the CLM Webinar Series!Number of Occurrences Is On the Agenda at This Year's ICLC SeminarVenue for Suing Public Payment BondLandmark Montana Supreme Court Decision Series: Known Loss Doctrine & Interpretation of “Occurrence”Be Careful With Construction Fraud AllegationsContract Interpretation – Determining What the Contract RequiresA Customized Approach to Data Center ConstructionFlorida Governor Signs Construction Defect Amendments into LawWe Knew Concrete Could Absorb Carbon—New Study Tells How MuchRed Tape Is Holding Up a Greener FutureAlabama Supreme Court Finds No Coverage for Construction Defect to Contractor's own ProductTexas Shortens Its Statute of Repose To 6 Years, With LimitationsAs Some States Use the Clean Water Act to Delay Energy Projects, EPA Issues New CWA 401 GuidanceNationwide Immigrant Strike May Trigger Excusable Delay and Other Contract ProvisionsHow to Challenge a Project Labor AgreementConstruction Site Blamed for Flooding
