BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    condominium Taylor County Florida structural steel construction Taylor County Florida multi family housing Taylor County Florida townhome construction Taylor County Florida custom homes Taylor County Florida landscaping construction Taylor County Florida production housing Taylor County Florida institutional building Taylor County Florida casino resort Taylor County Florida hospital construction Taylor County Florida Subterranean parking Taylor County Florida concrete tilt-up Taylor County Florida mid-rise construction Taylor County Florida industrial building Taylor County Florida office building Taylor County Florida housing Taylor County Florida custom home Taylor County Florida tract home Taylor County Florida condominiums Taylor County Florida retail construction Taylor County Florida parking structure Taylor County Florida Medical building Taylor County Florida
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
     
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Taylor County, Florida

    Florida Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: In Title XXXIII Chapter 558, the Florida Legislature establishes a requirement that homeowners who allege construction defects must first notify the construction professional responsible for the defect and allow them an opportunity to repair the defect before the homeowner canbring suit against the construction professional. The statute, which allows homeowners and associations to file claims against certain types of contractors and others, defines the type of defects that fall under the authority of the legislation and the types of housing covered in thelegislation. Florida sets strict procedures that homeowners must follow in notifying construction professionals of alleged defects. The law also establishes strict timeframes for builders to respond to homeowner claims. Once a builder has inspected the unit, the law allows the builder to offer to repair or settle by paying the owner a sum to cover the cost of repairing the defect. The homeowner has the option of accepting the offer or rejecting the offer and filing suit. Under the statute the courts must abate any homeowner legal action until the homeowner has undertaken the claims process. The law also requires contractors, subcontractors and other covered under the law to notify homeowners of the right to cure process.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Taylor County Florida

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Panama City (Fla)
    Local # 1042
    PO Box 979
    Panama City, FL 32402


    Northeast Florida Builders Association
    Local # 1024
    103 Century 21 Dr Ste 100
    Jacksonville, FL 32216
    http://www.nefba.com

    Forgotten Coast Builders Assoc
    Local # 1015
    PO Box 1005
    Port Saint Joe, FL 32457
    http://www.forgottencoastbuilder.com/

    Columbia County Builders Association
    Local # 1007
    PO Box 7353
    Lake City, FL 32055
    http://www.buildcolumbiacounty.com

    Builders Association of North Central FL
    Local # 1020
    2217 NW 66th Ct
    Gainesville, FL 32653
    http://www.bancf.com

    Florida Home Builders Association (State)
    Local # 1000
    PO Box 1259
    Tallahassee, FL 32302
    http://www.fhba.com

    Home Builders Association of West Florida
    Local # 1048
    4400 Bayou Blvd Suite 45
    Pensacola, FL 32503
    http://www.westfloridabuilders.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Taylor County Florida

    Texas covered versus uncovered allocation and “legally obligated to pay.”

    Alabama “occurrence” and subcontractor work exception to the “your completed work” exclusion

    New Apartment Tower on the Rise in Seattle

    Fifth Circuit Asks Texas Supreme Court to Clarify Construction Defect Decision

    Water Damage Covered Under Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine

    Sometimes It’s Okay to Destroy Evidence

    Florida Property Bill Passes Economic Affairs Committee with Amendments

    Construction Worker Dies after Building Collapse

    Arbitration Clause Not Binding on Association in Construction Defect Claim

    Condo Buyers Seek to Void Sale over Construction Defect Lawsuit

    Public Relations Battle over Harmon Tower

    Driver’s Death May Be Due to Construction Defect

    Bar to Raise on Green Standard

    Federal Court Denies Summary Judgment in Leaky Condo Conversion

    Hawaii State Senate Requires CGL Carriers to Submit Premium Information To State Legislature

    No Coverage For Construction Defects When Complaint Alleges Contractual Damages

    Colorado Court of Appeals Finds Damages to Non-Defective Property Arising From Defective Construction Covered Under Commercial General Liability Policy

    Parking Garage Collapse May Be Due to Construction Defect

    Virginia Homebuilding Slumps After Last Year’s Gain

    Defective Grout May Cause Trouble for Bridges

    Policing Those Subcontractors: It Might Take Extra Effort To Be An Additional Insured

    Construction Delayed by Discovery of Bones

    Lower Court “Eminently Reasonable” but Wrong in Construction Defect Case

    Appeals Court Reverses Summary Judgment over Defective Archway Construction

    Condominium Communities Must Complete Construction Defect Repairs, Says FHA

    Builder to Appeal Razing of Harmon Tower

    Hovnanian Increases Construction Defect Reserves for 2012

    New Washington Law Nixes Unfair Indemnification in Construction Contracts

    Mandatory Arbitration Provision Upheld in Construction Defect Case

    Construction Defects Not Occurrences under Ohio Law

    Contractor Sues License Board

    Town Files Construction Lawsuit over Dust

    High School Gym Closed by Construction Defects

    Insurers Reacting to Massachusetts Tornadoes

    There is No Non-Delegable Duty on the Part of Residential Builders in Colorado

    Cogently Written Opinion Finds Coverage for Loss Caused By Defective Concrete

    Cabinetmaker Exceeds Expectations as Conditions Improve

    Anti-Assignment Provision Unenforceable in Kentucky

    Coverage for Construction Defects Barred by Business Risk Exclusions

    Homeowners Sue Over Sinkholes, Use Cash for Other Things

    North Carolina Exclusion j(6) “That Particular Part”

    Construction Firm Sues City and Engineers over Reservoir Project

    LEED Certified Courthouse Square Negotiating With Insurers, Mulling Over Demolition

    Construction Defect Lawsuit Stayed by SB800

    Insurance Company Must Show that Lead Came from Building Materials

    No Duty to Indemnify When Discovery Shows Faulty Workmanship Damages Insured’s Own Work

    Rihanna Finds Construction Defects Hit a Sour Note

    Excess Carrier Successfully Appeals Primary Insurer’s Summary Judgment Award

    Florida County Suspends Impact Fees to Spur Development

    Equipment Costs? It’s a Steal!

    The Montrose Language Interpreted: How Many Policies Are Implicated By A Construction Defect That Later Causes a Flood?

    Williams v. Athletic Field: Hugely Important Lien Case Argued Before Supreme Court

    There Is No Non-Delegable Duty on the Part of Residential Builders in Colorado

    Irene May Benefit Construction Industry

    Fifth Circuit Reverses Insurers’ Summary Judgment Award Based on "Your Work" Exclusion

    Florida trigger

    Condo Owners Worried Despite Settlement

    Does the New Jersey Right-To-Repair Law Omit Too Many Construction Defects?

    Analysis of the “owned property exclusion” under Panico v. State Farm

    Surveyors Statute Trumps Construction Defect Claim in Tennessee

    Construction Company Head Pleads Guilty to Insurance and Tax Fraud

    Contractor Removed from Site for Lack of Insurance

    Follow Up on Continental Western v. Shay Construction

    Appeals Court Upholds Decision by Referee in Trial Court for Antagan v Shea Homes

    A Performance-Based Energy Code in Seattle: Will It Save Existing Buildings?

    Changes To Indemnification Statute Are Here! Say Hello To Defense Duties

    New Construction Laws, New Forms in California

    Save a Legal Fee: Prevent Costly Lawsuits With Claim Limitation Clauses

    Water District Denied New Trial in Construction Defect Claim

    Contractor Underpaid Workers, Pocketed the Difference

    The Hidden Dangers of Construction Defect Litigation

    California Supreme Court to Examine Arbitration Provisions in Several Upcoming Cases

    Construction Jobs Expected to Rise in Post-Hurricane Rebuilding

    South Carolina Legislature Defines "Occurrence" To Include Property Damage Arising From Faulty Workmanship

    Summary Judgment in Construction Defect Case Cannot Be Overturned While Facts Are Still in Contention in Related Cases

    Texas “your work” exclusion

    Safety Officials Investigating Death From Fall

    Contractor Convicted of Additional Fraud

    Harsh New Time Limits on Construction Defect Claims

    Florida: No Implied Warranties for Neighborhood Improvements

    Court Voids Settlement Agreement in Construction Defect Case

    Construction Upturn in Silicon Valley

    Ohio Court Finds No Coverage for Construction Defect Claims

    Pennsylvania Court Extends Construction Defect Protections to Subsequent Buyers

    Tenth Circuit Finds Insurer Must Defend Unintentional Faulty Workmanship

    Texas contractual liability exclusion

    Continuous Trigger of Coverage Adopted for Loss Under First Party Policy

    Georgia Law: “An Occurrence Can Arise Where Faulty Workmanship Causes Unforeseen or Unexpected Damage to Other Property”

    Condo Owners Allege Construction Defects

    Construction Defects Are Occurrences, Says Georgia Supreme Court
    Corporate Profile

    TAYLOR COUNTY FLORIDA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Taylor County, Florida Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Taylor County, Florida

    Construction Worker Dies after Building Collapse

    November 18, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    A Bronx construction worker died when the pillars gave way in the basement where he was working. The two-story commercial building collapsed, burying Mr. Kebbeh under about six feet of rubble. The New York Times reports that firefighters dug him out with their bare hands. Mr. Kebbeh was taken to Jacobi Medical Center where he died. Two other construction workers escaped unharmed.

    Read the full story…


    Coverage for Construction Defects Barred by Business Risk Exclusions

    September 1, 2011 — Tred Eyerley, Insurance Law Hawaii

    Although the court determined there was an occurrence, coverage was excluded by the business risk exclusions.  See Cont’l W. Ins. Co. v. Shay Constr. Co., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82839 (D. Colo. July 28, 2011).

    White was the general contractor on the project. White had three subcontracts with Shay to provide framing, siding, and related work on the project. Shay was insured under a CGL policy issued by Continental Western.

    Two of Shay’s subcontractors furnished materials, labor and equipment to Shay. These subcontractors filed suit in state court alleging they had not been compensated for the work and materials. White and Shay were named as defendants. White cross claimed against Shay, alleging Shay had breached its obligations under the subcontracts. Several allegations sounded in contract. Other allegations, however, contended Shay had performed defective work and had damaged the work of other trades in correcting deficiencies in its own performance.

    Shay sought coverage under Continental Western’s policy. Continental Western filed suit for a declaratory judgment and moved for summary judgment.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Kentucky Court Upholds Arbitration Award, Denies Appeal

    June 15, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    The Kentucky Court of Appeals has ruled in Lake Cumberland Community Action Agency v. CMW, Inc. affirming the arbitration award. CMW, Inc. was responsible for the construction of a facility to be used for pre-school students and the housing of Alzheimer patients and senior citizens. An agreement was made that any disputes would be heard by an arbitrator selected by the construction industry.

    The plaintiff alleged that there were design and construction defects in the building trusses, violation of the Kentucky Building Code, and problems with the HVAC system. The arbitrator awarded $106,000 to the plaintiff which then sought to vacate the award. The circuit court upheld the arbitrator’s decision.

    The Court of Appeals found that there was no basis for rejecting the arbitrator’s decision, noting “there is nothing to show that there was any fraud or bias on the part of the arbitrator.” The appeals court, with all three judges concurring, upheld the arbitration award.

    Read the court’s decision


    Court Clarifies Sequence in California’s SB800

    December 20, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    As California’s Right-To-Repair law, SB800, nears its ninth birthday, it has remained “largely untested in the legal system” as noted by Megan MacNee of Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman LLP on the site RealEstateRama. She writes that some homeowners have requested documents prior to filing a claim, which she describes as an attempt to “game the system,” and “analogous to requiring a party to litigation to comply with discovery before a complaint is filed.”

    The court determined that homeowners may not request documents from the builder until they have actually filed a claim. The court noted that SB800 lacks any clear indication that homeowners may request documents before filing a claim (and also does not indicate that a builder would have to provide documents in these circumstances). The court concluded that the section that sets up the prelitigation procedures occurs before they section on documents discovery.¬? “Because the document request is part of the prelitigation procedure, and the prelitigation procedure does not begin until the homeowner has served notice of a claim, it follows that there can be no prelitigation obligation to produce documents under section 912, subdivision (a) unless the homeowner has commenced the prelitigation procedure by serving notice of a claim.”

    Read the full story…


    Home Sales Still Low, But Enough to Spur Homebuilders

    August 16, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Although new home sales are still fifty percent below the average over the last forty years, the housing rebound has sent stock of homebuilders up 53 percent this year, during the same period, the S&P 500 rose only 12 percent. The San Francisco Chronicle reports that from 2005 through 2011, homebuilder stocks trailed the S&P 500.

    The growth isn’t limited to homebuilders alone. Building suppliers are also seeing a growth in sales, with profits for companies that make gypsum wallboard, cabinetry, plumbing products, and other items used in home building.

    Homebuilders have also been able to raise prices. Standard Pacific Corp of Irvine, California has raised prices and cut incentives. Nevertheless, the buyers still come. PulteGroup and D.R. Horton are also raising prices.

    Read the full story…


    Architectural Firm Disputes Claim of Fault

    May 27, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Lake-Flato Architects has disputed the arbitration panel’s conclusion that problems with the home of Tom Hanks and Rita Wilson were due to design flaws. The firm settled with the couple for $900,000, however the Idaho Mountain Express reports that David Lake said, “the settlement in the case in no way represents that Lake Flato was responsible for faulty design.” The Express reported that “the arbitrators found that problems at the home were attributable to design errors that did not take into account the cold winter climate of the Sun Valley area.”

    Read the full story…


    Florida Contractor on Trial for Bribing School Official

    October 28, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Lloyd Whann, an executive in M. M. Parrish Construction, a Gainesville, Florida firm, is going to trial over claims that he bribed a school district official with more than $50,000 in gifts. The trial has been pushed to March of 2012, in order for his defense to review documents.

    Bob Williams, the former school official, plead guilty to conspiracy to commit bribery. He agreed to testify against Whann and M.M. Parrish Construction.

    Read the full story...


    Hawaii Building Codes to Stay in State Control

    March 1, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The Hawaii State Senate voted down Senate Bill 2692. Had it been passed, the State Building Code Council would have been abolished and building codes would have become the responsibility of county governments. The bill was opposed by the Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety. Their director of code development, Wanda Edwards said that the bill “would have undermined key components that are essential to an effective state building code regime.”

    Read the full story…


    No Coverage for Negligent Misrepresentation without Allegations of “Bodily Injury” or “Property Damage”

    February 10, 2012 — Tred Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    Jeff City Industries was the general contractor for a sewer system improvement project in Branson, Missouri. Bituminous Cas. Corp. v. United HRB Gen. Contractors, Inc., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145666 (W.D. Mo. Dec. 19, 2011). Branson sued Jeff City, alleging breach of the construction contract for the project. The claims included improperly bedded sewer piping, improper aligning portions of trenching for the sewer piping, improper service line connections to the sewer piping, etc.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Defective Grout May Cause Trouble for Bridges

    August 16, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Grout, which was used to protect the steel support cables of the Woodrow Wilson Bridge, may lead to problems instead. The Baltimore Sun reports that the Federal Highway Administration is looking at three dozen bridges in twenty-one states that were built with defective grout. The grout contains high levels of chlorides, which can lead to corrosion. The collapse of pedestrian walkway in Concord, North Carolina was attributed to chloride contamination in the grout.

    The grout, SikaGrout 300PT, was advertised as "non-corrosive, does not contain chlorides," but later testing showed that it contained levels that exceeded limits by 400 percent. Throughout the country, about 16 million pounds of this were used. Sika Corp. suspended production of the grout in 2010. If repairs need to be made, it is unclear who will pay.

    Read the full story…


    Construction Firm Charged for Creating “Hail” Damage

    June 19, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    A Burlington County, Pennsylvania judge has sentenced a firm and its employee for insurance fraud. In the scam, representatives of Precision Builders visited homes after hailstorms and advised homeowners that they could get new roofs and sidings covered by insurance. Many of the homeowners noted that they had not noticed any hail damage.

    After homeowners filed claims, employees of Precision Builders would visit the homes and damage the roofs and sidings consistent with the adjusters’ reports.

    One employee of Precision Builders, Dominik Sadowski, has pleaded guilty to third-degree insurance fraud. He has been sentenced to four years probation and 100 hours of community service. Another defendant, Marcin Gradziel, is alleged to have visited and damaged properties. He has plead not guilty.

    Read the full story…


    Housing Market on Way to Recovery

    October 23, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Bloomberg News reports that new home purchases neared a two-year high, with July sales being the strongest since April 2010. Economists polled by Bloomberg expected an annual pace of 380,000 sales, the current levels are at 373,000. Strongest sales gains were in the Northeast, with a 20 percent jump. The Midwest and Western regions had small gains, and the South saw a drop of 4.9 percent. As the Northeast’s home prices are highest and the South’s the lowest, the pattern of sales lead to a sharp increase in median sales price.

    Meanwhile, existing stocks of homes continued to deplete, reaching a record low of 38,000 completed homes on the market. In response, builders are constructing new homes at a pace not seen since April 2010, accord to the Commerce Department.

    Read the full story…


    When Does a Claim Against an Insurance Carrier for Failing to Defend Accrue?

    November 7, 2012 — David McLain, Colorado Construction Litigation

    The following is an update on our December 20, 2010 article regarding United States Fire Insurance Company v. Pinkard Construction Company, Civil Action No. 09-CV-01854-MSK-MJW, and its underlying dispute, Legacy Apartments v. Pinkard Construction Company, Case No. 2003 CV 703, Boulder County Dist. Ct. That article can be found here.

    The present action, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co., et al. v. The North River Insurance Co., et al., Civil Action No. 10-CV-02936-MSK-CBS, encompasses the coverage battle that ensued between Pinkard’s insurers, Travelers Indemnity Company of America (“Travelers”) and United States Fire Insurance Company (“USFI”), following the settlement of Legacy’s construction defect claims against Pinkard. A short history of the underlying facts is as follows:

    In 1995, Pinkard constructed the Legacy Apartments housing complex in Longmont, Colorado. Following construction, Legacy notified Pinkard of water leaks associated with various elements of construction. Legacy ultimately filed suit against Pinkard in 2003, and would go on to clarify and amend its defect claims in 2004, 2006, and again in 2008. Following Pinkard’s notification of Legacy’s claims, USFI provided a defense to Pinkard, but Travelers refused to do so, on the purported basis that Legacy’s allegations did not implicate property damage under the terms of Travelers’ policy.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of David M. McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC. Mr. McLain can be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com


    Oregon agreement to procure insurance, anti-indemnity statute, and self-insured retention

    March 5, 2011 — By CDCoverage.com, March 5, 2011

    In Continental Casualty Ins. Co. v. Zurich American Ins. Co., No. 09-35484 (9th Cir. Oct. 28, 2010), general contractor TCR was sued by an employee of subcontractor Safeway for bodily injuries suffered while working on the project. In the subcontract, Safeway agreed to procure primary insurance providing coverage for TCR for liability arising out of Safeway’s negligence. Safeway’s CGL policy included a self-insured retention that had to be satisfied before the insurer had a duty to defend. TCR filed suit against Safeway alleging that

    Read the full story...

    Reprinted courtesy of CDCoverage.com


    Reference to "Man Made" Movement of Earth Corrects Ambiguity

    December 20, 2012 — Tred Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    In Pioneer Tower Owners Assn. v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 12 NY3d 302 (2009), the New York Court of Appeals found an "earth movement" exclusion was ambiguous when applied to an excavation. The court now considered whether a similar exclusion, expressly made applicable to "man made" movement of earth, eliminated the ambiguity when loss was created by excavation. Bentoria Holdings, Inc. v. Travelers Indem. Co., 2012 N.Y. LEXIS 3087 (N.Y. Oct. 25, 2012).

    Plaintiff's building suffered cracks due to an excavation being conducted on the lot next door. A claim was submitted to Travelers, plaintiff's insurer. Travelers rejected the claim, relying on the earth movement exclusion. 

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Geometrically Defined Drainage Cavities in EIFS as a Guard Against Defects

    July 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The blog Stucco & Insulation Contractor writes up some details on a “relatively new modification to modern Exterior Insulation Finish Systems,” known as “geometrically defined insulation boards.” They note that the insulation has grooves cut in the back to provide a route for water to drain, instead of getting trapped. They note that when EIFS is installed by a skilled applicator, this is unnecessary. However, with less experienced (and cheaper) installers, problems are more likely.

    By cutting these channels, the application of EIFS is rendered “idiot proof,” as they note. Their preference would be that EIFS installers take the time to do the job right, but call this “a step in the right direction.”

    Read the full story…


    Residential Construction: Shrinking Now, Growing Later?

    August 17, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Jim Haugey, the Chief Economist for Reed Construction Data noted that new residential construction spending fell 0.2% in June and a slightly larger drop of 0.5% in residential remodeling. While economic growth is still low, Haugey states that homebuilders have “record low inventories.” He forecasts a shrinkage of 1.5% in 2011, followed by about 20% growth in 2012.

    Read the full story…


    OSHA Cites Construction Firm for Safety Violations

    August 16, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    S.J. Louis Construction of Texas Ltd. has been cited by OHSH for one serious and one repeat safety violation, according to a report in Insurance Journal. OSHA officials saw S.J. Louis employees working in an unshored trench along a highway service road. The company had cited for this violation previously. Without shoring of trenches deeper than five feet there is a risk of serious injury or death.

    Read the full story…