BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    institutional building Williamston Michigan Subterranean parking Williamston Michigan townhome construction Williamston Michigan structural steel construction Williamston Michigan mid-rise construction Williamston Michigan casino resort Williamston Michigan industrial building Williamston Michigan high-rise construction Williamston Michigan low-income housing Williamston Michigan Medical building Williamston Michigan condominiums Williamston Michigan multi family housing Williamston Michigan landscaping construction Williamston Michigan condominium Williamston Michigan custom homes Williamston Michigan hospital construction Williamston Michigan concrete tilt-up Williamston Michigan tract home Williamston Michigan housing Williamston Michigan production housing Williamston Michigan office building Williamston Michigan parking structure Williamston Michigan
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
     
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Williamston, Michigan

    Michigan Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Article 24 of the Occupational Code dictates that a complaint against a builder must be filed with the Department of Consumer and Industry Service within 18 months of the completion, occupancy or purchase of a residence. If building official determines complaint has merit, "Notice to Respondent: sent to provide builder with opportunity to repair; additional administrative procedures follow to conclusion; Individual townships have local rules regarding properties; Example: Bloomfield has mandated that structures must meet ongoing minimum maintenance standards.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Williamston Michigan

    Residential contractors need to be licensed. License required for plumbing and electrical trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Greater Lansing Home Builders & Remodelers Assoc
    Local # 2352
    2937 Atrium Dr Ste 201
    Okemos, MI 48864
    http://www.glhba.org

    MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS
    Local # 2300
    6427 Centurion Dr #150B
    Lansing, MI 48917
    http://www.buildingmichigan.org

    Home Builders Association of Barry County
    Local # 2310
    2700 S Broadway
    Hastings, MI 49058
    http://www.barrycountyhba.com

    Home Builders Association of the Holland Area
    Local # 2340
    211 Lincoln Ave
    Holland, MI 49423
    http://www.hbaholland.com

    Building Industry Association of Southeastern Michigan
    Local # 2328
    2075 Walnut Lake Road
    West Bloomfield, MI 48323
    http://www.builders.org

    Home Builders Association of Livingston County
    Local # 2355
    132 E Grand River Ave
    Brighton, MI 48116
    http://www.hbalc.com

    Home & Builders Association of Gtr Grd Rapids
    Local # 2336
    3196 Kraft Ave SE Ste 300
    Grand Rapids, MI 49512
    http://www.hbaggr.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Williamston Michigan

    Construction Defects Not Occurrences under Ohio Law

    Webinar on Insurance Disputes in Construction Defects

    Vegas Hi-Rise Not Earthquake Safe

    Delaware “occurrence” and exclusions j(5) and j(6)

    Mark Van Wonterghem To Serve as Senior Forensic Consultant in the Sacramento Offices of Bert L. Howe & Associates, Inc.

    Connecticut Gets Medieval All Over Construction Defects

    Florida Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Homeowners Unaware of Construction Defects and Lack of Permits

    Ohio Court Finds No Coverage for Construction Defect Claims

    Colorado Statutes of Limitations and Repose, A First Step in Construction Defect Litigation

    Construction Company Head Pleads Guilty to Insurance and Tax Fraud

    Hovnanian Sees Second-Quarter Profit, Points to Recovery

    A Call to Washington: Online Permitting Saves Money and the Environment

    A Performance-Based Energy Code in Seattle: Will It Save Existing Buildings?

    Court Grants Summary Judgment to Insurer in HVAC Defect Case

    Construction Case Alert: Appellate Court Confirms Engineer’s Duty to Defend Developer Arises Upon Tender of Indemnity Claim

    Insurer Rejects Claim on Dolphin Towers

    Negligent Misrepresentation in Sale of Building Altered without Permits

    Construction Delayed by Discovery of Bones

    Texas Court of Appeals Conditionally Grant Petition for Writ of Mandamus to Anderson

    No Coverage for Construction Defects Under Alabama Law

    School Sues over Botched Pool

    Micropiles for bad soil: a Tarheel victory

    More Charges in Las Vegas HOA Construction Defect Scam

    California insured’s duty to cooperate and insurer’s right to select defense counsel

    Record-Setting Construction in Fargo

    California Supreme Court to Examine Arbitration Provisions in Several Upcoming Cases

    Application of Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine Supports Coverage

    Changes To Indemnification Statute Are Here! Say Hello To Defense Duties

    Preventing Costly Litigation Through Your Construction Contract

    New Households Moving to Apartments

    CC&Rs Not the Place for Arbitration Agreement, Court Rules

    Nevada Court Adopts Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine

    Colorado Senate Bill 12-181: 2012’s Version of a Prompt Pay Bill

    Cleveland Condo Board Says Construction Defects Caused Leaks

    Policyholder Fails to Build Adequate Record to Support Bad Faith Claim

    Are Construction Defects Covered by Your General Liability Policy?

    Ensuing Losses From Faulty Workmanship Must be Covered

    Sometimes It’s Okay to Destroy Evidence

    State Farm Too Quick To Deny Coverage, Court Rules

    Virginia Homebuilding Slumps After Last Year’s Gain

    Excess Carrier Successfully Appeals Primary Insurer’s Summary Judgment Award

    Harmon Towers Case to Last into 2014

    Joinder vs. Misjoinder in Colorado Construction Claims: Roche Constructors v. One Beacon

    Tennessee Court: Window Openings Too Small, Judgment Too Large

    Ohio “property damage” caused by an “occurrence.”

    Arizona Homeowners Must Give Notice of Construction Defect Claims

    Florida Chinese drywall, pollution exclusion, “your work” exclusion, and “sistership” exclusion.

    Residential Construction: Shrinking Now, Growing Later?

    Texas “Loser Pays” Law May Benefit Construction Insurers

    Virginia Chinese Drywall and pollution exclusion

    Florida County Suspends Impact Fees to Spur Development

    Safer Schools Rendered Unsafe Due to Construction Defects

    When is a Construction Project truly “Complete”? That depends. (law note)

    Unlicensed Contractors Nabbed in Sting Operation

    Insurers Reacting to Massachusetts Tornadoes

    Residential Construction Down in San Diego

    Ensuing Loss Provision Does Not Salvage Coverage

    Supreme Court of Oregon Affirms Decision in Abraham v. T. Henry Construction, et al.

    Know the Minnesota Statute of Limitations for Construction Defect Claims

    Pennsylvania Court Extends Construction Defect Protections to Subsequent Buyers

    Contractors Admit Involvement in Kickbacks

    A Loud Boom, But No Serious Injuries in World Trade Center Accident

    Florida: No Implied Warranties for Neighborhood Improvements

    Arizona Supreme Court Confirms Eight-Year Limit on Construction Defect Lawsuits

    North Carolina Exclusion j(6) “That Particular Part”

    Coverage Rejected Under Owned Property and Alienated Property Exclusions

    Bound by Group Builders, Federal District Court Finds No Occurrence

    After Breaching its Duty to Defend, Insurer Must Indemnify

    Contractor Removed from Site for Lack of Insurance

    Good and Bad News on Construction Employment

    Nevada Assembly Bill Proposes Changes to Construction Defect Litigation

    Court Requires Adherence to “Good Faith and Fair Dealing” in Construction Defect Coverage

    MGM Seeks to Demolish Harmon Towers

    Save a Legal Fee: Prevent Costly Lawsuits With Claim Limitation Clauses

    Contractor’s Coverage For Additional Insured Established by Unilateral Contract

    Michigan Supreme Court Concludes No Statute of Repose on Breach of Contract

    Plaintiffs In Construction Defect Cases to Recover For Emotional Damages?

    Quarter Four a Good One for Luxury Homebuilder

    One to Watch: Case Takes on Economic Loss Rule and Professional Duties

    Insurer Has Duty to Defend in Water Intrusion Case

    Yellow Brass Fittings Play a Crucial Role in Baker v Castle & Cooke Homes

    New OSHA Fall Rules to Start Early in Minnesota

    US Courts in Nevada Busy with Yellow Brass

    New Web Site Tracks Settled Construction Defect Claims

    Toxic Drywall Not Covered Under Homeowner’s Policy

    There Is No Non-Delegable Duty on the Part of Residential Builders in Colorado

    Contract Not So Clear in South Carolina Construction Defect Case

    Defect Claims as Occurrences? Check Your State Laws

    In Re Golba: The Knaubs v. Golba and Rollison, Debtors

    Ensuing Loss Provision Found Ambiguous
    Corporate Profile

    WILLIAMSTON MICHIGAN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Williamston, Michigan Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 5,500 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Williamston's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Williamston, Michigan

    After Katrina Came Homes that Could Withstand Isaac

    October 23, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, Louisiana adopted its first uniform building code. Under the new standards, homes are better able to withstand the winds generated by hurricanes. The owner of one home said that during Hurricane Isaac, “there’s no shaking of the building itself, there’s no sign of a storm except for the rain.”

    WWWLTV reports that the new standards require home to be able to withstand 130 mile per hour winds. They also must follow FEMA guidelines for elevation. Build Now, a non-profit organization, is seeking to build green homes that meet the new standards. Their executive director said “we’re building higher. We’re building stronger. We’re building greener.”

    Read the full story…


    Environment Decision May Expand Construction Defect Claims

    August 16, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Could a California Supreme Court decision on environmental claims have an effect on construction defect cases? Jonathan B. Sokol, a lawyer at Greenberg Glusker argues just that in a post on his firm’s blog. He notes that the California Supreme Court has held that “the ‘all sums” method of allocation applies in California” and that “an insurer cannot limit its liability to just the amount of loss that occurred in its particular policy period.” While his focus is on environmental cases, he says that “the decision could also potentially expand the scope of coverage for construction defect claims and other claims involving continuous and progressive property damage and bodily injury.

    Read the full story…


    Coverage for Construction Defects Barred by Business Risk Exclusions

    September 1, 2011 — Tred Eyerley, Insurance Law Hawaii

    Although the court determined there was an occurrence, coverage was excluded by the business risk exclusions.  See Cont’l W. Ins. Co. v. Shay Constr. Co., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82839 (D. Colo. July 28, 2011).

    White was the general contractor on the project. White had three subcontracts with Shay to provide framing, siding, and related work on the project. Shay was insured under a CGL policy issued by Continental Western.

    Two of Shay’s subcontractors furnished materials, labor and equipment to Shay. These subcontractors filed suit in state court alleging they had not been compensated for the work and materials. White and Shay were named as defendants. White cross claimed against Shay, alleging Shay had breached its obligations under the subcontracts. Several allegations sounded in contract. Other allegations, however, contended Shay had performed defective work and had damaged the work of other trades in correcting deficiencies in its own performance.

    Shay sought coverage under Continental Western’s policy. Continental Western filed suit for a declaratory judgment and moved for summary judgment.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    No Coverage for Negligent Misrepresentation without Allegations of “Bodily Injury” or “Property Damage”

    February 10, 2012 — Tred Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    Jeff City Industries was the general contractor for a sewer system improvement project in Branson, Missouri. Bituminous Cas. Corp. v. United HRB Gen. Contractors, Inc., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145666 (W.D. Mo. Dec. 19, 2011). Branson sued Jeff City, alleging breach of the construction contract for the project. The claims included improperly bedded sewer piping, improper aligning portions of trenching for the sewer piping, improper service line connections to the sewer piping, etc.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Construction Defect Lawsuits? There’s an App for That

    July 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The website ebeeky.com reviews Picture It Settled, an app designed to help people engaged in lawsuits figure out where settlement strategies would be most successful. First available for Android and then iOS, the app is now available for Blackberry. One user of the application wrote that “anyone who has set through a construction defect mediation can immediately grasp the value of this app.

    The app tracks the negotiation process, allowing users to see a history of bids and counteroffers. It also models the negotiation process in order to predict the ultimate cost of settlement. These numbers are based on past similar negotiations that the user has entered.

    Read the full story…


    Changes to Arkansas Construction and Home Repair Laws

    September 30, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    A new law, set to take effect in 2012, lowers the ceiling on when work must be done by a licensed contractor. Through the end of the year, projects costing $20,000 or more had to be done by an Arkansas licensed contractor. As of January 1, 2012, that new limit will be $2,000.

    This will apply to all single-family residences and according to Lovely County Citizen, covers “construction, alteration, renovation, repair, modification, improvement, removal, demotion, or addition to a pre-existing structure.” Residential building contractors will be required to have workers compensation insurance, as will home improvement contactors if they take jobs worth more than $20,000.

    Morris Dillow, a building inspector in Holiday Island, said, “It will get these scammers out of here who are ripping people off.” He cited the example of a contractor who after getting paid for roof repairs and painting, left the job unfinished.

    Read the full story…


    Defective Grout May Cause Trouble for Bridges

    August 16, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Grout, which was used to protect the steel support cables of the Woodrow Wilson Bridge, may lead to problems instead. The Baltimore Sun reports that the Federal Highway Administration is looking at three dozen bridges in twenty-one states that were built with defective grout. The grout contains high levels of chlorides, which can lead to corrosion. The collapse of pedestrian walkway in Concord, North Carolina was attributed to chloride contamination in the grout.

    The grout, SikaGrout 300PT, was advertised as "non-corrosive, does not contain chlorides," but later testing showed that it contained levels that exceeded limits by 400 percent. Throughout the country, about 16 million pounds of this were used. Sika Corp. suspended production of the grout in 2010. If repairs need to be made, it is unclear who will pay.

    Read the full story…


    After Breaching its Duty to Defend, Insurer Must Indemnify

    August 11, 2011 — Tred Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    In a brief decision analyzing Oregon law, the Ninth Circuit determined that once an insurer breaches its duty to defend, it must indemnify. See Desrosiers v. Hudson Speciality Ins. Co., 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 12591 (9th CIr. June 21, 2011).

    The victim secured a judgment against the insured after he was beaten by another patron outside the insured's bar. Hudson Speciality Insurance refused to defend the insured, claiming the injury arose from an assault and battery, which excluded coverage.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Ghost Employees Steal Jobs from Legit Construction Firms

    September 13, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Firms that skirt labor laws for construction workers can undercut firms that are obeying those laws. In a piece in Raleigh, North Carolina’s News & Observer, Doug Burton, a commercial masonry contractor summed it up: “my competitors are cheating.” The article describes the low-bidding firms “called their workers independent contractors ? or treated them like ghosts, paid under the table and never acknowledged.” The cost to the state is “unpaid medical bills for injured workers, uncollected business and personal taxes, and payments not made to a depleted state unemployment reserve.”

    One firm examined in the article, Martin’s Bricklaying, employs mostly immigrant Mexican laborers, many of whom are in the country illegally. One employee told the News & Observer, “we don’t complain.”

    Read the full story…


    Federal District Court Continues to Find Construction Defects do Not Arise From An Occurrence

    May 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Coverage for construction defects continues to be hotly contested in Hawaii state and federal courts. In a recent decision, Judge Mollway felt bound to follow the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Burlington Ins. Co. v. Oceanic Design & Constr., Inc., 383 F.3d 940, 944 (9th Cir. 2004), where the court found construction defect claims arise from breach of contract, not from an occurrence. Judge Mollway’s most recent decision on the issue is Illinois Nat. Ins. Co. v. Nordic PCL Constr., Inc., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58464 (D. Haw. April 26, 2012).

    Nordic constructed a grocery store for Safeway. In addition to the grocery store, Nordic built a 165-space rooftop parking deck, retail shops and related improvements. After opening for business in 2007, Safeway experienced significant leaks. Safeway demanded that Nordic repair the parking deck. Nordic sent the demand letter to the insurer, who agreed to appoint counsel subject to a reservation of rights.

    Safeway filed suit against Nordic in state court alleging, among other things, breach of contract and negligence. The insurer provided Nordic with a defense, but Nordic hired independent counsel.

    The insurer filed for declaratory relief in federal district court.

    Read the full story…


    Architect Not Liable for Balcony’s Collapse

    September 13, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The Texas Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal from a woman who was partially paralyzed due to the collapse of a balcony. She had sued the architect of her friends’ home, but the Texas Third Circuit Court of Appeals had reversed a jury ruling against the architect, Sinclair Black. Black’s firm, Black + Vernooy, had designed the home and had supervised “administration of the construction contract.” Despite a contractual obligation to “endeavor to guard the owner against defects and deficiencies,” the balcony builder had not followed the architect’s specifications, including in the construction of the balcony.

    While the jury found Black liable for ten percent of the blame, Black argued that he could not be held liable for the contractor’s negligence, nor did he have any duty to third parties.

    Read the full story…


    Construction Defects and Contractor-Owners

    July 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    On the expert advice site Avvo.com, a user asks if he can be sued for construction defects by the new owner of a building for which he served as general contractor and then owned for four years. He had construction insurance, but does not think he had construction defect insurance.

    A lawyer responding to his question says that “you could be sued.” In the event of a suit, “you would have to bring claims against all of your subcontractors.”

    Read the full story…


    Federal Court Denies Summary Judgment in Leaky Condo Conversion

    August 4, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    In the US District Court for Illinois, Judge William Hibber has rejected the request for summary judgment sought by the developers of a condominium building in the case of Nautilus Ins. Co. v. 1735 W. Diversey, LLC (the insureds). The insureds renovated a building at 1735 W. Diversey, Chicago, converting it into condominiums. After the project was completed and all units sold, and a condominium association form, one of the owners found that unit suffered leaks during rainstorms. The condo board hired a firm, CRI, to investigate the cause of the leakage. CRI found “water infiltration through the exterior brick masonry walls, build-up of efflorescence on the interior surfaces of the masonry, and periodic spalling of portions of the brick masonry.”

    The redevelopment firm had purchased coverage from Nautilus. “Shortly after the Board filed its first complaint, the Insureds tendered the mater to Nautilus and requested that it indemnify and defend them from the Board's underlying claims. Nautilus, however, rejected the Insureds’ tender and denied coverage under both insurance policies.” Nautilus stated that the water leakage did not constitute an occurrence under the policies. The court cited these policies in which an occurrence is defined as “an accident, including continuous or repeated exposure to substantially the same general harmful conditions.” The Illinois courts have determined that construction defects are not accidents.

    The court concluded that the insured did not bring forth claims within the coverage of the policies and denied the motion for summary judgment.

    Read the court’s decision…


    FHA Lists Bridges and Overpasses that May Have Defective Grout

    September 13, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The Federal Highway Administration has released a list of bridges and overpasses that may be prone to corrosion problems due to grout that was in chlorides when it was supposed to be completely free of them. Currently, the FHA is working with state departments of transportation to determine if the defective grout was indeed used on additional bridges and overpasses. The initial FHA list of structures determined to have been built with the defective grout lists thirty-four sites, of which four are in Ohio, the largest number for any state.

    California contains only one such site, the intersection of the 55 and 405 freeways, one of the few items on the list not designated as a bridge.

    Read the full story…


    Williams v. Athletic Field: Hugely Important Lien Case Argued Before Supreme Court

    June 17, 2011 — Douglas Reiser, Builders Counsel

    Well, it finally made it. The most important Washington lien case of recent memory was argued in front of the Washington Supreme Court on Tuesday, June 14, 2011. So, what should we all expect?

    As I was reading through my RSS feeds this afternoon ? I was stopped dead in my tracks. Williams v . Athletic Field, the Division II case that has been a frequent topic here on Builders Counsel, has finally been argued before the Supreme Court. All of you who have been anxiously awaiting this day, you can check out the Supreme Court submissions by following this link.

    The Williams case has been the center of attention for construction lawyers and construction organizations over the past year. Some have called for complete lien law reform, others have tried to patch a hole in the law. Now, we can expect a ruling from the highest court in the state. That ruling will have a major impact on whether the Legislature feels compelled to change lien law.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Douglas Reiser of Reiser Legal LLC. Mr. Reiser can be contacted at info@reiserlegal.com


    Homebuilding on the Rise in Nation’s Capitol

    November 7, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Is the homebuilding crunch over in DC? The Washington Post has reported that while new home construction is up throughout the country, in the DC area, construction has reached levels last seen in 2006. From January to August 2012, there were more than 19,000 building permits issued in the area, nearly doubling the number issued by that point in 2011.

    While building is on a quicker pace, what’s being built has changed. As compared to 2006, there are more townhomes, condos, and smaller homes being built. The article notes that 11 percent of new construction is condos, while in 2006, it was only 5 percent.

    Read the full story…


    School District Settles Construction Lawsuit

    November 7, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The Franklin County, Pennsylvania Public Opinion reports that an area school is coming to an end with its construction lawsuit. The school district was sued by its contractors for a combined $1.4 million, which the school district withheld when the project was not completed on schedule. Lobar Inc. claimed that the district additionally owed interest and should pay attorney fees. The school claimed that only $1.15 million was due under the contract. Under the settlement, they will be paying $1.136 million.

    Read the full story…


    Hovnanian Increases Construction Defect Reserves for 2012

    January 6, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    In their fourth quarter earnings call, executives of Hovnanian Enterprises made some projections for investors, covering the company’s plans for 2012. During the call, Ara K. Hovnanian, the firm’s CEO, discussed their reserves to meet construction defect claims. The firm does an annual actuarial study of their construction defect reserves.

    Mr. Hovnanian noted that there have been no changes for the past several years, but this year they are increasing their reserves by about $6.3 million. Additionally, the firm has added $2.5 million to their legal reserves. Mr. Hovnanian stated “we do not anticipate that changes of this magnitude will be recurring as we look forward to 2012.”

    Read the full story…