BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    industrial building Baltic Ohio mid-rise construction Baltic Ohio retail construction Baltic Ohio tract home Baltic Ohio Medical building Baltic Ohio structural steel construction Baltic Ohio condominium Baltic Ohio housing Baltic Ohio condominiums Baltic Ohio office building Baltic Ohio low-income housing Baltic Ohio custom homes Baltic Ohio production housing Baltic Ohio townhome construction Baltic Ohio institutional building Baltic Ohio hospital construction Baltic Ohio custom home Baltic Ohio Subterranean parking Baltic Ohio multi family housing Baltic Ohio high-rise construction Baltic Ohio parking structure Baltic Ohio casino resort Baltic Ohio
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
     
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Baltic, Ohio

    Ohio Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to HB 175, Chptr 1312, for a homebuilder to qualify for right to repair protection, the contractor must notify consumers (in writing) of NOR laws at the time of sale; The law stipulates written notice of defects required itemizing and describing and including documentation prepared by inspector. A contractor has 21 days to respond in writing.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Baltic Ohio

    Licensing is done at the local level. Licenses required for plumbing, electrical, HVAC, heating, and hydronics trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    East Central OH Building Industry Association
    Local # 3664
    706 E. Shafer Ave
    Dover, OH 44622
    http://www.eco-bia.com

    Shelby County Builders Association
    Local # 3670
    PO Box 534
    Sidney, OH 45365
    http://www.shelbybuild.com

    Union County Chapter
    Local # 3684
    PO Box 525
    Marysville, OH 43040
    http://www.ucbia.com

    Mercer Co Builders Association
    Local # 3656
    PO Box 363
    Rockford, OH 45882


    Building Industry Association of North Central OH
    Local # 3651
    1183 Lexington Avenue
    Mansfield, OH 44907
    http://www.biancohio.com

    West Central Buckeye Builders Association
    Local # 3648
    1520 Allentown Rd
    Lima, OH 45805
    http://WWW.WESTCENTRALOHIOBUILDERS.COM

    Building Industry Association of Central Ohio
    Local # 3627
    495 Executive Campus Drive
    Westerville, OH 43082
    http://www.biahomebuilders.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Baltic Ohio

    Seven Former North San Diego County Landfills are Leaking Contaminants

    Flooded Courtroom May be Due to Construction Defect

    Ohio “property damage” caused by an “occurrence.”

    Construction Defect Claim Did Not Harm Homeowner, Court Rules

    Construction Bright Spot in Indianapolis

    Construction Employment Rises in Half of the States

    No Duty to Indemnify When Discovery Shows Faulty Workmanship Damages Insured’s Own Work

    After $15 Million Settlement, Association Gets $7.7 Million From Additional Subcontractor

    Green Buildings Could Lead to Liabilities

    Contractor Liable for Soils Settlement in Construction Defect Suit

    Time to Repair Nevada’s Construction Defect Laws?

    Construction Law Client Alert: California Is One Step Closer to Prohibiting Type I Indemnity Agreements In Private Commercial Projects

    Insurer Beware: Failure to Defend Ends with Hefty Verdict

    Late Filing Contractor Barred from Involving Subcontractors in Construction Defect Claim

    Sometimes It’s Okay to Destroy Evidence

    Insurer Unable to Declare its Coverage Excess In Construction Defect Case

    In Re Golba: The Knaubs v. Golba and Rollison, Debtors

    Are Construction Defects Covered by Your General Liability Policy?

    Oregon agreement to procure insurance, anti-indemnity statute, and self-insured retention

    Insurer’s Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Earth Movement Exclusion Denied

    Construction Defects Not Occurrences under Ohio Law

    BUILD Act Inching Closer To Reality

    Bill Seeks to Protect Legitimate Contractors

    Connecticut Gets Medieval All Over Construction Defects

    Construction Defect Case Not Over, Despite Summary Judgment

    Construction Firm Sues City and Engineers over Reservoir Project

    Ensuing Loss Found Ambiguous, Allowing Coverage

    Contractor Convicted of Additional Fraud

    Insurance Company Must Show that Lead Came from Building Materials

    “Other Insurance” and Indemnity Provisions Determine Which Insurer Must Cover

    Conspirators Bilked Homeowners in Nevada Construction Defect Claims

    Construction Defect Destroys Home, Forty Years Later

    Couple Sues Attorney over Construction Defect Case, Loses

    Amerisure Case to be Heard by Texas Supreme Court

    California Posts Nation’s Largest Gain in Construction Jobs

    California insured’s duty to cooperate and insurer’s right to select defense counsel

    Contractor Underpaid Workers, Pocketed the Difference

    Homeowner Has No Grounds to Avoid Mechanics Lien

    Contractor Manslaughter? Safety Shortcuts Are Not Worth It

    School District Settles Construction Lawsuit

    Nevada Assembly Bill Proposes Changes to Construction Defect Litigation

    Texas “Loser Pays” Law May Benefit Construction Insurers

    Excess Carrier Successfully Appeals Primary Insurer’s Summary Judgment Award

    Insurers Reacting to Massachusetts Tornadoes

    Is Construction Heading Off the Fiscal Cliff?

    Construction Defects Lead to Demolition of Seattle’s 25-story McGuire Apartments Building

    Fire Reveals Defects, Appeals Court Affirms Judgment against Builder

    Delaware “occurrence” and exclusions j(5) and j(6)

    Does the New Jersey Right-To-Repair Law Omit Too Many Construction Defects?

    Environment Decision May Expand Construction Defect Claims

    DA’s Office Checking Workers Comp Compliance

    Condo Owners Allege Construction Defects

    Georgia Law: “An Occurrence Can Arise Where Faulty Workmanship Causes Unforeseen or Unexpected Damage to Other Property”

    Pictorial Construction Terminology Dictionary — A Quick and Helpful Reference

    Contractor Sues License Board

    California Supreme Court Binds Homeowner Associations To Arbitration Provisions In CC&Rs

    Subcontractor Not Liable for Defending Contractor in Construction Defect Case

    Park District Sues over Leaky Roof

    Quarter Four a Good One for Luxury Homebuilder

    Faulty Workmanship Causing Damage to Other Property Covered as Construction Defect

    Nevada Senate Rejects Construction Defect Bill

    Ohio Casualty’s and Beazer’s Motions were Granted in Part, and Denied in Part

    South Carolina “occurrence” and allocation

    Insurer Has Duty to Defend Despite Construction Defects

    Crane Dangles and So Do Insurance Questions

    Home Repair Firms Sued for Fraud

    Local Government Waives Construction Fees to Spur Jobs

    Construction Firm Charged for Creating “Hail” Damage

    FHA Lists Bridges and Overpasses that May Have Defective Grout

    Construction Law Client Alert: Hirer Beware - When Exercising Control Over a Job Site’s Safety Conditions, You May be Held Directly Liable for an Independent Contractor’s Injury

    Florida: No Implied Warranties for Neighborhood Improvements

    An Upward Trend in Commercial Construction?

    Cogently Written Opinion Finds Coverage for Loss Caused By Defective Concrete

    No Coverage For Construction Defects When Complaint Alleges Contractual Damages

    Contractor Sues Supplier over Defective Products

    Ensuing Loss Provision Does Not Salvage Coverage

    Geometrically Defined Drainage Cavities in EIFS as a Guard Against Defects

    Changes to Arkansas Construction and Home Repair Laws

    No Coverage For Damage Caused by Chinese Drywall

    Construction Case Alert: Appellate Court Confirms Engineer’s Duty to Defend Developer Arises Upon Tender of Indemnity Claim

    High School Gym Closed by Construction Defects

    Illinois Court Determines Insurer Must Defend Property Damage Caused by Faulty Workmanship

    Condo Owners Worried Despite Settlement

    After Katrina Came Homes that Could Withstand Isaac

    Insurer Settles on Construction Defect Claim

    Insurance for Defective Construction Now in Third Edition

    Mississippi exclusions j(5) and j(6) “that particular part”

    Eleventh Circuit Asks Georgia Supreme Court if Construction Defects Are Caused by an "Occurrence"

    Supreme Court of New York Denies Motion in all but One Cause of Action in Kikirov v. 355 Realty Assoc., et al.

    Mark Van Wonterghem To Serve as Senior Forensic Consultant in the Sacramento Offices of Bert L. Howe & Associates, Inc.
    Corporate Profile

    BALTIC OHIO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 5500 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Baltic, Ohio Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Baltic's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Baltic, Ohio

    Connecticut Gets Medieval All Over Construction Defects

    February 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The Hartford Courant reports that Connecticut is trying a very old tactic in a construction defect suit. The law library building at the University of Connecticut suffered from leaks which have now been repaired. The state waited twelve years after was complete to file lawsuit, despite that Connecticut has a six-year statute of limitations on construction defect claims. Connecticut claims that the statute of limitations does apply to the state.

    The state is arguing that a legal principle from the thirteenth century allows it to go along with its suit. As befits a medieval part of common law, the principle is called “nullum tempus occurrit regi,” or “time does not run against the king.” In 1874, the American Law Register said that nullum tempus occurrit reipublicae “has been adopted in every one of the United States” and “is now firmly established law.”

    In the case of Connecticut, Connecticut Solicitor General Gregory D’Auria said that “the statute of limitations does not apply to the state.” He also noted that “the state did not ‘wait’ to file the lawsuit. The lawsuit was filed only after all other options and remedies were exhausted.”

    Connecticut also argued that “nullus tempus occurrit regi” applied in another construction defect case at the York Correctional Institution. The judge in that case ruled in December 2008 to let the case proceed. But in the library case, Judge William T. Cremins ruled in February 2009 that the statute of limitations should apply to the state as well. Both cases have been appealed, with the library case moving more quickly toward the Connecticut Supreme Court.

    Read the full story…


    Destruction of Construction Defect Evidence Leads to Sanctions against Plaintiff

    July 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Stating that the plaintiff’s actions have left the defendants in a situation where they “cannot properly defend the action,” a judge in the US District Court of New York has sanctioned the plaintiffs in Aktas v. JMC Dev. Co.

    The plaintiffs hired JMC Development and Stephen Jung, an architect, to renovate their vacation home in Adirnodack, New York. As work progressed, “due to disagreements regarding the completion date and payments for the project, the relationship began to deteriorate.” The plaintiffs hired George Villar as an owner’s representative who “testified that he deemed the workmanship to be ‘poor.’”

    Subsequently, the locks where changed on the home, preventing JMC from performing any additional work, after which drywall was removed, which Villar stated was so that “the engineer come and look at the framing.” Subsequently, Villar sent a letter to JMC stating that the work was “performed in an inadequate, negligent and un-professional manner.” Villar informed JMC that they were not to visit the property. Subsequently, the plaintiffs hired another firm. “Plaintiffs testified that the materials were ‘carted away’ and ‘thrown out.’”

    The plaintiffs filed a suit against JMC and others. JMC filed a motion requesting that the plaintiffs be sanctioned for their spoliation of evidence. The court noted that “the plaintiffs recognized that litigation was imminent,” and that they “had a duty to preserve the evidence. As all of JMC’s work was destroyed, there is no evidence of whether or not the work was defective. The court concluded that it will “issue an adverse inference charge that permits the jury to infer that the missing evidence was favorable to the defendants.”

    In conclusion, the court granted in part the spoliation sanctions. They granted JMC a summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ claims of fraud.

    Read the court’s decision…


    Instant Hotel Tower, But Is It Safe?

    March 28, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Broad Sustainable Building has leapfrogged in China’s construction boom by building a thirty-story hotel in just fifteen days in the city of Changsha. According to an article in the Los Angeles Times, most of the building was prefabricated, but most prefabricated buildings require a longer time for assembly. Broad claimed that it cut no corners on safety. However, Zhang Li, a Beijing architect, told the Times that “incredible speed also means incredible risk.”

    At the completion date, the interior was still partially finished. Some rooms were furnished, while others weren’t quite so ready. The hotel will be used to house clients who are visiting Broad and some of its employees.

    Broad called their process “the most profound innovation in human history” and predicted that soon a third of new buildings worldwide would be constructed this way. The company anticipates using the same process to build taller buildings, with hopes of eventually constructing a 150-story building.

    China is currently undergoing a building boom which Zhang attributed to a desire to catch up to the developed world. As a result of this boom, he noted that building inspections are often skipped in China to speed up building.

    Read the full story…


    Texas Windstorm Insurance Agency Under Scrutiny

    April 5, 2011 — April 5, 2011 Beverley BevenFlorez - Construction Defect Journal

    Representative Larry Taylor has introduced a bill in the Texas Legislature (HB 2818) that would further regulate the Texas Windstorm Insurance Agency (TWIA). According to Taylor, “In order to be adequately prepared for future hurricane seasons, it is imperative that TWIA be operating at maximum efficiency, that the Reserve Trust Fund be solvent and that the agency have adequate management measures in place to protect consumers and ensure that claims are paid in a timely manner. House Bill 2818 is an important step in the right direction toward restoring public confidence in TWIA.”

    HB 2818 includes measures that would create an expert panel that would advise the commissioner on how to evaluate loss from the storm, and a greater transparency of TWIA Board meetings and actions.

    In addition, the Texas Department of Insurance (TDI) has placed TWIA on Administrative Oversight. According to TDI, “While under Administrative Oversight, the Department may require its prior review and approval of executive decisions, certain expenditures, and other transactions. The insurer is required to fully cooperate with the Department and provide complete and timely disclosure of all information responsive to Department requests.”

    Read the full story (Rep. Taylor’s Press Release)...

    Read the full story (Texas Department of Insurance’s Press Release)...


    Denver Court Rules that Condo Owners Must Follow Arbitration Agreement

    November 7, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Prior to initiating a construction defect lawsuit, the Glass House Residential Association voted to invalidate the arbitration agreement that had been written into its declaration and bylaws by the developer and general contractor. After the association started their construction defect claims, the developer and general contractor argued that the case must go to arbitration, as the arbitration clause contained a provision that it could not be altered without the agreement of the developer and general contractor.

    The Denver District Court has ruled against that association, determining that the res triction was not in violation of Colorado condominium law. And, as a post from Polsinelli Shughart PC on JDSupra notes, the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act encourages the use of arbitration procedures to settle disputes. The CCIOA does prohibit “certain restrictions on the homeowners association’s ability to amend the condominium declarations,” however, preserving an arbitration agreement is not one of them.

    Read the full story…


    FHA Lists Bridges and Overpasses that May Have Defective Grout

    September 13, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The Federal Highway Administration has released a list of bridges and overpasses that may be prone to corrosion problems due to grout that was in chlorides when it was supposed to be completely free of them. Currently, the FHA is working with state departments of transportation to determine if the defective grout was indeed used on additional bridges and overpasses. The initial FHA list of structures determined to have been built with the defective grout lists thirty-four sites, of which four are in Ohio, the largest number for any state.

    California contains only one such site, the intersection of the 55 and 405 freeways, one of the few items on the list not designated as a bridge.

    Read the full story…


    San Diego Construction Defect Claim Settled for $2.3 Million

    July 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The Nauman Law firm has settled the lawsuit by the Latitude Owners Association against CS-Crossroads and others, as reported in the Sacramento Bee from a press release by the firm. The owners at Latitude, a condominium community in San Diego, found that hillside crawl spaces were not property waterproofed, leading to rotting plywood, water intrusion, and pipe leaks. There were additional problems with retrofitted windows and repairs of outside decks. The case was filed in San Diego Superior Court, but settled after multiple mediations.

    Read the full story…


    Damage During Roof Repairs Account for Three Occurrences

    August 2, 2012 — Tred Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    Southgate Gardens Condominium had buildings damaged by Hurricane Wilma in 2005. See Mid-Continent Cas. Co. v. Basedeo, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 11864 (11th Cir. June 12, 2012). First State Development Corporation was hired by Southgate to do repairs.

    On November 1, 2005, First State completed tarping on the buildings. Thereafter, on November 11, 2005, First State contracted with Southgate to remove and replace the roofs of the Southgate Buildings.

    The tarps placed by First State were inadequate and allowed water to enter the unit of Wayne Basdeo and cause damage. Further, when it attached the tarps, First State caused holes to be made in the roofs of buildings, leading to additional damage. First State also left open the mansards (a type of roof which has two slopes on all all sides, but with the lower slope steeper that the upper one). Finally, the peeled-back condition of the roofing allowed rain to enter.

    Basdeo filed a claim with Mid-Continent.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Tampa Condo Owners Allege Defects

    October 23, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Owners in the Bel Mare towers have filed a lawsuit alleging that the building have construction defects that could lead to problems during periods with high winds. The Tampa Bay Business Journal reports that the condo association has sued the developer, the general contractor, the architects, the structural engineers, and subcontractors.

    Read the full story…


    Wisconsin “property damage” caused by an “occurrence.”

    April 4, 2011 — April 4, 2011 in CDCoverage.com

    In American Family Mut. Ins. Co. v. American Girl, Inc., 673 N.W.2d 65 (Wis. 2004), the insured general contractor was hired by the owner to design and build a warehouse on the owner s property. The general contractor hired a soil engineer to do a soil analysis and make site preparation recommendations. The soil engineer determined that the soil conditions were poor and recommended a compression process which the general contractor followed. After the warehouse was completed and the owner took possession, excessive soil settlement caused the foundation to sink which in turn caused structural damage to the warehouse. The warehouse had to be torn down.

    Read the full story...

    Reprinted courtesy of CDCoverage.com


    Construction Defects Leave Animal Shelter Unusable

    October 23, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The Press Democrat reports that the Healdsburg Animal Shelter is proceeding in its lawsuit against the architect, general contractor, and subcontractors of its unfinished new facility. Shelter officials described the building as “effectively uninhabitable,” and the board has suggested that the building might have to be demolished. The chair of the shelter board told donors that “your investment is protected.”

    The defects in the building include cracked concrete slabs and gaps around windows. However, even without these defects, the shelter alleges that the architect failed to correct design flaws.

    Read the full story…


    Construction Workers Face Dangers on the Job

    November 18, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    OSHA calculates that for each 33,000 active construction workers, one will die on the job each year, making their risk over the course of their careers at one out of every 200 workers. This puts it many times over OSHA’s definition of “significant risk” of 1 death per 1,000 workers over the course of their careers. According to an article in People’s World, “the main risk of death is from falls.”

    At a talk at the American Public Health Association’s meeting, one expert noted that “construction workers make up 6 percent to 8 percent of all workers, but account for 20 percent of all deaths on the job every year.”

    Read the full story…


    Colorado statutory “property damage” caused by an “occurrence”

    August 4, 2011 — CDCoverage.com

    Colorado General Assembly House Bill 10-1394 was signed into law by the Governor on May 21, 2010, codified at Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-20-808 (2010)

    13-20-808. Insurance policies issued to construction professionals

    (1) (a) The general assembly finds and determines that:

    (I) The interpretation of insurance policies issued to construction professionals is of vital importance to the economic and social welfare of the citizens of Colorado and in furthering the purposes of this part 8.

    (II) Insurance policies issued to construction professionals have become increasingly complex, often containing multiple, lengthy endorsements and exclusions conflicting with the reasonable expectations of the insured.

    (III) The correct interpretation of coverage for damages arising out of construction defects is in the best interest of insurers, construction professionals, and property owners.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of CDCoverage.com


    Mississippi exclusions j(5) and j(6) “that particular part”

    June 7, 2011 — CDCoverage.com

    In Lafayete Ins. Co. v. Peerboom, No. 3:10cv336 (S.D. Miss. June 2, 2011), claimant homeowner Peerboom hired insured contractor Absolute to raise Peerboom’s house two feet to avoid future flooding. While Absolute was raising the house, it fell, resulting in physical injury to the home. Peerboom sued Absolute for negligence, breach of contract, and fraud, seeking damages for the destruction of the home. Absolute’s CGL insurer Lafayette defended under a reservation of rights and filed a declaratory judgment action.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of CDCoverage.com


    Construction Job Opening Rise in October

    December 20, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    There was a significant increase in the number of open construction jobs during October, according to a report for the National Association of Home Builders. Working from preliminary data provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the NAHB said that the number of open positions reached “levels and rates last seen in 2007.” As the data is still preliminary, the NAHB noted that the conclusions should be taken with caution.

    While there was a spike in job openings, the hiring of people to fill these positions hasn’t caught up with it, and there was a small decline in hires. But to return to the good news, there was also a drop in layoffs in that same period.

    Through October, about 8,000 people have been hired in the construction sector. The NAHB notes that this does not correspond with the recent increases with home construction. They suggest that “it may be the case that startups in the home building and remodeling sectors are being missed by the establishment survey.” Another possibility they raise is that already-employed construction workers are simply working more hours.

    Read the full story…


    One World Trade Center Due to Be America’s Tallest and World’s Priciest

    February 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    As One World Trade Center rises, so does the price tag. After construction delays and cost overruns, the cost of the building at the site of the September 11 attacks has risen to $3.8 billion. Part of the expense of the skyscraper is the heavily reinforced base of the building. The elevator shafts are also heavily reinforced, all part of guarding against future terrorist attacks.

    In comparison, the world’s tallest tower, the Burj Khalifa in Dubai, cost only $1.5 billion, less than half the cost of One World Trade Center. As a result, the Port Authority does not see the building as being profitable in near future. In order to fund it, the agency is raising tolls on bridge and tunnel traffic.

    Currently, about the half the unfinished building is leased. Construction is expected to conclude in 2013.

    Read the full story…


    Foundation Arbitration Doesn’t Preclude Suing Over Cracks

    March 28, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The Louisiana Court of Appeals has reversed the decision of a lower court, allowing a construction defect case to go through. In Greer v. Town Construction Company, the Greers hired Town Construction to build a home in Baton Rouge. The business relationship went sour, with disputes over “costs, change orders, workmanship, and timeliness issues.”

    Town Construction filed an arbitration claim for the unpaid contract balance. In the counterclaim, the Greers made claims of mold and mildew problems, and wall cracks that they attributed to a “structural defect in the foundation.” In arbitration, Town Construction was awarded the full contract balance plus extra costs and interest, while the Greers were awarded for their structural claims.

    Three years later, the Greers found additional cracks and filed a suit against Town Construction. Town Construction argued that the Greer’s lawsuit should be dismissed, as the claims had already been through the arbitration process. The district court agreed with Town Construction and dismissed the suit.

    The appeals court noted that the Greers would have no ground for a suit if the arbitration was a “valid and final judgment,” and went on to note that there was no evidence in the trial record that the arbitration met this qualification. The court noted that although it was clear that both parties had agreed to the decisions of the arbiter, under Louisiana law, arbitration is not final until it has been “rendered by a court with jurisdiction over subject mater and over parties.”

    The court remanded the case to the lower court, noting that “the district court is obligated to first determine whether a valid arbitration award is in existence and had been confirmed before considering the merits of the exception. The court noted that their decision “should not be read to express any opinion as to the merits of the claims or as to the propriety of damages sought in the Greer’s lawsuit.”

    Read the court’s decision…


    Construction Worker Dies after Building Collapse

    November 18, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    A Bronx construction worker died when the pillars gave way in the basement where he was working. The two-story commercial building collapsed, burying Mr. Kebbeh under about six feet of rubble. The New York Times reports that firefighters dug him out with their bare hands. Mr. Kebbeh was taken to Jacobi Medical Center where he died. Two other construction workers escaped unharmed.

    Read the full story…