BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    parking structure expert witness Anaheim California landscaping construction expert witness Anaheim California townhome construction expert witness Anaheim California concrete tilt-up expert witness Anaheim California Medical building expert witness Anaheim California casino resort expert witness Anaheim California condominiums expert witness Anaheim California retail construction expert witness Anaheim California multi family housing expert witness Anaheim California tract home expert witness Anaheim California custom homes expert witness Anaheim California mid-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California condominium expert witness Anaheim California office building expert witness Anaheim California hospital construction expert witness Anaheim California housing expert witness Anaheim California structural steel construction expert witness Anaheim California low-income housing expert witness Anaheim California production housing expert witness Anaheim California high-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California Subterranean parking expert witness Anaheim California industrial building expert witness Anaheim California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211
    http://www.desertchapter.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501


    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biasc.org

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biaoc.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Baldy View Chapter
    Local # 0532
    8711 Monroe Ct Ste B
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
    http://www.biabuild.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - LA/Ventura Chapter
    Local # 0532
    28460 Ave Stanford Ste 240
    Santa Clarita, CA 91355


    Building Industry Association Southern California - Building Industry Association of S Ca Antelope Valley
    Local # 0532
    44404 16th St W Suite 107
    Lancaster, CA 93535



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Anaheim California

    Tall and Sustainable Is Not an Easy Fix

    Nevada Supreme Court Rejects Class Action Status, Reducing Homes from 1000 to 71

    Decline in Home Construction Brings Down Homebuilder Stocks

    Several Wilke Fleury Attorneys Featured in Sacramento Magazine 2022 Top Lawyers!

    When Your Scheduler Hallucinates: Managing AI Risk on the Job Site

    Deescalating Hyper Escalation

    Los Angeles Is Building a Future Where Water Won’t Run Out

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “I Never Had a Chance”

    Don’t Get Caught Holding the Bag: Hold the State Liable When General Contractor Fails to Pay on a Public Project.

    John Paulson’s $1 Billion Caribbean Empire Faces Betrayal

    The “Pay When Paid” Clause in California Construction—Strategies as the Battle Continues

    EPA and the Corps of Engineers Repeal the 2015 “Waters of the United States” Rule

    Texas Supreme Court Cements Exception to “Eight-Corners” Rule Through Two Recent Rulings

    Court Finds that Subcontractor Lacks Standing to Appeal Summary Judgment Order Simply Because Subcontractor “Might” Lose at Trial Due to Order

    Chapman Glucksman Press Release

    These Roads Aren’t Built for Wilder Weather Driven by Climate Change

    Major Change to Residential Landlord Tenant Law

    Congratulations Bryan Stofferahn, August Hotchkin, and Eileen Gaisford on Their Promotion to Partner!

    The Impact of the IIJA and Amended Buy American Act on the Construction Industry

    U.S. Homeownership Rate Falls to Lowest Since Early 1995

    This Times Square Makeover Is Not a Tourist Attraction

    No Coverage Under Property Policy With Other Insurance and Loss Payment Provisions

    Contractor Side Deals Can Waive Rights

    Thomson Reuters Construction Law (Virginia Practice Series)

    Quick Note: Insurer Must Comply with Florida’s Claims Administration Act

    City Drops Impact Fees to Encourage Commercial Development

    Reasonable Expectations – Pennsylvania’s Case by Case Approach to the Sutton Rule

    Stucco Contractor Trying to Limit Communication in Construction Defect Case

    Anthony Garasi, Jared Christensen and August Hotchkin are Recognized as Nevada Legal Elite

    Value In Being Deemed “Statutory Employer” Under Workers Compensation Law

    “Over? Did you say ‘over’?”

    Coloradoans Deserve More Than Hyperbole and Rhetoric from Plaintiffs’ Attorneys; We Deserve Attainable Housing

    Philadelphia Proposed Best Value Procurement Bill

    Proving & Defending Lost Profit Damages

    Two Snell & Wilmer Attorneys Selected as 2026 San Diego Super Lawyers Rising Stars

    Construction Defects Lead to “A Pretty Shocking Sight”

    Brooklyn’s Hipster Economy Challenges Manhattan Supremacy

    New York’s Lawsky Proposes Changes to Reduce Home Foreclosures

    Condo Building Increasing in Washington D.C.

    Seabold Construction Ties Demise to Dispute with Real Estate Developer

    Part II: Key Provisions of School Facility Construction & Design Contracts

    Hamptons Home Up for Foreclosure That May Set Record

    Lien Law Change in Idaho

    Contractor Entitled to Continued Defense Against Allegations of Faulty Construction

    Construction Delays: Which Method Should Be Used to Calculate Delay?

    Montana Supreme Court: Insurer Not Bound by Insured's Settlement

    Phillips & Jordan Awarded $176M Everglades Restoration Contract

    Contractual Impartiality Requires an Appraiser to be Unbiased, Disinterested, and Unswayed by Personal Interest

    Product Liability Alert: Evidence of Apportionment of Fault Admissible in Strict Products Liability Action

    Jurisdictional Conflict Over “Related Claims”: Montana Federal Court Latest to Weigh in on When Claims Are Related
    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 4500 construction defect and claims related expert designations, the Anaheim, California Construction Expert Directory delivers a wide range of trial support and consulting services to attorneys and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides building related trial support and expert consulting services to the industry's leading construction attorneys, Fortune 500 builders, insurers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with in house assets comprising building envelope and design experts, forensic engineers, forensic architects, and construction cost and scheduling consultants, the firm brings specialized expertise and local capabilities to the Anaheim region.

    Anaheim California consulting architect expert witnessAnaheim California construction project management expert witnessesAnaheim California construction expert witnessAnaheim California window expert witnessAnaheim California construction claims expert witnessAnaheim California fenestration expert witnessAnaheim California roofing construction expert
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    Your AI Tool Could Be Your Next Breach of Contract

    October 20, 2026 —
    Like many industries, the construction industry is rapidly adopting artificial intelligence. AI-powered tools now help construction teams estimate costs, transcribe meetings, summarize RFIs, model schedules, and manage project documents faster than ever before. But amid this rush toward efficiency, a serious risk hides in plain sight: every time project documents are uploaded into a third-party AI tool, contractual confidentiality obligations may be implicated — or outright breached — exposing companies to potentially substantial and uncapped liability. General contractors often face strict confidentiality and nondisclosure obligations, whether under the prime construction contract or a separate NDA. This is especially true for complex projects or those involving proprietary technology — such as data centers, medical or scientific facilities, and energy generation and storage facilities. These confidentiality clauses typically define “confidential information” broadly to encompass all non-public information provided for the project, including plans, specifications, pricing, schedules, RFPs, and even the contract terms themselves. These confidentiality obligations almost always flow down to subcontractors. Reprinted courtesy of Laurie Choi, Snell & Wilmer and Christian Fernandez, Snell & Wilmer Ms. Choi may be contacted at lchoi@swlaw.com Mr. Fernandez may be contacted at cfernandez@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    D.C. Circuit Upholds EPA’s CERCLA Hazardous-Substance Designations for PFAS as State-Law Settlements Highlight Expanding Liability Landscape

    September 15, 2026 —
    On August 18, 2026, a unanimous panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld the 2024 designation by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) as hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund). (See Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. EPA, No. 24-1193 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 18, 2026).) The decision leaves EPA’s PFOA and PFOS hazardous substance designations in place and provides guidance on the scope of EPA’s authority to make future hazardous substances designations under CERCLA Section 102(a). The decision also likely resolves a challenge to the rule that has spanned two presidential administrations. After taking office, the Trump administration had obtained an abeyance of the litigation challenging the Biden-era rule while EPA reconsidered its position. In September 2025, EPA informed the court that it had decided to retain the designations, while signaling that it would work with Congress and industry to address CERCLA liability concerns for “passive receivers.” The litigation then resumed, with the current Administration defending the rule. Reprinted courtesy of Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury, Amanda G. Halter, Pillsbury, Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury and Anthony B. Cavender, Pillsbury Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Halter may be contacted at amanda.halter@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Cavender may be contacted at anthony.cavender@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    NJ Public Works Contractors Beware – Pay Special Attention When Submitting Your Public Works Contractor Registration

    May 26, 2026 —
    While it is always important to be careful when making submissions to government agencies, recent activity by the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development (“NJDOL”) reveals considerably increased scrutiny in connection with contractors renewing their New Jersey Public Works Registration. Extra care when completing the registration renewal process is warranted, because the consequences of a misstep can be significant and disruptive. The New Jersey Public Works Contractor Registration Act requires all contractors bidding on or engaging in construction-related public works projects to register with the NJDOL. This registration, which must be resubmitted every 1-2 years, requires contractors to make a number of detailed disclosures relating to, among other things, the entity’s ownership structure, prior state and federal labor law violations, details regarding interests in other businesses, unlawful acts by owners/officers, and participation in apprenticeship programs. Reprinted courtesy of Levi W. Barrett, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Aaron C. Schlesinger, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Barrett may be contacted at lbarrett@pecklaw.com Mr. Schlesinger may be contacted at aschlesinger@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Texas Adopts New Procedural Rules for Summary Judgment Motions: What You Need To Know

    July 13, 2026 —
    On March 1, 2026, sweeping amendments to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 166a took effect, fundamentally changing how Texas courts handle summary judgment motions — from filing and briefing through disposition. Whether representing a plaintiff or defendant, Texas litigants and attorneys must understand these new rules and their impact on case strategy and timelines. These procedural changes carry particular significance for construction litigants. Background: The Prior Rule Texas summary judgment practice has long diverged from the federal model. The Texas Rules of Civil Procedure recognize two types of summary judgment motions: (1) the traditional motion for summary judgment, and (2) the “no-evidence” motion for summary judgment. The no-evidence motion — unique to Texas — may be filed only after adequate time for discovery has passed. No bright-line rule governs that determination; it depends on the unique circumstances of each case. Reprinted courtesy of Conor G. Bateman, Snell & Wilmer and Marsha Cotton, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Bateman may be contacted at cbateman@swlaw.com Ms. Cotton may be contacted at mcotton@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    ACEC Research Institute Report: Real Risk of AI Isn’t Technology. It’s the Org Chart.

    September 01, 2026 —
    WASHINGTON (August 19, 2026) – The ACEC Research Institute today released Leading Through AI Risk: The Enterprise Framework for Engineering Firm Leaders, a new study finding that the most significant risks artificial intelligence poses to engineering firms are organizational rather than technological, and that firms treating AI as an IT initiative are managing the wrong issue. The report, part of the Institute’s yearslong Firm of the Future initiative, combines an extensive literature review with in-depth interviews of 21 leaders drawn from engineering firms, public infrastructure owners, technology vendors, insurance and legal professionals, licensing and regulatory agencies, and AI consultants. The report groups AI risk into eight interconnected domains:
    • technical reliability and model risk
    • professional liability and standard of care risk
    • data governance, privacy, and intellectual property risk
    • organizational and workforce risk
    • ethical, regulatory, and reputational risk
    • operational and cybersecurity risk
    • financial and business model risk
    • strategic leadership and enterprise governance risk
    The last serves as the integrating domain through which firms coordinate responsible AI adoption enterprise wide. The report stresses that firms do not experience these risks one at a time. Weak oversight may create legal liability. Workforce gaps may affect quality assurance. “Understanding these interactions,” the study notes, “is often more important than understanding individual risks independently.” About the ACEC Research Institute The ACEC Research Institute is the independent research arm of the American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC). Its mission is to fund and deliver research to equip the engineering industry with actionable intelligence on the issues critical to its success. Learn more at www.acecresearchinstitute.org.

    Executive Insights 2026: Leaders in Construction Law

    October 06, 2026 —
    What advice would you give contractors regarding documentation and recordkeeping to better protect themselves during disputes? Jim Archibald Partner Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP Disputes over payment, scope and delays are among the biggest risks contractors face. Thorough documentation doesn’t just help win these disputes; it may prevent them from happening at all. Start with the contract: Every project should begin with a written agreement that clearly defines scope, schedule, payment terms and change-order procedures. Verbal understandings are difficult to enforce. Track changes in real time: Change orders, change directives, RFIs and scope clarifications should always be documented in writing. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Landlord Determined to Not Qualify as Additional Insured

    September 08, 2026 —
    In a dispute between two insurers, the Second Circuit affirmed the district court’s determination that the landlord was not an additional insured under the tenant’s policy. Peleus Ins. Co. v. Am. European Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 17981 June 22, 2026). Blossom Miller sued 57th Avenue and 21st Century in state court alleging that she was injured when she tripped on the sidewalk in front of the leased premises (the “Miller Action”). The premises was leased by 57th Avenue to 21st Century. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Samuel Alhadeff Represents LGI Homes in Acquisition and Re-Entitlement of Maravilla Estates

    July 06, 2026 —
    Temecula Partner Samuel Alhadeff recently represented LGI Homes in its acquisition and re-entitlement of Maravilla Estates, a 169-lot active adult community located in San Jacinto, California. The acquisition and re-entitlement of the project provide LGI Homes with the opportunity to deliver much-needed age-qualified housing in one of Riverside County's growing residential markets. The community includes a recorded final map and finished lots, as well as future development inventory and planned amenities, positioning the project for continued development and completion. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois