BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    production housing Marshall County Tennessee tract home Marshall County Tennessee multi family housing Marshall County Tennessee concrete tilt-up Marshall County Tennessee townhome construction Marshall County Tennessee low-income housing Marshall County Tennessee structural steel construction Marshall County Tennessee mid-rise construction Marshall County Tennessee office building Marshall County Tennessee parking structure Marshall County Tennessee hospital construction Marshall County Tennessee industrial building Marshall County Tennessee casino resort Marshall County Tennessee landscaping construction Marshall County Tennessee custom homes Marshall County Tennessee condominium Marshall County Tennessee retail construction Marshall County Tennessee custom home Marshall County Tennessee high-rise construction Marshall County Tennessee Subterranean parking Marshall County Tennessee condominiums Marshall County Tennessee housing Marshall County Tennessee
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Marshall County, Tennessee

    Tennessee Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2787/SB2931 & HB 2771/SB 2201; Title 66, Chptr 36) Homeowners must serve written notice of a defect 15 days after its discovery; Contractors, upon receipt of the notice, have 10 business days to inspect the residence and inform any subcontractors it believes are reasonably responsible on the defect. Within 10 business days after notice of the claim, the subcontractor must serve a written response to contractor. Within 30 days after receipt of notice of a defect, the contractor must provide written notice of intention (repair, replace, monetarily compensate or reject) to the homeowner.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Marshall County Tennessee

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    South Central Home Builders Association
    Local # 4488
    PO Box 1625
    Tullahoma, TN 37388


    Jackson Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 4430
    206 E Main St Ste 204
    Jackson, TN 38302
    http://www.jacksonareabuilders.com

    Memphis Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 4466
    7990 Trinity Road Ste 110
    Cordova, TN 38018
    http://www.mahba.com

    Warren County Chapter
    Local # 4495
    PO Box 608
    McMinnville, TN 37111


    Maryville Alcoa Home Builders Association
    Local # 4453
    1719 Kings Cir
    Maryville, TN 37801
    http://www.maryvillealcoahomebuildersassociation.org

    Ocoee Region Builders Association
    Local # 4424
    19 Broad St NW
    Cleveland, TN 37311
    http://www.myorba.org

    Home Builders Association of Southern Tennessee
    Local # 4422
    3221 Harrison Pike
    Chattanooga, TN 37406
    http://www.hbast.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Marshall County Tennessee

    The Flood Insurance Reform Act May be Extended to 2016

    Construction Defect Lawsuits? There’s an App for That

    Harmon Towers Duty to Defend Question Must Wait, Says Court

    Public Relations Battle over Harmon Tower

    Statute of Limitations Upheld in Construction Defect Case

    Alabama “occurrence” and subcontractor work exception to the “your completed work” exclusion

    California Appeals Court Remands Fine in Late Completion Case

    The Ever-Growing Thicket Of California Civil Code Section 2782

    Ensuing Loss Found Ambiguous, Allowing Coverage

    Court Rejects Anti-SLAPP Motion in Construction Defect Suit

    Court Rules on a Long List of Motions in Illinois National Insurance Co v Nordic PCL

    Follow Up on Continental Western v. Shay Construction

    Harmon Hotel Construction Defect Update

    Supreme Court of New York Denies Motion in all but One Cause of Action in Kikirov v. 355 Realty Assoc., et al.

    Preventing Costly Litigation Through Your Construction Contract

    Destruction of Construction Defect Evidence Leads to Sanctions against Plaintiff

    School District Settles Construction Lawsuit

    Know the Minnesota Statute of Limitations for Construction Defect Claims

    Nevada Construction Defect Lawyers Dead in Possible Suicides

    Montrose Language Interpreted: How Many Policies Are Implicated By A Construction Defect That Later Causes a Flood?

    Retaining Wall Contractor Not Responsible for Building Damage

    Celebrities Lose Case in Construction Defect Arbitration

    Vegas Hi-Rise Not Earthquake Safe

    No Coverage For Construction Defects When Complaint Alleges Contractual Damages

    Unfinished Building Projects Litter Miami

    California Supreme Court Binds Homeowner Associations To Arbitration Provisions In CC&Rs

    Hilton Grand Vacations Defect Trial Delayed

    Boston Tower Project to Create 450 Jobs

    Appeals Court Reverses Summary Judgment over Defective Archway Construction

    Safe Harbors- not just for Sailors anymore (or, why advance planning can prevent claims of defective plans & specs) (law note)

    Safety Officials Investigating Death From Fall

    Limiting Plaintiffs’ Claims to a Cause of Action for Violation of SB-800

    Texas covered versus uncovered allocation and “legally obligated to pay.”

    Late Filing Contractor Barred from Involving Subcontractors in Construction Defect Claim

    All Risk Policy Only Covers Repair to Portion of Dock That Sustains Damage

    Faulty Workmanship may be an Occurrence in Indiana CGL Policies

    Safer Schools Rendered Unsafe Due to Construction Defects

    Court Grants Summary Judgment to Insurer in HVAC Defect Case

    Construction Defects: 2010 in Review

    Judge Rejects Extrapolation, Harmon Tower to Remain Standing

    Surveyors Statute Trumps Construction Defect Claim in Tennessee

    Contract Not So Clear in South Carolina Construction Defect Case

    History of Defects Leads to Punitive Damages for Bankrupt Developer

    Insurance for Defective Construction Now in Third Edition

    Builder to Appeal Razing of Harmon Tower

    Does the New Jersey Right-To-Repair Law Omit Too Many Construction Defects?

    Nebraska Man Sentenced for Insurance Fraud in Construction Projects

    Construction Defects Are Occurrences, Says South Carolina High Court

    Construction Law Alert: A Specialty License May Not Be Required If Work Covered By Another License

    Unit Owners Have No Standing to Sue under Condominium Association’s Policy

    Policyholder Fails to Build Adequate Record to Support Bad Faith Claim

    Ohio subcontractor work exception to the “your work” exclusion

    Coverage for Construction Defects Barred by Business Risk Exclusions

    Crane Dangles and So Do Insurance Questions

    Flooded Courtroom May be Due to Construction Defect

    Read Her Lips: “No New Buildings”

    Denver Court Rules that Condo Owners Must Follow Arbitration Agreement

    Orange County Home Builder Dead at 93

    Restitution Unlikely in Las Vegas Construction Defect Scam

    Nevada Assembly Sends Construction Defect Bill to Senate

    Faulty Workmanship Exclusion Does Not Bar Coverage

    Instant Hotel Tower, But Is It Safe?

    Demand for Urban Living Leads to Austin Building Boom

    Connecticut Gets Medieval All Over Construction Defects

    Insurer Not Entitled to Summary Judgment on Construction Defect Claims

    Texas Construction Firm Files for Bankruptcy

    Another Guilty Plea In Nevada Construction Defect Fraud Case

    Contractor Removed from Site for Lack of Insurance

    Coverage Exists Under Ensuing Loss Provision

    Australian Developer Denies Building Problems Due to Construction Defects

    An Upward Trend in Commercial Construction?

    South Carolina Contractors Regain General Liability Coverage

    South Carolina Legislature Defines "Occurrence" To Include Property Damage Arising From Faulty Workmanship

    Workers Hurt in Casino Floor Collapse

    Plaintiffs In Construction Defect Cases to Recover For Emotional Damages?

    Home Repair Firms Sued for Fraud

    Insurance Company Prevails in “Chinese Drywall” Case

    Save A Legal Fee? Sometimes You Better Talk With Your Construction Attorney

    Homeowners May Not Need to Pay Lien on Defective Log Cabin

    No Coverage for Property Damage That is Limited to Work Completed by Subcontractor

    Construction Defect Lawsuit Stayed by SB800

    Hovnanian Increases Construction Defect Reserves for 2012

    Can We Compel Insurers To Cover Construction Defect in General Liability Policies?

    Illinois Court Determines Insurer Must Defend Property Damage Caused by Faulty Workmanship

    Tampa Condo Owners Allege Defects

    Tennessee Court: Window Openings Too Small, Judgment Too Large

    A Lien Might Just Save Your Small Construction Business

    South Carolina “occurrence” and allocation

    Virginia Chinese Drywall “property damage” caused by an “occurrence” and number of “occurrences”

    Bound by Group Builders, Federal District Court Finds No Occurrence
    Corporate Profile

    MARSHALL COUNTY TENNESSEE CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 5500 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Marshall County, Tennessee Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Marshall County's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Marshall County, Tennessee

    Insurer Beware: Failure to Defend Ends with Hefty Verdict

    June 1, 2011 — Douglas Reiser in the Builders Counsel Blog

    Served with a lawsuit that you turned over to your insurer? Insurer refusing to defend you? Well, find some hope in this news. Washington’s IFCA has the claws to ensure that insurers perform their duties.

    Contractors heavily rely on the defense provisions of their Commercial General Liability (CGL) policies. In construction, a legal dispute can easily rear its head when you least expect it. Luckily, Washington registered contractors are required to maintain CGL insurance. That insurance often provides contractors with adequate legal defense in the event that they are sued.

    But, what if your insurer turns down the defense request? They might be staring at massive damages. A current Reiser Legal client, Australia Unlimited, Inc., recently won a large verdict against Hartford Insurance, after the insurer unreasonably denied their claim. The firm who represented Australia Unlimited Inc. in that case, Hackett Beecher and Hart, were successful in procuring a $5.43 Million verdict

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Douglas Reiser of Reiser Legal LLC. Mr. Reiser can be contacted at info@reiserlegal.com


    Construction Jobs Expected to Rise in Post-Hurricane Rebuilding

    November 7, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Businessweek reports that construction jobs and materials will see increased demand as property owners in New York and New Jersey rebuild after hurricane Sandy. Tom Jeffery, of Irvine, California-based CoreLogic, a real estate information service, noted that “a high percent of damaged properties are going to be repaired.” Experts estimate property damage to total anywhere from $7 billion to $40 billion.

    It is also estimated that about 739,000 properties in the area are underwater in the way that has nothing to do with flooding, with negative equity of 25 percent or more. Many of these homeowners are likely to walk away from their mortgages.

    Ken Simonson, chief economist of the Associated General Contractors of America, expects “localized spikes in construction employment throughout November and the winter.” Martin Connor, the chief financial officer of Toll Brothers, expects to see more a rise in labor costs than in materials.

    Read the full story…


    Preventing Costly Litigation Through Your Construction Contract

    August 17, 2011 — Douglas Reiser, Builders Counsel

    It’s Tuesday, which means it ’s the middle of your work week. Tuesday is a great time to take an hour to look over your contracts, while the crews are pushing through their scheduled work. Today’s food for thought: How do you use your contract to reduce your litigation burden?

    Your contract should do many things. It should discuss the scope of work, scheduling of work, quality of work, coverage for liabilities and conditions and timeliness for payment. But often overlooked is how your contract can lend to dispute resolution.

    Commonly, you will see a simple provision that covers governing law, venue for disputes and the awarding of attorneys’ fees. But you can do better. Remember, a contract is enforced to the maximum extent possible in Washington state.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Douglas Reiser of Reiser Legal LLC. Mr. Reiser can be contacted at info@reiserlegal.com


    Going Green for Lower Permit Fees

    October 23, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Clay County, Kansas is offering rebates on building permits for green homes. According to the Kansas City Star, building permits in the county are typically $2,500. The county will rebate anything from half to all of the permit fee, depending on how well the builder meets green standards. The county will monitor and inspect the process to make certain that builders adhere to their promises for green construction. The county hopes this will encourage green building by offsetting the cost.

    Read the full story…


    Loss Caused by Seepage of Water Not Covered

    July 10, 2012 — Tred Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    The anti-concurrent clause in a homeowner’s policy barred coverage for damage caused by hidden seepage. Boazova v. Safety Ins. Co., 2012 Mass. LEXIS 462 (Mass. May 29, 2012).

    The insured had a concrete patio built along the rear wall of her house at a grade higher than the home’s foundation. Years later, severe deterioration was discovered in the floor joists, wall studs and other parts of the home. The insured held a homeowner’s policy with Safety. An inspector hired by Safety determined the deterioration was caused by the placement of the concrete patio slab adjacent to the wall of the house, allowing water to seep onto the top of the foundation.

    Safety denied coverage because the damage was caused by a combination of surface water, deterioration, settling and improper construction of the concrete patio.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Boyfriend Pleads Guilty in Las Vegas Construction Defect Scam Suicide

    November 7, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    One of the odder twists of the Las Vegas construction defect scandal was the charge that Nancy Quon’s boyfriend helped her in an initial suicide attempt. Quon, implicated by not charged in the case of taking control of homeowner boards in order to profit from construction defect settlements. William Webb was alleged to have bought the drug GBH in order to allow Quon, his girlfriend, to commit suicide. Ms. Quon later overdosed on a combination of alcohol and prescription drugs.

    In addition to pleading guilty to the drug charges, Webb also made a plea bargain with prosecutors in which he did not admit guilt in an insurance fraud charge, but acknowledged that prosecutors would likely be successful at obtaining a conviction. Webb will be sentenced February 7 and is expected to receive a sentence of six years imprisonment.

    Read the full story…


    No Coverage for Negligent Misrepresentation without Allegations of “Bodily Injury” or “Property Damage”

    February 10, 2012 — Tred Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    Jeff City Industries was the general contractor for a sewer system improvement project in Branson, Missouri. Bituminous Cas. Corp. v. United HRB Gen. Contractors, Inc., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145666 (W.D. Mo. Dec. 19, 2011). Branson sued Jeff City, alleging breach of the construction contract for the project. The claims included improperly bedded sewer piping, improper aligning portions of trenching for the sewer piping, improper service line connections to the sewer piping, etc.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Construction Demand Unsteady, Gains in Some Regions

    June 29, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    The Associated General Contractors of America reported Tuesday, June 28 that construction employment increased in 120 of the 337 metropolitan areas surveyed between May 2010 and May 2011.

    ‘While construction employment has stopped plunging, any sign of a recovery remains spotty at best,” said Ken Simonson, the association’s chief economist. ‘The close to even split between areas adding and losing jobs is a reminder that for every market doing well, there is another market that is still hurting.”

    The largest number of jobs created was in the Dallas, Texas region, with 5,600 new jobs, a five percent increase. The northern Massachusetts/southern New Hampshire region near Haverhill saw the greatest percentage increase, although that twenty-two percent increase represents only 800 new jobs. The Chicago, Illiinois area added 4,600 jobs, a four percent increase.

    Other regions were not so lucky. The Atlanta, Georgia area saw a loss of 7,400 jobs, an eight percent loss. Las Vegas also lost 7,400 jobs, which there represented a sixteen percent decline. The New York City area lost 6,700 jobs, a six percent reduction. The Riverside, California area lost 5,300 jobs, a nine percent loss.

    Stephen E. Sandherr, the association’s chief executive officer, blamed a combination of regulation and budget squeezes. "Some in Washington never met a regulation they didn’t like and others never found a penny they didn’t want to pinch. Together that makes for a bad way to boost employment and a great way to stifle the private sector and neglect critical economic infrastructure.”

    Read the full story…


    Harmon Hotel Construction Defect Update

    July 18, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Coverage of the ongoing litigation concerning the Harmon Hotel continues to proliferate. Architectural Record and a number of other news outlets continue to provide additional details and coverage of the matter. Chief among the conditions alleged are improperly installed reinforcing steel inside link beams on 15 floors. MGM Claims that the conditions amount to hundreds of millions of dollars in damages, while Perini (the builder) indicated in a July 12th statement that the buildings problems are related to the design, and the they are “fixable.”

    There is significant speculation that MGM Resorts International isn’t interested in repairing the hotel due to a glut of hotel rooms attendant to the troubled economy. In a statement Tuesday Perini reportedly stated that “Repairing and opening the Harmon would only create a greater glut of unused hotel rooms for MGM,” “If market conditions were better and MGM found that demand existed for the Harmon hotel rooms, MGM would not be claiming that the Harmon is unstable.”

    MGM asserts that Perini failed to ”properly construct” the project. Clark County’s Department of Development Services has reportedly asked MGM to provide a plan to fix the project by August 15th.

    The Harmon is part of the $8.5 billion CityCenter project that opened in the fourth quarter of 2009 and is jointly owned by MGM Resorts and Dubai World.

    Prior reports indicated that the owner (MGM) had considered razing the entire project. The future of the project remains uncertain.


    Homebuilding Still on the Rise

    December 20, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The National Association of Home Builders reports that spending on private homes was up three percent in October 2012, bringing it to a four-year high. This was part of a trend in which fourteen of the last fifteen months have seen increases in spending on residential construction. Likewise, multifamily residences have seen thirteen months of increased spending, putting it 82% higher than its low, two years ago. ¬?In addition to new homes, remodeling is also up, reaching its highest point in five years.

    Read the full story…


    Defective Shingle Claims Valid Despite Bankruptcy

    June 19, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The Third Circuit Court has allowed claims to go forward against Owens Corning for making allegedly defective shingles. The shingles split, leading to leaking roofs. The building products manufacturer filed for bankruptcy in 2000, which “extinguished” claims against it. The company was facing millions in liabilities over asbestos lawsuits.

    The lawsuit was filed in 2009. The courts initially found the lawsuit timely, but the Third Circuit Court later applied determined the exposure stated before the bankruptcy. On appeal, the court has reversed this and is again allowing the suit to proceed.

    Read the full story…


    School District Marks End of Construction Project by Hiring Lawyers

    June 19, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    A school district in northeastern Pennsylvania has retained legal services as they approach the end of a construction project. The Mid Valley School Board cited concerns about the project’s budget, but Randy Parry, Superintendent of Mid Valley schools referenced “possible litigation at the end of the project.” Mr. Parry told the Scranton Times Tribune that construction delays could be a reason for litigation.

    In addition to approving an additional $20,000 for legal representation, the board also approved $21,579 for additional project costs.

    Read the full story…


    Contractor’s Coverage For Additional Insured Established by Unilateral Contract

    November 18, 2011 — Tred Eyerley, Insurance Law Hawaii

    The contractor was covered as an additional insured under the subcontractor’s policy even though the parties had never actually signed an agreement to add the contractor to the policy. Evanston Ins. Co. v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co., 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 20081 (9th Cir. Oct. 3, 2011).

    The policies held by Bellevue Master, the general contractor, required it to be an additional insured under any subcontractor’s liability policy. Northwest Tower Crane Services was a subcontractor. Bellevue Master LLC, faxed a message that Northwest could continue to be a subcontractor on the project if it complied with Bellevue Master’s insurance requirements. Northwest contacted its insurance broker and requested an insurance certificate be issued to Bellevue Master so that it would be an additional insured under Northwest’s policy.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Construction Firm Charged for Creating “Hail” Damage

    June 19, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    A Burlington County, Pennsylvania judge has sentenced a firm and its employee for insurance fraud. In the scam, representatives of Precision Builders visited homes after hailstorms and advised homeowners that they could get new roofs and sidings covered by insurance. Many of the homeowners noted that they had not noticed any hail damage.

    After homeowners filed claims, employees of Precision Builders would visit the homes and damage the roofs and sidings consistent with the adjusters’ reports.

    One employee of Precision Builders, Dominik Sadowski, has pleaded guilty to third-degree insurance fraud. He has been sentenced to four years probation and 100 hours of community service. Another defendant, Marcin Gradziel, is alleged to have visited and damaged properties. He has plead not guilty.

    Read the full story…


    The Complete and Accepted Work Doctrine and Construction Defects

    August 16, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Matthew C. Bouchard of Lewis & Roberts PLLC, writes how North Carolina is “bucking the trend” on the “complete and accepted work doctrine.” As he notes, in most states “a contractor can be found liable for personal injuries suffered by third parties from accidents occurring after the contractor’s work is completed and accepted.” But one exception is North Carolina.

    He gives the example of a case, Lamb v. D.S. Duggins Welding, Inc., in which a site superintendent was “injured by the alleged negligence of the project’s steel deck installer, a sub-subcontractor in the contractual chain” “after the sub-sub’s work had been completed and accepted.” The trial court held that the “completed and accepted work doctrine” ended the subcontractor’s liability. The case noted that “employees of the general contractor had modified the installation of the perimeter safety cable in question after the sub-sub had demobilized from the site.”

    Mr. Bouchard notes that “once a project is accepted and turned over, the contractor typically loses control over maintenance of the new facility.” However, he notes that “where the contractor’s work constitutes negligence ?Ķ the doctrine may not apply.” Nor does it end breach of contract claims. It only covers third parties.

    Read the full story…


    Tacoma Construction Site Uncovers Gravestones

    August 11, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    The Seattle Times reports that a transit construction project has uncovered about twenty-five gravestones. The area was historically sensitive, as it is in territory once occupied by the Puyallup Tribe. At current report, no human remains have been found and the article cites the project?s archeological consultant as describing the gravestones as “not historically significant.”

    Read the full story…


    Construction Defect Journal Marks First Anniversary

    January 6, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    November 2011 marked the first anniversary of the Construction Defect Journal. During the first year our staff and contributors in the insurance and legal communities have compiled several hundred articles of interest to the construction defect and claims community.

    Each of these articles are maintained in the CDJ archives, and are accessible at http://www.constructiondefectjournal.com/archives.html. Each story in the archives is listed in the order it was posted to the archives. Each story in the archives opens up in its own page, so you can easily locate topics and articles of interest.

    If you’re new to Construction Defect Journal, or just want peruse past articles, please take a moment to visit the CDJ Archives page. Also please feel encouraged to submit your firm’s articles or legal publications of interest to the CD community at http://www.constructiondefectjournal.com/submitStory.html.


    New Apartment Tower on the Rise in Seattle

    September 13, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The Seattle Times reports that groundbreaking is planned for a forty-story tower in Seattle. The building process will take at least five years, during which time, according to the paper, there will be nearly eight thousand new apartments in Seattle. The planned tower will add another 386 units to that.

    The developer, Holland Partner Group, has four other apartments buildings planned or in construction currently, which will account for more than a thousand of the units being added to the city’s apartment stock.

    Read the full story…