BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    tract home Bokoshe Oklahoma multi family housing Bokoshe Oklahoma Medical building Bokoshe Oklahoma retail construction Bokoshe Oklahoma office building Bokoshe Oklahoma housing Bokoshe Oklahoma custom home Bokoshe Oklahoma structural steel construction Bokoshe Oklahoma concrete tilt-up Bokoshe Oklahoma Subterranean parking Bokoshe Oklahoma landscaping construction Bokoshe Oklahoma industrial building Bokoshe Oklahoma custom homes Bokoshe Oklahoma production housing Bokoshe Oklahoma condominium Bokoshe Oklahoma townhome construction Bokoshe Oklahoma low-income housing Bokoshe Oklahoma condominiums Bokoshe Oklahoma casino resort Bokoshe Oklahoma parking structure Bokoshe Oklahoma institutional building Bokoshe Oklahoma mid-rise construction Bokoshe Oklahoma
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Bokoshe, Oklahoma

    Oklahoma Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Bokoshe Oklahoma

    Resident electrical, mechanical, and plumbing contractors must be licensed. There are special requirements for non-resident contractors. See website for details.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders Association of South Central Oklahoma
    Local # 3742
    210 36th Ave SW 1H
    Norman, OK 73072
    http://www.builderassoc.com

    Home Builders Association of Moore City
    Local # 3736
    2109 Lincoln
    Moore, OK 73160


    Home Builders Association of Shawnee (Oklahoma)
    Local # 3777
    2510 E Independence Ste 400
    Shawnee, OK 74804
    http://www.shawneehomebuilders.com

    Oklahoma State Home Builders Association
    Local # 3700
    917 NE 63rd St
    Oklahoma City, OK 73105
    http://www.oshba.org

    Greater Sequoyah County Chapter
    Local # 3787
    2031 Breckenridge
    Sallisaw, OK 74955


    Central Oklahoma Home Builders Association
    Local # 3749
    PO Box 14005
    Oklahoma City, OK 73114
    http://www.okchomebuilders.com

    Lawton Home Builders Association
    Local # 3728
    PO Box 1085
    Lawton, OK 73502
    http://www.lawtonhomebuilders.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Bokoshe Oklahoma

    Important Information Regarding Colorado Mechanic’s Lien Rights.

    Ninety-Day Extension Denied to KB Home in Construction Defect Insurance Claim

    Micropiles for bad soil: a Tarheel victory

    The Montrose Language Interpreted: How Many Policies Are Implicated By A Construction Defect That Later Causes a Flood?

    Exclusion Bars Coverage for Mold, Fungus

    Florida Law: Defects in Infrastructure Improvements Not Covered in Home Construction Warranties

    Exact Dates Not Needed for Construction Defect Insurance Claim

    Mobile Home Owners Not a Class in Drainage Lawsuit

    More Charges in Las Vegas HOA Construction Defect Scam

    Des Moines Home Builders Building for Habitat for Humanity

    Construction Law Client Alert: Hirer Beware - When Exercising Control Over a Job Site’s Safety Conditions, You May be Held Directly Liable for an Independent Contractor’s Injury

    Park District Sues over Leaky Roof

    California Bill Would Notify Homeowners on Construction Defect Options

    Record-Setting Construction in Fargo

    In Re Golba: The Knaubs v. Golba and Rollison, Debtors

    Contractor Underpaid Workers, Pocketed the Difference

    Appropriation Bill Cuts Military Construction Spending

    Arizona Supreme Court Confirms Eight-Year Limit on Construction Defect Lawsuits

    Texas res judicata and co-insurer defense costs contribution

    Contractor Sues License Board

    Florida Chinese drywall, pollution exclusion, “your work” exclusion, and “sistership” exclusion.

    South Carolina Contractors Regain General Liability Coverage

    Does the New Jersey Right-To-Repair Law Omit Too Many Construction Defects?

    California Lawyer Gives How-To on Pursuing a Construction Defect Claim

    New Buildings in California Soon Must Be Greener

    Tenth Circuit Finds Insurer Must Defend Unintentional Faulty Workmanship

    Court Clarifies Sequence in California’s SB800

    Insurer Able to Refuse Coverage for Failed Retaining Wall

    Five Years of Great Legal Blogging at Insurance Law Hawaii

    Contract Not So Clear in South Carolina Construction Defect Case

    Quarter Four a Good One for Luxury Homebuilder

    South Carolina Legislature Defines "Occurrence" To Include Property Damage Arising From Faulty Workmanship

    Nevada Budget Remains at Impasse over Construction Defect Law

    Insurer Must Cover Construction Defects Claims under Actual Injury Rule

    Are Construction Defects Covered by Your General Liability Policy?

    Faulty Workmanship Exclusion Does Not Bar Coverage

    Flooded Courtroom May be Due to Construction Defect

    Safety Officials Investigating Death From Fall

    Bad Faith and a Partial Summary Judgment in Seattle Construction Defect Case

    Insurer Must Defend Claims for Diminution in Value of Damaged Property

    Tucson Officials to Discuss Construction Defect Claim

    A Call to Washington: Online Permitting Saves Money and the Environment

    Retaining Wall Contractor Not Responsible for Building Damage

    $5 Million Construction Defect Lawsuit over Oregon Townhomes

    Unlicensed Contractors Nabbed in Sting Operation

    Surveyors Statute Trumps Construction Defect Claim in Tennessee

    Restitution Unlikely in Las Vegas Construction Defect Scam

    Coverage for Construction Defects Barred by Business Risk Exclusions

    Court Orders House to be Demolished or Relocated

    Construction Jobs Expected to Rise in Post-Hurricane Rebuilding

    Nebraska Man Sentenced for Insurance Fraud in Construction Projects

    Alabama “occurrence” and subcontractor work exception to the “your completed work” exclusion

    Brown Paint Doesn’t Cover Up Construction Defects

    Parking Garage Collapse May Be Due to Construction Defect

    Construction Firm Charged for Creating “Hail” Damage

    Court Voids Settlement Agreement in Construction Defect Case

    Insurance Firm Under No Duty to Defend in Hawaii Construction Defect Case

    Conspirators Bilked Homeowners in Nevada Construction Defect Claims

    Denver Court Rules that Condo Owners Must Follow Arbitration Agreement

    Going Green for Lower Permit Fees

    Construction Defect Exception Does Not Lift Bar in Payment Dispute

    Local Government Waives Construction Fees to Spur Jobs

    Australian Developer Denies Building Problems Due to Construction Defects

    Construction Company Head Pleads Guilty to Insurance and Tax Fraud

    Texas Windstorm Insurance Agency Under Scrutiny

    Cabinetmaker Exceeds Expectations as Conditions Improve

    Seller Cannot Compel Arbitration for Its Role in Construction Defect Case<

    Insurer Has Duty to Defend in Water Intrusion Case

    Housing Market on Way to Recovery

    Claims Under Colorado Defect Action Reform Act Count as Suits

    Federal District Court Continues to Find Construction Defects do Not Arise From An Occurrence

    Insurer’s Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Earth Movement Exclusion Denied

    New Safety Standards Issued by ASSE and ANSI

    MGM Seeks to Demolish Harmon Towers

    Developer’s Fraudulent Statements Are His Responsibility Alone in Construction Defect Case

    Construction Defects Lead to Demolition of Seattle’s 25-story McGuire Apartments Building

    Florida Contractor on Trial for Bribing School Official

    In Colorado, Primary Insurers are Necessary Parties in Declaratory Judgment Actions

    Anti-Assignment Provision Unenforceable in Kentucky

    Colorado statutory “property damage” caused by an “occurrence”

    Fifth Circuit Reverses Insurers’ Summary Judgment Award Based on "Your Work" Exclusion

    No Coverage for Property Damage That is Limited to Work Completed by Subcontractor

    Allowing the Use of a General Verdict Form in a Construction Defect Case Could Subject Your Client to Prejudgment Interest

    Rihanna Finds Construction Defects Hit a Sour Note

    Construction Defects Are Occurrences, Says Georgia Supreme Court

    Ghost Employees Steal Jobs from Legit Construction Firms

    Construction Defect Not an Occurrence in Ohio

    Contractors with Ties to Trustees Reaped Benefits from LA Community College Modernization Program

    No Coverage For Construction Defects When Complaint Alleges Contractual Damages

    Application of Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine Supports Coverage
    Corporate Profile

    BOKOSHE OKLAHOMA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Bokoshe, Oklahoma Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 5,500 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Bokoshe's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Bokoshe, Oklahoma

    Pier Fire Started by Welders

    August 2, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Welders working on Pier 29 in San Francisco were preparing the building for the America’s Cup sailing race. Instead, they accidentally caused $2.4 million in damages. Mindy Talmadge, a fire department spokesperson, attributed the fire to crews welding a latter to a wall. According to Talmadge, a spark entered a crack in the concrete wall and “the wood on the building underneath was really dry.” It took firefighters more than two hours to extinguish the blaze.

    Read the full story…


    $5 Million Construction Defect Lawsuit over Oregon Townhomes

    January 6, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    A homeowners’ association in Lake Oswego, Oregon has filed a $5 million lawsuit against the developers of the luxury townhomes. The homeowners of Sunset Crossing are suing Centurion Homes and Aspen Townhomes over claims that construction defects have lead to water intrusion and structural damages. The townhomes were built in 2005.

    Andy Burns, the lawyer for Phillip and Patricia Gentelmann, the owners of both Centurion Homes and Aspen Townhomes, said the Gentelmanns were “taking these allegations very seriously.” The suit says that the construction violated state and local building codes and that the firms did not repair damage caused by water intrusion.

    Read the full story…


    New OSHA Fall Rules to Start Early in Minnesota

    June 14, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Minnesota has elected to implement the new OSHA rules concerning fall prevention in residential construction on June 20, well before OSHA’s September 15 deadline. Brian Johnson, reporting in Finance and Commerce, quotes Pam Perri, the executive vice president of the Builders Association of Minnesota, “this is the worst time to implement a new rule.” Ms. Perri notes “In Minnesota, education time for the residential construction industry is between November and March 1, not in the middle of the construction season.”

    Mike Swanson of Rottlund Homes estimated that the new regulations would add between $200 to $500 to the cost of a house and that he felt the current safety regulations were adequate. OSHA officials are quoted that there continues “to be a high number of fall-related deaths in construction.”

    Read the fully story…


    Nevada District Court Dismisses Case in Construction Defect Coverage Suit

    August 16, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The United States District Court of Nevada has dismissed a case filed by Maryland Casualty Company against National Fire & Marine Insurance Company. This case follows a case in which National was sued over “200 causes of action arising out of 193 separate insurance coverage disputes related to 75 different insureds and 163 unrelated construction defect or Chapter 40 proceedings across seven states.” The judge in this initial case severed the plaintiffs, as he found that allowing joinder “would make this case impossible to manage.” In this particular instance, National seeks to have the claims made by Maryland Casualty dismissed.

    Maryland Casualty alleged that for insurance policies issued to 38 companies, National was obligated to defend the insured. National was, according to the plaintiff, named as defendants in 72 unrelated lawsuits to which National disclaimed coverage. However, the court found that Maryland Casualty failed “to provide enough detail regarding the relevant property damage, policies, claims, and time periods.” The court found that Maryland failed to “state a claim upoin which relief can be granted.

    The court also found that “the Complaint lacks any well-pled allegations from which the Court could conclude the Plaintiff has standing since the Complaint is devoid of information about the specific policies at issue.

    The court did allow Maryland Casualty up to September 3, 2012 in which to file an amended complaint.

    Read the court’s decision…


    Florida Contractor on Trial for Bribing School Official

    October 28, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Lloyd Whann, an executive in M. M. Parrish Construction, a Gainesville, Florida firm, is going to trial over claims that he bribed a school district official with more than $50,000 in gifts. The trial has been pushed to March of 2012, in order for his defense to review documents.

    Bob Williams, the former school official, plead guilty to conspiracy to commit bribery. He agreed to testify against Whann and M.M. Parrish Construction.

    Read the full story...


    No Choice between Homeowner Protection and Bankrupt Developers?

    February 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Donna DiMaggio Berger, writing in the Sun Sentinel argues those may be the only current choices in Florida. A recent court case, Lakeview Reserve HOA v. Maronda Homes has caused a swift response from the legislators. Ms. Berger notes that the construction defect bill, HB 1013, “would take away a homeowner’s rights to pursue a developer for defects to the driveways, roads, sidewalks, utilities, drainage areas and other so-called ‘off-site’ improvements.” The alternative? She notes that applying the Maronda decision would “bankrupt developers who don’t build defect-free roads and sidewalks.”

    Read the full story…


    Condo Buyers Seek to Void Sale over Construction Defect Lawsuit

    November 7, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    A Michigan couple seeks to void their purchase of a condo in Texas after discovering that the complex was undergoing a construction defect lawsuit. ABQ Journal reports that Charles M. Lea and Olga Y. Ziabrikova said that they would not have purchased the condo if they had known the association was already alleging construction defects. The condo association discovered the defects “by at least late 2010,” according to the suit. The couple bought their condo in August 2011 and heard of the defects only in March 2012.

    The couple notes that no one involved with the sale informed them of the construction defect complaints. The community association’s lawsuit states that problems have lead to $2.5 million in damages. The developer, Vegas Verde Condo Partners, have filed a general denial of the construction problems.

    Read the full story…


    Window Manufacturer Weathers Recession by Diversifying

    October 28, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    American Openings, a Tuscon-based window manufacturer, has responded to the loss of its sales of windows for new home construction by moving into new markets. The Arizona Daily Star reports that American Openings used to see providing windows for new homes as half their business. Now, Tom Regina, the founder and president says “single family is just dead.”

    Their products are insulated windows, designed to comply with Energy Star standards. Without new homes being built, now the company is focusing on homeowners and building owners looking for more energy efficient windows. As the windows have two or three panes and special coatings, homeowners using them are eligible for tax credits.

    One of their newer products combines their energy-saving coatings with “break resistant” glass. The article notes that the windows repel “all but the most determined burglars.” However, the company is still awaiting special equipment to cut the glass.

    Read the full story...


    Architect Not Liable for Balcony’s Collapse

    September 13, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The Texas Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal from a woman who was partially paralyzed due to the collapse of a balcony. She had sued the architect of her friends’ home, but the Texas Third Circuit Court of Appeals had reversed a jury ruling against the architect, Sinclair Black. Black’s firm, Black + Vernooy, had designed the home and had supervised “administration of the construction contract.” Despite a contractual obligation to “endeavor to guard the owner against defects and deficiencies,” the balcony builder had not followed the architect’s specifications, including in the construction of the balcony.

    While the jury found Black liable for ten percent of the blame, Black argued that he could not be held liable for the contractor’s negligence, nor did he have any duty to third parties.

    Read the full story…


    There Is No Non-Delegable Duty on the Part of Residential Builders in Colorado

    August 16, 2012 — Brady Iandiorio, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC

    Recently, in the Arapahoe District Court, the Honorable Michael Spear, issued an order holding that builders do not owe a non-delegable duty to homeowners. In Marx and Corken v. Alpert Custom Homes, Inc., et al., Judge Spear’s order came in response to plaintiffs’ motion for determination of question of law seeking a finding that the defendants owed a non-delegable duty to the plaintiffs and thus, to strike defendants’ designation of nonparties at fault. After being fully briefed, Judge Spear, found that such a non-delegable duty does not exist.

    The case arises from the construction of a single-family residence in Aurora, Colorado. Through the construction and interaction with Alpert Custom Homes, Inc. and Scott and Sally Alpert, the defendants, Paul Marx and Kay Corken, the plaintiffs claimed they suffered various damages and losses, and brought claims for breach of contract-warranty, breach of contract, violation of the Colorado Consumer Protection Act, breaches of the implied covenant of good faith, promissory estoppel, willful breach of contract, and quantum meruit. During litigation, the defendants filed a designation of nonparties at fault, which named several parties which were at fault for the alleged construction defects at issue in the case.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Brady Iandiorio, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC. Mr. Iandiorio can be contacted at iandiorio@hhmrlaw.com


    Firm Sued For Construction Defects in Parking Garage

    October 23, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Northhampton County, Pennsylvania is suing a contractor who resurfaced a parking garage in 2009. According to the Express-Times, three years later, the surface is cracked and the county is seeking $700,000 for repairs. Additionally, they have withheld $44,000 of the $2.2 million contract because of the problems. John Stoffa, Northampton County Executive, says that the garage is stable, but not up to safety standards.

    Read the full story…


    Faulty Workmanship may be an Occurrence in Indiana CGL Policies

    April 7, 2011 — April 7, 2011 Beverley BevenFlorez - Construction Defect Journal

    The question of whether construction defects can be an occurrence in Commercial General Liabilities (CGL) policies continues to find mixed answers. The United States District Court in Indiana denied the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment in the case of General Casualty Insurance v. Compton Construction Co., Inc. and Mary Ann Zubak stating that faulty workmanship can be an occurrence in CGL policies.

    Judge Theresa L. Springmann cited Sheehan Construction Co., et al. v. Continental Casualty Co., et al. for her decision, ”The Indiana Supreme Court reversed summary judgment, which had been granted in favor of the insurer in Sheehan, holding that faulty workmanship can constitute an ‘accident’ under a CGL policy, which means any damage would have been caused by an ‘occurrence’ triggering the insurance policy’s coverage provisions. The Indiana Supreme Court also held that, under identically-worded policy exclusion terms that are at issue in this case, defective subcontractor work could provide the basis for a claim under a CGL policy.”

    As we reported on April 1st, South Carolina’s legislature is currently working on bill S-431 that would change the wording of CGL policies in their state to include construction defects. Ray Farmer, Southwest region vice president of the American Insurance Association spoke out against the bill. “CGL policies were never meant to cover faulty workmanship by the contractor,” he said. “The bill’s supplementary and erroneous liability provisions will only serve to unnecessarily impact construction costs in South Carolina.”

    Read the Opinion and order...
    Read the court’s ruling...
    Read the American Insurance Association statement...


    Another Guilty Plea in Las Vegas HOA Scandal

    December 20, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    A twenty-eighth person has plead guilty in the ongoing Las Vegas HOA scandal. Dax Louderman, who had been a construction company manager had acknowledged that he stole more than $495,000 from his former employers, Alpha 1 Construction and the Stone Canyon Homeowners Association, and further that he did not report this improper income on his tax returns. He has agreed to work with prosecutors and to pay $134,860 to the IRS. His actual sentencing will happen on June 24.

    Read the full story…


    Defective Grout May Cause Trouble for Bridges

    August 16, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Grout, which was used to protect the steel support cables of the Woodrow Wilson Bridge, may lead to problems instead. The Baltimore Sun reports that the Federal Highway Administration is looking at three dozen bridges in twenty-one states that were built with defective grout. The grout contains high levels of chlorides, which can lead to corrosion. The collapse of pedestrian walkway in Concord, North Carolina was attributed to chloride contamination in the grout.

    The grout, SikaGrout 300PT, was advertised as "non-corrosive, does not contain chlorides," but later testing showed that it contained levels that exceeded limits by 400 percent. Throughout the country, about 16 million pounds of this were used. Sika Corp. suspended production of the grout in 2010. If repairs need to be made, it is unclear who will pay.

    Read the full story…


    Florida Construction Defect Case Settled for $3 Million

    June 19, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The Runaway Beach Club Condominium Association of Kissimmee, Florida has settled its construction defect claims against the parties involved in the construction and development of the buildings. The association claimed that defective roofs and improperly installed windows had lead to leaks and associated damages. A trial date had been set, but parties involved were able to reach this settlement instead.

    Read the full story…


    New Web Site Tracks Settled Construction Defect Claims

    June 19, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Peter Lissner, a former Nevada homebuilder, has created a new site to help track homes that have been involved in construction defect litigation. His site, housefaxreview.com, collections documentation about homes where claims of construction defects have been made. He told The Builders Magazine concerns about “the number of homes that have been served notices, received compensation, yet the homes weren’t repaired.” On the site, the creator is identified as “a family owned builder.” According to the site, “the builder had no claims until the neighborhood reached the statutory claims limit 10 years.”

    Lissner also claims that in many cases, after settling construction defect lawsuits, the homeowners sell to subsequent buyers without disclosing the lawsuit or their failure to repair. “Who is going to let the new homeowner know about the issue?” he asks.

    Documents on the site are priced according to their relevance. Lissner notes that those who provide documents to the site will receive free access.

    Read the full story…


    Vegas Hi-Rise Not Earthquake Safe

    July 12, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    If an earthquake hit Las Vegas, the Harmon Tower would not withstand it. A report from Weidlinger Associates told MGM Resorts that “in a code-level earthquake, using either the permitted or current code specified loads, it is likely that critical structural members in the tower will fail and become incapable of supporting gravity loads, leading to a partial or complete collapse of the tower.” The inspection came at the request of county officials, according to the article in Forbes.

    According to Ronald Lynn, directory of the building division in the county’s development services division, “these deficiencies, in their current state, make the building uninhabitable.” The county is concerned about risks to adjacent buildings.

    MGM Resorts is currently in litigation, separate from the stability issues, with Perini Corp., the builders of Harmon Tower.

    Read the full story…


    A Call to Washington: Online Permitting Saves Money and the Environment

    October 28, 2011 — Douglas Reiser, Builders Counsel

    Here’s some good news for Oregon contractors:  Electronic Permitting is here. That’s right, no more standing in line with folders full of printed submittals and waiting all day for your permit. The click of a few buttons and you are in business. Great news, right? Unfortunately, Oregon isn’t sharing that celebration with Washington. So I say - why not?

    Last week, the State of Oregon released its new ePermitting online interface. The website allows contractors, owners and even local building departments to create an account, submit building plans and procure permits. With your account, you can track the progress of submissions, print documents and get posting information.

    The state ran a limited test version in the City of Florence since 2009, working out the kinks. Perhaps the most impressive result of the new system is that Oregon tackled the task of coagulating a local process into one central location.

    Read the full story...

    Reprinted courtesy of Douglas Reiser of Reiser Legal LLC. Mr. Reiser can be contacted at info@reiserlegal.com