BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    industrial building Paw Paw Michigan Subterranean parking Paw Paw Michigan casino resort Paw Paw Michigan townhome construction Paw Paw Michigan condominiums Paw Paw Michigan condominium Paw Paw Michigan office building Paw Paw Michigan multi family housing Paw Paw Michigan structural steel construction Paw Paw Michigan housing Paw Paw Michigan retail construction Paw Paw Michigan landscaping construction Paw Paw Michigan high-rise construction Paw Paw Michigan tract home Paw Paw Michigan mid-rise construction Paw Paw Michigan hospital construction Paw Paw Michigan custom home Paw Paw Michigan institutional building Paw Paw Michigan concrete tilt-up Paw Paw Michigan production housing Paw Paw Michigan custom homes Paw Paw Michigan Medical building Paw Paw Michigan
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Paw Paw, Michigan

    Michigan Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Article 24 of the Occupational Code dictates that a complaint against a builder must be filed with the Department of Consumer and Industry Service within 18 months of the completion, occupancy or purchase of a residence. If building official determines complaint has merit, "Notice to Respondent: sent to provide builder with opportunity to repair; additional administrative procedures follow to conclusion; Individual townships have local rules regarding properties; Example: Bloomfield has mandated that structures must meet ongoing minimum maintenance standards.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Paw Paw Michigan

    Residential contractors need to be licensed. License required for plumbing and electrical trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Jackson
    Local # 2344
    1815 E High St
    Jackson, MI 49203
    http://www.hbaofjacksonmichigan.com

    Builders and Remodelers Association of Greater Ann Arbor
    Local # 2304
    179 Little Lake Drive
    Ann Arbor, MI 48103
    http://www.hbawc.com

    Home Builders Association of Greater Kalamazoo
    Local # 2348
    5700 W Michigan Ave
    Kalamazoo, MI 49009
    http://www.kalamazoohomepage.com

    Battle Creek Associated Home Builders
    Local # 2312
    P.O. Box 2197
    Battle Creek, MI 49016
    http://www.bcahb.org/

    Home Builders Association of Livingston County
    Local # 2355
    132 E Grand River Ave
    Brighton, MI 48116
    http://www.hbalc.com

    Home Builders Association of Monroe County
    Local # 2366
    1645 N. Dixie Hwy
    Monroe, MI 48162
    http://www.hbamonroe.com

    Southwestern Michigan Home Builders Association
    Local # 2305
    107 W Ferry St
    Berrien Springs, MI 49103
    http://www.swmhba.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Paw Paw Michigan

    Mortar Insufficient to Insure Summary Judgment in Construction Defect Case

    Excess Carrier Successfully Appeals Primary Insurer’s Summary Judgment Award

    Construction Suit Ends with Just an Apology

    Defense for Additional Insured Not Barred By Sole Negligence Provision

    Insurers Reacting to Massachusetts Tornadoes

    Construction Defect Exception Does Not Lift Bar in Payment Dispute

    Judge Concludes Drywall Manufacturer Sold in Florida

    Construction Defect Not a RICO Case, Says Court

    Texas Construction Firm Files for Bankruptcy

    History of Defects Leads to Punitive Damages for Bankrupt Developer

    Important Information Regarding Colorado Mechanic’s Lien Rights.

    In Oregon Construction Defect Claims, “Contract Is (Still) King”

    Application of Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine Supports Coverage

    Construction Defect Notice in the Mailbox? Respond Appropriately

    Eleventh Circuit Asks Georgia Supreme Court if Construction Defects Are Caused by an "Occurrence"

    Florida “get to” costs do not constitute damages because of “property damage”

    Repair of Part May Necessitate Replacement of Whole

    New Washington Law Nixes Unfair Indemnification in Construction Contracts

    Are Construction Defects Covered by Your General Liability Policy?

    Construction Defect Litigation at San Diego’s Alicante Condominiums?

    Nevada Assembly Bill Proposes Changes to Construction Defect Litigation

    No Resulting Loss From Deck Collapsing Due to Rot

    No-Show Contractor Can’t Hide from Construction Defect Claim

    Homeowners Must Comply with Arbitration over Construction Defects

    One World Trade Center Due to Be America’s Tallest and World’s Priciest

    Houses Can Still Make Cents: Illinois’ Implied Warranty of Habitability

    Mississippi exclusions j(5) and j(6) “that particular part”

    Architect Not Responsible for Injuries to Guests

    Boston’s Tunnel Project Plagued by Water

    Loose Bolts Led to Sagging Roof in Construction Defect Claim

    After Construction Defect Case, Repairs to Austin Building

    Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause Bars Coverage for Landslide and Water Leak

    When Does a Claim Against an Insurance Carrier for Failing to Defend Accrue?

    Damage During Roof Repairs Account for Three Occurrences

    California Construction Bill Dies in Committee

    Construction Defect Claim Did Not Harm Homeowner, Court Rules

    No Coverage Under Ensuing Loss Provision

    Preparing For the Worst with Smart Books & Records

    Southern California Lost $8 Billion in Construction Wages

    Good Signs for Housing Market in 2013

    Allowing The Use Of a General Verdict Form in a Construction Defect Case Could Subject Your Client to Prejudgment Interest

    Colorado Senate Bill 12-181: 2012’s Version of a Prompt Pay Bill

    Will They Blow It Up?

    Colorado Court of Appeals Finds Damages to Non-Defective Property Arising From Defective Construction Covered Under Commercial General Liability Policy

    El Paso Increases Surety Bond Requirement on Contractors

    Court Grants Summary Judgment to Insurer in HVAC Defect Case

    Colorado Court of Appeals holds that insurance companies owe duty of prompt and effective communication to claimants and repair subcontractors

    Construction Workers Face Dangers on the Job

    Equipment Costs? It’s a Steal!

    Texas “Loser Pays” Law May Benefit Construction Insurers

    Federal District Court Predicts Florida Will Adopt Injury In Fact Trigger

    Seller Cannot Compel Arbitration for Its Role in Construction Defect Case<

    No Coverage For Damage Caused by Chinese Drywall

    Legislatures Shouldn’t Try to Do the Courts’ Job

    Former New York Governor to Head Construction Monitoring Firm

    Homeowner Loses Suit against Architect and Contractor of Resold Home

    Bad Faith and a Partial Summary Judgment in Seattle Construction Defect Case

    “Other Insurance” and Indemnity Provisions Determine Which Insurer Must Cover

    A Performance-Based Energy Code in Seattle: Will It Save Existing Buildings?

    Construction Law Alert: A Specialty License May Not Be Required If Work Covered By Another License

    Subcontractor Not Liable for Defending Contractor in Construction Defect Case

    Can We Compel Insurers To Cover Construction Defect in General Liability Policies?

    OSHA Cites Construction Firm for Safety Violations

    Construction Defects in Home a Breach of Contract

    Follow Up on Continental Western v. Shay Construction

    A Downside of Associational Standing - HOA's Claims Against Subcontractors Barred by Statute of Limitations

    Lawsuit over Construction Defects Not a Federal Case

    State Audit Questions College Construction Spending in LA

    Texas exclusions j(5) and j(6).

    The Colorado Court of Appeals Rules that a Statutory Notice of Claim Triggers an Insurer’s Duty to Defend.

    San Diego Construction Defect Claim Settled for $2.3 Million

    Gut Feeling Does Not Disqualify Expert Opinion

    Ensuing Loss Found Ambiguous, Allowing Coverage

    Nevada Budget Remains at Impasse over Construction Defect Law

    Flooded Courtroom May be Due to Construction Defect

    Arizona Supreme Court Confirms Eight-Year Limit on Construction Defect Lawsuits

    Instant Hotel Tower, But Is It Safe?

    Harmon Towers Duty to Defend Question Must Wait, Says Court

    Unit Owners Have No Standing to Sue under Condominium Association’s Policy

    Alabama “occurrence” and subcontractor work exception to the “your completed work” exclusion

    More Charges in Las Vegas HOA Scandal

    Contractor Sues Supplier over Defective Products

    Condo Owners Allege Construction Defects

    Contractor Manslaughter? Safety Shortcuts Are Not Worth It

    Australian Group Seeks Stronger Codes to Combat Dangerous Defects

    Vegas Hi-Rise Not Earthquake Safe

    Seven Tips to Manage Construction Defect Risk

    Hovnanian Increases Construction Defect Reserves for 2012

    New Safety Standards Issued by ASSE and ANSI

    2011 Worst Year Ever for Home Sales
    Corporate Profile

    PAW PAW MICHIGAN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Paw Paw, Michigan Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Paw Paw, Michigan

    MGM Seeks to Demolish Harmon Towers

    September 1, 2011 — CJD Staff

    Citing public safety concerns and the cost of repair, MGM Resorts International is seeking to demolish the unfinished hotel tower. The company has a few hurdles to go through before they start laying the charges to implode the structure. Any plans would have to be approved by not only Clark County officials, but also the district court has an order blocking any activity during litigation between MGM and the general contractor on the project, Perini Building Company.

    Architectural Record reports that MGM states it would take “approximately 18 months to conduct test and come up with an approved, permitted design to fix the Harmon.” MGM feels that repairs would then take another two to three years. Perini contends that they could “provide stamped drawings detailing all necessary repairs within three months.” They attribute MGM’s desire to demolish the building as “buyer’s remorse.”

    Read the full story…


    Micropiles for bad soil: a Tarheel victory

    March 14, 2011 — Original article by by Melissa Brumback on March 14, 2011

    Despite foundation challenges, construction is almost complete on the expansion at University of North Carolina’s Kenan stadium. The project started with a deep foundation system from design-build contractor GeoStructures. Known as the Carolina Student-Athlete Center for Excellence, the addition was built on a parcel with a knotty mix of fill soils, subsurface boulders and varying depths to rock. To achieve uniform foundation support, GeoStructures designed a Micropile system (also known as a Mini pile system) which could be drilled into the variable ground conditions.

    Read the full story...

    Reprinted courtesy of Melissa Brumback of Ragsdale Liggett PLLC. Ms. Brumback can be contacted at mbrumback@rl law.com.


    Hospital Construction Firm Settles Defect Claim for $1.1 Million

    September 13, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Law360 reports that Bovis Lend Lease has settled claims of $10 million in damages for $1.1 million. Bovis was building three annexes to a hospital in Oklahoma. The hospital alleged that a faulty moisture barrier system lead to damage throughout the hospital.

    Bovis is a division of the Lend Lease Group, a multinational construction firm based Sydney, Australia.

    Read the full story…


    Defense for Additional Insured Not Barred By Sole Negligence Provision

    August 11, 2011 — Tred Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    A general contractor was entitled to a defense as an additional insured when the underlying complaint did not allege it was solely negligent. A-1 Roofing Co. v. Navigators Ins. Co., 2011 Ill. App. LEXIS 656 (Ill. Ct. App. June 24, 2011).

    A-1 was the general contractor for a roof resurfacing job at a high school. Jack Frost Iron Works Inc. (“Frost”) was one of A-1’s subcontractors. Frost had a CGL policy with Navigators Insurance Company under which A-1 was an additional insured.

    An employee of Frost’s subcontractor Midwest Sheet Metal Inc. was killed at the job site when a boom-lift he was operating flipped over. The boom-lift had been leased by another Frost subcontractor, Bakes Steel Erectors, Inc. (BSE). The deceased's estate filed suit against A-1, BSE and two other defendants.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    South Carolina “occurrence” and allocation

    September 1, 2011 — CDCoverage.com

    In Crossman Communities of North Carolina, Inc. v. Harleysville Mutual Insurance Co., No. 26909 (S.C. Aug. 22, 2011), insured Crossman was the developer and general contractor of several condominium projects constructed by Crossman’s subcontractors over multiple years. After completion, Crossman was sued by homeowners alleging negligent construction of exterior components resulting in moisture penetration property damage to non-defective components occurring during multiple years.  Crossman settled the underlying lawsuit and then filed suit against its CGL insurers to recover the settlement amount.  Crossman settled with all of the insurers except for Harleysville.  Crossman and Harleysville stipulated that the only coverage issue was whether there was an “occurrence.”  The trial court subsequently entered judgment in favor of Crossman, determining that there was an “occurrence.” The trial court also ruled that Harleysville was liable for the entire settlement amount without offset for the amounts paid by the other insurers.  

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of CDCoverage.com


    New Construction Laws, New Forms in California

    July 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    New construction laws came into effect in California on July 1. Writing for the Martindale-Hubble Legal Library, Glenn Mau, J. Michael McGuire, and John Tonsing, all of Archer Norris, discuss these changes. They note that the most important part of the changes to California construction law is that “all mechanics liens, stop notices and bond claims recorded after July 1, 2012 must use the new standardized forms and follow the new definitions, notice prerequisites and statutory release form language.”

    Read the full story…


    Granting Stay, Federal Court Reviews Construction Defect Coverage in Hawaii

    January 6, 2012 — Tred Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    The federal district court ultimately stayed a construction defect case, but offered comments on the current status of coverage disputes for such defects in Hawaii. See National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Simpson Mfg. Co., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128481(D. Haw. Nov. 7, 2011).

    National Union filed a complaint for declaratory relief to establish it had no duty to defend or to indemnify Simpson Manufacturing Company in four actions pending in the Hawaii state courts. The state court actions concerned allegedly defective hurricane strap tie hold downs that were manufactured and sold by Simpson. The hurricane ties allegedly began to prematurely corrode and rust, causing cracking, spalling and other damage to homes.

    National Union contended the underlying allegations did not constitute "property damage" caused by an "occurrence," as defined in the policies.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Florida “get to” costs do not constitute damages because of “property damage”

    August 11, 2011 — CDCoverage.com

    In Palm Beach Grading, Inc. v. Nautilus Ins. Co., No. 10-12821 (11th Cir. July 14, 2011), claimant general contractor Palm Beach Grading (?PBG?) subcontracted with insured A-1 for construction of a sewer line for the project.   A-1 abandoned its work and PBG hired another subcontractor to complete construction of the sewer line.   The new subcontractor discovered that A-1?s work was defective requiring repair and replacement of portions of the sewer line which also required the destruction and replacement of surrounding work.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of CDCoverage.com


    Florida County Suspends Impact Fees to Spur Development

    November 18, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Hernando County, just north of Tampa on Florida’s west coast, has suspended impact fees for a year, hoping to spur development. Hernando Today reports that the move drew applause from the audience at the county commissioners meeting. Many of those in attendance were builders or members of the Greater Hernando Chamber of Commerce.

    Not all were convinced. Frankie Burnett, the mayor of Brooksville, told the commissioners that his city council were not convinced that this would spur development. “Development should pay its fair share, even in slow economic times.” Burnett’s letter to the board warned that “if lowering impact fees succeeded in stimulating more residential overbuilding, it would only further depress the current real estate market.”

    Read the full story…


    No Coverage For Damage Caused by Chinese Drywall

    October 28, 2011 — Tred Eyerley, Insurance Law Hawaii

    The pollution exclusion barred coverage for alleged property damage and bodily injury in Evanston Ins. Co. v. Harbor Walk Dev., LLC, No. 2:10cv312 (E.D. Va. Sept. 9, 2011).

    Homeowners sued the insured, Harbor Walk, in three lawsuits, alleging the Chinese drywall installed in their homes emitted sulfides and other noxious gases. This caused corrosion and damage to the air-conditioning and ventilation units, refrigeration coils, copper tubing, faucets, metal surfaces, electrical appliances and other personal items. The homeowners also alleged the compounds emitted by the drywall caused bodily injury, such as allergic reactions, headaches, etc.

    Harbor Walk’s insurer, Evanston, filed for a declaratory judgment that the pollution exclusion precluded coverage.

    Read the full story...

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Construction Job Opening Rise in October

    December 20, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    There was a significant increase in the number of open construction jobs during October, according to a report for the National Association of Home Builders. Working from preliminary data provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the NAHB said that the number of open positions reached “levels and rates last seen in 2007.” As the data is still preliminary, the NAHB noted that the conclusions should be taken with caution.

    While there was a spike in job openings, the hiring of people to fill these positions hasn’t caught up with it, and there was a small decline in hires. But to return to the good news, there was also a drop in layoffs in that same period.

    Through October, about 8,000 people have been hired in the construction sector. The NAHB notes that this does not correspond with the recent increases with home construction. They suggest that “it may be the case that startups in the home building and remodeling sectors are being missed by the establishment survey.” Another possibility they raise is that already-employed construction workers are simply working more hours.

    Read the full story…


    Nevada Construction Defect Lawyers Dead in Possible Suicides

    March 28, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    A number of news sources have reported on the recent death of Nevada construction defect attorney, Nancy Quon. Ms. Quon was implicated in a recent scandal in which a group conspired to control homeowner associations in order to divert construction defect lawsuits to the members of the conspiracy.

    Ms. Quon was found dead in her bathtub. The details are still under investigations. She and her boyfriend were accused of a failed arson/suicide scheme in 2010. Ms. Quon survived an attempt to burn down her home. Subsequently, her boyfriend obtained some gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GBH) for her, as part of another failed suicide attempt.

    Subsequent to Ms. Quon’s death, David Amesbury was found in California dead by hanging. Mr. Amesbury took a plea deal in the case, and he had admitted his role in providing legal and construction contracts to firms in the conspiracy. He was accused of fixing HOA elections.

    Read the full story…

    Read the full story…

    Read the full story…

    Read the full story…


    South Carolina Contractors Regain General Liability Coverage

    May 20, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    PR Newswire reports that the Carolinas Associated General Contractors (CAGC) have successfully persuaded the South Carolina legislature to pass a bill restoring commercial general liability (CGL) coverage. Governor Nikki Hartley signed the legislation on May 17.

    A South Carolina Supreme Court decision given on January 7, 2011, had ended commercial general liability coverage in the state. Senate Bill 431 addressed this decision, restoring the ability of home builders to obtain CGL coverage.

    PR Newswire quotes South Carolina homebuilder, Allen Amsler: “We have seen a lot of legislation with substantial impact to our business over the years. However, I would place this in the same level of importance with the original tort reform legislation. The effects of the Supreme Court’s ruling could have been catastrophic to our industry in South Carolina had it not been for this bill. Thanks to all those in the House, Senate and the Governor’s office who assisted us.”

    Read the full story…


    Tampa Condo Owners Allege Defects

    October 23, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Owners in the Bel Mare towers have filed a lawsuit alleging that the building have construction defects that could lead to problems during periods with high winds. The Tampa Bay Business Journal reports that the condo association has sued the developer, the general contractor, the architects, the structural engineers, and subcontractors.

    Read the full story…


    Remodels Replace Construction in Redding

    September 9, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    The Record Searchlight reports that while new construction is down in Redding, California, residential and commercial remodel permits are up 17 percent. By August 2010, there had been 63 housing and commercial business starts in Redding, while this year has seen only 15.

    One such remodel, that of Parkview Market, will cost about $201,000. Safeway is planning on two $80,000 remodels of its grocery stores in Redding. In all, the 150 building permits for remodels are worth a total of $2.8 million.

    Read the full story…


    Background Owner of Property Cannot Be Compelled to Arbitrate Construction Defects

    November 7, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    In Truppi v. Pasco Engineering, John Quattro sued Property Management Contractors, Inc. over construction defects in William Truppi’s home. All parties are named in the suit. The California Court of Appeals ruled that Property Management Contractors, Inc. (PMCI) could not compel Mr. Quattro to arbitration.

    The background of the case involves two houses built in Encinitas, California by PCMI: one for Mr. Truppi at 560 Neptune, and one for Mr. Quattro at 566 Neptune. Both contracts contained an arbitration provision. Mr. Quattro signed the contract for his residence and Mr. Truppi signed the other. Mr. Quattro then sued PCMI and its principal, William Gregory. Mr. Quattro claimed to be the true contracting party for the 560 Neptune residence and a third party beneficiary of the contract Mr. Truppi signed, and stated that PCMI was aware of this.

    PCMI in a demurrer stated that Quattro “had only a ‘prospective beneficial interest in the property upon its eventual sale or lease.’” Mr. Quattro amended his complaint to account for the issues raised by PCMI. The court rejected PCMI’s demurrer to the amended complaint.

    Finally, PCMI and Gregory asserted that Quattro was “not the real party in interest” and could not sue. PCMI continues to assert that Quattro lacks standing, but their attorney sent Quattro an e-mail stating, “While my client disputes that you are a party, and that you lack standing to assert the claim, to the extent you do so I believe you are obligated to proceed by way of arbitration.”

    The court did not cover the issue of Quattro’s standing in the case, only if he could be compelled to arbitration. The court affirmed the lower court’s finding that Quattro could not be compelled to arbitrate the construction defect claim as neither he nor Gregory signed the contract in an individual capacity. Further, the court noted that PCMI and Gregory “denied the existence of an agreement between themselves and Quattro on the 560 contract,” and cannot compel arbitration on a non-existent agreement. And while non-signatories can, in some situations be compelled to arbitrate, the court found that “these cases are inapplicable because here they seek to have the alleged third party beneficiary (Quattro) compelled by a nonsignatory (Gregory).” The arbitration clause in question “expressly limited its application to persons or entities that signed the 560 contract.”

    As Mr. Quattro was not a signatory to that agreement, the court found that he could not be held to its arbitration provision.

    Read the court’s decision…


    Nevada Senate Rejects Construction Defect Bill

    June 7, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    The Las Vegas Sun reports that Assembly Bill 401, the construction defect bill, lost in a vote of 9 to 12. The measure extended the time for construction defect suits to be filed, awarded legal costs only to successful plaintiffs, and set a definition of construction defects. Two Democrats joined the Republicans in the Senate in defeating the bill.

    Read the full story…


    Crane Dangles and So Do Insurance Questions

    November 7, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Hurricane Sandy sent a construction crane dangling from the top of One57, a condo construction project in New York City. In response to the risk, the nearby Parker Meridian and other nearby buildings were evacuated until the crane could be stabilized. Businessweek reports that One57 involves “a tangle of companies,” including the developer, Extell Development and the contractor, Lend Lease Construction. Pinnacle Industries was responsible for providing and operating the crane.

    The insurance claims are yet to be made, but they will likely include the costs of evacuating nearby buildings and to cover any damage to the building itself. David DeLaRue, a vice president in construction practice at Willis Group Holdings said there would be two questions: “Did our insured do anything to cause that loss? Does this policy cover it?”

    Read the full story…