BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom home expert witness Anaheim California concrete tilt-up expert witness Anaheim California casino resort expert witness Anaheim California multi family housing expert witness Anaheim California custom homes expert witness Anaheim California mid-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California production housing expert witness Anaheim California parking structure expert witness Anaheim California housing expert witness Anaheim California hospital construction expert witness Anaheim California low-income housing expert witness Anaheim California retail construction expert witness Anaheim California condominium expert witness Anaheim California Medical building expert witness Anaheim California Subterranean parking expert witness Anaheim California tract home expert witness Anaheim California townhome construction expert witness Anaheim California structural steel construction expert witness Anaheim California institutional building expert witness Anaheim California office building expert witness Anaheim California industrial building expert witness Anaheim California condominiums expert witness Anaheim California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211
    http://www.desertchapter.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501


    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biasc.org

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biaoc.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Baldy View Chapter
    Local # 0532
    8711 Monroe Ct Ste B
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
    http://www.biabuild.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - LA/Ventura Chapter
    Local # 0532
    28460 Ave Stanford Ste 240
    Santa Clarita, CA 91355


    Building Industry Association Southern California - Building Industry Association of S Ca Antelope Valley
    Local # 0532
    44404 16th St W Suite 107
    Lancaster, CA 93535



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Anaheim California
    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately 5000 construction and design related expert designations, the Anaheim, California Construction Expert Directory provides a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to builders and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides building related litigation support and expert witness services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Employing in house resources which comprise testifying architects, design engineers, construction cost and standard of care experts, the construction experts group brings national experience and local capabilities to Anaheim and the surrounding areas.

    Anaheim California construction expert witness consultantAnaheim California architecture expert witnessAnaheim California engineering expert witnessAnaheim California expert witness commercial buildingsAnaheim California hospital construction expert witnessAnaheim California civil engineering expert witnessAnaheim California construction expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    Navigating Timelines and Technology: Patent Strategies for Space and Earth

    June 01, 2026 —
    More than half a century after the Apollo 11 landing fulfilled President John F. Kennedy’s bold vision, the global race back to the Moon is no longer theoretical. With renewed attention on NASA’s Artemis program and a surge of commercial investment in space infrastructure, lunar exploration is again shaping technology priorities here on Earth. Reprinted courtesy of Kate Nuehring Su, Engineering News-Record and Vanessa Wang, Engineering News-Record Read the full story...
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Jurisdiction Over Foreign Manufacturers in Construction Litigation

    May 14, 2026 —
    A recent decision from the Washington Court of Appeals provides important guidance on personal jurisdiction over foreign product manufacturers in construction and infrastructure litigation. In King County v. Aquatherm GmbH, No. 85572-7-I (Wash.Ct. App.Div.I)(unpublished), the court addressed whether a German manufacturer could be sued in Washington for alleged defects in piping used in major public infrastructure projects. The ruling offers a detailed, fact-driven roadmap for how Washington courts evaluate jurisdiction over foreign manufacturers operating through layered distribution networks. It also reflects a broader trend toward focusing on real-world commercial conduct rather than formal corporate structure. Background of the Case King County sued after widespread failures in polypropylene piping installed at the King County Correctional Facility. The pipe, manufactured by Aquatherm GmbH in Germany, was marketed, distributed, and installed through a network of U.S.-based entities. Following a six-week trial, the jury returned a verdict exceeding $18 million on claims under the Washington Product Liability Act and Consumer Protection Act. Aquatherm challenged, among other things, the trial court's exercise of personal jurisdiction. Reprinted courtesy of Timothy J. Repass, Wood Smith Henning Berman and Miki J. Saito, Wood Smith Henning Berman Mr. Repass may be contacted at trepass@wshblaw.com Ms. Saito may be contacted at msaito@wshblaw.com Read the full story...

    How AEC Firms Move AI Beyond the Pilot

    July 27, 2026 —
    Most AEC firms can run an AI pilot, but few can scale it. Enthusiasm for a first experiment rarely extends beyond the pilot team, leaving the pilot as an isolated win that never changes how the company works. In a recent AEC Business Podcast episode, Adeline Chan, CEO and co-founder of Hong Kong-based AAL Innovation, explained why that gap exists and what separates the firms that close it from those that stall. The Pilot Mindset that Holds Construction Back Adeline draws a sharp contrast between finance and construction. Banks cannot afford to fall behind their competitors, so they pilot constantly, sometimes running hundreds of proof-of-concept teams in parallel and letting them compete internally to identify the approach that works. The winning concept becomes the standard and scales across the organization, and the return on investment is measured in undeniable numbers. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Beyond the Storm: How Non-Hurricane Catastrophes Expose Florida’s Construction Defect Blind Spot

    August 11, 2026 —
    On June 8, 2026, a magnitude 6.1 earthquake struck the Gulf near the coast of Cuba, the largest instrumentally recorded earthquake in the Gulf since seismic monitoring began in 1950. Buildings swayed, offices were evacuated, and many residents along the east coast of Florida, from Miami-Dade to Jacksonville, felt the ground shake. Although no tsunami followed and reported structural damage was limited, this event exposed a blind spot that Florida property owners, developers, and their counsel cannot afford to ignore: catastrophic stress on Florida buildings does not always come in the form of a named storm. Florida property owners have grown accustomed to preparing for wind, storm surge, floods, and torrential rain. Far less attention is paid to earthquakes, sinkholes, tornadoes, hail, and non-tropical flooding, each of which can place unexpected stress on buildings not designed with those forces top of mind and can trigger deficiencies in buildings that were not otherwise known, expose design failures, and create an urgency for both insurance claims and subsequent litigation. Non-Hurricane Triggers of Latent Defects Seismic activity is the clearest example. Florida’s building code accounts for wind loads, not seismic forces, meaning even a moderate earthquake can reveal weaknesses in curtain wall systems, structural connections, or foundations that were already marginal. Sinkholes, driven by Florida’s karst limestone geology, remain a persistent threat, particularly in Central Florida, where subsurface voids can undermine foundations without warning. Non-tropical flooding, like the record rainfall that flooded South Florida in June 2024, can intrude through building envelopes and waterproofing systems that were never stress-tested for such volumes of water. Tornadoes and hail, while more localized, can cause roofing and envelope failures that mimic, mask, or trigger latent construction defects. The Litigation and Coverage Disputes That Follow When one of these events strikes a building already carrying undisclosed or unresolved construction defects, the resulting disputes become considerably more complex. Property owners and associations must move quickly to document existing conditions and distinguish damage caused by the event from pre-existing defective construction, the same causation issue that arises in the hurricane context under Chapter 558, but often without the benefit of established precedent or adjuster experience with these less common events. Insurance coverage disputes frequently follow close behind. Carriers may dispute whether an earthquake, flood, or other peril is covered at all, particularly where policies contain earthquake or flood exclusions requiring separate endorsements, or anti-concurrent causation language that can bar coverage entirely when a covered peril combines with an uncovered one, such as pre-existing defective construction, to cause a loss. Sinkhole claims carry their own statutory framework under Florida law, requiring specific testing protocols and reporting before a claim is compensable. Developers and contractors, in turn, may find themselves defending Chapter 558 claims while simultaneously litigating with their own carriers over defense and indemnity obligations. Practical Risk Mitigation Strategies Property owners, associations, and developers can take several concrete steps to reduce their exposure. First, maintain thorough documentation, including engineering reports, maintenance logs, and photographs, well before any event occurs. This documentation is often the deciding factor in causation disputes. Second, engage structural engineers and consultants immediately following any seismic event, unusual flooding, or storm damage, regardless of whether a hurricane is involved. Prompt inspection preserves evidence and can help prevent inadvertent waiver of construction defect claims. Third, review insurance policies regularly with counsel or a broker to confirm earthquake, flood, and sinkhole coverage matches the property’s actual risk profile, rather than assuming a standard property policy responds to every peril. Fourth, avoid rushing to remediate before conditions are documented and/or before consulting counsel. Well-intentioned repairs can inadvertently compromise evidence needed to prove a defect claim. The June earthquake was a reminder that Florida’s catastrophic risk profile extends beyond hurricane season. Property owners, associations, and developers who build readiness plans around all forms of catastrophic stress, not just named storms, will be far better positioned when the next unexpected event occurs. Franchesco “Frank” Soto is a partner in Ball Janik’s Construction Defect Practice Group in Miami. He may be reached at fsoto@balljanik.com. Amanda L. Gonzalez is a litigation attorney in Ball Janik’s Construction Defect Practice Group in Miami. She may be reached at agonzalez@balljanik.com.

    SDNY Ruling Highlights Privilege Risks in Client Use of Generative AI

    March 03, 2026 —
    Artificial intelligence is quickly becoming a go‑to tool for aggregating and summarizing large volumes of data, formulating and testing arguments, and even sketching litigation strategies. But a recent ruling from the Southern District of New York serves as a stark warning: when clients turn to generative AI for legal strategy, they may be unknowingly turning privileged information over to a third party and then creating documents that may later be discoverable in litigation. In a closely watched bench decision, Judge Rakoff ruled that AI‑generated documents created by the target of a criminal investigation using Anthropic’s Claude were not privileged despite being generated with information learned from his attorneys to support his potential legal defense and then shared with his counsel. The decision highlights the unresolved and increasingly consequential intersection of AI, privilege, and discovery. Facts Bradley Heppner received a grand jury subpoena and hired attorneys at Quinn Emanuel to represent him. After learning he was a target of the investigation, but before he was arrested, he created 31 documents with Claude using information from his attorneys to outline a potential defense strategy. He was later arre
    Independent Contractor v. Employee. The “ABC Test” Does Not Include a Threshold Hiring Entity Test

    CC&Rs Not the Place for Arbitration Agreement, Court Rules

    Court Makes an Unsettling Inference to Find that the Statute of Limitations Bars Claims Arising from a 1997 Northridge Earthquake Settlement

    With No Evidence of COVID-19 Being Present, DC Trial Court Finds No Claim for Business Interruption

    Retainage on Pennsylvania Public Contracts

    Pa. Contractor Pleads No Contest to Prevailing-Wage Charges, Pays Workers $20.7M

    Strategic Implementation of AI in AEC

    Illinois Appellate Court Address the Scope of the Term “Resident” in Homeowners Policy

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Give a Little Extra …”

    Delay Matters: Florida’s Fourth DCA Reverses Hurricane Irma Dismissal

    New 2021 ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey Standards Effective February 23, 2021

    Home Prices in 20 U.S. Cities Rose at Faster Pace in January

    NY Pay-to-Play Charges Dropped Against LPCiminelli Executive As Another Pleads Guilty

    U.S. Supreme Court Limits the Powers of the Nation’s Bankruptcy Courts

    Construction Firm Sues Town over Claims of Building Code Violations

    Verdict In Favor Of Insured Homeowner Reversed For Improper Jury Instructions

    Europe’s Satellites Could Help Catch the Next Climate Disaster

    Will European Insurers’ Positive Response to COVID-19 Claims Influence US Insurers?

    Substitutions On a Construction Project — A Specification Writer Responds

    New York Considering Legislation That Would Create Statute of Repose For Construction

    Employee or Independent Contractor? New Administrator’s Interpretation Issued by Department of Labor Provides Guidance

    New Jersey Court Adopts Continuous Trigger for Construction Defect Claims

    To Arbitrate or Not to Arbitrate? That is the Question

    Claim for Collapse After Demolition of Building Fails

    Inspired by Filipino Design, an Apartment Building Looks Homeward

    Damp Weather Not Good for Wood

    Hawaii Supreme Court Finds Subcontractor Has No Duty to Defend Under Indemnity Provision

    Applying Mighty Midgets, NY Court Awards Legal Expenses to Insureds Which Defeated Insurer’s Coverage Claims

    Kahana Feld LLP Senior Attorney Rachael Marvin and Partner Dominic Donato Obtain Complete Dismissal of Plaintiff’s Labor Law Claims on Summary Judgment

    Decline in Home Construction Brings Down Homebuilder Stocks

    Client Alert: Michigan Insurance Company Not Subject to Personal Jurisdiction in California for Losses Suffered in Arkansas

    Homeowner Who Wins Case Against Swimming Pool Contractor Gets a Splash of Cold Water When it Comes to Attorneys’ Fees

    Construction Industry Survey Says Optimism Hits All-Time High

    Sometimes You Get Away with Unwritten Contracts. . .

    California Trial Court Clarifies Application of SB800 Roofing Standards and Expert’s Opinions

    How to Document Changes and Preserve Claims Without Starting a Fight

    Sobering Facts for Construction Safety Day

    Five "Boilerplate" Terms to Negotiate in Your Next Subcontract

    Understanding the Real Estate and Tax Implications of Florida's Buyer Ban Law

    Just When You Thought General Contractors Were Necessary Parties. . .

    Will COVID-19 Permanently Shift the Balance between Work from Home and the Workplace?

    General Commercial Liability Coverage Depends on Facts - Not Labels

    Shoring of Problem Girders at Salesforce Transit Center Taking Longer than Expected

    Owner’s Obligation Giving Notice to Cure to Contractor and Analyzing Repair Protocol

    How BIM Helps Make Buildings Safer

    COVID-19 Is Not Direct Physical Loss Or Damage

    U.S. Stocks Fluctuate Near Record After Housing Data

    Condominium Exclusion Bars Coverage for Construction Defect

    City of Seattle Temporarily Shuts Down Public Works to Enforce Health and Safety Plans

    Wendel Rosen’s Construction Practice Group Receives “Tier 1” Ranking by U.S. News and World Reports

    Do We Need Blockchain in Construction?

    Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell Recognized in 2024 Best Law Firm® Rankings

    Amendments to California Insurance Code to Require Enhanced Claims Handling Requirements for Claims Arising Out Of Catastrophic Events

    California Court of Appeal Affirms Trial Court’s Denial of anti-SLAPP Motion in Dispute Over Construction of Church Facilities

    Court Requires Adherence to “Good Faith and Fair Dealing” in Construction Defect Coverage

    Just When You Thought the Green Building Risk Discussion Was Over. . .

    UCP Buys Citizen Homes

    Quick Note: Liability Insurer’s Duty to Defend and Duty to Indemnify

    No Coverage for Faulty Installation of Windows

    On Rehearing, Fifth Circuit Finds Contractual-Liability Exclusion Does Not Apply

    From Both Sides Now: Looking at Contracts Through a Post-Pandemic Lens

    Miller Act Statute of Limitations and Equitable Tolling

    Concrete Worker Wins Lawsuit and Settles with Other Defendant

    Insureds’ Altering Dates for Hailstorm Damage Justifies Denial of Claim

    Personal Guarantor Cannot Escape a Personal Guarantee By…

    Independent Contractor v. Employee. The “ABC Test” Does Not Include a Threshold Hiring Entity Test

    Challenging and Defending a California Public Works Stop Payment Notice: Affidavit vs. Counter-Affidavit Process

    JPMorgan Blamed for ‘Zombie’ Properties in Miami Lawsuit

    ALERT: COVID-19 / Coronavirus-Related Ransomware and Phishing Attacks

    Colorado Supreme Court Rules that Developers Retain Perpetual Control over Construction Defect Covenants

    Georgia Federal Court Says Fact Questions Exist As To Whether Nitrogen Is An “Irritant” or “Contaminant” As Used in Pollution Exclusion

    Cameron Pledges to Double Starter Homes to Boost Supply

    Newmeyer & Dillion Attorney Casey Quinn Selected to the 2017 Mountain States Super Lawyers Rising Stars List

    The 2021 Top 50 Construction Law Firms™

    Is Ohio’s Buckeye Lake Dam Safe?

    Builders Support Most of Bipartisan Housing Reform Bill in Congress

    Tesla Finishes First Solar Roofs—Including Elon's House

    Research Project Underway to Prepare Water Utilities for Wildfire Events

    Congratulations to Partner Alex Giannetto for Being Named to San Diego Business Journal’s Top 100 Leaders in Law List

    Florida Death Toll Rises by Three, Reaching 27 as Search Resumes

    Mitsui Fudosan Said to Consider Rebuilding Tilted Apartments

    'Right to Repair' and Fixing Equipment in a Digital Age

    CDJ’s #5 Topic of the Year: Beacon Residential Community Association v. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, et al.

    School District Practice Bulletin: Loose Lips Can Sink More Than Ships

    No Duty to Defend under Homeowner's Policy Where No Occurrence, No Property Damage

    Indemnity Provision Provides Relief to Contractor; Additional Insured Provision Does Not

    Tenth Circuit Reverses District Court's Ruling that Contractor Entitled to a Defense

    Struggling Astaldi Announces Defaults on Florida Highway Contracts

    Here's How Much You Can Make by Renting Out Your Home

    Massive Wildfire Near Boulder, Colo., Destroys Nearly 1,000 Homes and Businesses