BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    multi family housing Burnett Wisconsin custom homes Burnett Wisconsin tract home Burnett Wisconsin Subterranean parking Burnett Wisconsin office building Burnett Wisconsin Medical building Burnett Wisconsin mid-rise construction Burnett Wisconsin housing Burnett Wisconsin parking structure Burnett Wisconsin condominium Burnett Wisconsin production housing Burnett Wisconsin landscaping construction Burnett Wisconsin townhome construction Burnett Wisconsin retail construction Burnett Wisconsin concrete tilt-up Burnett Wisconsin hospital construction Burnett Wisconsin custom home Burnett Wisconsin structural steel construction Burnett Wisconsin casino resort Burnett Wisconsin industrial building Burnett Wisconsin condominiums Burnett Wisconsin institutional building Burnett Wisconsin
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Burnett, Wisconsin

    Wisconsin Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB448 specifies 90 day notice with details and evidence prior to commencing legal action. It provides for a 15 day written response from contractor or 25 days if cross-claims against subcontractors; The law states “The claimant and contractor or supplier are bound by any contractor or supplier warranty terms pertaining to products or services supplied for the dwelling.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Burnett Wisconsin

    Contractors are required to have the correct credentials for their trade. Not all classifications require credentialing. For a list of credentials, see the website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Mid Wisconsin Home Builders Association
    Local # 5181
    PO Box 865
    Portage, WI 53901
    http://www.mwhba.org/

    Sheboygan Cty Home Builders Association
    Local # 5159
    435 E Mill Street
    Plymouth, WI 53073
    http://www.schba.org

    Home Builders Association of Fond Du Lac & Dodge Cos
    Local # 5116
    490 W Rolling Meadows Dr
    Fond Du Lac, WI 54937
    http://www.homebuildersfdldodge.com

    La Crosse Area Builders Association
    Local # 5126
    816 2nd Ave S
    Onalaska, WI 54650
    http://www.labaonline.com

    Wisconsin Builders Association (State)
    Local # 5100
    4868 High Crossing Blvd
    Madison, WI 53704
    http://www.wisbuild.org

    Mid-Shore Home Builders Association Affil w/National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 5150
    PO Box 125 2104 Mary Ave
    New Holstein, WI 53061
    http://midshoreshomebuilders.com

    Metro Builders Association of Gr Milwaukee
    Local # 5148
    N16 W23321 Stoneridge Dr
    Waukesha, WI 53188
    http://www.mbaonline.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Burnett Wisconsin

    Construction Workers Unearth Bones

    Court Will Not Compel Judge to Dismiss Construction Defect Case

    District Court’s Ruling Affirmed in TCD v American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

    Changes to Arkansas Construction and Home Repair Laws

    Town Files Construction Lawsuit over Dust

    California Lawyer Gives How-To on Pursuing a Construction Defect Claim

    Lien Claimant’s Right to Execute against Bond Upheld in Court of Appeals

    Florida Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Homeowners Unaware of Construction Defects and Lack of Permits

    Bill Seeks to Protect Legitimate Contractors

    New Apartment Tower on the Rise in Seattle

    Equipment Costs? It’s a Steal!

    Ohio Court Finds No Coverage for Construction Defect Claims

    Granting Stay, Federal Court Reviews Construction Defect Coverage in Hawaii

    Condominium Communities Must Complete Construction Defect Repairs, Says FHA

    Insurer Rejects Claim on Dolphin Towers

    Consulting Firm Indicted and Charged with Falsifying Concrete Reports

    Preparing For the Worst with Smart Books & Records

    Ghost Employees Steal Jobs from Legit Construction Firms

    Insurance Company Must Show that Lead Came from Building Materials

    Fifth Circuit Reverses Insurers’ Summary Judgment Award Based on "Your Work" Exclusion

    Houses Can Still Make Cents: Illinois’ Implied Warranty of Habitability

    General Contractor/Developer May Not Rely on the Homeowner Protection Act to Avoid a Waiver of Consequential Damages in an AIA Contract

    The Flood Insurance Reform Act May be Extended to 2016

    Preparing for Trial on a Cause of Action for Violation of Civil Code section 895, et seq.

    Contractor Sues Supplier over Defective Products

    Construction Defects Lead to Demolition

    Limiting Plaintiffs’ Claims to a Cause of Action for Violation of SB-800

    Australian Developer Denies Building Problems Due to Construction Defects

    Nevada Supreme Court Reverses Decision against Grader in Drainage Case

    Contractor Manslaughter? Safety Shortcuts Are Not Worth It

    Arizona Court of Appeals Decision in $8.475 Million Construction Defect Class Action Suit

    Ensuing Loss Provision Does Not Salvage Coverage

    Massachusetts Couple Seek to Recuse Judge in Construction Defect Case

    Bar to Raise on Green Standard

    Time to Repair Nevada’s Construction Defect Laws?

    Instant Hotel Tower, But Is It Safe?

    Ensuing Loss Provision Found Ambiguous

    Park District Sues over Leaky Roof

    Destruction of Construction Defect Evidence Leads to Sanctions against Plaintiff

    In Oregon Construction Defect Claims, “Contract Is (Still) King”

    Cogently Written Opinion Finds Coverage for Loss Caused By Defective Concrete

    Contractor’s Home Not Covered for Construction Defects

    Gilroy Homeowners Sue over Leaky Homes

    Harsh New Time Limits on Construction Defect Claims

    Federal District Court Continues to Find Construction Defects do Not Arise From An Occurrence

    Mark Van Wonterghem To Serve as Senior Forensic Consultant in the Sacramento Offices of Bert L. Howe & Associates, Inc.

    Another Guilty Plea In Nevada Construction Defect Fraud Case

    West Hollywood Building: Historic Building May Be Defective

    Damron Agreement Questioned in Colorado Casualty Insurance v Safety Control Company, et al.

    Alaska Supreme Court Dismisses Claims of Uncooperative Pro Se Litigant in Defect Case

    2011 West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar – Recap

    History of Defects Leads to Punitive Damages for Bankrupt Developer

    Ensuing Losses From Faulty Workmanship Must be Covered

    OSHA Cites Construction Firm for Safety Violations

    Ninety-Day Extension Denied to KB Home in Construction Defect Insurance Claim

    Gut Feeling Does Not Disqualify Expert Opinion

    Subcontractor Not Liable for Defending Contractor in Construction Defect Case

    Contract Not So Clear in South Carolina Construction Defect Case

    Injured Construction Worker Settles for Five Hundred Thousand

    North Carolina Exclusion j(6) “That Particular Part”

    The Complete and Accepted Work Doctrine and Construction Defects

    Steps to Defending against Construction Defect Lawsuits

    No Coverage for Counterclaim Alleging Construction Defects Pled as Breach of Contract

    California Supreme Court Finds Associations Bound by Member Arbitration Clauses

    BUILD Act Inching Closer To Reality

    Court Requires Adherence to “Good Faith and Fair Dealing” in Construction Defect Coverage

    San Diego Construction Defect Claim Settled for $2.3 Million

    Mandatory Arbitration Provision Upheld in Construction Defect Case

    The Ever-Growing Thicket Of California Civil Code Section 2782

    Lockton Expands Construction and Design Team

    Insurer Beware: Failure to Defend Ends with Hefty Verdict

    Lawsuit over Construction Defects Not a Federal Case

    Florida Property Bill Passes Economic Affairs Committee with Amendments

    Association May Not Make Claim Against Builder in Vermont Construction Defect Case

    After Breaching its Duty to Defend, Insurer Must Indemnify

    Florida County Suspends Impact Fees to Spur Development

    Insurance Policy Provides No Coverage For Slab Collapse in Vision One

    Plaintiffs In Construction Defect Cases to Recover For Emotional Damages?

    Building Inspector Jailed for Taking Bribes

    “Other Insurance” and Indemnity Provisions Determine Which Insurer Must Cover

    Retaining Wall Contractor Not Responsible for Building Damage

    Arizona Court of Appeals Rules Issues Were Not Covered in Construction Defect Suit

    Celebrities Lose Case in Construction Defect Arbitration

    Changes To Indemnification Statute Are Here! Say Hello To Defense Duties

    Can We Compel Insurers To Cover Construction Defect in General Liability Policies?

    New Households Moving to Apartments

    Insurers Reacting to Massachusetts Tornadoes

    California insured’s duty to cooperate and insurer’s right to select defense counsel

    Building Boom Leads to Construction Defect Cases

    Contractor Sues License Board
    Corporate Profile

    BURNETT WISCONSIN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Burnett, Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Burnett Wisconsin forensic architect consulting engineersBurnett Wisconsin forensic architect construction project management expert witnessesBurnett Wisconsin forensic architect engineering expert witnessBurnett Wisconsin forensic architect hospital construction expert witnessBurnett Wisconsin forensic architect stucco expert witnessBurnett Wisconsin forensic architect expert witnesses fenestrationBurnett Wisconsin forensic architect construction claims expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Burnett, Wisconsin

    Lockton Expands Construction and Design Team

    July 19, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Lockton Companies, LLC, the largest privately held independent insurance broker, has announced that it is expanding its construction and design team with the hiring of Karen Erger and Tom Miller.

    Ms. Erger will provide professional liability practice management, loss prevention, contract and complex claims management consulting services to Lockton's architectural, engineering and construction clients in her role as Vice President, Director of Practice Management. Her background includes construction litigation at a leading construction law firm, professional liability claims defense and claims consulting for major professional liability underwriters.

    Miller joins Lockton as a Senior Vice President within the Design and Construction Unit. His role will be dedicated to serving the needs of engineering, architecture and construction firms performing services around the globe. He has spent more than 15 years concentrating on professional liability for design professionals and contractors in multiple roles. He previously managed the professional liability underwriting of one of the largest construction insurers and has developed numerous manuscript insurance products as well as focused on strategic planning to enhance business unit opportunities.

    Read the full story…


    SB800 Cases Approach the Courts

    July 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    California’s Right to Repair Law turns ten this year and cases under the statute are finally coming to trial, as John V. O’Meara of Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara writes for the Martindale-Hubble Legal Library. Mr. O’Meara notes that SB800 eliminated “the traditional definitions of construction defect,” replacing them with “functionality standards.” He argues that these standards are not uniform: “some standards require damage and others do not.” He also wonders what terms like “significant cracks,” “intended water” and “materially comply” mean in a court.

    Mr. O’Meara states that “defendants in construction defect cases have a right to know the standards that apply to a case, the definitions that will be presented to the jury, and the burden of proof that attaches.”

    Read the full story…


    Continuous Trigger of Coverage Adopted for Loss Under First Party Policy

    August 2, 2012 — Tred Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    The Seventh Circuit predicted that the Wisconsin Supreme Court would adopt the continuous injury trigger for first party property loss that extends over several policy periods. Miller v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am., 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 12940 (7th Cir. June 25, 2012).

    A home inspection report performed before the Millers purchased their home showed a soft spot on the roof. The stucco's finish color was also uneven and stained. Further, some water damage was found in the study and skylights above the kitchen sink. But the report advised that the exterior walls, chimney, grass roof, flashings, floor joists/beams and columns, garage walls and floor appeared serviceable. A roof specialist determined the soft spot was not significant and could be repaired for $1,500.

    The Millers purchased a homeowner's policy from Safeco on June 30, 2005. The policy went into effect the next day when the Millers closed on the property. But the Millers did not see the policy's terms until Safeco mailed them a copy of the policy at the end of July.

    Before receiving the policy, the Millers discovered severe inner wall water leaks and significant water infiltration on three of the home's exterior walls.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Construction Demand Unsteady, Gains in Some Regions

    June 29, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    The Associated General Contractors of America reported Tuesday, June 28 that construction employment increased in 120 of the 337 metropolitan areas surveyed between May 2010 and May 2011.

    ‘While construction employment has stopped plunging, any sign of a recovery remains spotty at best,” said Ken Simonson, the association’s chief economist. ‘The close to even split between areas adding and losing jobs is a reminder that for every market doing well, there is another market that is still hurting.”

    The largest number of jobs created was in the Dallas, Texas region, with 5,600 new jobs, a five percent increase. The northern Massachusetts/southern New Hampshire region near Haverhill saw the greatest percentage increase, although that twenty-two percent increase represents only 800 new jobs. The Chicago, Illiinois area added 4,600 jobs, a four percent increase.

    Other regions were not so lucky. The Atlanta, Georgia area saw a loss of 7,400 jobs, an eight percent loss. Las Vegas also lost 7,400 jobs, which there represented a sixteen percent decline. The New York City area lost 6,700 jobs, a six percent reduction. The Riverside, California area lost 5,300 jobs, a nine percent loss.

    Stephen E. Sandherr, the association’s chief executive officer, blamed a combination of regulation and budget squeezes. "Some in Washington never met a regulation they didn’t like and others never found a penny they didn’t want to pinch. Together that makes for a bad way to boost employment and a great way to stifle the private sector and neglect critical economic infrastructure.”

    Read the full story…


    Insurer Not Liable for Construction Defect Revealed by Woodpecker

    September 13, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that an insurance provision that excluded construction defects must stand in Friedberg v. Chubb, granting a summary judgment to the insurance firm.

    The Friedbergs discovered extensive water damage to their home after a woodpecker drilled a hole in a vertical support. They sought insurance coverage under their Chubb “Masterpiece” policy. The decision quotes the policy as covering “all risk of physical loss” “unless stated otherwise or an exclusion applies.” These exclusions included “gradual or sudden loss,” “structural movement,” and “faulty planning, construction or maintenance,” but the policy covered “ensuing covered loss unless another exclusion applies.”

    Chubb’s expert determined that the Friedbergs’ home had defective construction, and “attributed the damage to the beams and walls below the beam to a failure to install control joints.” After Chubb denied coverage, the Friedbergs sued, although the court ruled that “even under the Friedbergs’ theory, the water damage was a loss caused by faulty construction and therefore excluded under the policy.”

    On appeal, the Friedbergs argued that “the loss resulted from the combination of both faulty construction and the presence of water” and that Minnesota’s “concurrent causation” doctrine must apply, which according to the decision, “when a loss results from both a covered peril and an excluded peril, coverage exists unless the excluded peril is the ‘overriding cause’ of the loss.” The court rejected this reasoning, noting that “once the house was plagued with faulty construction, it was a foreseeable and natural consequence that water would enter.”

    The Friedbergs also contended that “the damage caused by the intrusion of water into their home is an ‘ensuing covered loss’ for which they are due coverage.” The court also rejected this claim, noting that Minnesota law excludes defective construction from the ensuing loss provision. The court said that “the Friedbergs’ reading of their ensuing-loss clause, by contrast, would dramatically limit their policy’s faulty-construction exclusion, because almost ‘any loss cause by’ faulty construction could also be characterized as an ensuing loss under an all-risk policy.”

    Read the court’ decision…


    No Coverage for Construction Defects Under Alabama Law

    June 19, 2012 — Tred Eyerely, Insurance Law Hawaii

    The federal district court determined that under Alabama law, there was no coverage for breach of contract claims arising from alleged construction defects. Owners Ins. Co. v. Shep Jones Constr., Inc., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62085 (N.D. Ala. May 3, 2012).

    The insured entered a contract with the homeowner to remodel her home. After construction was completed, the homeowner sued the insured, alleging damages arising form breach of contract, negligence and negligent supervision.

    The insured had a policy with Owners Insurance Company. Owners Insurance defended under a reservation rights.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Contractor Removed from Site for Lack of Insurance

    October 28, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    The MetroWest Daily News reports that a demolition firm was told to leave the construction site at Natick High School since their failure to have workers compensation insurance makes them unable to work on the project. The contractor, Atlantic Dismantling and Site Construction, Inc. may have been working illegally since September.

    The equipment that Atlantic had rented for the job was repossessed in August. Brait Builders Corp, the general contractor for the site had rented equipment so Atlantic could continue their work.

    Their lack of insurance was discovered when a worker had a minor job-related injury. The state had issued a stop-work order for the firm and they could not legally bid on public projects. The school system did not receive any notice of this, and the school’s facilities director said of the general contractor, “chances are Brait never heard of anything either.”

    Read the full story...


    MGM Seeks to Demolish Harmon Towers

    September 1, 2011 — CJD Staff

    Citing public safety concerns and the cost of repair, MGM Resorts International is seeking to demolish the unfinished hotel tower. The company has a few hurdles to go through before they start laying the charges to implode the structure. Any plans would have to be approved by not only Clark County officials, but also the district court has an order blocking any activity during litigation between MGM and the general contractor on the project, Perini Building Company.

    Architectural Record reports that MGM states it would take “approximately 18 months to conduct test and come up with an approved, permitted design to fix the Harmon.” MGM feels that repairs would then take another two to three years. Perini contends that they could “provide stamped drawings detailing all necessary repairs within three months.” They attribute MGM’s desire to demolish the building as “buyer’s remorse.”

    Read the full story…


    Delays in Filing Lead to Dismissal in Moisture Intrusion Lawsuit

    September 9, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals has upheld a summary judgment in the case of Franklin v. Mitchell. Walter Mitchell, doing business as Southern Classic Construction built a new home for the Franklins. The Franklins moved into the home in October 2001. In April 2006 they discovered sagging floors in both the bathroom and kitchen. They contacted Mitchell who suggested the flooring might be defective. The Franklins spent eight months attempting to contact the flooring manufacturer.

    In March 2007, the Franklins had the home inspected. The sagging was determined to be due to a loss of strength in the decking because of condensation from the air conditioning system. Air returns were not properly sealed and drawing moisture into the structure. There was mold on the decking and floor joints.

    When Mitchell was contacted by the Franklins, he told them his one-year warranty had expired but had the HVAC subcontractor, Southern Mechanical Heating & Air (owned by Mitchell’s father, Jim Mitchell), look at the situation. SMHA replaced and braced subfloors. Later, they entered the crawl space to tape ducts, seal the air return, and insulate the air vent housing. The Franklins were not satisfied with the repairs, as not all the ducts were taped, nor were the air vent housings insulated.

    Franklin complained to Walter Mitchell who again cited his one-year warranty. Jim Mitchell said he would not report complaints to his insurer, stating that the repairs were unnecessary, that the work had been done correctly in the first place, and it was only done at the request of Walter Mitchell.

    In February 2009, the Franklins sued Walker Mitchell. Mitchell denied the claims, citing in part the statute of limitations. Mitchell also filed complaints against three subcontractors, including his father’s firm. Mitchell received a summary judgment as the case started after Alabama’s six-year statute of limitations.

    The appeals court rejected the Franklin’s argument that the claim of damage did not start until they were aware it was due to a construction defect. The court noted that as Walter Mitchell was licensed as a “residential home builder, the statute the Franklins cite did not apply, as it concerns architects, engineers, and licensed general contactors.”

    Nor did they feel that Mitchells’ claim that his warranty had expired were sufficient to override the statute of limitations, quoting an earlier case, “Vague assurances do not amount to an affirmative inducement to delay filing suit.” Their claim of subsequent negligent repairs was rejected because Mitchell did not direct the specific actions taken by his father’s firm.

    Read the court’s decision…


    Insurer Not Entitled to Summary Judgment on Construction Defect Claims

    February 10, 2012 — Tred Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    The insurer unsuccessfully moved for summary judgment, contending it had no obligation to defend two related underlying construction defect cases. Amerisure Ins. Co. v. R.L.Lantana Boatyard, Ltd., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2466 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 9, 2012).

    An engineering report noted design construction defects and deficiencies in visible, physical improvements at The Moorings at Lantana Condominium. In two lawsuits, The Moorings sued the developer, R.L. Lantana Boatyard ("RLLB"), and the contractor, Current Builders of Florida.

    Current Builders was insured by Amerisure. RLLB was named as an additional insured under the Amerisure policy.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    California Posts Nation’s Largest Gain in Construction Jobs

    March 28, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    California added about 8,900 construction jobs in January, 2012, as compared to December, 2011, leading the nation in the number of added construction jobs. Thirty-four other states also saw added construction jobs. A year prior, only twenty-eight states added construction jobs. The Associated General Contractors of America analyzed the monthly report from the Labor Department. Ken Simonson, the chief economist for the Associated General Contractors of America noted that “the gains this January partly reflect very mild weather this winter and exceptionally cold and snowy conditions a year before.”

    Read the full story…


    Record-Setting Construction in Fargo

    November 7, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Prairie Business reports that Fargo is experiencing the most new construction it has ever seen, totaling $434 million in value, which exceeds the previous high in 2006 of $428 million. Many of the construction starts are for single family homes, although there is also an increase in construction of apartments and townhomes.

    The Home Builders Association of Fargo-Moorhead also noted that there was also a large of remodeling projects. Terry Becker, the president of the HBA, said that “remodeling is just huge right now.”

    Read the full story…


    Injured Construction Worker Settles for Five Hundred Thousand

    October 28, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    An upstate New York man who was injured when an unsecured truss fell off the railings of a scissor lift has settled for $500,000. As the accident happened at the building site for a casino for the Seneca Nation, attorneys for the construction firm had argued that New York labor laws were inapplicable as the injury happened on Seneca Nation land. The state appeals court ruled that as none of the parties involved were Native Americans, it was not internal to the affairs of the Seneca Nation.

    Read the full story...


    Quarter Four a Good One for Luxury Homebuilder

    December 20, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Toll Brothers has announced that their fourth-quarter net income is $2.35 per share, which they attribute in part to an income tax benefit. Their revenue, at $632.8 million, easily exceeded analysts’ projections of $565.1 million. Additionally, their number of signed contracts jumped seventy percent while their cancellation rate dropped nearly half to 4.9 percent.

    Read the full story…


    Good Signs for Housing Market in 2013

    December 20, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Dan Green, a loan officer at Waterstone Mortgage, is optimistic about the construction market in 2013. He notes that the rise in building permit, housing starts, and housing completions are all good signs. Mortgage rates are still low, making these new homes attractive to buyers.

    Read the full story…


    Construction Defect Lawsuits? There’s an App for That

    July 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The website ebeeky.com reviews Picture It Settled, an app designed to help people engaged in lawsuits figure out where settlement strategies would be most successful. First available for Android and then iOS, the app is now available for Blackberry. One user of the application wrote that “anyone who has set through a construction defect mediation can immediately grasp the value of this app.

    The app tracks the negotiation process, allowing users to see a history of bids and counteroffers. It also models the negotiation process in order to predict the ultimate cost of settlement. These numbers are based on past similar negotiations that the user has entered.

    Read the full story…


    Loss Caused by Seepage of Water Not Covered

    July 10, 2012 — Tred Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    The anti-concurrent clause in a homeowner’s policy barred coverage for damage caused by hidden seepage. Boazova v. Safety Ins. Co., 2012 Mass. LEXIS 462 (Mass. May 29, 2012).

    The insured had a concrete patio built along the rear wall of her house at a grade higher than the home’s foundation. Years later, severe deterioration was discovered in the floor joists, wall studs and other parts of the home. The insured held a homeowner’s policy with Safety. An inspector hired by Safety determined the deterioration was caused by the placement of the concrete patio slab adjacent to the wall of the house, allowing water to seep onto the top of the foundation.

    Safety denied coverage because the damage was caused by a combination of surface water, deterioration, settling and improper construction of the concrete patio.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Texas “Loser Pays” Law May Benefit Construction Insurers

    June 7, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Under a new law, Texas HB 274, the Texas Supreme Court will be making rules for motions to dismiss and to expedite suits of less than $100,000. The law also contains two “loser pays” provisions. If a lawsuit is found dismissed for having “no basis in fact or law,” the losing side must pay attorney costs. The other provision caps award of attorney fees if plaintiffs reject settlement offers. Texas Lawyer quotes Houston attorney Mike Gallagher as saying this will affect “the practice of everyone who handles significant lawsuits.”

    Gregory Marcum, whose practice includes construction defect litigation, plans to contact insurance companies, as the new law may save them money. “It will definitely be a factor in the defense strategy for handling a case.” He notes that “any insurance carrier would want that done.”

    Marcum notes that the offer-of-settlement rules only apply when cases go to trial. “Almost all cases settle.”

    Read HB 274

    Read the full story…