BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    multi family housing expert witness Anaheim California industrial building expert witness Anaheim California high-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California retail construction expert witness Anaheim California office building expert witness Anaheim California Medical building expert witness Anaheim California institutional building expert witness Anaheim California custom home expert witness Anaheim California structural steel construction expert witness Anaheim California condominiums expert witness Anaheim California production housing expert witness Anaheim California low-income housing expert witness Anaheim California condominium expert witness Anaheim California Subterranean parking expert witness Anaheim California parking structure expert witness Anaheim California tract home expert witness Anaheim California townhome construction expert witness Anaheim California casino resort expert witness Anaheim California custom homes expert witness Anaheim California concrete tilt-up expert witness Anaheim California housing expert witness Anaheim California mid-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211
    http://www.desertchapter.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501


    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biasc.org

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biaoc.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Baldy View Chapter
    Local # 0532
    8711 Monroe Ct Ste B
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
    http://www.biabuild.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - LA/Ventura Chapter
    Local # 0532
    28460 Ave Stanford Ste 240
    Santa Clarita, CA 91355


    Building Industry Association Southern California - Building Industry Association of S Ca Antelope Valley
    Local # 0532
    44404 16th St W Suite 107
    Lancaster, CA 93535



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Anaheim California

    Ill-fated Complaint Fails to State Claims Against Broker and FEMA

    New Jersey Appellate Court Reinstates Asbestos Action

    Arizona Supreme Court Confirms a Prevailing Homeowner Can Recover Fees on Implied Warranty Claims

    Ohio Court Finds No Coverage for Construction Defect Claims

    Venue for Suing Public Payment Bond

    Insured's Collapse Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    Reminder: Always Order a Title Search for Your Mechanic’s Lien

    HOA Foreclosure Excess Sale Proceeds Go to Owner

    Lawsuits over Roof Dropped

    Another Reminder that Your Construction Contract Language Matters

    Homebuilder Confidence Takes a Beating

    Just Because You Label It A “Trade Secret” Does Not Make It A “Trade Secret”

    How to Make the Construction Dispute Resolution Process More Efficient and Less Expensive

    Florida Appellate Courts Holds Underwriting Manuals are Discoverable in Breach of Contract Case

    Real-Estate Pros Fight NYC Tax on Wealthy Absentee Owners

    Baltimore Bridge Collapse Occurred After Ship Lost Power Multiple Times

    The Final Nail: Ongoing Repairs Do Not Toll the Statute of Repose

    But Wait There’s More: Preserving Claims on Commonwealth Projects

    Construction Attorneys: Contract Negotiation Strategy

    New Jersey School Blames Leaks on Construction Defects, May Sue

    2018 Update to EPA’s “Superfund Task Force Report”

    Tarriffs, a Pandemic and War: Construction Contracts Must Withstand the Unforeseeable

    Florida Court Puts the Claim of Landlord’s Insurer In The No-Fly Zone

    When is a “Willful” Violation Willful (or Not) Under California’s Contractor Enforcement Statutes?

    Firm Claims Construction Defects in Hawaiian Homes

    “We Are Here for One Reason”: Newark Trial Team Achieves Another Favorable Settlement for Client After Jury Selection

    New Insurance Case: Owners'​ Insurance Barred in Reimbursement Action against Tenant

    VF Law Strengthens Litigation Practice with Experienced Litigation Attorney Andre Egle in the Seattle Office

    The Construction Industry's Health Kick

    Recent Changes in the Law Affecting Construction Defect Litigation

    The Insurance Coverage Debate on Construction Defects Continues

    Insurers' Motion to Knock Out Bad Faith, Negligent Misrepresentation Claims in Construction Defect Case Denied

    2019 Legislative Session

    New Home Sales Slip, but Still Strong

    Avoid L&I Violations by Following Appropriate Safety Procedures

    Bert L. Howe & Associates Returns as a Sponsor at the 30th Annual Construction Law Conference in San Antonio

    Everyone's Moving to Seattle, and It's Stressing Out Sushi Lovers

    CGL Policy Covering Attorney’s Fees in Property Damage Claims

    Comparative Breach of Contract – The New Benefit of the Bargain in Construction?

    A Court-Side Seat: Permit Shields, Hurricane Harvey and the Decriminalization of “Incidental Taking”

    New York State Trial Court: Non-Cumulation Provision in Excess Policies Mandates “All Sums” Allocation

    Nonparty Discovery in California Arbitration: How to Get What You Want

    Trump Administration Announces New Eviction Moratorium

    TOP TAKE-AWAY SERIES: The 2023 Annual Meeting in Vancouver

    Colorado Senate Bill 15-177: This Year’s Attempt at Reasonable Construction Defect Reform

    CDJ’s Year-End Review: The Top 10 CD Topics of 2014

    Shimmick Gets Nod for Second Pilot Pile at Settling Millennium Tower

    Chicago Aldermen Tell Casino Bidders: This Is a Union Town

    Insurers May Not Be Required to Defend Contractors In a Florida §558 Proceeding

    Federal Courts Keep Chipping Away at the CDC Eviction Moratorium
    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Drawing from more than 4500 construction claims related expert witness designations, the Anaheim, California Construction Expert Directory provides a wide spectrum of trial support and consulting services to builders, risk managers, and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides construction related consulting and expert witness support services to the industry's most recognized construction attorneys, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Employing in house resources which comprise testifying architects, design engineers, construction cost and standard of care experts, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Anaheim and the surrounding areas.

    Anaheim California delay claim expert witnessAnaheim California building code expert witnessAnaheim California construction expert witness consultantAnaheim California slope failure expert witnessAnaheim California construction claims expert witnessAnaheim California expert witness concrete failureAnaheim California consulting architect expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    Construction Seyt Named a Top Construction Blog by FeedSpot

    March 31, 2026 —
    Since 2019, we have strived to bring our readers practical, useful insights on recent trends shaping our industry. Whether you are a contractor, designer, developer, attorney, or industry professional, our goal is to equip you with the knowledge to navigate your business with that much more confidence. We are honored that “The Construction Seyt” has been named by FeedSpot as a “Best Construction Blog” to follow for 2026. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Seyfarth Shaw LLP

    Jonathan Aihie Named to The National Bar Association’s “Top 40 Under 40” List

    August 03, 2026 —
    Fort Lauderdale Partner Jonathan Aihie was recently named to The National Bar Association (NBA) “Top 40 Under 40” list. The NBA “Top 40 Under 40” recognizes the nation's top lawyers under the age of 40 who demonstrate professional excellence, leadership, and commitment to the community. Recipients represent a broad cross-section of the legal profession, including private practice, government, academia, the judiciary, corporate counsel, and public service. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Understanding the EPA’s Latest Proposed Drinking Water Contaminant Monitoring Rule, Published in Law360

    September 01, 2026 —
    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) proposed Sixth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 6) represents another step in the federal government’s ongoing effort to identify and evaluate emerging contaminants in drinking water. The proposal would require certain public water systems to monitor and report on 30 unregulated drinking water contaminants from 2028 through 2030, while generating occurrence data that could inform future regulation and affect environmental, commercial, litigation and risk assessments. In an article published by Law360, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Senior Counsel, Ayodeji Ayolola, analyzes the scope and practical implications of UCMR 6, including the contaminants selected, the proposed monitoring requirements for public water systems, and the EPA’s continued focus on PFAS and related organofluorine compounds. The article also touches upon the potential significance of publicly available monitoring data for businesses and property stakeholders. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Presumption of Prejudice Applies to All Affirmative Defenses Regarding Insured’s Failure to Comply with Post-Loss Policy Conditions

    June 23, 2026 —
    n a recent property insurance coverage dispute, an issue on appeal pertained to the “prejudice” jury instruction associated with the insured’s failure to comply with post-loss policy conditions. The trial court found that the prejudice only pertained to prompt notice and not other post-loss policy conditions. This was reversed on appeal as prejudice applied to ALL the post loss policy conditions that the insured failed to comply with, not just the prompt notice requirement. The prejudice presumption applies to all affirmative defenses regarding an insured’s failure to comply with post-loss policy conditions. Consider this discussion when dealing with an insurer raising prejudice as an affirmative defense to do an insured’s failure to comply with post-loss policy conditions, and the associated burdens of proof: On appeal, [the insurer] contends the trial court erred by instructing the jury that the presumption of prejudice was inapplicable to all of its post-loss obligation defenses except prompt notice. We agree. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Celebrating BWB&O’s 2026 Super Lawyers Rising Stars in San Diego!

    March 31, 2026 —
    Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP is proud to announce that Partners Jocelyn Russo, Christina Matian, and Associate Angelo Perillo have been named to the Super Lawyers 2026 San Diego Rising Stars list. This recognition highlights their outstanding dedication and distinguished service in Family Law, Civil Litigation, and Personal Injury Litigation.
    SUPER LAWYERS Jocelyn Russo: 2023-2026 Christina Matian: 2024-2026 Angelo Perillo: 2024-2026
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP

    We Won’t Permit That Excuse!

    June 23, 2026 —
    A Texas appellate court recently ruled that a building permit wasn’t a condition precedent for a construction project. That caught our attention. Can you build a commercial project without a permit? But as we read the case, we see the court’s reasoning. And it reminds us of an important legal principle that should inform our contract drafting and negotiation. The case was a civil suit brought by the project owner against its tenant improvement contractor for work on a medical spa. The owner claimed that the contractor didn’t perform the work properly and didn’t finish construction. The contractor argued that delays and problems were caused by the owner, alleging numerous failures, including the owner’s failure to secure a building permit. Reprinted courtesy of Curt Martin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Richard Eiszner, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Martin may be contacted at cmartin@pecklaw.com Mr. Eiszner may be contacted at reiszner@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Applying Jury Verdict Method in Quantifying Damages Due to Defective Specifications

    March 31, 2026 —
    An older case deals with three important considerations: (1) defective specifications; (2) whether the defective specifications were misleading or misrepresentative; and (3) applying the jury verdict method in quantifying damages. In Metric Construction Co., Inc. v. U.S., 80 Fed. Cl. 178 (Fed. Cl. 2008), a contractor was contracted by the federal government to construct a warehouse. There were defects in the structural steel design specifications underlying the standing seam metal roof installed by the contractor and, as a result, the roof system leaked causing damage. The contractor incurred significant costs in repairing the damage, and pursued recovery of these costs against the government. The contractor claimed the structural steel design serving as the framework for the metal roof was defective and misleading and caused the leaks. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    OC Streetcar Project Mediation Sets $50M Payment to Walsh

    July 20, 2026 —
    Walsh Construction told a California state court judge last month that lawsuit mediation of its claims on an Orange County light-rail project—known as OC Streetcar—had produced a settlement of some claims under which the county agreed to pay the contractor almost an additional $50 million. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com