BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    tract home expert witness Anaheim California retail construction expert witness Anaheim California townhome construction expert witness Anaheim California office building expert witness Anaheim California Medical building expert witness Anaheim California concrete tilt-up expert witness Anaheim California structural steel construction expert witness Anaheim California high-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California multi family housing expert witness Anaheim California condominium expert witness Anaheim California institutional building expert witness Anaheim California Subterranean parking expert witness Anaheim California casino resort expert witness Anaheim California condominiums expert witness Anaheim California parking structure expert witness Anaheim California landscaping construction expert witness Anaheim California custom home expert witness Anaheim California production housing expert witness Anaheim California industrial building expert witness Anaheim California custom homes expert witness Anaheim California hospital construction expert witness Anaheim California low-income housing expert witness Anaheim California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211
    http://www.desertchapter.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501


    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biasc.org

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biaoc.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Baldy View Chapter
    Local # 0532
    8711 Monroe Ct Ste B
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
    http://www.biabuild.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - LA/Ventura Chapter
    Local # 0532
    28460 Ave Stanford Ste 240
    Santa Clarita, CA 91355


    Building Industry Association Southern California - Building Industry Association of S Ca Antelope Valley
    Local # 0532
    44404 16th St W Suite 107
    Lancaster, CA 93535



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Anaheim California
    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over 4500 construction defect and claims related expert designations, the Anaheim, California Construction Expert Directory delivers a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to lawyers and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides construction claims evaluation and expert support services to the construction industry's leading builders and developers, legal professionals, and owners, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies. In connection with regional assets which comprise construction delay claims experts, registered design professionals, professional engineers, and credentailed construction consultants, the construction experts group brings national experience and local capabilities to Anaheim and the surrounding areas.

    Anaheim California civil engineering expert witnessAnaheim California window expert witnessAnaheim California consulting general contractorAnaheim California building consultant expertAnaheim California architectural expert witnessAnaheim California slope failure expert witnessAnaheim California construction expert witness consultant
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    Insurer Dispenses with Bad Faith Claim on Summary Judgment

    June 22, 2026 —
    The court granted the insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment because the insured failed to present evidence that the insurer failed to conduct a reasonable investigation. PSY Burger, LLC v. State Farm General Insurance Company, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66991(C.D. Cal. March 20, 2026). The insured’s commercial property suffered heavy damage from tropical storm Hilary. State Farm denied coverage to repair the damage. The insured sued State Farm alleging breach of contract and bad faith due to an inadequate investigation. Apparently, the insured did not retain an expert to opine on claims handling. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Segal McCambridge Recognized in 2026 Chambers USA Rankings

    June 15, 2026 —
    Los Angeles, CA, June 8, 2026 - Segal McCambridge is pleased to announce that the firm has been recognized as a leader by Chambers USA in California. The firm is listed in the Chambers-ranked department, receiving a Band 5 ranking for construction in California. The ranking further reinforces the firm's commitment to supporting California's construction market, from owners to developers and contractors, in high-stakes disputes statewide. "Chambers' research-driven process and independence make this acknowledgment especially meaningful. We're proud of this ranking and grateful to our clients and colleagues whose consistent trust and collaboration make our work possible," said Jason P. Eckerly, Managing Shareholder of Segal McCambridge. Chambers and Partners is widely regarded as one of the legal industry's most respected and independent ranking organizations. Operating across 200 jurisdictions and relied on in more than 70 countries, Chambers has, since 1990, conducted rigorous research to identify leading lawyers and law firms through a methodology that combines analysis of firm capability, achievement, and market presence through interviews and assessment of recent matters across more than 1,400 U.S. ranking tables, covering all 50 states, Washington, DC, and nationwide. About Segal McCambridge Segal McCambridge has built a reputation as a national law firm of accomplished trial attorneys for almost four decades. Founded in 1986, the firm has grown from a four-lawyer shop in Chicago to a firm with more than 20 offices nationwide. The firm routinely counsels and defends clients, including Fortune 500 companies, corporations, and individuals, across the United States in complex litigation matters, including, but not limited to: asbestos, class action, construction, employment, environmental, food and beverage, insurance coverage and bad faith, life sciences, product liability, professional liability, technology and cyber risk, transportation, and warranty. For more information, visit: www.segalmccambridge.com.

    Arbitration Provision Must Be Incorporated into a Bond for Surety to Elect Arbitration

    March 03, 2026 —
    “Sureties cannot exercise unilateral election rights that are reserved for the principal of the underlying contract.” Anderson Service Corp. v. Old Republic Surety Company, 2026 WL 61436, *2 (Fla. 4th DCA 2026). This was the holding in a recent case dealing with arbitration. In this case, a subcontractor entered into a contract with a contractor that gave the contractor the right to elect arbitration in Pennsylvania. A dispute arose and the subcontractor recorded a construction lien. The contractor transferred the lien to a lien transfer bond under Florida law. (The contractor was the principal of the lien transfer bond.) The lien transfer bond surety then moved to compel the subcontractor to arbitration based on the underlying subcontract. The trial court agreed to compel arbitration but this was reversed on appeal. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Endra Rethinks MEP Design with AI

    July 06, 2026 —
    Niklas Lindgren, co-founder and CEO of Endra, joins the AEC Business Podcast to discuss why his Stockholm-based startup is rebuilding MEP design from the ground up with AI. Endra recently raised $50 million in Series A funding and counts some of the world’s largest engineering consultancies as customers. Niklas explains why Revit’s underlying data model is too coarse to support deep automation, and why Endra built its own granular 3D data model instead of working as a plugin. He describes Endra’s “spatial AI” approach to routing conduit and ductwork without clashes, and how the platform models entire electrical systems, from receptacle to transformer, inside a single source of truth. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Modular Construction’s Big Boom: New Risks Outpacing Standard Contracts in Industrial Projects

    March 24, 2026 —
    Modular construction is revolutionizing the construction industry, tackling labor shortages, sustainability goals and supply-chain challenges, with the global market for modular and prefabricated construction projected to reach over $200 billion by 2030. While residential builders have embraced modular’s speed and affordability, the greatest risks—and opportunities—are emerging in the industrial sector, where project scale and complexity demand new legal strategies. In 2023, Chad Theriot explored industrial and infrastructure applications of modular construction, addressing risks like offsite fabrication and integration complexities in his article, “The Rise of Modular Construction—Impacts for Consideration.” Since that time, modular construction has continued to experience significant advancements and has been increasingly adopted by contractors across a broad spectrum of industrial and commercial projects. As modular construction continues to reshape the industrial landscape, contractors and owners alike must be mindful of the legal implications associated with its use, specifically as it relates to liability and risk allocation, regulatory compliance, quality control and upstream factors such as transportation and intellectual property concerns. Reprinted courtesy of Chad Theriot and Jack Mayo, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Fourth Circuit Extends Coverage to Contractor

    May 14, 2026 —
    The Fourth Circuit in APAC-Atlantic, Inc. v. Owners Insurance Co., No. 24-1969, 2026 WL 458402 (4th Cir. Feb. 18, 2026) recently endorsed broad coverage for additional insureds, interpreting “arising out of” broadly under North Carolina law to extend coverage to a repaving company under its subcontractor’s liability insurance policy. The court held that an additional insured’s liability “arising out of” a named insured’s work in an additional-insured endorsement means liability “relating to” or “causally connected to” the named insured’s operations, rather than liability defined more narrowly as “caused by” or “the fault of” the named insured. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    End of an (Endangerment) Era

    February 23, 2026 —
    On February 12, 2026, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced the repeal of the 2009 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Endangerment Finding and the elimination of all federal GHG emission standards for motor vehicles and engines.1 The EPA characterized the action as the “single largest deregulatory action in U.S. history.”2 This development marks a fundamental shift in federal climate policy under the Clean Air Act (CAA) and is expected to trigger immediate and extensive litigation. In Massachusetts v. EPA, the U.S. Supreme Court held that GH
    Lien Law Change in Idaho

    New York’s Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act Imposes Increased Disclosure Requirements On Defendants at the Beginning of Lawsuits

    Do Not Pass Go! Duty to Defend in a Professional Services Agreement (law note)

    A Riveting (or at Least Insightful) Explanation of the Privette Doctrine

    Additional Insured Obligations and the Underlying Lawsuit

    Mitigate Construction Risk Through Use of Contingency

    Kaboom! Illinois Applies the Anti-Subrogation Rule to Require a Landlord’s Subrogating Property Insurer to Defend a Third-Party Complaint Against Tenants

    Reminder: Pay if Paid Not All Encompassing (but Could it be?)

    Fourth Circuit Rejects Application of Wrap-Up Exclusion to Additional Insured

    Why Construction Firms Should Think Differently on the Issue of Sustainability

    CDJ’s #5 Topic of the Year: Beacon Residential Community Association v. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, et al.

    Potential Problems with Cases Involving One Owner and Multiple Contractors

    Eleventh Circuit Affirms Jury Verdict on Covered Property Loss

    Mandatory Attorneys’ Fee Award for Actions Brought Under the Underground Utility Damage Prevention Act

    Washington Court Limits Lien Rights of Construction Managers

    The Montrose Language Interpreted: How Many Policies Are Implicated By A Construction Defect That Later Causes a Flood?

    Bad Faith Claim For Independent Contractor's Reduced Loss Assessment Survives Motion to Dismiss

    Out of Eastern Europe, a Window Into the Post-Pandemic Office

    Schools Remain Top Priority in Carolinas as Cleanup From Storms Continues

    Athens, Ohio, Sues to Recover Nearly $722,000 After Cyber Attack

    Leonard Fadeeff v. State Farm General Insurance Company

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Highlighted | 2019 Northern California Super Lawyers

    New York Labor Laws and Action Over Exclusions

    Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. Expands with New Office in Foxborough, Massachusetts

    Summarizing Changes to NEPA in the Fiscal Responsibility Act (P.L. 118-5)

    Sometimes You Just Need to Call it a Day: Court Finds That Contractor Not Entitled to Recover Costs After Public Works Contract is Invalidated

    Bay Area Firm Offers Construction Consulting to Remodels

    County Officials Refute Resident’s Statement that Defect Repairs Improper

    Damron Agreement Questioned in Colorado Casualty Insurance v Safety Control Company, et al.

    America’s Infrastructure Gets a D+

    Alabama Supreme Court Reverses Determination of Coverage for Faulty Workmanship

    Risk Management for Condominium Conversions

    BWB&O Expands to North San Diego

    Defenses Raised Three-Years Too Late Estop Insurer’s Coverage Denial

    Landlords Beware: Subordination Agreements

    Subcontractors on Washington Public Projects can now get their Retainage Money Sooner

    Massachusetts Appellate Court Confirms Construction Defects are Not Covered Under Commercial General Liability Policies

    Thank You to Virginia Super Lawyers

    James R. Lynch Appointed to the Washington State Capital Project Review Committee

    Homeowner’s Policy Excludes Coverage for Loss Caused by Chinese Drywall

    Does the Miller Act Trump Subcontract Dispute Provisions?

    Blackstone Suffers Court Setback in Irish Real Estate Drama

    Nation’s Top Court Limits EPA's Authority in Clean Air Case

    Bad Welds Doom Art Installation at Central Park

    Residential Building Sector: Peaking or Soaring?

    ISO Proposes New Designated Premises Endorsement in Response to Hawaii Decision

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (7/8/26) – Data Centers Negotiate Flexibility for Speed, Hotel Deal Activities Focus on Luxury, and DC Sues Apartment Owners

    Watch Your Step – Playing Golf on an Outdoor Course Necessarily Encompasses Risk of Encountering Irregularities in the Ground Surface

    Construction Defects Uncertain Role in Coverage in Pennsylvania

    Congratulations to Karen Baytosh and August Hotchkin on Their Recognition as 2021 Nevada Legal Elites!
    hastory.php?cdjs=595386240">New York Team Secures Appellate Win on Behalf of National Home Improvement Chain

    Seattle Crane Strike Heads Into Labor Day Weekend After Some Contractors Sign Agreements

    COVID-19 Business Closure and Continuity Compliance Resource

    The ABCs of PFAS: What You Need to Know About Liabilities for the “Forever Chemical”

    Fraud Claims and Breach Of Warranty Claims Against Manufacturer

    New Strategy for Deterring Intracorporate Litigation?: Delaware Supreme Court Supports Fee-Shifting Bylaws

    Why the Renovation of Federal Reserve Headquarters Costs $2.5 Billion

    Create a Culture of Safety to Improve Labor Recruitment Efforts

    Reinsurer Must Reimburse Health Care Organization for Settlement Costs

    Airbnb Declares End to Party!

    Definitions Matter in Illinois: Tenant Held Liable Only for Damage to Apartment Unit

    Traub Lieberman Partner Greg Pennington Wins Summary Judgment in Favor of Property Owner

    Sales of New U.S. Homes Fell in February to Five-Month Low

    It Was a Wild Week for Just About Everyone. Ok, Make that Everyone.

    Policy Renewals: Has Your Insurer Been Naughty or Nice?

    Jet Crash Blamed on Runway Construction Defect

    Fifth Circuit: Primary Insurer Relieved of Duty to Defend Without Release of Liability of Insured

    Rancosky Adopts Terletsky: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Sets Standard for Statutory Bad Faith Claims