BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    concrete tilt-up Middleville Michigan tract home Middleville Michigan parking structure Middleville Michigan landscaping construction Middleville Michigan multi family housing Middleville Michigan hospital construction Middleville Michigan structural steel construction Middleville Michigan Medical building Middleville Michigan casino resort Middleville Michigan Subterranean parking Middleville Michigan custom homes Middleville Michigan low-income housing Middleville Michigan retail construction Middleville Michigan office building Middleville Michigan housing Middleville Michigan production housing Middleville Michigan custom home Middleville Michigan condominiums Middleville Michigan high-rise construction Middleville Michigan industrial building Middleville Michigan townhome construction Middleville Michigan condominium Middleville Michigan
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Middleville, Michigan

    Michigan Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Article 24 of the Occupational Code dictates that a complaint against a builder must be filed with the Department of Consumer and Industry Service within 18 months of the completion, occupancy or purchase of a residence. If building official determines complaint has merit, "Notice to Respondent: sent to provide builder with opportunity to repair; additional administrative procedures follow to conclusion; Individual townships have local rules regarding properties; Example: Bloomfield has mandated that structures must meet ongoing minimum maintenance standards.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Middleville Michigan

    Residential contractors need to be licensed. License required for plumbing and electrical trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Greater Lansing Home Builders & Remodelers Assoc
    Local # 2352
    2937 Atrium Dr Ste 201
    Okemos, MI 48864
    http://www.glhba.org

    MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS
    Local # 2300
    6427 Centurion Dr #150B
    Lansing, MI 48917
    http://www.buildingmichigan.org

    Home Builders Association of Barry County
    Local # 2310
    2700 S Broadway
    Hastings, MI 49058
    http://www.barrycountyhba.com

    Home Builders Association of the Holland Area
    Local # 2340
    211 Lincoln Ave
    Holland, MI 49423
    http://www.hbaholland.com

    Building Industry Association of Southeastern Michigan
    Local # 2328
    2075 Walnut Lake Road
    West Bloomfield, MI 48323
    http://www.builders.org

    Home Builders Association of Livingston County
    Local # 2355
    132 E Grand River Ave
    Brighton, MI 48116
    http://www.hbalc.com

    Home & Builders Association of Gtr Grd Rapids
    Local # 2336
    3196 Kraft Ave SE Ste 300
    Grand Rapids, MI 49512
    http://www.hbaggr.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Middleville Michigan

    Hilton Grand Vacations Defect Trial Delayed

    Louisiana Politicians Struggle on Construction Bills, Hospital Redevelopment

    Largest Per Unit Settlement Ever in California Construction Defect Case?

    Unfinished Building Projects Litter Miami

    Virginia Chinese Drywall “property damage” caused by an “occurrence” and number of “occurrences”

    Appropriation Bill Cuts Military Construction Spending

    Construction Law Client Alert: California Is One Step Closer to Prohibiting Type I Indemnity Agreements In Private Commercial Projects

    Construction Defects Lead to Demolition

    Builder to Appeal Razing of Harmon Tower

    Ensuing Losses From Faulty Workmanship Must be Covered

    Construction Defects Not Occurrences under Ohio Law

    Badly Constructed Masonry Walls Not an Occurrence in Arkansas Law

    Defective Shingle Claims Valid Despite Bankruptcy

    Ensuing Loss Provision Does Not Salvage Coverage

    California insured’s duty to cooperate and insurer’s right to select defense counsel

    Discovery Ordered in Nevada Construction Defect Lawsuit

    Nevada Budget Remains at Impasse over Construction Defect Law

    The Colorado Court of Appeals Rules that a Statutory Notice of Claim Triggers an Insurer’s Duty to Defend.

    An Upward Trend in Commercial Construction?

    Couple Sues Attorney over Construction Defect Case, Loses

    Webinar on Insurance Disputes in Construction Defects

    Arizona Court of Appeals Decision in $8.475 Million Construction Defect Class Action Suit

    Hovnanian Increases Construction Defect Reserves for 2012

    Water Is the Enemy

    Construction Bright Spot in Indianapolis

    Ohio Court of Appeals Affirms Judgment in Landis v. Fannin Builders

    BUILD Act Inching Closer To Reality

    Construction Defect Exception Does Not Lift Bar in Payment Dispute

    Architectural Firm Disputes Claim of Fault

    Insurer Unable to Declare its Coverage Excess In Construction Defect Case

    Las Vegas Home Builder Still in Bankruptcy

    Construction Defects: 2010 in Review

    Geometrically Defined Drainage Cavities in EIFS as a Guard Against Defects

    Seller Cannot Compel Arbitration for Its Role in Construction Defect Case<

    Tacoma Construction Site Uncovers Gravestones

    Florida trigger

    Courts Are Conflicted As To Whether "Good Faith" Settlement Determinations Can Be Reviewed Via Writ Petition Or Appeal

    Joinder vs. Misjoinder in Colorado Construction Claims: Roche Constructors v. One Beacon

    Green Buildings Could Lead to Liabilities

    Homebuilding on the Rise in Nation’s Capitol

    New Washington Law Nixes Unfair Indemnification in Construction Contracts

    Driver’s Death May Be Due to Construction Defect

    Who Is To Blame For Defective — And Still LEED Certified — Courthouse Square?

    Surveyors Statute Trumps Construction Defect Claim in Tennessee

    OSHA Extends Delay of Residential Construction Fall Protection Requirements

    Illinois Court Determines Insurer Must Defend Property Damage Caused by Faulty Workmanship

    Condo Owners Worried Despite Settlement

    Injured Construction Worker Settles for Five Hundred Thousand

    Don MacGregor To Speak at 2011 West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar

    Texas covered versus uncovered allocation and “legally obligated to pay.”

    Battle of “Other Insurance” Clauses

    Colorado Statutes of Limitations and Repose, A First Step in Construction Defect Litigation

    Construction Job Opening Rise in October

    Construction Defects as Occurrences, Better Decided in Law than in Courts

    Nevada District Court Dismisses Case in Construction Defect Coverage Suit

    Amerisure Case to be Heard by Texas Supreme Court

    Differing Rulings On Construction Defect Claims Leave Unanswered Questions For Builders, and Construction Practice Groups. Impact to CGL Carriers, General Contractors, Builders Remains Unclear

    Is There a Conflict of Interest When a CD Defense Attorney Becomes Coverage Counsel Post-Litigation?

    Florida Construction Defect Case Settled for $3 Million

    Hospital Construction Firm Settles Defect Claim for $1.1 Million

    Insurer Must Defend Claims for Diminution in Value of Damaged Property

    HOA Has No Claim to Extend Statute of Limitations in Construction Defect Case

    Nebraska Man Sentenced for Insurance Fraud in Construction Projects

    Another Colorado District Court Refuses to Apply HB 10-1394 Retroactively

    Manhattan Developer Breaks Ground on $520 Million Project

    Construction Case Alert: Appellate Court Confirms Engineer’s Duty to Defend Developer Arises Upon Tender of Indemnity Claim

    Arbitrator May Use Own Discretion in Consolidating Construction Defect Cases

    No Coverage Under Ensuing Loss Provision

    No Duty to Indemnify When Discovery Shows Faulty Workmanship Damages Insured’s Own Work

    New Buildings in California Soon Must Be Greener

    Boston Tower Project to Create 450 Jobs

    Construction Suit Ends with Just an Apology

    Contractor Manslaughter? Safety Shortcuts Are Not Worth It

    Contractor Sues Supplier over Defective Products

    Ohio Court Finds No Coverage for Construction Defect Claims

    More Charges in Las Vegas HOA Construction Defect Scam

    Kansas Man Caught for Construction Scam in Virginia

    Nevada Assembly Sends Construction Defect Bill to Senate

    Although Property Damage Arises From An Occurrence, Coverage Barred By Business Risk Exclusions

    The King of Construction Defect Scams

    Former New York Governor to Head Construction Monitoring Firm

    Vegas Hi-Rise Not Earthquake Safe

    In Re Golba: The Knaubs v. Golba and Rollison, Debtors

    Court Requires Adherence to “Good Faith and Fair Dealing” in Construction Defect Coverage

    Lawsuit over Construction Defects Not a Federal Case

    No Coverage For Construction Defects When Complaint Alleges Contractual Damages

    One World Trade Center Due to Be America’s Tallest and World’s Priciest

    Home Builder Doesn’t See Long Impact from Hurricane

    Construction Defects in Home a Breach of Contract

    San Diego Construction Defect Claim Settled for $2.3 Million
    Corporate Profile

    MIDDLEVILLE MICHIGAN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Middleville, Michigan Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 5,500 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Middleville's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Middleville Michigan forensic architect building consultant expertMiddleville Michigan forensic architect construction scheduling expert witnessMiddleville Michigan forensic architect construction expert testimonyMiddleville Michigan forensic architect construction claims expert witnessMiddleville Michigan forensic architect defective construction expertMiddleville Michigan forensic architect hospital construction expert witnessMiddleville Michigan forensic architect stucco expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Middleville, Michigan

    Record-Setting Construction in Fargo

    November 7, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Prairie Business reports that Fargo is experiencing the most new construction it has ever seen, totaling $434 million in value, which exceeds the previous high in 2006 of $428 million. Many of the construction starts are for single family homes, although there is also an increase in construction of apartments and townhomes.

    The Home Builders Association of Fargo-Moorhead also noted that there was also a large of remodeling projects. Terry Becker, the president of the HBA, said that “remodeling is just huge right now.”

    Read the full story…


    Wine without Cheese? (Why a construction contract needs an order of precedence clause)(Law Note)

    August 11, 2011 — Melissa Brumback

    For today’s law note, I’m addressing a comment that came to me last week from Dave O’Hern of Miller O’Hern Construction.  Dave writes:

    I am a general contractor doing a fuel tank replacement project for our county. In the specifications there is a spec for a UL 142 tank, on the plans the spec references UL 2085 ? a much more expensive tank. My subcontractor bid the UL 142 tank. The specifications state that the specs and plans are on the same level of precedence.

    The county wants me to furnish the more expensive tank without compensation citing the clause that states the plans and specs are complementary and what is called for by one is binding as if called by all and the most stringent requirement will apply.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Melissa Brumback of Ragsdale Liggett PLLC. Ms. Brumback can be contacted at mbrumback@rl-law.com.


    South Carolina Law Clarifies Statue of Repose

    July 11, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    A new law in South Carolina, H 3375, fixes a loophole in that state’s statute of repose. State law puts a cap of eight years on construction defects, but the 2008 law that set that limit had a loophole that would allow for construction defect claims to start thirteen years after construction. The law also provides a cap on punitive damages.

    The measure was backed by the Carolinas Association of General Contractors. Their spokesperson said that the legislation “increases our state’s ability to be economically competitive and helps protect our members from frivolous lawsuits.”

    Read the full story…

    Read South Carolina H 3375…


    Will They Blow It Up?

    March 28, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The issues concerning the Harmon Towers building in Las Vegas continue to make their way through the courts. As we noted in a previous piece, Cook County building officials stated that the building could be a hazard if Las Vegas were struck by an earthquake. The question of whether the building will continue to stand is just one of the issues in front of a judge.

    MGM Resorts International argued at a March 13 hearing for permission to implode the Harmon hotel building. They claim that more than 1,700 defects have been discovered in the building and that the building is a public safety hazard. Arguing against demolition, Perini Building Company, the general contractor for the hotel, and its subcontractors are claiming that imploding the building would destroy evidence and prejudice juries in the ongoing construction defect claims. They claim that MGM Resorts wishes to abandon the building due to the economic slowdown. Perini Corp, the contractor for the project, claims that the building can be fixed. Perini claims that MGM’s position in the construction trial would be improved if the building is demolished.

    After Judge Elizabeth Gonzalez heard the four days of testimony on the Harmon Towers building and whether it should be demolished, she scheduled more testimony, with two days in April and an entire week in July. Judge Gonzalez will be deciding whether the building will be torn down, imploded, or left in place.

    Read the full story…

    Read the full story…


    Parking Garage Collapse May Be Due to Construction Defect

    November 7, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    A parking garage under construction at the Doral campus of Miami Dade College collapsed on October 9. Experts state that the collapse may have been due to errors in the construction process, either in the fabrication of the pre-cast components or in their assembly. The Bradenton Herald quotes Mark Santos, a structural engineer, who “would look at erection procedures ?Äì that’s probably the one question to ask first.”

    During the failure, floors separated from the south wall of the structure. The contractor responsible for the garage, Ajax Building Corp, said there was “no indication of any potential cause.”

    Read the full story…


    Construction Defect Litigation at San Diego’s Alicante Condominiums?

    March 25, 2011 — Alicante HOA Website

    According to recent posts in the Alicante HOA website, construction experts and legal counsel have been retained. The HOA board has been informed that testing of a variety of the building’s components are underway or will begin in the near future.

    Read More...


    Insurer Has Duty to Disclose Insured's Interest In Obtaining Written Explanation of Arbitration Award

    October 23, 2012 — Tred Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    The issue faced by the Minnesota Supreme Court was whether the insurer had a duty to disclose the insured's interest in obtaining a written explanation of an arbitration award that identified the claims of recovery and the portions of the award attributable to each. Remodeling Dimensions, Inc. v. Integrity Mut. Ins. Co., 2012 LEXIS Minn. 404 (Minn. Sup. Ct., Aug. 22, 2012).

    Remodeling Dimensions, Inc. ("RDI") built an addition for the homeowners and installed windows in the original part of the house. After construction began, the homeowners also asked RDI to fix the master bedroom window in the original part of the house.

    After completion of the project, the house sustained storm damage.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    FHA Lists Bridges and Overpasses that May Have Defective Grout

    September 13, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The Federal Highway Administration has released a list of bridges and overpasses that may be prone to corrosion problems due to grout that was in chlorides when it was supposed to be completely free of them. Currently, the FHA is working with state departments of transportation to determine if the defective grout was indeed used on additional bridges and overpasses. The initial FHA list of structures determined to have been built with the defective grout lists thirty-four sites, of which four are in Ohio, the largest number for any state.

    California contains only one such site, the intersection of the 55 and 405 freeways, one of the few items on the list not designated as a bridge.

    Read the full story…


    The King of Construction Defect Scams

    June 19, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Echoing Businessweek, the Las Vegas Sun agrees that the Nevada HOA scandal is the “king of all Vegas real estate scams,” and says that the Nevada legislatures should take action. The Sun notes that the case involves only 12 out of 2,356 HOAs in Southern Nevada.

    To date, 25 people have plead guilty in the case. At the center were an attorney and contractor who allegedly referred work to each other. To enable this, they assembled a wider conspiracy of people who enriched by the process. In the words of the Sun, those involved “upended the concept of a ‘common interest’ community.”

    Read the full story…


    No Coverage for Construction Defects Under Alabama Law

    June 19, 2012 — Tred Eyerely, Insurance Law Hawaii

    The federal district court determined that under Alabama law, there was no coverage for breach of contract claims arising from alleged construction defects. Owners Ins. Co. v. Shep Jones Constr., Inc., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62085 (N.D. Ala. May 3, 2012).

    The insured entered a contract with the homeowner to remodel her home. After construction was completed, the homeowner sued the insured, alleging damages arising form breach of contract, negligence and negligent supervision.

    The insured had a policy with Owners Insurance Company. Owners Insurance defended under a reservation rights.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Wisconsin “property damage” caused by an “occurrence.”

    April 4, 2011 — April 4, 2011 in CDCoverage.com

    In American Family Mut. Ins. Co. v. American Girl, Inc., 673 N.W.2d 65 (Wis. 2004), the insured general contractor was hired by the owner to design and build a warehouse on the owner s property. The general contractor hired a soil engineer to do a soil analysis and make site preparation recommendations. The soil engineer determined that the soil conditions were poor and recommended a compression process which the general contractor followed. After the warehouse was completed and the owner took possession, excessive soil settlement caused the foundation to sink which in turn caused structural damage to the warehouse. The warehouse had to be torn down.

    Read the full story...

    Reprinted courtesy of CDCoverage.com


    Home Sales Still Low, But Enough to Spur Homebuilders

    August 16, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Although new home sales are still fifty percent below the average over the last forty years, the housing rebound has sent stock of homebuilders up 53 percent this year, during the same period, the S&P 500 rose only 12 percent. The San Francisco Chronicle reports that from 2005 through 2011, homebuilder stocks trailed the S&P 500.

    The growth isn’t limited to homebuilders alone. Building suppliers are also seeing a growth in sales, with profits for companies that make gypsum wallboard, cabinetry, plumbing products, and other items used in home building.

    Homebuilders have also been able to raise prices. Standard Pacific Corp of Irvine, California has raised prices and cut incentives. Nevertheless, the buyers still come. PulteGroup and D.R. Horton are also raising prices.

    Read the full story…


    New Washington Law Nixes Unfair Indemnification in Construction Contracts

    April 25, 2012 — Douglas Reiser, Builders Cousel

    Contractual fairness ? it is part of my mantra. If you read the blog, you probably know that I preach brevity, balance and clarity in contracting. The State of Washington did well to finally eliminate something that has angered me for quite some time ? unfair indemnification.

    One of my favorite construction contract revisions is mutual indemnification. Many “up the chain” contractors and owners are going to stick you with a unilateral indemnification clause that protects them for just about everything, including their own fumbling of a project. Adding mutual indemnification provides some balance, and keeps parties reliant upon each other for success on the job site.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Douglas Reiser of Reiser Legal LLC. Mr. Reiser can be contacted at info@reiserlegal.com


    Construction Jobs Expected to Rise in Post-Hurricane Rebuilding

    November 7, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Businessweek reports that construction jobs and materials will see increased demand as property owners in New York and New Jersey rebuild after hurricane Sandy. Tom Jeffery, of Irvine, California-based CoreLogic, a real estate information service, noted that “a high percent of damaged properties are going to be repaired.” Experts estimate property damage to total anywhere from $7 billion to $40 billion.

    It is also estimated that about 739,000 properties in the area are underwater in the way that has nothing to do with flooding, with negative equity of 25 percent or more. Many of these homeowners are likely to walk away from their mortgages.

    Ken Simonson, chief economist of the Associated General Contractors of America, expects “localized spikes in construction employment throughout November and the winter.” Martin Connor, the chief financial officer of Toll Brothers, expects to see more a rise in labor costs than in materials.

    Read the full story…


    Georgia Supreme Court Rules Construction Defects Can Constitute an Occurrence in CGL Policies

    April 5, 2011 — April 5, 2011 Beverley BevenFlorez - Construction Defect Journal

    Recently, the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed the decision in American Empire Surplus Lines Insurance Company v Hathaway Development Company, Inc. stating that because Whisnant’s faulty workmanship caused damage to the surrounding properties, the construction defects constituted “occurrences” under the Commercial General Liability (CGL) policy. Unlike the South Carolina Supreme court ruling in the case of Crossman Communities v Harleysville Mutual, the Georgia Supreme Court stated that an accident can happen intentionally if the effect is not the intended result.

    Interestingly, the only dissenting judge, J. Melton, disagreed with his colleagues on the basis that “although the term ‘accident’ is not specifically defined in the policy, it is axiomatic that an ‘accident’ cannot result from ‘intentional’ behavior.” It is clear that what constitutes an occurrence in CGL policies is still being hotly debated.

    Read the full story...


    Montrose Language Interpreted: How Many Policies Are Implicated By A Construction Defect That Later Causes a Flood?

    March 17, 2011 — By Shaun McParland Baldwin, March 17, 2011

    The Court of Appeals of Indiana recently addressed the “Montrose” language added to the CGL ISO form in 2001 in the context of a construction defect claim where a fractured storm drain caused significant flooding a year after the drain was damaged. The insuring agreement requires that “bodily injury” or “property damage” be caused by an “occurrence” and that the “bodily injury” or “property damage” occur during the policy period. The Montrose language adds that the insurance applies only if, prior to the policy period, no insured knew that the “bodily injury” or “property damage” had occurred in whole or in part. Significantly, it also states that any “bodily injury“ or “property damage” which occurs during the policy period and was not, prior to the policy period known to have occurred, includes a continuation, change or resumption of that “bodily injury” or “property damage” after the end of the policy period.

    In Grange Mutual Cas. Co. v. West Bend Mut. Ins. Co., No. 29D04-0706-PL-1112 (Ct. App. IN March 15, 2011), http://www.ai.org/judiciary/opinions/pdf/03151109ehf.pdf, Sullivan was the General Contractor for a school construction project. Its subcontractor, McCurdy, installed the storm drain pipes. One of the storm pipes was fractured in 2005 while McCurdy was doing its installation work. More than a year later, the school experienced significant water damage due to flooding. It was later discovered that the flooding was due to the fractured storm drain. Sullivan’s insurer paid $146,403 for the water damage. That insurer brought a subrogation claim against McCurdy and its two insurers: West Bend and Grange. West Bend had issued CGL coverage to McCurdy while the construction was ongoing , including the date in which the storm pipe was fractured. Grange issued CGL coverage to McCurdy at the time of the flooding. Those two carriers jointly settled the subrogation claim and then litigated which insurer actually owed coverage for the loss. Significantly, the loss that was paid included only damages from the flooding, not any damages for the cost of repairing the pipe.

    Read the full story...

    Reprinted courtesy of Shaun McParland Baldwin of Tressler LLP. Ms Baldwin can be contacted at sbaldwin@tresslerllp.com


    Differing Rulings On Construction Defect Claims Leave Unanswered Questions For Builders, and Construction Practice Groups. Impact to CGL Carriers, General Contractors, Builders Remains Unclear

    March 7, 2011 — March 7, 2011 Construction Defect Journal Staff

    In the past year a number of state and federal courts have rendered a number of conflicting decisions that promise to alter or perhaps shift entirely the paradigm, of how builders manage risk.

    According to a report today by Dave Lenckus in Property Casualty 360 “Nine state and federal courts and one state legislature over the past year have addressed whether a construction defect a defective product or faulty workmanship is fortuitous and therefore an occurrence under the commercial general liability insurance policy. Four jurisdictions determined it is; three said no; two ruled that a construction defect that causes consequential damage to property other than the work product is an occurrence; and one federal court contributed its conflicting case law that has developed in Oregon since its high court ruled in 2000 that a construction defect is not an occurrence”.

    The article strongly suggests that in the absence of a clear consensus over what the recent rulings mean for builders and contractors coverage disputes will intensify and continue to proliferate.

    Doing this on a state-by-state basis has caused a lot of confusion among buyers and sellers, said Jeffrey A. Segall, a Tampa-based senior vice president and the Florida Construction Practice leader at Willis of Florida, a unit of Willis Group Holdings.

    Read Full Story...


    Residential Construction: Shrinking Now, Growing Later?

    August 17, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Jim Haugey, the Chief Economist for Reed Construction Data noted that new residential construction spending fell 0.2% in June and a slightly larger drop of 0.5% in residential remodeling. While economic growth is still low, Haugey states that homebuilders have “record low inventories.” He forecasts a shrinkage of 1.5% in 2011, followed by about 20% growth in 2012.

    Read the full story…