BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    retail construction Hurst Illinois high-rise construction Hurst Illinois industrial building Hurst Illinois townhome construction Hurst Illinois tract home Hurst Illinois hospital construction Hurst Illinois office building Hurst Illinois condominium Hurst Illinois low-income housing Hurst Illinois custom homes Hurst Illinois parking structure Hurst Illinois structural steel construction Hurst Illinois production housing Hurst Illinois Subterranean parking Hurst Illinois housing Hurst Illinois casino resort Hurst Illinois mid-rise construction Hurst Illinois multi family housing Hurst Illinois landscaping construction Hurst Illinois condominiums Hurst Illinois Medical building Hurst Illinois concrete tilt-up Hurst Illinois
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Hurst, Illinois

    Illinois Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB4873 Pending: The Notice and Opportunity to Repair Act provides that a construction professional shall be liable to a homeowner for damages caused by the acts or omissions of the professional and his or her agents, employees, or subcontractors. This bill requires the service of notice to the professional of the complained-of defect in the construction by the homeowner prior to commencement of a lawsuit. Allows the professional to make an offer of repair or settlement and to rescind this offer if the claimant fails to respond within 30 days.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Hurst Illinois

    No state license required for general contracting. License required for roofing.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Greater Fox Valley
    Local # 1431
    PO Box 1146
    Saint Charles, IL 60174
    http://www.buildfoxvalley.com

    Northern Illinois Home Builders Association Inc
    Local # 1434
    3695 Darlene Ct Ste 102
    Aurora, IL 60504
    http://www.nihba.com

    Home Builders Association of Greater Chicago
    Local # 1425
    5999 S. New Wilke Rd Ste 104
    Rolling Meadows, IL 60008
    http://www.hbagc.com

    SouthWest Suburban Home Builders Association
    Local # 1432
    10767 W 163rd Pl
    Orland Park, IL 60467
    http://www.sshba.com

    Home Builders Association of the Greater Rockford Area
    Local # 1465
    631 N Longwood St Suite 102
    Rockford, IL 61107
    http://www.hbarockford.com

    Home Builders Association of Kankakee
    Local # 1445
    221 S Schuyler Ave Ste B
    Kankakee, IL 60901
    http://www.hbakankakee.com/

    Home Builders Association of Greater Peoria
    Local # 1455
    1599 N Main Street
    East Peoria, IL 61611
    http://www.peoriahba.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Hurst Illinois

    Orange County Home Builder Dead at 93

    Judge Kobayashi Determines No Coverage for Construction Defect Claim

    Construction Law Client Alert: California Is One Step Closer to Prohibiting Type I Indemnity Agreements In Private Commercial Projects

    There Is No Non-Delegable Duty on the Part of Residential Builders in Colorado

    Good Signs for Housing Market in 2013

    Faulty Workmanship Exclusion Does Not Bar Coverage

    Texas “your work” exclusion

    Architect Not Responsible for Injuries to Guests

    Florida trigger

    California Construction Bill Dies in Committee

    Yellow Brass Fittings Play a Crucial Role in Baker v Castle & Cooke Homes

    Construction Defect Case Not Over, Despite Summary Judgment

    Construction Defect Litigation at San Diego’s Alicante Condominiums?

    Construction Defects Lead to Demolition of Seattle’s 25-story McGuire Apartments Building

    No Coverage Under Ensuing Loss Provision

    Bound by Group Builders, Federal District Court Finds No Occurrence

    No Third-Quarter Gain for Construction

    Unit Owners Have No Standing to Sue under Condominium Association’s Policy

    New Households Moving to Apartments

    Nevada Senate Rejects Construction Defect Bill

    Federal District Court Continues to Find Construction Defects do Not Arise From An Occurrence

    Florida Chinese drywall, pollution exclusion, “your work” exclusion, and “sistership” exclusion.

    Death of Construction Defect Lawyer Ruled a Suicide

    No Coverage for Property Damage That is Limited to Work Completed by Subcontractor

    Construction Workers Unearth Bones

    Australian Developer Denies Building Problems Due to Construction Defects

    Kansas Man Caught for Construction Scam in Virginia

    Colorado “property damage” caused by an “occurrence” and exclusions j(5) and j(6) “that particular part”

    Harmon Hotel Construction Defect Update

    No Choice between Homeowner Protection and Bankrupt Developers?

    Granting Stay, Federal Court Reviews Construction Defect Coverage in Hawaii

    In Colorado, Primary Insurers are Necessary Parties in Declaratory Judgment Actions

    Important Information Regarding Colorado Mechanic’s Lien Rights.

    Defective Drains Covered Despite Water Intrusion Exclusion

    Construction Defects: 2010 in Review

    The Year 2010 In Review: Design And Construction Defects Litigation

    Massachusetts Couple Seek to Recuse Judge in Construction Defect Case

    One Colorado Court Allows Negligence Claim by General Contractor Against Subcontractor

    Vegas Hi-Rise Not Earthquake Safe

    Insurance for Defective Construction Now in Third Edition

    Federal Court Denies Summary Judgment in Leaky Condo Conversion

    Liability policy covers negligent construction: GA high court

    Geometrically Defined Drainage Cavities in EIFS as a Guard Against Defects

    Faulty Workmanship may be an Occurrence in Indiana CGL Policies

    California Assembly Bill Proposes an End to Ten Year Statute of Repose

    BHA Expands Construction Experts Group

    Insurer Not Liable for Construction Defect Revealed by Woodpecker

    Hawaii Building Codes to Stay in State Control

    Court Strikes Down Reasonable Construction Defect Settlement

    Boston Tower Project to Create 450 Jobs

    Florida Property Bill Passes Economic Affairs Committee with Amendments

    United States District Court Confirms That Insurers Can Be Held Liable Under The CCPA.

    A Call to Washington: Online Permitting Saves Money and the Environment

    California Posts Nation’s Largest Gain in Construction Jobs

    Australian Group Seeks Stronger Codes to Combat Dangerous Defects

    South Carolina Law Clarifies Statue of Repose

    Insurer Settles on Construction Defect Claim

    Exclusions Bar Coverage for Damage Caused by Chinese Drywall

    General Contractor/Developer May Not Rely on the Homeowner Protection Act to Avoid a Waiver of Consequential Damages in an AIA Contract

    One to Watch: Case Takes on Economic Loss Rule and Professional Duties

    Lower Court “Eminently Reasonable” but Wrong in Construction Defect Case

    Former New York Governor to Head Construction Monitoring Firm

    Nebraska Man Sentenced for Insurance Fraud in Construction Projects

    Fifth Circuit Reverses Insurers’ Summary Judgment Award Based on "Your Work" Exclusion

    Texas exclusions j(5) and j(6).

    Condominium Communities Must Complete Construction Defect Repairs, Says FHA

    Condominium Exclusion Bars Coverage for Construction Defect

    Ensuing Loss Provision Does Not Salvage Coverage

    Is There a Conflict of Interest When a CD Defense Attorney Becomes Coverage Counsel Post-Litigation?

    Guilty Pleas Draw Renewed Interest In Nevada’s Construction Defect Laws

    Insurer Has Duty to Defend in Water Intrusion Case

    Arizona Contractor Designs Water-Repellant Cabinets

    Differing Rulings On Construction Defect Claims Leave Unanswered Questions For Builders, and Construction Practice Groups. Impact to CGL Carriers, General Contractors, Builders Remains Unclear

    Federal Judge Dismisses Insurance Coverage Lawsuit In Construction Defect Case

    Contractor Burns Down Home, Insurer Refuses Coverage

    Texas Construction Firm Files for Bankruptcy

    BUILD Act Inching Closer To Reality

    Insurance Policy Provides No Coverage For Slab Collapse in Vision One

    Conspirators Bilked Homeowners in Nevada Construction Defect Claims

    Ohio Casualty’s and Beazer’s Motions were Granted in Part, and Denied in Part

    Construction Worker Dies after Building Collapse

    Gilroy Homeowners Sue over Leaky Homes

    Construction on the Rise in Denver

    Hawaii State Senate Requires CGL Carriers to Submit Premium Information To State Legislature

    FHA Lists Bridges and Overpasses that May Have Defective Grout

    Lien Claimant’s Right to Execute against Bond Upheld in Court of Appeals

    Contractual Liability Exclusion Bars Coverage

    Construction on the Rise in Washington Town

    Policyholder Fails to Build Adequate Record to Support Bad Faith Claim

    Colorado Senate Bill 12-181: 2012’s Version of a Prompt Pay Bill
    Corporate Profile

    HURST ILLINOIS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Hurst, Illinois Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Hurst Illinois forensic architect roofing and waterproofing expert witnessHurst Illinois forensic architect construction defect expert witnessHurst Illinois forensic architect ada design expert witnessHurst Illinois forensic architect construction expertsHurst Illinois forensic architect architectural expert witnessHurst Illinois forensic architect stucco expert witnessHurst Illinois forensic architect eifs expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Hurst, Illinois

    All Risk Policy Only Covers Repair to Portion of Dock That Sustains Damage

    January 6, 2012 — Tred Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    A portion of a dock on Lack Michigan operated by the Ports of Indiana suffered visible damage. See Ports of Indiana v. Lexington Ins. Co., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130979 (S.D. Ind. Nov. 14, 2011). Lexington Insurance Company insured the port. Lexington agreed that a portion of the dock was damaged and paid $1.2 million for repairs. A dispute arose, however, over whether additional sections of the dock were damaged and whether the damage was the result of more than one "occurrence."

    An expert report opined that a significant drop creating record lows in the water level of Lake Michigan in 2007 caused damage to the dock. Lexington maintained that only 128 feet of the dock was damaged; other portions of the dock did not sustain "direct physical loss or damage."

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Who Is To Blame For Defective — And Still LEED Certified — Courthouse Square?

    September 1, 2011 — Douglas Reiser, Builders Counsel

    Remember Courthouse Square? I sure do. We have talked about the closed and evacuated LEED certified building a couple of times here on Builders Counsel. Well, it’s back in the news. This time building professionals are pointing fingers — but there is some talk about a fix. Still, its LEED certification remains.

    If you read my past articles about Courthouse Square, you can get caught up on this mess. The short of it is that Salem, Oregon had the five-story government building and bus mall completed in 2000 for $34 Million. It was awarded LEED certification during the USGBC’s infancy. Last year, it became public that the building had significantly defective concrete and design. The Salem-Keizer Transit District worked with the City of Salem to shut the building down, and it has not been occupied since.

    Last fall, Courthouse Square failed thorough forensic testing leading to a lengthy bout with a number of insurers.  The contractors and designers had been hauled into court, but the Transit District was able to settle with the architect and contractors. The only remaining party involved in the lawsuit appears to be the engineering firm, Century West Engineering. Most expert reports have pinned the responsibility for the poor design and materials on Century West’s shoulders.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Douglas Reiser of Reiser Legal LLC. Mr. Reiser can be contacted at info@reiserlegal.com


    Largest Per Unit Settlement Ever in California Construction Defect Case?

    October 28, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    BusinessWire reports that the Chelsea Court Homeowners Association has settled their construction defect case for $5.4 million. That works out to $169,000 per unit, which BusinessWire describes as “California’s largest per-unit recovery known to be on record to date.”

    Most of the money in the settlement is coming from insurance companies for the builder and thirteen subcontractors. Issues included roof and window leaks, deck failures, and unsafe walkways.

    Read the full story...


    Pipes May Be Defective, But Owners Lack Standing

    September 13, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The United States District Court in Minnesota has determined that Steven and Cecilia Thundander cannot make a class-action claim against Uponor, Inc. over the plumbing in their home, as they do not have Article III standing. In this situation, the alleged defect is that Uponor made fraudulent claims that the pipes met National Sanitation Foundation (NSF) standards for use in potable water systems. Uponor submitted samples of other pipes, and their substitution was discovered when the NSF made an inspection of the manufacturing facility. The court noted that “the Thunanders contend that Uponor failed to inform homeowners, plumbers and consumers that it had been selling pipe that failed to meet NSF toxicity requirements at the time of sale and installation.”

    The Court noted that the Thunanders have not tested their piping to determine if they “demonstrate toxicity or lack of compliance with the NSF 61 standards,” noting also that the Complaint seeks to require Uponor to instruct the plaintiffs on “how to test the piping and water to determine the level of risk.” Lacking testing, the Court could not find that the Thundanders have defective pipes. The Court found that the “Plaintiffs have failed to adequately plead an injury in fact sufficient to confer standing as to their product liability claims.”

    The Court also concluded that it could not determine if the Plaintiff’s warranty actions could not be applied, as they “have failed to allege a plausible defect.” Even in the presence of a defect, the Court noted that more than eight years had passed before the filing of the suit, when the warranties under both Indiana and Minnesota law have a four-year statute of limitations. The Court also rejected the Thunanders tort claims, once again because “Plaintiffs have not tested their pipes,” noting that “a tort requires the existence of an injury.”

    In conclusion, Judge Nelson rejected the entirety of the complaint, granting the motions to dismiss by the defendants. However, despite the problems with the Thunanders’ claims, she found that they were not “patently frivolous or groundless.” Therefore, she denied attorney fees requested by one of the defendants.

    Read the court’s decision…


    Irene May Benefit Construction Industry

    September 1, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Noting that while it wasn’t the $15 billion disaster some predicted, Hurricane Irene still caused quite a bit of damage on its path up the Eastern Seaboard. Martha White, reporting for MSNBC cites Kinetc Analysis Corp. with an estimate of $7 billion in damage. Carl Van Horn, a professor of public policy at Rutgers University expected an initial decline in construction jobs, due to projects delayed due to the storm’s arrival, but he said, “a few weeks later, employment picks up as people rebuild.”

    Kinetic says that one unknown is how much of the damage is insured. They expect only $3 billion of damage will be covered by insurance. This would likely put a drag on consumer spending, as homeowners would have to dig into their own pockets to pay for repairs, according to Karl Smith, associate professor of economics and government at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

    Read the full story…


    Texas Construction Firm Files for Bankruptcy

    December 20, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    A Texas construction firm, founded in 1937, filed for bankruptcy, bringing twenty-two projects to a sudden halt, and resulting in the loss of jobs for hundreds of employees. Ballenger Construction told its employees to go home, as it could not complete the jobs. In some cases, work will need to be done to ensure that the work sites do not cause public safety hazards.

    Read the full story…


    Hawaii State Senate Requires CGL Carriers to Submit Premium Information To State Legislature

    March 20, 2011 — March 20, 2011 Construction Defect Journal Staff

    In light of the decision in Hawaii’s Intermediate Court of Appeals in Group Builders, Inc.,v. Admiral Insurance Company, 231 P.3d 67(2010), Hawaii’s state senate is requesting that "every domestic and foreign insurance company that has ever issued commercial general liability policies in the State is requested to submit information to the Legislature on the total premiums received for their commercial general liability policies during the past ten years"

    Read Full Text of Hawaii State Senate Resolution


    Parking Garage Collapse May Be Due to Construction Defect

    November 7, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    A parking garage under construction at the Doral campus of Miami Dade College collapsed on October 9. Experts state that the collapse may have been due to errors in the construction process, either in the fabrication of the pre-cast components or in their assembly. The Bradenton Herald quotes Mark Santos, a structural engineer, who “would look at erection procedures ?Äì that’s probably the one question to ask first.”

    During the failure, floors separated from the south wall of the structure. The contractor responsible for the garage, Ajax Building Corp, said there was “no indication of any potential cause.”

    Read the full story…


    Federal District Court Continues to Find Construction Defects do Not Arise From An Occurrence

    May 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Coverage for construction defects continues to be hotly contested in Hawaii state and federal courts. In a recent decision, Judge Mollway felt bound to follow the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Burlington Ins. Co. v. Oceanic Design & Constr., Inc., 383 F.3d 940, 944 (9th Cir. 2004), where the court found construction defect claims arise from breach of contract, not from an occurrence. Judge Mollway’s most recent decision on the issue is Illinois Nat. Ins. Co. v. Nordic PCL Constr., Inc., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58464 (D. Haw. April 26, 2012).

    Nordic constructed a grocery store for Safeway. In addition to the grocery store, Nordic built a 165-space rooftop parking deck, retail shops and related improvements. After opening for business in 2007, Safeway experienced significant leaks. Safeway demanded that Nordic repair the parking deck. Nordic sent the demand letter to the insurer, who agreed to appoint counsel subject to a reservation of rights.

    Safeway filed suit against Nordic in state court alleging, among other things, breach of contract and negligence. The insurer provided Nordic with a defense, but Nordic hired independent counsel.

    The insurer filed for declaratory relief in federal district court.

    Read the full story…


    Senate Committee Approves Military Construction Funds

    June 29, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    With a decrease in funding, as compared to the House bill, the Military Construction and Veteran’s Affairs subcommittee of the Senate moved on a $72 billion construction bill. The House version had approved an additional half billion dollars in funding. Senator Tim Johnson, Democrat of South Carolina, said that he expected easy reconciliation with the House version. The Senate bill will move to the full Senate Appropriations Committee on June 30.

    The bill, S 1255, includes funding for construction and remodeling of military housing, as well as construction and remodeling of base facilities.

    Read the full story…

    Read S1255


    Kentucky Court Upholds Arbitration Award, Denies Appeal

    June 15, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    The Kentucky Court of Appeals has ruled in Lake Cumberland Community Action Agency v. CMW, Inc. affirming the arbitration award. CMW, Inc. was responsible for the construction of a facility to be used for pre-school students and the housing of Alzheimer patients and senior citizens. An agreement was made that any disputes would be heard by an arbitrator selected by the construction industry.

    The plaintiff alleged that there were design and construction defects in the building trusses, violation of the Kentucky Building Code, and problems with the HVAC system. The arbitrator awarded $106,000 to the plaintiff which then sought to vacate the award. The circuit court upheld the arbitrator’s decision.

    The Court of Appeals found that there was no basis for rejecting the arbitrator’s decision, noting “there is nothing to show that there was any fraud or bias on the part of the arbitrator.” The appeals court, with all three judges concurring, upheld the arbitration award.

    Read the court’s decision


    Virginia Homebuilding Slumps After Last Year’s Gain

    June 19, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    As of May, only 61 residential construction permits have been issues in Roanoke County, Virginia, leaving officials doubtful that this year will meet last year’s mark of 179 permits. Residential construction was at its highest in the county in 2004. The worst year since then was 2009, when the county issued 143 permits. The county is in the western end of the state, near the border with West Virginia, and far from the D.C. metropolitan area.

    Arnold Covey, the Director of Community Development for the county said that “it may be until 2014 before we really see a difference. The article by WDBJ7.com notes that a “key part” of the county budget comes from real estate.

    Read the full story…


    Construction Defects Lead to Demolition of Seattle’s 25-story McGuire Apartments Building

    March 16, 2011 — March 16, 2011 Construction Defect Journal Staff

    According to a story published last Thursday in Seattle PI: " The 25-story McGuire Apartments, at Second Avenue and Wall Street, would cost more to fix than the building is worth, according to its owners. Its most serious defect involves steel cables that are corroding inside of concrete slabs because the ends weren’t properly treated with a rust-proof coating and a pocket in the edge of the concrete that wasn’t properly sealed"

    The report by Aubrey Cohen outlines the demolition plans which are expected to take between 12 and 18 months, and will utilize robotic Brokk Machines. The demolition plan calls for one story at a time to be demolished, with the debris to be trucked offsite. Demolition plans aim to minimize disruption to residents and businesses in the area by Limiting work 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. on weekdays and 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. Saturdays with "impact and percussive activities" limited to 8 a.m to 5 p.m weekdays.

    Read More...


    Contractor Manslaughter? Safety Shortcuts Are Not Worth It

    August 11, 2011 — Douglas Reiser, Builders Counsel

    It’s been a while since I discussed the importance of safety. But, a recent article on ENR.com compelled this brief article. Don’t shortcut safety — you could be facing serious criminal repercussions.

    A New York crane company owner and one of his employees are each facing a second-degree manslaughter charge for the death of two construction workers.  The charges stem from the collapse of a crane in New York City. The district attorney determined that the crane owner cut a few corners to reduce its operation costs, significantly sacrificing safety.

    Another example was the 2010 trial of another New York crane operator who was charged with manslaughter. In that case, the criminal charges failed to stick, but an administrative judge found that the contractor used a damaged sling to support the steel collar binding the tower-crane mast to the 18th floor of a high-rise building being constructed. The company also used four slings instead of the eight, as specified by the crane manufacturer; improperly attached the slings and failed to pad or soften them.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Douglas Reiser of Reiser Legal LLC. Mr. Reiser can be contacted at info@reiserlegal.com


    Washington Court Limits Lien Rights of Construction Managers

    August 17, 2011 — Douglas Reiser, Builders Counsel

    A newly filed, yet unpublished, court opinion opines that a construction manager cannot file a construction lien in Washington state. So, how far reaching is this opinion?

    In the case of Blue Diamond Group Inc. v. KB Seattle 1, Inc., et al, a New York construction manager filed a lien against the Westfield Southcenter Mall in Tukwila, Washington. The lien was filed after the owner of a coffee stand failed to pay Blue Diamond for consulting services used in the construction of a kiosk.

    Blue Diamond served as the owner’s agent, assisting with managing subcontractors, vendors and other tasks. The manager’s tasks also included paying invoices, managing deliveries, setting schedules and other site managerial tasks. Blue Diamond was not registered as a contractor under Washington’s RCW 18.27.

    Read the full story…

    Read the court’s decision…

    Reprinted courtesy of Douglas Reiser of Reiser Legal LLC. Mr. Reiser can be contacted at info@reiserlegal.com


    New Households Moving to Apartments

    December 20, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The New York Times reports that multifamily construction?Äîapartment buildings?Äîis leading the recovery in construction. Construction of single-family homes is only a third of the way up from its fall from its earlier heights, while multifamily construction has recovered two-thirds of its peak. Young adults are moving out of their parents’ homes, but instead of buying homes, they’re renting apartments.

    Houston is adding thousands of new units, leading to a fear of overbuilding. Rents have been rising, but as the supply of apartment units rises, higher rents may be unsustainable. However, during the recession, young adults did not move out of their parents’ homes, leading to about two million doubled-up households. David Crowe, the chief economist of the National Association of Home Builders, noted that “all of the net addition to households since 2004 has been in rentals.”

    Read the full story…


    Construction Defects Lead to Demolition

    May 26, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Ten years after it was built, demolition of Seattle’s McGuire Building has begun, as Jeanne Lang Jones reports in the Puget Sound Business Journal. Construction defects had rendered the 25-story apartment building uninhabitable. The major problem was corroded steel cabling. According to the report, “the building’s owners reached an undisclosed settlement last year with St. Louis-based contractor McCarthy Building Companies.”

    Read the full story…


    Nevada District Court Dismisses Case in Construction Defect Coverage Suit

    August 16, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The United States District Court of Nevada has dismissed a case filed by Maryland Casualty Company against National Fire & Marine Insurance Company. This case follows a case in which National was sued over “200 causes of action arising out of 193 separate insurance coverage disputes related to 75 different insureds and 163 unrelated construction defect or Chapter 40 proceedings across seven states.” The judge in this initial case severed the plaintiffs, as he found that allowing joinder “would make this case impossible to manage.” In this particular instance, National seeks to have the claims made by Maryland Casualty dismissed.

    Maryland Casualty alleged that for insurance policies issued to 38 companies, National was obligated to defend the insured. National was, according to the plaintiff, named as defendants in 72 unrelated lawsuits to which National disclaimed coverage. However, the court found that Maryland Casualty failed “to provide enough detail regarding the relevant property damage, policies, claims, and time periods.” The court found that Maryland failed to “state a claim upoin which relief can be granted.

    The court also found that “the Complaint lacks any well-pled allegations from which the Court could conclude the Plaintiff has standing since the Complaint is devoid of information about the specific policies at issue.

    The court did allow Maryland Casualty up to September 3, 2012 in which to file an amended complaint.

    Read the court’s decision…