BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Subterranean parking Bridgeport Connecticut multi family housing Bridgeport Connecticut condominiums Bridgeport Connecticut landscaping construction Bridgeport Connecticut housing Bridgeport Connecticut tract home Bridgeport Connecticut custom home Bridgeport Connecticut hospital construction Bridgeport Connecticut concrete tilt-up Bridgeport Connecticut condominium Bridgeport Connecticut industrial building Bridgeport Connecticut production housing Bridgeport Connecticut Medical building Bridgeport Connecticut retail construction Bridgeport Connecticut high-rise construction Bridgeport Connecticut townhome construction Bridgeport Connecticut custom homes Bridgeport Connecticut institutional building Bridgeport Connecticut casino resort Bridgeport Connecticut mid-rise construction Bridgeport Connecticut low-income housing Bridgeport Connecticut structural steel construction Bridgeport Connecticut
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Bridgeport, Connecticut

    Connecticut Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Bridgeport Connecticut

    License required for electrical and plumbing trades. No state license for general contracting, however, must register with the State.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders & Remo Assn of Fairfield Co
    Local # 0780
    433 Meadow St
    Fairfield, CT 06824
    http://www.buildfairfieldcounty.com

    Builders Association of Eastern Connecticut
    Local # 0740
    20 Hartford Rd Suite 18
    Salem, CT 06420
    http://www.baec.net

    Home Builders Association of New Haven Co
    Local # 0720
    2189 Silas Deane Highway
    Rocky Hill, CT 06067
    http://www.hbanewhaven.com

    Home Builders Association of Hartford Cty Inc
    Local # 0755
    2189 Silas Deane Hwy
    Rocky Hill, CT 06067
    http://www.hbahartford.com

    Home Builders Association of NW Connecticut
    Local # 0710
    110 Brook St
    Torrington, CT 06790
    http://www.hbanwct.org

    Home Builders Association of Connecticut (State)
    Local # 0700
    3 Regency Dr Ste 204
    Bloomfield, CT 06002
    http://www.hbact.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Bridgeport Connecticut

    Liability policy covers negligent construction: GA high court

    No Coverage Under Ensuing Loss Provision

    OSHA Cites Construction Firm for Safety Violations

    Renovation Contractors: Be Careful How You Disclose Your Projects

    An Upward Trend in Commercial Construction?

    Connecticut Gets Medieval All Over Construction Defects

    Virginia Homebuilding Slumps After Last Year’s Gain

    Preventing Costly Litigation Through Your Construction Contract

    Construction Firm Charged for Creating “Hail” Damage

    Bad Faith and a Partial Summary Judgment in Seattle Construction Defect Case

    Gut Feeling Does Not Disqualify Expert Opinion

    Guilty Pleas Draw Renewed Interest In Nevada’s Construction Defect Laws

    Five Years of Great Legal Blogging at Insurance Law Hawaii

    Texas contractual liability exclusion

    Legislatures Shouldn’t Try to Do the Courts’ Job

    Texas Court of Appeals Conditionally Grant Petition for Writ of Mandamus to Anderson

    Allowing The Use Of a General Verdict Form in a Construction Defect Case Could Subject Your Client to Prejudgment Interest

    Builder to Appeal Razing of Harmon Tower

    General Contractor/Developer May Not Rely on the Homeowner Protection Act to Avoid a Waiver of Consequential Damages in an AIA Contract

    Builder Cannot Receive Setoff in Construction Defect Case

    Fifth Circuit Asks Texas Supreme Court to Clarify Construction Defect Decision

    Water Drainage Case Lacks Standing

    No Third-Quarter Gain for Construction

    Arizona Supreme Court Confirms Eight-Year Limit on Construction Defect Lawsuits

    Joinder vs. Misjoinder in Colorado Construction Claims: Roche Constructors v. One Beacon

    Contractor Burns Down Home, Insurer Refuses Coverage

    Driver’s Death May Be Due to Construction Defect

    Subcontractor Not Liable for Defending Contractor in Construction Defect Case

    Washington Court Limits Lien Rights of Construction Managers

    Drug Company Provides Cure for Development Woes

    Record-Setting Construction in Fargo

    Contract Not So Clear in South Carolina Construction Defect Case

    Australian Group Seeks Stronger Codes to Combat Dangerous Defects

    Florida Law: Defects in Infrastructure Improvements Not Covered in Home Construction Warranties

    Contractual Liability Exclusion Bars Coverage

    West Coast Casualty Promises Exciting Line Up at the Nineteenth Annual Conference

    Colorado “property damage” caused by an “occurrence” and exclusions j(5) and j(6) “that particular part”

    Safe Harbors- not just for Sailors anymore (or, why advance planning can prevent claims of defective plans & specs) (law note)

    Construction Defect Lawsuit Stayed by SB800

    After Katrina Came Homes that Could Withstand Isaac

    No Coverage For Damage Caused by Chinese Drywall

    Florida trigger

    Condo Owners Worried Despite Settlement

    Boston’s Tunnel Project Plagued by Water

    Home Builder Doesn’t See Long Impact from Hurricane

    Window Manufacturer Weathers Recession by Diversifying

    Construction Case Alert: Appellate Court Confirms Engineer’s Duty to Defend Developer Arises Upon Tender of Indemnity Claim

    Harsh New Time Limits on Construction Defect Claims

    Reference to "Man Made" Movement of Earth Corrects Ambiguity

    California Lawyer Gives How-To on Pursuing a Construction Defect Claim

    Ensuing Losses From Faulty Workmanship Must be Covered

    Couple Sues Attorney over Construction Defect Case, Loses

    South Carolina Contractors Regain General Liability Coverage

    North Carolina Exclusion j(6) “That Particular Part”

    Florida Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Homeowners Unaware of Construction Defects and Lack of Permits

    Insurers Reacting to Massachusetts Tornadoes

    Homeowners Not Compelled to Arbitration in Construction Defect Lawsuit

    Dust Infiltration Due to Construction Defect Excluded from Policy

    Ohio Court Finds No Coverage for Construction Defect Claims

    Eleventh Circuit Asks Georgia Supreme Court if Construction Defects Are Caused by an "Occurrence"

    Are Construction Defects Covered by Your General Liability Policy?

    Condo Board May Be Negligent for not Filing Construction Defect Suit in a Timely Fashion

    Instant Hotel Tower, But Is It Safe?

    Preparing for Trial on a Cause of Action for Violation of Civil Code section 895, et seq.

    Harmon Hotel Construction Defect Update

    Ohio Court Finds No Coverage for Construction Defect Claims

    “Other Insurance” and Indemnity Provisions Determine Which Insurer Must Cover

    Construction Upturn in Silicon Valley

    The Hidden Dangers of Construction Defect Litigation

    Appeals Court Reverses Summary Judgment over Defective Archway Construction

    Georgia Supreme Court Rules Construction Defects Can Constitute an Occurrence in CGL Policies

    Nevada Supreme Court Reverses Decision against Grader in Drainage Case

    Contractor Manslaughter? Safety Shortcuts Are Not Worth It

    Homeowner may pursue negligence claim for construction defect, Oregon Supreme Court holds

    Coverage Rejected Under Owned Property and Alienated Property Exclusions

    Plaintiff Not Entitled to Further Damages over Defective Decking

    Condominium Exclusion Bars Coverage for Construction Defect

    MGM Seeks to Demolish Harmon Towers

    Construction on the Rise in Washington Town

    Application of Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine Supports Coverage

    Contractor Convicted of Additional Fraud

    Recent Case Brings Clarity and Questions to Statute of Repose Application

    Toxic Drywall Not Covered Under Homeowner’s Policy

    Arbitration Clause Found Ambiguous in Construction Defect Case

    United States District Court Confirms That Insurers Can Be Held Liable Under The CCPA.

    Retaining Wall Contractor Not Responsible for Building Damage

    The Flood Insurance Reform Act May be Extended to 2016

    More Charges in Las Vegas HOA Construction Defect Scam

    A Downside of Associational Standing - HOA's Claims Against Subcontractors Barred by Statute of Limitations

    History of Defects Leads to Punitive Damages for Bankrupt Developer
    Corporate Profile

    BRIDGEPORT CONNECTICUT CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Bridgeport, Connecticut Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Bridgeport Connecticut forensic architect roofing and waterproofing expert witnessBridgeport Connecticut forensic architect construction expert witness public projectsBridgeport Connecticut forensic architect building envelope expert witnessBridgeport Connecticut forensic architect soil failure expert witnessBridgeport Connecticut forensic architect construction defect expert witnessBridgeport Connecticut forensic architect ada design expert witnessBridgeport Connecticut forensic architect defective construction expert
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Bridgeport, Connecticut

    Construction Workers Face Dangers on the Job

    November 18, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    OSHA calculates that for each 33,000 active construction workers, one will die on the job each year, making their risk over the course of their careers at one out of every 200 workers. This puts it many times over OSHA’s definition of “significant risk” of 1 death per 1,000 workers over the course of their careers. According to an article in People’s World, “the main risk of death is from falls.”

    At a talk at the American Public Health Association’s meeting, one expert noted that “construction workers make up 6 percent to 8 percent of all workers, but account for 20 percent of all deaths on the job every year.”

    Read the full story…


    Changes to Arkansas Construction and Home Repair Laws

    September 30, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    A new law, set to take effect in 2012, lowers the ceiling on when work must be done by a licensed contractor. Through the end of the year, projects costing $20,000 or more had to be done by an Arkansas licensed contractor. As of January 1, 2012, that new limit will be $2,000.

    This will apply to all single-family residences and according to Lovely County Citizen, covers “construction, alteration, renovation, repair, modification, improvement, removal, demotion, or addition to a pre-existing structure.” Residential building contractors will be required to have workers compensation insurance, as will home improvement contactors if they take jobs worth more than $20,000.

    Morris Dillow, a building inspector in Holiday Island, said, “It will get these scammers out of here who are ripping people off.” He cited the example of a contractor who after getting paid for roof repairs and painting, left the job unfinished.

    Read the full story…


    Texas Construction Firm Files for Bankruptcy

    December 20, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    A Texas construction firm, founded in 1937, filed for bankruptcy, bringing twenty-two projects to a sudden halt, and resulting in the loss of jobs for hundreds of employees. Ballenger Construction told its employees to go home, as it could not complete the jobs. In some cases, work will need to be done to ensure that the work sites do not cause public safety hazards.

    Read the full story…


    The Montrose Language Interpreted: How Many Policies Are Implicated By A Construction Defect That Later Causes a Flood?

    March 17, 2011 — By Shaun McParland Baldwin, March 17, 2011

    The Court of Appeals of Indiana recently addressed the “Montrose” language added to the CGL ISO form in 2001 in the context of a construction defect claim where a fractured storm drain caused significant flooding a year after the drain was damaged. The insuring agreement requires that “bodily injury or “property damage” be caused by an occurrence and that the “bodily injury or “property damage” occur during the policy period. The Montrose language adds that the insurance applies only if, prior to the policy period, no insured knew that the “bodily injury or “property damage” had occurred in whole or in part. Significantly, it also states that any “bodily injury” or “property damage” which occurs during the policy period and was not, prior to the policy period known to have occurred, includes a continuation, change or resumption of that “bodily injury” or “property damage” after the end of the policy period.

    In Grange Mutual Cas. Co. v. West Bend Mut. Ins. Co., No. 29D04-0706-PL-1112 (Ct. App. IN March 15, 2011), http://www.ai.org/judiciary/opinions/pdf/03151109ehf.pdf, Sullivan was the General Contractor for a school construction project. Its subcontractor, McCurdy, installed the storm drain pipes. One of the storm pipes was fractured in 2005 while McCurdy was doing its installation work. More than a year later, the school experienced significant water damage due to flooding. It was later discovered that the flooding was due to the fractured storm drain. Sullivanrsquo;s insurer paid $146,403 for the water damage. That insurer brought a subrogation claim against McCurdy and its two insurers: West Bend and Grange. West Bend had issued CGL coverage to McCurdy while the construction was ongoing, including the date in which the storm pipe was fractured. Grange issued CGL coverage to McCurdy at the time of the flooding. Those two carriers jointly settled the subrogation claim and then litigated which insurer actually owed coverage for the loss. Significantly, the loss that was paid included only damages from the flooding, not any damages for the cost of repairing the pipe.

    Read the full story...

    Reprinted courtesy of Shaun McParland Baldwin of Tressler LLP. Ms Baldwin can be contacted at sbaldwin@tresslerllp.com


    Firm Sued For Construction Defects in Parking Garage

    October 23, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Northhampton County, Pennsylvania is suing a contractor who resurfaced a parking garage in 2009. According to the Express-Times, three years later, the surface is cracked and the county is seeking $700,000 for repairs. Additionally, they have withheld $44,000 of the $2.2 million contract because of the problems. John Stoffa, Northampton County Executive, says that the garage is stable, but not up to safety standards.

    Read the full story…


    California Lawyer Gives How-To on Pursuing a Construction Defect Claim

    September 13, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    On his recently started blog, Harry Kaladjian writes about construction defect litigation in California. He notes that after taking possession, homeowners sometimes notices problems such as “slab cracks in the garage, water leaking through the ceiling, warped floors, improper framing, cracking stucco, etc.” He goes on to note that once that happens, there are series of things homeowners must do.

    The first is to be concerned about the statute of limitations. Then, “once it has been established that defects exist, the homeowner must refer to the ‘Right to Repair Act’ and ‘Calderon Procedures.’” These, he notes set out the “pre-litigation procedures prior to filing a lawsuit.”

    Read the full story…


    Orange County Home Builder Dead at 93

    April 25, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Randall E. Presley was a homebuilder in Southern California for more than thirty years, acting as head of Presley Development Company from 1956 until selling the firm to Lyon Homes in 1987. The two companies merged in 1991 as the Presley Cos. Mr. Presley saw the need in the 1950s to provide people in Southern California with low- to medium-priced quality homes.

    His firm built more than 160 communities and was among the ten largest homebuilding firms in the country, expanding beyond California. Mr. Presley was 93 when he succumbed to pneumonia. He is survived by a wife, three children, seven grandchildren, and 11 great-grandchildren.

    Read the full story…


    Does the New Jersey Right-To-Repair Law Omit Too Many Construction Defects?

    January 6, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    A post on the blog of Liberty Building Forensics Group find fault with the New Jersey Home Warranty and Builders’ Registration Act for not being stringent enough. The poster notes the coverage given under the bill. In the first year, builders are responsible to remedy faulty workmanship and materials and major structural defects. While other protections expire in the first or second year, there is a ten year coverage of major construction defects.

    The blogger finds fault with the exclusion New Jersey law places on these claims, arguing that “due to the stringent definition of ‘major construction defects,” the warranty affords no coverage unless the house is practically collapsing.” The bill excludes leaks, cracks, and mold, and further limits claims if the homeowner has failed to inform the builder or insurer of defects, failure to maintain the home, and alterations made by the homeowner.

    The intent of the New Jersey law is given as “requiring that newly constructed homes conform to certain construction and quality standards as well as to provide buyers of new homes with insurance-backed warranty protection in the event such standards are not met.” It’s argued in the piece that it instead serves to “strip homeowners of any meaningful means of recovery for discovered construction defects.”

    Read the full story…


    Building Inspector Jailed for Taking Bribes

    September 30, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    The LA Times reports that Raoul Germain, a city Los Angeles building inspector has been sentenced to 21 months in prison after pleading guilty to taking bribes. Germain was caught as part of an FBI sting operation in which he approved work in exchange for thousands of dollars in bribes. The Times notes that that in some cases, Germain never visited the construction sites. Germain was offered a chance to cooperate with investigators. His lawyer, Steve Cron asked the Times, “What do you think happens to someone who cooperates?”

    In addition to Germain, another city inspector has pleaded guilty to taking bribes and two more employees of the Department of Building and Safety have been fired in connection with the investigation.

    Read the full story…


    Ensuing Loss Provision Does Not Salvage Coverage

    December 9, 2011 — Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    Water intrusion caused by a construction defect was not covered under the all risk policy’s ensuing loss provision. See Friedberg v. Chubb & Son, Inc., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123582 (D. Minn. Oct. 25, 2011).

    Extensive water damage was discovered in the insureds’ home when a small hole in the exterior wall was being repaired. Chubb’s adjuster and an expert found water intrusion causing rot, mold, and damage to the home’s wood framing and insulation. Chubb denied coverage because water intruded through the roof and wall, resulting in gradual deterioration. The insureds filed suit.

    The policy excluded coverage for construction defects, but insured "ensuing covered loss unless another exclusion applies."

    The court agreed there was a prima facie case for coverage because the home suffered a physical loss.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Construction Delayed by Discovery of Bones

    June 28, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Work stopped on a $7 million construction project in Oak Harbor, Washington, after three sets of Native American remains were found. The Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation had suggested that the project employ an archaeologist. City, state, and tribal officials are determining what will happen next. The Seattle Times reports that Jim Slowik, Oak Harbor’s mayor, has asked for a review of why no archaeologist was part of the project.

    Read the full story…


    Businesspeople to Nevada: Revoke the Construction Defect Laws

    March 1, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The Nevada chapter of the National Federation of Independent Businesses has said that Nevada’s construction defect and minimum wage laws are hampering job growth. The organization conducted a survey, and although only about two percent of the members responded, they passed the opinions of the group on to Governor Brian Sandoval. Sandoval has said, according to the report by Fox News Reno, that he wants the state to be more business friendly. He supports reforms to Nevada’s construction defect laws, saying that he’d “like to see some reform” on the issue of mandatory attorney’s fees.

    Randi Thompson, the spokesperson for the Nevada chapter of the National Federation of Independent Businesses, said that members of her organization would like to see current Nevada construction defect law revoked. She described current law as “driven towards lawyers and not toward protecting consumers.”

    Read the full story…


    Vegas Hi-Rise Not Earthquake Safe

    July 12, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    If an earthquake hit Las Vegas, the Harmon Tower would not withstand it. A report from Weidlinger Associates told MGM Resorts that “in a code-level earthquake, using either the permitted or current code specified loads, it is likely that critical structural members in the tower will fail and become incapable of supporting gravity loads, leading to a partial or complete collapse of the tower.” The inspection came at the request of county officials, according to the article in Forbes.

    According to Ronald Lynn, directory of the building division in the county’s development services division, “these deficiencies, in their current state, make the building uninhabitable.” The county is concerned about risks to adjacent buildings.

    MGM Resorts is currently in litigation, separate from the stability issues, with Perini Corp., the builders of Harmon Tower.

    Read the full story…


    Contractors with Ties to Trustees Reaped Benefits from LA Community College Modernization Program

    March 3, 2011 — Original reporting by Gale Holland, Michael Finnegan and Doug Smith, Los Angeles Times

    In the latest installment of the “Billions To Spend” series of investigative reports focused on construction defects, management, and cost issues relevant to LACC’s Community College Modernization Projects, the LA Times examines the costs associated with the various layers of construction management and benefits that accrued to contractors with ties to LACC trustees.

    The reporting by the Times is seemingly critical of the project’s utilization of “body shops” an industry term for companies that function as employers of record. The article segment published today cites a number of circumstances wherein their utilization appears to have escalated costs substantially.

    “To gauge the cost of the staffing system, The Times reviewed thousands of pages of financial records from April 2007, when URS began managing the program, to July 2010. Reporters identified two dozen contractors serving as conduits for pay and benefits for employees they did not supervise.

    At least 230 people were employed in this manner, at a total cost of about $40 million, the records show.

    Approximately $18 million of the total was paid to the employees, according to the Times analysis. The remaining $22 million went to profit and overhead for contractors, the records indicate.

    For employees on its own payroll, the district says that medical and other benefits increase compensation costs 40% above base salaries. So if the district had employed its construction staff directly, the total cost for the period studied would have been $25 million instead of $40 million, a savings of $15 million, The Times calculated.”

    Read Full Story...


    Southern California Lost $8 Billion in Construction Wages

    August 17, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Los Angeles and Orange Counties are first on a list no area wants to be on. According to the Sacramento Bee, reporting on data from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, LA and Orange Counties saw an $8 billion drop in construction wages in 2010, as compared to 2006. In 2006, the region saw payrolls of $26.8 billion, but in 2010, that was reduced to $18.5 billion.

    This was not the largest percentage change. Of the metropolitan areas with the largest declines in construction earnings, Las Vegas saw a $3.6 billion drop, however that represented half of their 2006 totals of $7.2 billion. Conversely, a $3.3 billion drop in the New York area represented only 10% of what had been $33.8 billion in payroll in 2006.

    Read the full story…


    Celebrities Lose Case in Construction Defect Arbitration

    May 26, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    An arbitration panel has ruled that problems with the Idaho home of actors Tom Hanks and Rita Wilson were not due to construction defects but rather to “poor design and bad architectural advice.” The couple had settled with the architectural firm, Lake Flato of San Antonio, Texas for $900,000 and was subsequently seeking $3 million from Storey Construction of Ketchum, Idaho.

    Problems with the couple’s home “included leaking roofs, inadequate drainage, fireplaces that did not vent properly and an inadequate air-conditioning system. In 2003, sliding snow from the roof damaged kitchen windows and roof components.”

    The arbitration panel, according to the report in the Idaho Mountain Express and Guide, noted that “Hanks and Wilson were responsible for the full $167,623 cost of arbitration, but further denied a Storey Construction counterclaim that alleged Hanks and Wilson filed their claim out of malice.”

    Read the full story…


    Consumer Protection Act Whacks Seattle Roofing Contractor

    July 21, 2011 — Douglas Reiser, Builders Council

    It’s been over 1 year since we last visited the CertainTeed Corp. v. Seattle Roof Brokers lawsuit. After my original post, the contractor, James Garcia, appeared at Builders Counsel in a comment to defend himself. It appears that 1 year later, the court decided to side with CertainTeed and award them significant attorneys’ fees. Ready for the whole story? Its a pricey one.

    Back in July 2010, good friend Mike Atkins (Seattle Trademark Attorney) authored a post about a Seattle roofing contractor who had been sued for false advertising on his website. The lawsuit was raised by CertainTeed, a roofing material producer, whose products were the target of a Seattle contractor’s ire. Seattle Roof Brokers, owned by James Garcia, published content on its website, remarking that CertainTeed products have a history of “premature failure” and that they “will fail?.resale inspection after 15-20 years.”

    CertainTeed filed its action to obtain an injunction and damages under the Consumer Protection Act.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Douglas Reiser of Reiser Legal LLC. Mr. Reiser can be contacted at info@reiserlegal.com


    South Carolina Law Clarifies Statue of Repose

    July 11, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    A new law in South Carolina, H 3375, fixes a loophole in that state’s statute of repose. State law puts a cap of eight years on construction defects, but the 2008 law that set that limit had a loophole that would allow for construction defect claims to start thirteen years after construction. The law also provides a cap on punitive damages.

    The measure was backed by the Carolinas Association of General Contractors. Their spokesperson said that the legislation “increases our state’s ability to be economically competitive and helps protect our members from frivolous lawsuits.”

    Read the full story…

    Read South Carolina H 3375…