BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    multi family housing Sweet Idaho production housing Sweet Idaho industrial building Sweet Idaho low-income housing Sweet Idaho office building Sweet Idaho condominiums Sweet Idaho Medical building Sweet Idaho high-rise construction Sweet Idaho institutional building Sweet Idaho hospital construction Sweet Idaho custom home Sweet Idaho casino resort Sweet Idaho retail construction Sweet Idaho parking structure Sweet Idaho structural steel construction Sweet Idaho townhome construction Sweet Idaho tract home Sweet Idaho concrete tilt-up Sweet Idaho mid-rise construction Sweet Idaho Subterranean parking Sweet Idaho custom homes Sweet Idaho landscaping construction Sweet Idaho
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Sweet, Idaho

    Idaho Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB133; title 6 increases builder liability by creating responsibility for attorney fees if the homeowner/HOA prevails; places stringent demands on builder to comply with statutes and repair/compromise/settle; compliance protects against liability for resultant personal property damage; NOR is triggered by any construction defect in a new or substantially remodeled dwelling; Owner must notice "professional"; pro must respond within 21 days; claimant must accept/reject within 30 days; or if the pro inspects, he must provide offer or statement within 14 days and claimant must accept/reject within 30 days; law appears, by definition, to impose same timelines on builder pro in cross-complaining


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Sweet Idaho

    License required for electrical, plumbing, pesticide, manufactured housing, landscape architecture, and asbestos removal. No state license for general contracting.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Upper Valley Building Contractors Association
    Local # 1335
    310 North 2nd East Ste 143
    Rexburg, ID 83440
    http://www.uvbca.com

    Building Contractors Association of SW Idaho
    Local # 1325
    6206 N Discovery Way Ste A
    Boise, ID 83713
    http://www.bcaswi.org

    Idaho State Home Builders Association
    Local # 1300
    6206 N Discovery Way Ste A
    Boise, ID 83713
    http://www.ibca.org

    Building Contractors Association of Wood River Valley
    Local # 1395
    PO Box 2721
    Hailey, ID 83333


    Snake River Valley Building Contractors Association
    Local # 1375
    1123 12 Ave S
    Nampa, ID 83651
    http://www.srvbca.com

    Eastern Idaho Builders Association
    Local # 1340
    PO Box 1782
    Idaho Falls, ID 83403
    http://www.eihba.org

    Building Contractors Association of South East Idaho Afiil w/ National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 1305
    770 E Chubbuck Rd.
    Chubbuck, ID 83205
    http://www.idahohomebuilders.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Sweet Idaho

    Illinois Court Determines Insurer Must Defend Property Damage Caused by Faulty Workmanship

    Ensuing Loss Provision Does Not Salvage Coverage

    Seven Former North San Diego County Landfills are Leaking Contaminants

    Appeals Court Upholds Decision by Referee in Trial Court for Antagan v Shea Homes

    Are Construction Defects Covered by Your General Liability Policy?

    Water Damage Covered Under Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine

    Homeowners May Not Need to Pay Lien on Defective Log Cabin

    Australian Developer Denies Building Problems Due to Construction Defects

    Joinder vs. Misjoinder in Colorado Construction Claims: Roche Constructors v. One Beacon

    California Supreme Court to Examine Arbitration Provisions in Several Upcoming Cases

    Hospital Construction Firm Settles Defect Claim for $1.1 Million

    Architect Not Liable for Balcony’s Collapse

    South Carolina Legislature Defines "Occurrence" To Include Property Damage Arising From Faulty Workmanship

    Seller Cannot Compel Arbitration for Its Role in Construction Defect Case<

    Cabinetmaker Exceeds Expectations as Conditions Improve

    Water District Denied New Trial in Construction Defect Claim

    Colorado Court of Appeals Rejects Retroactive Application of C.R.S. § 13-20-808.

    Crane Dangles and So Do Insurance Questions

    David McLain to Speak at the CDLA 2012 Annual Conference

    Virginia Chinese Drywall “property damage” caused by an “occurrence” and number of “occurrences”

    Arizona Court of Appeals Rules Issues Were Not Covered in Construction Defect Suit

    Construction Firm Charged for Creating “Hail” Damage

    No Coverage for Construction Defects Under Alabama Law

    Water Is the Enemy

    A Downside of Associational Standing - HOA's Claims Against Subcontractors Barred by Statute of Limitations

    Counterpoint: Washington Supreme Court to Rule on Resulting Losses in Insurance Disputes

    Good Signs for Housing Market in 2013

    Florida trigger

    Tucson Officials to Discuss Construction Defect Claim

    “Details Matter” is the Foundation in a Texas Construction Defect Suit

    Good and Bad News on Construction Employment

    Construction Bright Spot in Indianapolis

    Construction Workers Unearth Bones

    FHA Lists Bridges and Overpasses that May Have Defective Grout

    Battle of “Other Insurance” Clauses

    Mobile Home Owners Not a Class in Drainage Lawsuit

    Ensuing Losses From Faulty Workmanship Must be Covered

    El Paso Increases Surety Bond Requirement on Contractors

    Hawaii State Senate Requires CGL Carriers to Submit Premium Information To State Legislature

    Supreme Court of New York Denies Motion in all but One Cause of Action in Kikirov v. 355 Realty Assoc., et al.

    Arizona Court of Appeals Decision in $8.475 Million Construction Defect Class Action Suit

    Official Tried to Influence Judge against Shortchanged Subcontractor

    South Carolina Legislature Redefining Occurrences to Include Construction Defects in CGL Policies

    Limiting Plaintiffs’ Claims to a Cause of Action for Violation of SB-800

    Is Construction Heading Off the Fiscal Cliff?

    Oregon agreement to procure insurance, anti-indemnity statute, and self-insured retention

    Construction Defect Bill Introduced in California

    No Coverage for Negligent Misrepresentation without Allegations of “Bodily Injury” or “Property Damage”

    Construction Company Head Pleads Guilty to Insurance and Tax Fraud

    The Year 2010 In Review: Design And Construction Defects Litigation

    Congress Addresses Homebuilding Credit Crunch

    Who Is To Blame For Defective — And Still LEED Certified — Courthouse Square?

    Construction Defect Destroys Home, Forty Years Later

    Court Grants Summary Judgment to Insurer in HVAC Defect Case

    Was Jury Right in Negligent Construction Case?

    Window Manufacturer Weathers Recession by Diversifying

    Washington Supreme Court Sides with Lien Claimants in Williams v. Athletic Field

    Retaining Wall Contractor Not Responsible for Building Damage

    Will They Blow It Up?

    Application of Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine Supports Coverage

    There is No Non-Delegable Duty on the Part of Residential Builders in Colorado

    Colorado Senate Bill 12-181: 2012’s Version of a Prompt Pay Bill

    Know the Minnesota Statute of Limitations for Construction Defect Claims

    The Ever-Growing Thicket Of California Civil Code Section 2782

    Construction Defects in Home a Breach of Contract

    Insurer Beware: Failure to Defend Ends with Hefty Verdict

    Seven Tips to Manage Construction Defect Risk

    Federal District Court Continues to Find Construction Defects do Not Arise From An Occurrence

    Death of Construction Defect Lawyer Ruled a Suicide

    Texas Construction Firm Files for Bankruptcy

    Florida Chinese drywall, pollution exclusion, “your work” exclusion, and “sistership” exclusion.

    Underpowered AC Not a Construction Defect

    Courts Are Conflicted As To Whether "Good Faith" Settlement Determinations Can Be Reviewed Via Writ Petition Or Appeal

    Developer’s Fraudulent Statements Are His Responsibility Alone in Construction Defect Case

    Virginia Homebuilding Slumps After Last Year’s Gain

    Florida County Suspends Impact Fees to Spur Development

    California insured’s duty to cooperate and insurer’s right to select defense counsel

    Ninety-Day Extension Denied to KB Home in Construction Defect Insurance Claim

    Nevada District Court Dismisses Case in Construction Defect Coverage Suit

    Exact Dates Not Needed for Construction Defect Insurance Claim

    Injured Construction Worker Settles for Five Hundred Thousand

    Homeowners Not Compelled to Arbitration in Construction Defect Lawsuit

    Can Negligent Contractors Shift Blame in South Carolina?

    California Lawyer Gives How-To on Pursuing a Construction Defect Claim

    Faulty Workmanship may be an Occurrence in Indiana CGL Policies

    Alabama “occurrence” and subcontractor work exception to the “your completed work” exclusion

    Contractor Sues Supplier over Defective Products

    Claims Under Colorado Defect Action Reform Act Count as Suits

    Construction Defects: 2010 in Review

    Construction Defect Lawsuit Stayed by SB800
    Corporate Profile

    SWEET IDAHO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Sweet, Idaho Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 5,500 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Sweet's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Sweet Idaho forensic architect expert witnesses fenestrationSweet Idaho forensic architect construction expert witness consultantSweet Idaho forensic architect construction expert witnessesSweet Idaho forensic architect structural engineering expert witnessesSweet Idaho forensic architect building envelope expert witnessSweet Idaho forensic architect concrete expert witnessSweet Idaho forensic architect expert witness windows
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Sweet, Idaho

    General Contractor/Developer May Not Rely on the Homeowner Protection Act to Avoid a Waiver of Consequential Damages in an AIA Contract

    August 4, 2011 — Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC

    Recently, in Caribou Ridge Homes, LLC v. Zero Energy, LLC, et al., Case No. 10CV1094, Boulder County District Court Judge Ingrid S. Bakke entered a ruling and order on the Plaintiff’s Motion for Determination of Question of Law Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 56(h) on Issue of Damages. The Order found that the Plaintiff was not a homeowner intended to be protected by the Homeowner Protection Act (the “HPA”) and thus could not pursue its claims for consequential damages against Defendant.

    By way of background, on June 18, 2008, Plaintiff Caribou Ridge Homes, LLC (“Caribou”) entered into a Standard Form Agreement Between Owner and Contractor AIA Document A114-2001 (the “Contract”) with Defendant Zero Energy, LLC (“Zero Energy”). Plaintiff hired Zero Energy to serve as a general contractor for the construction of a single-family home in the Caribou Ridge subdivision in Nederland, Colorado. A provision in the contract contained a mutual waiver of consequential damages (“Waiver”).

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC


    Pictorial Construction Terminology Dictionary — A Quick and Helpful Reference

    July 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Does it seem like contractors speak their own language? Construction defect professionals can be hampered by not knowing the terminology. The Bert L. Howe & Associates, Inc. web site has a handy Pictorial Construction Terminology Dictionary in which more than a thousand terms are not only defined, but illustrated with pictures that give a visual component to each definition.

    Whether you’re wondering what a balustrade is, or you need to identify a joist girder, or hundreds of other terms, the Pictorial Construction Terminology Dictionary is there to help you. It can be found at http://www.berthowe.com/bhapedia.php.


    Good Signs for Housing Market in 2013

    December 20, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Dan Green, a loan officer at Waterstone Mortgage, is optimistic about the construction market in 2013. He notes that the rise in building permit, housing starts, and housing completions are all good signs. Mortgage rates are still low, making these new homes attractive to buyers.

    Read the full story…


    Contractor’s Coverage For Additional Insured Established by Unilateral Contract

    November 18, 2011 — Tred Eyerley, Insurance Law Hawaii

    The contractor was covered as an additional insured under the subcontractor’s policy even though the parties had never actually signed an agreement to add the contractor to the policy. Evanston Ins. Co. v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co., 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 20081 (9th Cir. Oct. 3, 2011).

    The policies held by Bellevue Master, the general contractor, required it to be an additional insured under any subcontractor’s liability policy. Northwest Tower Crane Services was a subcontractor. Bellevue Master LLC, faxed a message that Northwest could continue to be a subcontractor on the project if it complied with Bellevue Master’s insurance requirements. Northwest contacted its insurance broker and requested an insurance certificate be issued to Bellevue Master so that it would be an additional insured under Northwest’s policy.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    One to Watch: Case Takes on Economic Loss Rule and Professional Duties

    June 28, 2011 — Douglas Reiser, Builders Counsel

    According to the Supreme Court of Washington Blog, The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Jackowski v. Hawkins Poe on Thursday, June 16, 2011. The court’s synopsis of the case can be found on the Washington State Court website.

    In short, two home purchasers brought a lawsuit against the home’s sellers, the sellers’ agent and the purchasers’ own agent, alleging claims of fraud, fraudulent concealment, negligent misrepresentation and breach of common law and statutory duties. The trial court dismissed the buyers’ claims on the basis of the economic loss doctrine and Division II reversed, opining that the ELR does not apply to professional duties. The Supreme Court will now look at applying the Independent Duty Doctrine established last year, and whether professional duties (those of the real estate agents) should be reviewed under a different light.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Douglas Reiser of Reiser Legal LLC. Mr. Reiser can be contacted at info@reiserlegal.com


    Cogently Written Opinion Finds Coverage for Loss Caused By Defective Concrete

    November 7, 2012 — Tred Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    If ever in need of a concise, well-reasoned opinion on “occurrence,” “property damage” and applicability of the business risk exclusions, turn to Pamperin Rentals II, LLC v. R.G. Hendricks & Sons Construction, Inc., 2012 Wis Ct. App. LEXIS 698 (Wis. Ct. App. Sept. 5, 2012).

    A contractor was hired to install concrete during construction of seven gas stations. Red-D-Mix provided the concrete. The contractor and Red-D-Mix were eventually sued by the gas stations, based upon allegations that the concrete was defectively manufactured and installed. The gas stations alleged that Red-D-Mix supplied concrete that was defective and resulted in damages, including the need to repair nearby asphalt.

    Red-D-Mix tendered to its insurers, who denied coverage. Suit was filed and the insurers moved for summary judgment. The trial court determined there were no allegations of either “property damage” or an “occurrence.” Therefore, there was no duty to defend or indemnify Red-D-Mix.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    No “Special Relationship” in Oregon Construction Defect Claim

    July 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Writing on his firm’s blog, Justin Stark discusses recent changes in construction defect claims in Oregon where, as he points out, “courts in Oregon have been lowering legal hurdles that construction defect plaintiffs must overcome in bringing their cases.” He cites a case in which water damage was discovered more than six years after construction was complete. The owners claimed breach of contract and negligence. The trial court found for the contractor, who argued “that there was no ‘special relationship’ with the owners that could support the negligence claim.”

    This was overturned on appeal, with the court concluding that if there was a violation of the building code, then the negligence claim could stand. This was appealed to the Oregon Supreme court which concluded that “neither a special relationship nor a statutory standard of care, such as the building code, is necessary to bring a negligence claim here.”

    Stark notes that “many forms of construction contract incorporate the phrase ‘workmanlike,’ which implicates the ‘common law standard of care’ in negligence law.

    Read the full story…


    Orange County Home Builder Dead at 93

    April 25, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Randall E. Presley was a homebuilder in Southern California for more than thirty years, acting as head of Presley Development Company from 1956 until selling the firm to Lyon Homes in 1987. The two companies merged in 1991 as the Presley Cos. Mr. Presley saw the need in the 1950s to provide people in Southern California with low- to medium-priced quality homes.

    His firm built more than 160 communities and was among the ten largest homebuilding firms in the country, expanding beyond California. Mr. Presley was 93 when he succumbed to pneumonia. He is survived by a wife, three children, seven grandchildren, and 11 great-grandchildren.

    Read the full story…


    Minnesota Starts Wide-Ranging Registration of Contractors

    July 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Minnesota has replaced its Independent Contractor Exemption Certificate program with the Contractor Registration Pilot Project, according to an article in the Martindale-Hubble Legal Library by Michael B. Lapicola. Mr. Lapicola notes that “it will be a violation of the law to contract with or perform construction services for another person without first being registered with the Pilot Project, or to contract with or pay another person to perform construction services if the other person is not registered with the Pilot Project. There are, however, quite a few exceptions, including those who are currently registered with the earlier program. Additionally, independent contractors who do not register can avoid the fine (up to $2,000) by registering within thirty days of fines being levied. Individuals and firms that do not perform building construction or improvements are exempt from the hiring aspects of the statute.

    Minnesota’s goal is to “assist state agencies to investigate employee misclassification in the building industry.” Employees of construction firms do not individually register. Rather, the intent of the of law is to stop those who would “require any individual through coercion, misrepresentation or fraudulent means to adopt independent contractor status” or to “knowingly misrepresent or misclassify an individual as an independent contractor.”

    Read the full story…


    More Charges in Las Vegas HOA Construction Defect Scam

    May 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    VegasInc.com reports that U.S. District Judge James Mahan has unsealed fourteen more criminal cases in the ongoing Las Vegas HOA corruption probe. One of the fourteen is Lisa Kim, whose Platinum Community Services managed communities in which Nancy Quon and Leon Benzer were involved.

    Two attorneys were also named. Brian Jones had previously been named in civil litigation as working to rig HOA elections in favor of the straw buyers. Jeanne Winkler had done legal work for one of the communities and for the developer before her disbarment.

    Eight of the names released were of alleged straw buyers. These individuals are said to have bought fractional shares of homes so they could stand for election on the HOA boards. One of the individuals named, Arnold Meyers, had sued the Jasmine Homeowners Association, claiming that their HOA elections were tainted. Myers claimed that homeowners received postcards stating that he did not own his condo. His suit was dropped after two homeowners claimed that their names had been forged on Meyer’s affidavits.

    Read the full story…


    Official Tried to Influence Judge against Shortchanged Subcontractor

    February 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    A contractor testified in the trial of former Cuyahoga County Commissioner Jimmy Dimora. According to Fox 8 in Cleveland, Ohio, Sean Newman, the president of Letter Perfect testified that his company was a subcontractor on the reconstruction of the locker rooms at the Cleveland Browns Stadium. Newman said his company was paid only $400,000 of their $650,000 bid. When Letter Perfect sued the contractor, D.A.S. Construction, Dimora called the judge to influence her to rule in favor of D.A.S.

    The judge in the earlier case, Bridgett McCafferty, has been found guilty of lying to the FBI during their investigation and is serving a 14-month prison sentence.

    Read the full story…


    Construction Defect Litigation at San Diego’s Alicante Condominiums?

    March 25, 2011 — Alicante HOA Website

    According to recent posts in the Alicante HOA website, construction experts and legal counsel have been retained. The HOA board has been informed that testing of a variety of the building’s components are underway or will begin in the near future.

    Read More...


    Construction Demand Unsteady, Gains in Some Regions

    June 29, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    The Associated General Contractors of America reported Tuesday, June 28 that construction employment increased in 120 of the 337 metropolitan areas surveyed between May 2010 and May 2011.

    ‘While construction employment has stopped plunging, any sign of a recovery remains spotty at best,” said Ken Simonson, the association’s chief economist. ‘The close to even split between areas adding and losing jobs is a reminder that for every market doing well, there is another market that is still hurting.”

    The largest number of jobs created was in the Dallas, Texas region, with 5,600 new jobs, a five percent increase. The northern Massachusetts/southern New Hampshire region near Haverhill saw the greatest percentage increase, although that twenty-two percent increase represents only 800 new jobs. The Chicago, Illiinois area added 4,600 jobs, a four percent increase.

    Other regions were not so lucky. The Atlanta, Georgia area saw a loss of 7,400 jobs, an eight percent loss. Las Vegas also lost 7,400 jobs, which there represented a sixteen percent decline. The New York City area lost 6,700 jobs, a six percent reduction. The Riverside, California area lost 5,300 jobs, a nine percent loss.

    Stephen E. Sandherr, the association’s chief executive officer, blamed a combination of regulation and budget squeezes. "Some in Washington never met a regulation they didn’t like and others never found a penny they didn’t want to pinch. Together that makes for a bad way to boost employment and a great way to stifle the private sector and neglect critical economic infrastructure.”

    Read the full story…


    Court Grants Summary Judgment to Insurer in HVAC Defect Case

    August 4, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    The US District Court in Colorado has determined in the case of RK Mechanical, Inc. v. Travelers Property Casualty Company of America that Travelers did not breach its insurance contract when it refused to cover RK Mechanical.

    RK Mechanical performed an HVAC installation for a residential project for which J.E. Dunn Rocky Mountain was the general contractor. As part of the work, RK “installed approximately one hundred seventy-one CPVC flanges, which were manufactured by Charlotte Pipe and Foundry Company.” Two of these flanges failed in June, 2009 leading to water damage. RK replaced the cracked flanges and engaged in water remediation. “Travelers paid Dunn and RK for the costs associated with the water damage associated with the Flange Failure.” The court notes that Travelers did not pay for the cracked flanges, however.

    Subsequently, RK examined the remaining flanges, finding many cracked ones. These were replaced with new ones. Later, all the Charlotte flanges were replaced with ones from another manufacturer. RK applied for coverage.

    All sides brought in their experts: “Microbac Laboratories, Inc. prepared a report on behalf of RK concluding that the Flange Failure was due, in part, to an assembly or workmanship defect in addition to manufacturing defects in the flanges. Higgins & Associates prepared a report on behalf of Travelers concluding that the flanges failed due to improper installation. Plastic Failure Labs prepared a report on behalf of the flange manufacturer concluding that the flanges failed due to improper installation by RK.”

    At this point, Travelers denied coverage. RK sued alleging that the coverage for flange failure and water damage implicitly includes mitigation costs. The court rejected this claim, noting it would do so even if Travelers had paid for the replacement of the first two flanges. Nor did the court find that replacement of the faulty flanges is not "a covered cause of loss." RK also argued that as it was required to mitigate, Travelers was obligated to cover costs. However, the court found that “the mitigation costs expended by RK were not incurred in an effort to avoid damages from a potential breach of contract by Travelers.” The court additionally noted that despite RK’s claims, the Colorado courts have not found a common law duty to mitigate. Finally, the court found that the exclusions in the policy were not in violation of public policy.

    Read the court’s decision…


    Windows and Lawsuits Fly at W Hotel

    July 5, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    An Austin, Texas lawyer has filed a lawsuit against Starwood Hotels and Resorts, the operator of the W Hotel Austin, after two people were struck by glass which fell from the hotel’s balconies. YNN in Austin reports that the hotel has been closed indefinitely as construction workers removed panels. An additional three panels fell before work started. Randy Howry, the lawyer representing the injured parties, notes that in May glass falling from the W Hotel in Atlanta killed one woman and injured another. “Seventeen days pass and we put them on notice, our clients have put them on notice, yet nothing has been done an only after the glass fell yesterday did they do something about it,” YNN quotes Howry.

    The hotel released a statement that they will be replacing all of the balcony glass to ensure safety for their guests and the general public. They relocated all hotel guests and coordinated with Austin officials to close adjacent sidewalks and roads. The statement identifies the firms involved with the design and construction of the balconies.

    Read the full story …


    Is Construction Heading Off the Fiscal Cliff?

    December 20, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    After a period of growth, the construction industry lost 20,000 jobs in November, based on the federal jobs data. Damon Scott of New Mexico Business Weekly suggests that contractors may have laid off employees in anticipation of the “fiscal cliff.” Ken Simpson, the chief economist of the National Association of Home Builders said in a press release that “it is discouraging that construction employment is still struggling after three years of expansion in the overall economy.”

    Read the full story…


    Flooded Courtroom May be Due to Construction Defect

    September 1, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    The General Services Administration wouldn’t pin it on a construction defect, but a spokesperson said that a pipe that was misaligned during installation was the likely cause of a flood in the Thomas F. Eagleton US Courthouse on August 23. According to the St. Louis Dispatch, the burst pipe caused a 17-story waterfall in the courthouse, soaking ceilings and floors, and drenching the building’s contents.

    The building was dedicated eleven years ago. During the nearly ten years before the building was complete, there were construction disputes and soil contamination issues.

    Read the full story…


    When is a Construction Project truly “Complete”? That depends. (law note)

    August 2, 2012 — Melissa Dewey Brumback, Construction Law North Carolina

    Long-time readers of the blog may remember my earlier post on substantial completion. However, in looking over my blog stats to see what search terms lead people here, it looks like this is hot topic. The blog searches came in two general categories:

    1. Those searching strictly for a definition of substantial completion. Some examples:

    • What does “substantial completion” mean?
    • when does a building achieve substantial completion
    • contracts “substantial completion”
    • substantial completion undefined
    • when is a project substantially complete

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Melissa Dewey Brumback of Ragsdale Liggett PLLC. Ms. Brumback can be contacted at mbrumback@rl-law.com.