BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    multi family housing Lower Peach Tree Alabama low-income housing Lower Peach Tree Alabama custom home Lower Peach Tree Alabama production housing Lower Peach Tree Alabama landscaping construction Lower Peach Tree Alabama office building Lower Peach Tree Alabama Subterranean parking Lower Peach Tree Alabama housing Lower Peach Tree Alabama Medical building Lower Peach Tree Alabama industrial building Lower Peach Tree Alabama retail construction Lower Peach Tree Alabama parking structure Lower Peach Tree Alabama townhome construction Lower Peach Tree Alabama custom homes Lower Peach Tree Alabama high-rise construction Lower Peach Tree Alabama tract home Lower Peach Tree Alabama condominium Lower Peach Tree Alabama condominiums Lower Peach Tree Alabama institutional building Lower Peach Tree Alabama concrete tilt-up Lower Peach Tree Alabama casino resort Lower Peach Tree Alabama mid-rise construction Lower Peach Tree Alabama
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Lower Peach Tree, Alabama

    Alabama Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Although there is case law precedent for right to repair, Title 6 Article 13A states action must be commenced within 2 years after cause and not more than 13 years after completion of construction.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Lower Peach Tree Alabama

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    South Alabama Home Builders Association
    Local # 0102
    PO Box 190
    Greenville, AL 36037


    Home Builders Association of Alabama
    Local # 0100
    PO Box 241305
    Montgomery, AL 36124
    http://www.hbaa.org

    Greater Montgomery Home Builders Association
    Local # 0164
    6336 Woodmere Blvd
    Montgomery, AL 36117
    http://www.gmhba.org

    Enterprise Home Builders Association
    Local # 0133
    PO Box 310861
    Enterprise, AL 36331


    Home Builders Association of Phenix City
    Local # 0172
    1808 Opelika Road
    Phenix City, AL 36867


    Home Builders Association of Dothan & Wiregrass Area
    Local # 0132
    PO Box 9791
    Dothan, AL 36304


    Lee Co Home Builders Association
    Local # 0136
    528 Lafayette Pl
    Auburn, AL 36830



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Lower Peach Tree Alabama

    Godfather Charged with Insurance Fraud

    Illinois Court Determines Insurer Must Defend Property Damage Caused by Faulty Workmanship

    Homeowner may pursue negligence claim for construction defect, Oregon Supreme Court holds

    West Coast Casualty Promises Exciting Line Up at the Nineteenth Annual Conference

    California Lawyer Gives How-To on Pursuing a Construction Defect Claim

    Insurers Reacting to Massachusetts Tornadoes

    Washington Court of Appeals Upholds Standard of Repose in Fruit Warehouse Case

    Appropriation Bill Cuts Military Construction Spending

    Construction Defect Not an Occurrence in Ohio

    Insurance Company Must Show that Lead Came from Building Materials

    Excess Carrier Successfully Appeals Primary Insurer’s Summary Judgment Award

    Preventing Costly Litigation Through Your Construction Contract

    BUILD Act Inching Closer To Reality

    Fifth Circuit Reverses Insurers’ Summary Judgment Award Based on "Your Work" Exclusion

    More Charges in Las Vegas HOA Construction Defect Scam

    Nevada Supreme Court Reverses Decision against Grader in Drainage Case

    Construction Defect Journal Seeks Article Submissions Regarding SB800 and Other Builders Right to Repair Laws

    Southern California Lost $8 Billion in Construction Wages

    Mark Van Wonterghem To Serve as Senior Forensic Consultant in the Sacramento Offices of Bert L. Howe & Associates, Inc.

    Condominium Communities Must Complete Construction Defect Repairs, Says FHA

    Home Repair Firms Sued for Fraud

    Condominium Exclusion Bars Coverage for Construction Defect

    Federal District Court Predicts Florida Will Adopt Injury In Fact Trigger

    Construction Defect Case Not Over, Despite Summary Judgment

    The Colorado Court of Appeals Rules that a Statutory Notice of Claim Triggers an Insurer’s Duty to Defend.

    Homeowners Not Compelled to Arbitration in Construction Defect Lawsuit

    Insurer Rejects Claim on Dolphin Towers

    Consumer Protection Act Whacks Seattle Roofing Contractor

    Former New York Governor to Head Construction Monitoring Firm

    Tampa Condo Owners Allege Defects

    No Duty to Indemnify When Discovery Shows Faulty Workmanship Damages Insured’s Own Work

    Colorado Senate Bill 12-181: 2012’s Version of a Prompt Pay Bill

    Construction on the Rise in Washington Town

    Statute of Repose Dependant on When Subcontractors Finished

    Firm Sued For Construction Defects in Parking Garage

    Architect Not Responsible for Injuries to Guests

    Unlicensed Contractors Nabbed in Sting Operation

    Florida “get to” costs do not constitute damages because of “property damage”

    David McLain to Speak at the CDLA 2012 Annual Conference

    Pipes May Be Defective, But Owners Lack Standing

    OSHA Extends Delay of Residential Construction Fall Protection Requirements

    West Hollywood Building: Historic Building May Be Defective

    Increased Expenditure on Injuries for New York City School Construction

    Arizona Homeowners Must Give Notice of Construction Defect Claims

    Court Rejects Anti-SLAPP Motion in Construction Defect Suit

    Arbitrator May Use Own Discretion in Consolidating Construction Defect Cases

    Demand for Urban Living Leads to Austin Building Boom

    Construction Defect Not Occurrences, Says Hawaii Court

    Flooded Courtroom May be Due to Construction Defect

    Hawaii Building Codes to Stay in State Control

    South Carolina Legislature Redefining Occurrences to Include Construction Defects in CGL Policies

    Judge Okays Harmon Tower Demolition, Also Calls for More Testing

    The Montrose Language Interpreted: How Many Policies Are Implicated By A Construction Defect That Later Causes a Flood?

    Utah Construction Defect Claims Dependant on Contracts

    Town Files Construction Lawsuit over Dust

    Texas contractual liability exclusion

    Statutes of Limitations May be the Colorado Contractors’ Friend

    New Safety Standards Issued by ASSE and ANSI

    Dust Infiltration Due to Construction Defect Excluded from Policy

    Defect Claims as Occurrences? Check Your State Laws

    Colorado Court of Appeals holds that insurance companies owe duty of prompt and effective communication to claimants and repair subcontractors

    Congress Addresses Homebuilding Credit Crunch

    Coverage for Construction Defects Barred by Business Risk Exclusions

    Arizona Court of Appeals Decision in $8.475 Million Construction Defect Class Action Suit

    Injured Construction Worker Settles for Five Hundred Thousand

    Good and Bad News on Construction Employment

    Official Tried to Influence Judge against Shortchanged Subcontractor

    Home Sales Still Low, But Enough to Spur Homebuilders

    Appeals Court Upholds Decision by Referee in Trial Court for Antagan v Shea Homes

    Are Construction Defects Covered by Your General Liability Policy?

    Insurer Must Defend Claims for Diminution in Value of Damaged Property

    Georgia Law: “An Occurrence Can Arise Where Faulty Workmanship Causes Unforeseen or Unexpected Damage to Other Property”

    Construction Defect Bill Introduced in California

    Ohio Casualty’s and Beazer’s Motions were Granted in Part, and Denied in Part

    Contractor Burns Down Home, Insurer Refuses Coverage

    The Hidden Dangers of Construction Defect Litigation

    Architect Not Liable for Balcony’s Collapse

    Broker Not Liable for Failure to Reveal Insurer's Insolvency After Policy Issued

    Virginia Chinese Drywall and pollution exclusion

    Washington Court Limits Lien Rights of Construction Managers

    Harmon Hotel Construction Defect Update

    Boston Tower Project to Create 450 Jobs

    Although Property Damage Arises From An Occurrence, Coverage Barred By Business Risk Exclusions

    Nebraska Man Sentenced for Insurance Fraud in Construction Projects

    California Supreme Court Finds Associations Bound by Member Arbitration Clauses

    Workers Hurt in Casino Floor Collapse

    Lockton Expands Construction and Design Team

    Bound by Group Builders, Federal District Court Finds No Occurrence

    Oregon agreement to procure insurance, anti-indemnity statute, and self-insured retention

    Florida County Suspends Impact Fees to Spur Development
    Corporate Profile

    LOWER PEACH TREE ALABAMA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Lower Peach Tree, Alabama Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 5,500 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Lower Peach Tree's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Lower Peach Tree Alabama general contracting construction expert testimonyLower Peach Tree Alabama general contracting building code expert witnessLower Peach Tree Alabama general contracting consulting general contractorLower Peach Tree Alabama general contracting expert witness windowsLower Peach Tree Alabama general contracting expert witnesses fenestrationLower Peach Tree Alabama general contracting civil engineer expert witnessLower Peach Tree Alabama general contracting architectural engineering expert witnessLower Peach Tree Alabama general contracting architecture expert witnessLower Peach Tree Alabama general contracting engineering expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Lower Peach Tree, Alabama

    Homebuilding Still on the Rise

    December 20, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The National Association of Home Builders reports that spending on private homes was up three percent in October 2012, bringing it to a four-year high. This was part of a trend in which fourteen of the last fifteen months have seen increases in spending on residential construction. Likewise, multifamily residences have seen thirteen months of increased spending, putting it 82% higher than its low, two years ago. ¬?In addition to new homes, remodeling is also up, reaching its highest point in five years.

    Read the full story…


    Insurer Not Entitled to Summary Judgment on Construction Defect Claims

    February 10, 2012 — Tred Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    The insurer unsuccessfully moved for summary judgment, contending it had no obligation to defend two related underlying construction defect cases. Amerisure Ins. Co. v. R.L.Lantana Boatyard, Ltd., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2466 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 9, 2012).

    An engineering report noted design construction defects and deficiencies in visible, physical improvements at The Moorings at Lantana Condominium. In two lawsuits, The Moorings sued the developer, R.L. Lantana Boatyard ("RLLB"), and the contractor, Current Builders of Florida.

    Current Builders was insured by Amerisure. RLLB was named as an additional insured under the Amerisure policy.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Remodels Replace Construction in Redding

    September 9, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    The Record Searchlight reports that while new construction is down in Redding, California, residential and commercial remodel permits are up 17 percent. By August 2010, there had been 63 housing and commercial business starts in Redding, while this year has seen only 15.

    One such remodel, that of Parkview Market, will cost about $201,000. Safeway is planning on two $80,000 remodels of its grocery stores in Redding. In all, the 150 building permits for remodels are worth a total of $2.8 million.

    Read the full story…


    Housing Market on Way to Recovery

    October 23, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Bloomberg News reports that new home purchases neared a two-year high, with July sales being the strongest since April 2010. Economists polled by Bloomberg expected an annual pace of 380,000 sales, the current levels are at 373,000. Strongest sales gains were in the Northeast, with a 20 percent jump. The Midwest and Western regions had small gains, and the South saw a drop of 4.9 percent. As the Northeast’s home prices are highest and the South’s the lowest, the pattern of sales lead to a sharp increase in median sales price.

    Meanwhile, existing stocks of homes continued to deplete, reaching a record low of 38,000 completed homes on the market. In response, builders are constructing new homes at a pace not seen since April 2010, accord to the Commerce Department.

    Read the full story…


    Insurer Has Duty to Disclose Insured's Interest In Obtaining Written Explanation of Arbitration Award

    October 23, 2012 — Tred Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    The issue faced by the Minnesota Supreme Court was whether the insurer had a duty to disclose the insured's interest in obtaining a written explanation of an arbitration award that identified the claims of recovery and the portions of the award attributable to each. Remodeling Dimensions, Inc. v. Integrity Mut. Ins. Co., 2012 LEXIS Minn. 404 (Minn. Sup. Ct., Aug. 22, 2012).

    Remodeling Dimensions, Inc. ("RDI") built an addition for the homeowners and installed windows in the original part of the house. After construction began, the homeowners also asked RDI to fix the master bedroom window in the original part of the house.

    After completion of the project, the house sustained storm damage.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Florida trigger

    August 4, 2011 — CDCoverage.com

    In Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Siena Home Corp., No. 5:08-CV-385-Oc-10GJK (M.D. Fla. July 8, 2011), insured residential real estate developer Siena was sued by homeowners seeking damages for moisture penetration property damage resulting from exterior wall construction defects. Siena’s CGL insurer Mid-Continent filed suit seeking a declaratory judgment of no duty to defend or indemnify in part on the basis that the alleged “property damage” did not manifest during the Mid-Continent policy period.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of CDCoverage.com


    No “Special Relationship” in Oregon Construction Defect Claim

    July 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Writing on his firm’s blog, Justin Stark discusses recent changes in construction defect claims in Oregon where, as he points out, “courts in Oregon have been lowering legal hurdles that construction defect plaintiffs must overcome in bringing their cases.” He cites a case in which water damage was discovered more than six years after construction was complete. The owners claimed breach of contract and negligence. The trial court found for the contractor, who argued “that there was no ‘special relationship’ with the owners that could support the negligence claim.”

    This was overturned on appeal, with the court concluding that if there was a violation of the building code, then the negligence claim could stand. This was appealed to the Oregon Supreme court which concluded that “neither a special relationship nor a statutory standard of care, such as the building code, is necessary to bring a negligence claim here.”

    Stark notes that “many forms of construction contract incorporate the phrase ‘workmanlike,’ which implicates the ‘common law standard of care’ in negligence law.

    Read the full story…


    Florida Property Bill Passes Economic Affairs Committee with Amendments

    April 14, 2011 — April 14, 2011 Beverley BevenFlorez - Construction Defect Journal

    The Florida Property Bill (HBB 803) was passed by the Economic Affairs Committee by a vote of 11-7, according to Property Casualty 360, after adopting nine new amendments. The additions to the bill included limiting notice of claims to a set number of years, extending the statute of limitation on property claims from five years to six years, among others.

    HB 803 and SB 408, the Senate companion bill, focus primarily on residential property insurance. They make changes to the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund, while also promoting increased notification of policy changes to policyholders. Sections of the bills provide minor fixes such as renaming Citizens Property Insurance Corporation to Taxpayer-Funded Property Insurance Corporation. However, other sections of the bills contain more significant policy changes such as sinkhole coverage and hurricane claims.

    The bills’ intent, according to the SunSentinel.com, is to reduce fraudulent claims and to bring new insurers into the insurance market. However, SunSentinel.com also reports that the bills may drastically increase property insurance premiums.

    Read the full Property Casualty 360 article...

    Read the full Sun Sentinel article...


    Construction Spending Dropped in July

    September 13, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Bloomberg News reports that after four months of gains in construction spending, July saw a drop of 0.9 percent, wiping out June’s gain of 0.4 percent. Despite the overall decline in spending, there was an increase of 1.5 percent in expenditure on building new single-family homes and 2.8 percent on multifamily residential construction.

    Read the full story…


    Senate Committee Approves Military Construction Funds

    June 29, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    With a decrease in funding, as compared to the House bill, the Military Construction and Veteran’s Affairs subcommittee of the Senate moved on a $72 billion construction bill. The House version had approved an additional half billion dollars in funding. Senator Tim Johnson, Democrat of South Carolina, said that he expected easy reconciliation with the House version. The Senate bill will move to the full Senate Appropriations Committee on June 30.

    The bill, S 1255, includes funding for construction and remodeling of military housing, as well as construction and remodeling of base facilities.

    Read the full story…

    Read S1255


    Coverage Exists Under Ensuing Loss Provision

    July 10, 2012 — Tred Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    Finding coverage under the ensuing loss provision, the Washington Supreme Court overruled a Court of Appeals decision we previously reported here. Vision One, LLC v. Philadelphia Indem. Ins. Co., 276 P.3d 300 (Wash. 2012).

    Vision developed a condominium project. Before concrete was poured, a subcontractor supplied the shoring to temporarily support the poured concrete slabs. After the shoring installation was completed, concrete was poured on the first floor. When the pouring was finished, the shoring gave way. The framing, rebar and newly poured concrete came crashing down onto the the lower level parking area, where the wet concrete eventually hardened. It took several weeks to clean up the debris and repair the damage.

    Vision had a builders’ risk policy with Philadelphia. The policy excluded losses caused by or resulting from deficient design or faulty workmanship. Collapse, however, was not listed as an excluded event. Further, the exclusion for faulty workmanship contained a resulting loss clause providing that "if loss or damage by a Covered Cause of Loss results, [Philadelphia] will pay for the loss or damage caused by that Covered Cause of Loss."

    Philadelphia denied coverage under the faulty workmanship exclusion.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Ohio “property damage” caused by an “occurrence.”

    May 18, 2011 — May 18, 2011 - CDCoverage.com

    In JTO, Inc. v. State Automobile Mut. Ins. Co., No. 2010-L-062 (Ohio Ct. App. March 25, 2011), general contractor JTO was sued by hotel project owner Marriott for breach of contract and warranties seeking damages for the repair of construction defects resulting in moisture penetration property damage to interior components. JTO filed a third party complaint against subcontractor Farizel and also tendered its defense as an additional insured under Farizel’s State Auto CGL policy.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of CDCoverage.com


    Census Bureau, HUD Show Declines in Residential Construction

    May 17, 2011 – CDJ Staff

    The U.S. Census Bureau and the Department of Housing and Urban Development released their summary of residential construction for April 2011 on May 17.

    Building permits for privately owned housing units were down 4% from last month and 12% from last year. Similarly, privately-owned housing starts were down 10% from March and 23% below the previous year.

    For further details, read the Census Bureau/HUD report


    The Flood Insurance Reform Act May be Extended to 2016

    April 7, 2011 — April 7, 2011 Beverley BevenFlorez - Construction Defect Journal

    The Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2011 (H. R. 1309) has been referred to the House Committee on Financial Services—the first step in the legislative process. The bill, if passed, would extend the program to September 30, 2016. It is currently slated to be terminated September 30 of this year. The bill also contains changes to premium rates, mapping protocols, and privatization initiatives.

    H. R. 1309 has garnered the support of several Insurance organizations. Leigh Ann Pusey, president and CEO of the American Insurance Association (AIA), sent a letter of support to the Chair and Ranking member of the House Financial Services Subcommittee. “AIA has advocated for a long term reauthorization of the NFIP to protect consumers and help increase stability for real estate transactions and policyholders,” Pusey said. “AIA believes the five-year extension contained in HR 1309, will provide certainty in the flood program thereby increasing consumer and business confidence in the NFIP.”

    Jimi Grande, senior vice president of federal and political affairs for the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies (NAMIC) spoke out in support of the bill. “For the NFIP to survive, the prices for flood insurance must reflect the actual costs of flood risk for a property,” Grande said. “HR 1309 will provide that transparency. In addition, the Technical Mapping Advisory Council will give communities a voice in the flood mapping process, fostering a better understanding of what flood maps represent and how they are made.”

    Read H. R. 1309...
    Read the American Insurance Association statement...
    Read the NAMIC Press Release...


    Insurer Must Cover Construction Defects Claims under Actual Injury Rule

    March 1, 2012 — Tred Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    The Texas Court of Appeals held that the insured need not prove the exact dates physical damage occurred in order to trigger defense and indemnity coverage. Vines-Herrin Custom Homes, LLC v. Great Am. Lloyds Ins. Co., 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 10027 (Tex. Ct. App. Dec. 21, 2011).

    In 1999, the insured built a home. He was insured under a CGL policy issued by Great American from November 9, 1998 to November 9, 2000. Thereafter, the insured held a CGL policy issued by Mid-Continent from November 9, 2000 to September 18, 2002.

    After construction was completed, the insured sold the house to the buyer in May 2000. After moving in, the buyer found numerous construction defects in the home, including water entering cracks in the home, and sinking and sagging of parts of the house. The buyer sued the insured, who sought coverage under the two policies. When the insurers refused to defend the underlying suit, the insured sued for a declaratory judgment.

    The underlying case went to arbitration and an award of $2.4 million was granted to the buyer. The insured assigned to the buyer his claims against the insurers.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Windows and Lawsuits Fly at W Hotel

    July 5, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    An Austin, Texas lawyer has filed a lawsuit against Starwood Hotels and Resorts, the operator of the W Hotel Austin, after two people were struck by glass which fell from the hotel’s balconies. YNN in Austin reports that the hotel has been closed indefinitely as construction workers removed panels. An additional three panels fell before work started. Randy Howry, the lawyer representing the injured parties, notes that in May glass falling from the W Hotel in Atlanta killed one woman and injured another. “Seventeen days pass and we put them on notice, our clients have put them on notice, yet nothing has been done an only after the glass fell yesterday did they do something about it,” YNN quotes Howry.

    The hotel released a statement that they will be replacing all of the balcony glass to ensure safety for their guests and the general public. They relocated all hotel guests and coordinated with Austin officials to close adjacent sidewalks and roads. The statement identifies the firms involved with the design and construction of the balconies.

    Read the full story …


    Although Property Damage Arises From An Occurrence, Coverage Barred By Business Risk Exclusions

    July 8, 2011 — Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    The homeowners hired the insured to raise the structure of their home twenty-four inches above the flood zone. Lafayette Ins. Co. v. Peerboom, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58985 (S.D. Miss. June 2, 2011). When the insured’s crew returned from lunch one day, they found the house had fallen from hydraulic jacks being used to raise the structure a few inches at a time. There was substantial damage to the entire structure.

    The homeowners sued, asserting several claims, including negligence and breach of contract. The complaint alleged the homeowners entered a contract with the insured to raise their structure while maintaining its integrity. However, the insured failed to use proper equipment, which caused the house to fall and be completely destroyed.

    The insured tendered the claim to its insurer, Lafayette Insurance Company. Lafayette defended under a reservation of rights and filed suit for a declaratory judgment. Lafayette’s subsequent motion for summary judgment contended there was no “occurrence” alleged in the underlying complaint and, even if there was, the business risk exclusions barred coverage.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    State Farm Too Quick To Deny Coverage, Court Rules

    July 22, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    On July 13, 2011, Judge Sarah S. Vance of the US District Court issued a rule in the case of Travelers Cas. & Surety Co. of Am. v. Univ. Facilities, Inc. (E.D. La., 2011). In this case, Stanley Smith Drywall was contracted by Capstone Building Corporation to “perform undisclosed work at the facility believed to involve the installation of drywall.” The project involved the design and construction of student residences for the Southeastern Louisiana University in Hammond, Louisiana. In May, 2009, University Facilities, Inc. (UFI) sued Capstone Development Corporation and Capstone On-Campus Management.

    State Farm insured Stanley Smith Drywall and they sought a declaration that they have no duty: “(1) to insure Stanley Smith or CBC, or (2) to defend or indemnify any party against UFI's claims in the pending arbitration.” State Farm contends “(1) there is no "occurrence" to trigger coverage under the policy; (2) only breach of contract claims are asserted; (3) there is no property damage alleged; and (4) various coverage limitations and exclusions apply to prevent coverage.’

    The court concluded that “whether State Farm has a duty to defend in the arbitration must be determined by considering the claims asserted in the arbitration.” However, the arbitration claims were not made part of the record. There, “, the Court cannot determine as a matter of law State Farm's duty to defend on the present record.” The same was true of State Farm’s duty to indemnify. “Stanley Smith and CBC assert that State Farm's motion for summary judgment was filed before any discovery was conducted in the arbitration proceeding or in this case. The Court finds that State Farm has failed to develop the record sufficiently to establish that there is no genuine issue of material fact as to its duty to indemnify Stanley Smith or CBC in the arbitration.’

    The court denied State Farm’s motion for a summary judgment on its duty to defend and indemnify.

    Read the court’s decision…


    Discovery Ordered in Nevada Construction Defect Lawsuit

    August 16, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Gemstone LVS was sued by the Manhattan Homeowners Association in Las Vegas, after which Chartis Specialty Insurance informed Gemstone that they “had no duty to defend or indemnify Gemstone under the Commercial Umbrella Liability Policy.” Gemstone “asserts that at the time the Policy was purchased, it was understood that Chartis would provide insurance coverage for a construction defect lawsuit” and now seeks discovery “to prove Chartis’ bad faith purpose in drafting an illusory Policy.”

    The opinion notes that “the Court conducted a preliminary peek at the pending motion for partial summary judgment and finds that Chartis has not made the strong showing necessary to support the requested stay.” Further, the court notes that “when ambiguity in the language of a policy exists, the court may consider not only the language of the policy but also the ‘intent of the parties, the subject matter of the policy, and the circumstances surrounding its issuance.’” The court concludes that “this type of discovery is relevant to understanding the intent of the parties, more specifically, whether it was understood that Chartis would provide insurance coverage given the construction defect lawsuit.”

    Accordingly, the court denied Chartis’ motion for stay of discovery and established a schedule for discovery, expert designations, rebuttal expert designations, and other matters related to the trial.

    Read the court’s decision…