BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    mid-rise construction Summitville Ohio parking structure Summitville Ohio Subterranean parking Summitville Ohio condominiums Summitville Ohio townhome construction Summitville Ohio concrete tilt-up Summitville Ohio condominium Summitville Ohio landscaping construction Summitville Ohio high-rise construction Summitville Ohio retail construction Summitville Ohio tract home Summitville Ohio structural steel construction Summitville Ohio production housing Summitville Ohio low-income housing Summitville Ohio casino resort Summitville Ohio custom home Summitville Ohio institutional building Summitville Ohio multi family housing Summitville Ohio custom homes Summitville Ohio office building Summitville Ohio hospital construction Summitville Ohio Medical building Summitville Ohio
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Summitville, Ohio

    Ohio Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to HB 175, Chptr 1312, for a homebuilder to qualify for right to repair protection, the contractor must notify consumers (in writing) of NOR laws at the time of sale; The law stipulates written notice of defects required itemizing and describing and including documentation prepared by inspector. A contractor has 21 days to respond in writing.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Summitville Ohio

    Licensing is done at the local level. Licenses required for plumbing, electrical, HVAC, heating, and hydronics trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Mercer Co Builders Association
    Local # 3656
    PO Box 363
    Rockford, OH 45882


    Building Industry Association of North Central OH
    Local # 3651
    1183 Lexington Avenue
    Mansfield, OH 44907
    http://www.biancohio.com

    West Central Buckeye Builders Association
    Local # 3648
    1520 Allentown Rd
    Lima, OH 45805
    http://WWW.WESTCENTRALOHIOBUILDERS.COM

    Home Builders Association of Wayne and Holmes Cos
    Local # 3690
    4973 Cleveland Rd Suite A
    Wooster, OH 44691
    http://whhba.com

    East Central OH Building Industry Association
    Local # 3664
    706 E. Shafer Ave
    Dover, OH 44622
    http://www.eco-bia.com

    Building Industry Association of Stark County
    Local # 3615
    4344 Metro Cir NW
    North Canton, OH 44720
    http://www.biastark.com

    Home Builders Association of Hancock County
    Local # 3639
    9811 Smokies Way
    Findlay, OH 45840
    http://www.hancockhomebuilders.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Summitville Ohio

    Subcontractor Not Liable for Defending Contractor in Construction Defect Case

    Florida County Suspends Impact Fees to Spur Development

    Housing Prices Up through Most of Country

    Construction on the Rise in Denver

    Insurance for Defective Construction Now in Third Edition

    California Lawyer Gives How-To on Pursuing a Construction Defect Claim

    Save a Legal Fee: Prevent Costly Lawsuits With Claim Limitation Clauses

    Homebuilding on the Rise in Nation’s Capitol

    Instant Hotel Tower, But Is It Safe?

    Contract Not So Clear in South Carolina Construction Defect Case

    Supreme Court of Oregon Affirms Decision in Abraham v. T. Henry Construction, et al.

    Ninety-Day Extension Denied to KB Home in Construction Defect Insurance Claim

    Contractor Removed from Site for Lack of Insurance

    Ohio Court Finds No Coverage for Construction Defect Claims

    Delaware “occurrence” and exclusions j(5) and j(6)

    Insurer Settles on Construction Defect Claim

    After Katrina Came Homes that Could Withstand Isaac

    Massachusetts Couple Seek to Recuse Judge in Construction Defect Case

    Negligent Misrepresentation in Sale of Building Altered without Permits

    No Coverage For Construction Defects When Complaint Alleges Contractual Damages

    Another Guilty Plea In Nevada Construction Defect Fraud Case

    Appeals Court Upholds Decision by Referee in Trial Court for Antagan v Shea Homes

    Insurer Has Duty to Disclose Insured's Interest In Obtaining Written Explanation of Arbitration Award

    There is No Non-Delegable Duty on the Part of Residential Builders in Colorado

    Public Relations Battle over Harmon Tower

    Houses Can Still Make Cents: Illinois’ Implied Warranty of Habitability

    Washington Supreme Court Sides with Lien Claimants in Williams v. Athletic Field

    Construction Delayed by Discovery of Bones

    Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause Bars Coverage for Landslide and Water Leak

    Lien Claimant’s Right to Execute against Bond Upheld in Court of Appeals

    Construction Defects as Occurrences, Better Decided in Law than in Courts

    Georgia Supreme Court Rules Construction Defects Can Constitute an Occurrence in CGL Policies

    Unlicensed Contractors Nabbed in Sting Operation

    Policing Those Subcontractors: It Might Take Extra Effort To Be An Additional Insured

    Faulty Workmanship Causing Damage to Other Property Covered as Construction Defect

    New Safety Standards Issued by ASSE and ANSI

    Boston’s Tunnel Project Plagued by Water

    Construction Defects and Contractor-Owners

    Amerisure Case to be Heard by Texas Supreme Court

    New Apartment Tower on the Rise in Seattle

    Construction Firm Charged for Creating “Hail” Damage

    Who Is To Blame For Defective — And Still LEED Certified — Courthouse Square?

    California Supreme Court to Examine Arbitration Provisions in Several Upcoming Cases

    Construction Defect Case Not Over, Despite Summary Judgment

    Construction Company Head Pleads Guilty to Insurance and Tax Fraud

    Williams v. Athletic Field: Hugely Important Lien Case Argued Before Supreme Court

    More Charges in Las Vegas HOA Construction Defect Scam

    Crane Dangles and So Do Insurance Questions

    Yellow Brass Fittings Play a Crucial Role in Baker v Castle & Cooke Homes

    Housing Market on Way to Recovery

    Landmark San Diego Hotel Settles Defects Suit for $6.4 Million

    Safer Schools Rendered Unsafe Due to Construction Defects

    Homeowner Loses Suit against Architect and Contractor of Resold Home

    Harmon Tower Construction Defects Update: Who’s To Blame?

    Bad Faith and a Partial Summary Judgment in Seattle Construction Defect Case

    Seven Former North San Diego County Landfills are Leaking Contaminants

    Know the Minnesota Statute of Limitations for Construction Defect Claims

    Australian Developer Denies Building Problems Due to Construction Defects

    Home Builder Doesn’t See Long Impact from Hurricane

    Ensuing Loss Provision Found Ambiguous

    Analysis of the “owned property exclusion” under Panico v. State Farm

    Windows and Lawsuits Fly at W Hotel

    Alaska Supreme Court Dismisses Claims of Uncooperative Pro Se Litigant in Defect Case

    Negligent Construction an Occurrence Says Ninth Circuit

    History of Defects Leads to Punitive Damages for Bankrupt Developer

    Construction Law Client Alert: California Is One Step Closer to Prohibiting Type I Indemnity Agreements In Private Commercial Projects

    Insurer Must Defend Claims for Diminution in Value of Damaged Property

    Nevada Bill Aims to Reduce Legal Fees For Construction Defect Practitioners

    Hawaii Building Codes to Stay in State Control

    Differing Rulings On Construction Defect Claims Leave Unanswered Questions For Builders, and Construction Practice Groups. Impact to CGL Carriers, General Contractors, Builders Remains Unclear

    North Carolina Exclusion j(6) “That Particular Part”

    Construction Workers Face Dangers on the Job

    Georgia Law: “An Occurrence Can Arise Where Faulty Workmanship Causes Unforeseen or Unexpected Damage to Other Property”

    Background Owner of Property Cannot Be Compelled to Arbitrate Construction Defects

    Godfather Charged with Insurance Fraud

    Construction Defects Leave Animal Shelter Unusable

    Contractor Sues License Board

    A Lien Might Just Save Your Small Construction Business

    Ensuing Loss Provision Does Not Salvage Coverage

    Fifth Circuit Asks Texas Supreme Court to Clarify Construction Defect Decision

    Are Construction Defects Covered by Your General Liability Policy?

    Virginia Chinese Drywall “property damage” caused by an “occurrence” and number of “occurrences”

    Construction Law Client Alert: Hirer Beware - When Exercising Control Over a Job Site’s Safety Conditions, You May be Held Directly Liable for an Independent Contractor’s Injury

    Coverage for Construction Defects Barred by Business Risk Exclusions

    Denver Court Rules that Condo Owners Must Follow Arbitration Agreement

    Colorado statutory “property damage” caused by an “occurrence”

    Washington Court Limits Lien Rights of Construction Managers

    Construction Suit Ends with Just an Apology

    Ceiling Collapse Attributed to Construction Defect

    Workers Hurt in Casino Floor Collapse
    Corporate Profile

    SUMMITVILLE OHIO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Summitville, Ohio Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 5,500 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Summitville's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Summitville Ohio general contracting contractor expert witnessSummitville Ohio general contracting civil engineering expert witnessSummitville Ohio general contracting construction expert testimonySummitville Ohio general contracting delay claim expert witnessSummitville Ohio general contracting roofing construction expertSummitville Ohio general contracting fenestration expert witnessSummitville Ohio general contracting window expert witnessSummitville Ohio general contracting roofing and waterproofing expert witnessSummitville Ohio general contracting construction expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Summitville, Ohio

    Nevada Assembly Sends Construction Defect Bill to Senate

    June 6, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    In a 26 to 16 vote, the Nevada Assembly has passed Assembly Bill 401, which extends the time limit for legal action over home construction defects. According to the Las Vegas Sun, Assembly member Marcus Conklin, Democrat of Las Vegas, said the bill was about “keeping the consumer whole.” However, Ira Hansen, Republican of Sparks, told the sun that suits are happening before contractors can make repairs. The bill would allow attorney fees even if repairs are made.

    Read the full story…


    Judge Concludes Drywall Manufacturer Sold in Florida

    September 13, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    A Florida judge has concluded that the Chinese drywall manufacturer Taishan actively sought to sell its products in Florida and cannot now claim that it was not involved. Judge Joseph Farnia also noted that the main distributor of the drywall was, as noted in the Miami Herald, an arm of the company. Lennar Hones has sued the firm after installing drywall manufactured by the company in hundreds of homes.

    Taishan’s activities in Florida included not only distributing samples, but also hosting tours of their plants in China for construction executives, and even making customized runs. According to other reports, has lost past cases over defects in their drywall.

    Read the full story…


    Ensuing Loss Provision Does Not Salvage Coverage

    December 9, 2011 — Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    Water intrusion caused by a construction defect was not covered under the all risk policy’s ensuing loss provision. See Friedberg v. Chubb & Son, Inc., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123582 (D. Minn. Oct. 25, 2011).

    Extensive water damage was discovered in the insureds’ home when a small hole in the exterior wall was being repaired. Chubb’s adjuster and an expert found water intrusion causing rot, mold, and damage to the home’s wood framing and insulation. Chubb denied coverage because water intruded through the roof and wall, resulting in gradual deterioration. The insureds filed suit.

    The policy excluded coverage for construction defects, but insured "ensuing covered loss unless another exclusion applies."

    The court agreed there was a prima facie case for coverage because the home suffered a physical loss.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Lien Law Unlikely To Change — Yet

    May 26, 2011 — Melissa Brumback, Construction Law in North Carolina

    For those of you following the proposed revisions to the NC lien law that is currently at the NC House Judiciary Subcommittee B, a quick update: the proposed bill (HB 489) is unlikely to be voted on this legislative session due to its unpopularity with several constituency groups, including both the AIA-North Carolinaand the NC Home Builders Association.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Melissa Brumback of Ragsdale Liggett PLLC. Ms. Brumback can be contacted at mbrumback@rl-law.com.


    South Carolina Legislature Defines "Occurrence" To Include Property Damage Arising From Faulty Workmanship

    May 26, 2011 — Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    On May 17, 2011, South Carolina passed legislation to combat the restrictive interpretation of what constitutes an "occurrence" under CGL policies. S.C. Code Ann. sec. 38-61-70.

    The legislation reversed a decision by the state's Supreme Court issued earlier this year. See Crossman Communities of North Carolina, Inc. v. Harleysville Mut. Ins. Co., 2011 W.L. 93716 (S.C. Jan. 7, 2011). Crossman had overruled an earlier decision by the South Carolina Supreme Court that holding that defective construction was an “occurrence.” Crossman, however, reversed course, holding that damages resulting from faulty workmanship were the “natural and probable cause” of the faulty work and, as such, did not qualify as an “occurrence.”

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Contractors Admit Involvement in Kickbacks

    December 9, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Two New Jersey contractors have pleaded guilty to charges that they made false representations for a government contract in a case related to kickbacks for construction work done in two school districts. New Jersey is recommending that the two men, Martin Starr and Stephen Gallagher, will each pay $50,000 in penalties, serve up to a year in jail, and be unable to accept public contracts for five years.

    Last month, another individual in the case, Kenneth Disko, who had been the engineer for the school district, pleaded guilty on a similar charge. In addition to a $50,000 penalty, he will be serving three to five years in prison. A fourth conspirator, Robert Berman, the former business administrator for one of the school districts, has to pay a $13,000 fine and cooperate with the investigation. He is also barred from public employment in New Jersey and has been terminated from his position.

    Starr admitted to preparing fictitious quotes which appeared to be from other contractors in order that his firm would seem to be the lowest bidder. Gallagher helped in preparing the fictitious bids and also provided cash kickbacks to Disko.

    Read the full story…


    $5 Million Construction Defect Lawsuit over Oregon Townhomes

    January 6, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    A homeowners’ association in Lake Oswego, Oregon has filed a $5 million lawsuit against the developers of the luxury townhomes. The homeowners of Sunset Crossing are suing Centurion Homes and Aspen Townhomes over claims that construction defects have lead to water intrusion and structural damages. The townhomes were built in 2005.

    Andy Burns, the lawyer for Phillip and Patricia Gentelmann, the owners of both Centurion Homes and Aspen Townhomes, said the Gentelmanns were “taking these allegations very seriously.” The suit says that the construction violated state and local building codes and that the firms did not repair damage caused by water intrusion.

    Read the full story…


    Public Relations Battle over Harmon Tower

    October 23, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Tutor Pernini claims that CityCenter is portraying the construction firm as “the scum of the earth” in an attempt to influence eventual jurors, according to an article at Vegas Inc. The contractor’s attorneys have requested information regarding the public relations efforts of MGM Resorts and CityCenter, characterizing CityCenter’s PR as a “litigation spin doctor.”

    CityCenter has requested that at least one subpoena be canceled. Judge Elizabeth Gonzales has already allowed one to go through, although she has noted that Perini cannot request documents from CityCenter’s lawyers to the litigation consultants under attorney/client privilege. Tutor Perini claims that in 2010, Patricia Glaser, who has represented CityCenter, said her goal was to portray Perini as “the scum of the earth,” and make that certain that judges and juries would not “adopt the world view espoused by the opposing party.”

    Read the full story…


    Read Her Lips: “No New Buildings”

    November 18, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Martha Johnson, the head of the General Services Administration, has said that her agency will not be building any new buildings in the near future. Among other duties, the GSA is responsible for the building, renovating, and leasing of federal office space. The White House had proposed $840 million in new construction, the Senate only $56 million. The House did not appropriate any money for the agency to use for new construction.

    In addition to cutbacks on new buildings, Congress is suggesting only $280 million in repairs of existing government buildings. In order to cut back, the GSA has dropped plans to renovate their own offices in favor of renovations at the Department of Homeland Security and the Food and Drug Administration.

    Read the full story…


    Ohio Adopts Energy-Efficient Building Code

    June 19, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    In a compromise between environmental groups, who were looking for stricter standards, and homebuilders, who were trying to contain building costs, the state of Ohio has adopted buildings codes that will increase the energy efficiency of new homes. The estimated costs are about $1,100 with estimated annual savings of $230. According to Corey Roblee of the International Code Council, “It’s something needed in the state of Ohio.”

    The Ohio Home Builders Association opposed a proposal to adopt the guidelines of the International Code Council. Builders will be able to either follow the ICC guidelines or they can use the Ohio guidelines to meet the same energy efficiency. Vincent Squillace, the executive vice president of the OHBA, said, “We came up with an equivalent code that’s more strict but is about $2,000 cheaper per home to implement than the original code.”

    The new code will require that at least 75% of lighting must be high efficiency, increases the degree of insulation, and specifies more efficient windows, among other changes.

    Read the full story…


    Exclusion Bars Coverage for Mold, Fungus

    October 23, 2012 — Tred Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    The court considered whether rain damage to a house was barred by the policy's mold exclusion. Stewart v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 2012 U.S. Dist LEXIS 127804 (D. S.D. Sept. 7, 2012).

    The insureds hired DJ Construction to build a new home. Before construction was completed, it was discovered that DJ Construction and some of its subcontractors had failed to protect the partially constructed house from the elements, which allowed melting snow and rain to intrude into the house. Soon after this discovery, DJ Construction abandoned the project. The house remained incomplete and uninhabitable.

    The insureds sued DJ Construction.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Insurance for Defective Construction Now in Third Edition

    November 7, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Available both in print and online, the International Risk Management Institute, Inc has brought out a third edition of Insurance for Defective Construction. The work is written by Patrick J. Wielinski of Cokinos, Bosien & Young, a Dallas-Fort Worth law firm. Mr. Wielinski practice focuses on insurance coverage. Insurance for Defective Construction is described as “a must read for anyone who buys, sell, or underwrites construction insurance or who becomes involved in construction claims.”

    Read the full story…


    No Coverage For Damage Caused by Chinese Drywall

    October 28, 2011 — Tred Eyerley, Insurance Law Hawaii

    The pollution exclusion barred coverage for alleged property damage and bodily injury in Evanston Ins. Co. v. Harbor Walk Dev., LLC, No. 2:10cv312 (E.D. Va. Sept. 9, 2011).

    Homeowners sued the insured, Harbor Walk, in three lawsuits, alleging the Chinese drywall installed in their homes emitted sulfides and other noxious gases. This caused corrosion and damage to the air-conditioning and ventilation units, refrigeration coils, copper tubing, faucets, metal surfaces, electrical appliances and other personal items. The homeowners also alleged the compounds emitted by the drywall caused bodily injury, such as allergic reactions, headaches, etc.

    Harbor Walk’s insurer, Evanston, filed for a declaratory judgment that the pollution exclusion precluded coverage.

    Read the full story...

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Homeowners Not Compelled to Arbitration in Construction Defect Lawsuit

    January 6, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    A California appeals court has ruled that developers cannot enforce CC&Rs in a case where a developer cited an arbitration clause it had inserted into the CC&R. The homeowners are alleging construction defect and wished to sue the developer who claimed a right to this under the CC&Rs.

    The Marina del Rey Argonaut reports that particular appeal dealt only with whether the developer could compel arbitration. The underlying construction defect issues will subsequently have to be determined at trial.

    The attorney for the homeowners’ association, Dan Clifford, noted that “arbitration has to be agreed to by both parties.” The covenant was drafted by the developer and in addition to requiring arbitration, it had a clause that it could not be amended without the consent of the developers. The court ruled that CC&Rs “can be enforced only by the homeowners association, the owner of a condominium or both.”

    Read the full story…


    Demand for Urban Living Leads to Austin Building Boom

    August 16, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The New York Times reports that Austin is undergoing a building boom as a high-tech firms, including Facebook and Google, have moved into the downtown area. With them, comes a need for more apartment buildings and more retail space. Mike Kennedy, the president and chief executive of an Austin real estate firm, told the Times “the office space was here, the housing came, and retail is arriving last to the scene.” Currently, two large projects that will add about 500 apartment units is underway, including a 222-unit, 18-story building, and another that will contain 277 units. Apartment occupancy in Austin is at ninety-seven percent.

    Developers also have hotels and more office space planned. The area has about 6,000 hotel rooms with an additional 2,000 planned, but events in Austin can bring in more people than the city’s 30,000 hotel rooms can accommodate. Office space is eighty-eight percent occupied, and a lack of office space could cause firms to look elsewhere.

    Read the full story…


    Contractors with Ties to Trustees Reaped Benefits from LA Community College Modernization Program

    March 3, 2011 — Original reporting by Gale Holland, Michael Finnegan and Doug Smith, Los Angeles Times

    In the latest installment of the “Billions To Spend” series of investigative reports focused on construction defects, management, and cost issues relevant to LACC’s Community College Modernization Projects, the LA Times examines the costs associated with the various layers of construction management and benefits that accrued to contractors with ties to LACC trustees.

    The reporting by the Times is seemingly critical of the project’s utilization of “body shops” an industry term for companies that function as employers of record. The article segment published today cites a number of circumstances wherein their utilization appears to have escalated costs substantially.

    “To gauge the cost of the staffing system, The Times reviewed thousands of pages of financial records from April 2007, when URS began managing the program, to July 2010. Reporters identified two dozen contractors serving as conduits for pay and benefits for employees they did not supervise.

    At least 230 people were employed in this manner, at a total cost of about $40 million, the records show.

    Approximately $18 million of the total was paid to the employees, according to the Times analysis. The remaining $22 million went to profit and overhead for contractors, the records indicate.

    For employees on its own payroll, the district says that medical and other benefits increase compensation costs 40% above base salaries. So if the district had employed its construction staff directly, the total cost for the period studied would have been $25 million instead of $40 million, a savings of $15 million, The Times calculated.”

    Read Full Story...


    Contractor Manslaughter? Safety Shortcuts Are Not Worth It

    August 11, 2011 — Douglas Reiser, Builders Counsel

    It’s been a while since I discussed the importance of safety. But, a recent article on ENR.com compelled this brief article. Don’t shortcut safety — you could be facing serious criminal repercussions.

    A New York crane company owner and one of his employees are each facing a second-degree manslaughter charge for the death of two construction workers.  The charges stem from the collapse of a crane in New York City. The district attorney determined that the crane owner cut a few corners to reduce its operation costs, significantly sacrificing safety.

    Another example was the 2010 trial of another New York crane operator who was charged with manslaughter. In that case, the criminal charges failed to stick, but an administrative judge found that the contractor used a damaged sling to support the steel collar binding the tower-crane mast to the 18th floor of a high-rise building being constructed. The company also used four slings instead of the eight, as specified by the crane manufacturer; improperly attached the slings and failed to pad or soften them.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Douglas Reiser of Reiser Legal LLC. Mr. Reiser can be contacted at info@reiserlegal.com


    Conspirators Bilked Homeowners in Nevada Construction Defect Claims

    March 28, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Courthouse News has a summary of the current lawsuit over a Nevada conspiracy to defraud homeowners by taking control of homeowner boards and then providing inadequate repairs. Homeowners in eight Las Vegas area communities are involved in the suit, which claims that the conspirators purchased units in the communities and then transferred fractional interests to others to allow them to run for HOA board elections. The suit claims that David Amesbury and his firm helped manipulate the elections.

    Once homeowner boards were controlled by the conspirators, Nancy Quon, the construction defect attorney whose recent death appears to be by suicide, handled the litigation against homebuilders. She would settle out of court, engaging Silver Lining Construction to “do very minor and superficial repairs” to the homes. The remainder of the money was split by the conspirators. The suit also notes that the construction defect claims were “frivolous,” and?in addition to the negative publicity?caused the homes to lose at least 5% of their value.

    Read the full story…