BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    housing Grottoes Virginia parking structure Grottoes Virginia condominiums Grottoes Virginia tract home Grottoes Virginia multi family housing Grottoes Virginia industrial building Grottoes Virginia Subterranean parking Grottoes Virginia landscaping construction Grottoes Virginia custom homes Grottoes Virginia Medical building Grottoes Virginia concrete tilt-up Grottoes Virginia structural steel construction Grottoes Virginia office building Grottoes Virginia casino resort Grottoes Virginia mid-rise construction Grottoes Virginia townhome construction Grottoes Virginia low-income housing Grottoes Virginia retail construction Grottoes Virginia high-rise construction Grottoes Virginia institutional building Grottoes Virginia condominium Grottoes Virginia production housing Grottoes Virginia
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Grottoes, Virginia

    Virginia Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB558; H 150; §55-70.1) Warranty extension applicable to single-family but not HOAs: in addition to any other express or implied warranties; It requires registered or certified mail notice to "vendor" stating nature of claim; reasonable time not to exceed six months to "cure the defect".


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Grottoes Virginia

    A contractor's license is required for all trades. Separate boards license plumbing, electrical, HVAC, gas fitting, and asbestos trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Fredericksburg Area Builders Association
    Local # 4830
    3006 Lafayette Blvd
    Fredericksburg, VA 22408
    http://www.fabava.com

    Augusta Home Builders Association Inc
    Local # 4804
    PO Box 36
    Waynesboro, VA 22980
    http://www.augustahomebuilders.net

    Blue Ridge Home Builders Association
    Local # 4809
    PO Box 7743
    Charlottesville, VA 22906
    http://www.brhba.org

    Piedmont Virginia Building Industry Association
    Local # 4890
    PO Box 897
    Culpeper, VA 22701
    http://www.pvbia.org

    Shenandoah Valley Builders Association
    Local # 4848
    PO Box 1286
    Harrisonburg, VA 22803
    http://www.valleybuilders.org

    Home Builders Association of Rappahannock
    Local # 4847
    PO Box 88
    Wicomico Church, VA 22579


    Home Builders Association of Richmond
    Local # 4872
    400 North Ridge Road
    Richmond, VA 23229
    http://www.hbar.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Grottoes Virginia

    South Carolina Legislature Redefining Occurrences to Include Construction Defects in CGL Policies

    Insurer Not Entitled to Summary Judgment on Construction Defect Claims

    Appeals Court Upholds Decision by Referee in Trial Court for Antagan v Shea Homes

    Construction Defects Leave Animal Shelter Unusable

    Tacoma Construction Site Uncovers Gravestones

    Save a Legal Fee: Prevent Costly Lawsuits With Claim Limitation Clauses

    LEED Certified Courthouse Square Negotiating With Insurers, Mulling Over Demolition

    Contractor’s Home Not Covered for Construction Defects

    Construction Case Alert: Appellate Court Confirms Engineer’s Duty to Defend Developer Arises Upon Tender of Indemnity Claim

    Florida trigger

    Save A Legal Fee? Sometimes You Better Talk With Your Construction Attorney

    Virginia Homebuilding Slumps After Last Year’s Gain

    The Year 2010 In Review: Design And Construction Defects Litigation

    Arizona Contractor Designs Water-Repellant Cabinets

    Summary Judgment in Construction Defect Case Cannot Be Overturned While Facts Are Still in Contention in Related Cases

    Limiting Plaintiffs’ Claims to a Cause of Action for Violation of SB-800

    Coverage Exists Under Ensuing Loss Provision

    When Does a Claim Against an Insurance Carrier for Failing to Defend Accrue?

    Contractual Liability Exclusion Bars Coverage

    Contractors Admit Involvement in Kickbacks

    Application of Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine Supports Coverage

    Ninety-Day Extension Denied to KB Home in Construction Defect Insurance Claim

    Insurer Must Cover Construction Defects Claims under Actual Injury Rule

    No Coverage Under Ensuing Loss Provision

    Connecticut Gets Medieval All Over Construction Defects

    Fifth Circuit Reverses Insurers’ Summary Judgment Award Based on "Your Work" Exclusion

    West Coast Casualty Promises Exciting Line Up at the Nineteenth Annual Conference

    Bill Seeks to Protect Legitimate Contractors

    Construction Worker Dies after Building Collapse

    Guilty Pleas Draw Renewed Interest In Nevada’s Construction Defect Laws

    Subcontractor Not Liable for Defending Contractor in Construction Defect Case

    Cogently Written Opinion Finds Coverage for Loss Caused By Defective Concrete

    Courts Are Conflicted As To Whether "Good Faith" Settlement Determinations Can Be Reviewed Via Writ Petition Or Appeal

    Webinar on Insurance Disputes in Construction Defects

    When is a Construction Project truly “Complete”? That depends. (law note)

    Largest Per Unit Settlement Ever in California Construction Defect Case?

    After Breaching its Duty to Defend, Insurer Must Indemnify

    Legislatures Shouldn’t Try to Do the Courts’ Job

    Florida Chinese drywall, pollution exclusion, “your work” exclusion, and “sistership” exclusion.

    Timing of Insured’s SIR Payment Has No Effect on Non-Participating Insurer’s Equitable Contribution to Co-Insurer

    Homeowner’s Policy Excludes Coverage for Loss Caused by Chinese Drywall

    Window Manufacturer Weathers Recession by Diversifying

    Badly Constructed Masonry Walls Not an Occurrence in Arkansas Law

    Eighth Circuit Remands to Determine Applicability of Collapse Exclusion

    Construction Firm Sues City and Engineers over Reservoir Project

    Good Signs for Housing Market in 2013

    Insurers Reacting to Massachusetts Tornadoes

    Unit Owners Have No Standing to Sue under Condominium Association’s Policy

    Fourteen More Guilty Pleas in Las Vegas Construction Defect Scam

    California Construction Bill Dies in Committee

    DA’s Office Checking Workers Comp Compliance

    Insurer Has Duty to Defend Despite Construction Defects

    Texas exclusions j(5) and j(6).

    Court Voids Settlement Agreement in Construction Defect Case

    Important Information Regarding Colorado Mechanic’s Lien Rights.

    Changes To Indemnification Statute Are Here! Say Hello To Defense Duties

    Battle of “Other Insurance” Clauses

    Minnesota Starts Wide-Ranging Registration of Contractors

    Homeowners Sue Over Sinkholes, Use Cash for Other Things

    Seller Cannot Compel Arbitration for Its Role in Construction Defect Case<

    Texas “Loser Pays” Law May Benefit Construction Insurers

    Time to Repair Nevada’s Construction Defect Laws?

    Faulty Workmanship Causing Damage to Other Property Covered as Construction Defect

    Senate Committee Approves Military Construction Funds

    Construction Defect Lawsuit Stayed by SB800

    Wine without Cheese? (Why a construction contract needs an order of precedence clause)(Law Note)

    Construction Spending Dropped in July

    Arizona Homeowners Must Give Notice of Construction Defect Claims

    No Resulting Loss From Deck Collapsing Due to Rot

    State Audit Questions College Construction Spending in LA

    Continuous Trigger of Coverage Adopted for Loss Under First Party Policy

    Insurer Rejects Claim on Dolphin Towers

    Mandatory Arbitration Provision Upheld in Construction Defect Case

    Driver’s Death May Be Due to Construction Defect

    Colorado statutory “property damage” caused by an “occurrence”

    Insurance Company Must Show that Lead Came from Building Materials

    Texas covered versus uncovered allocation and “legally obligated to pay.”

    Construction on the Rise in Washington Town

    Policing Those Subcontractors: It Might Take Extra Effort To Be An Additional Insured

    Florida Law: Defects in Infrastructure Improvements Not Covered in Home Construction Warranties

    Texas Windstorm Insurance Agency Under Scrutiny

    California Assembly Bill Proposes an End to Ten Year Statute of Repose

    Nevada Court Adopts Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine

    Homebuilders Go Green in Response to Homebuyer Demand

    Is Construction Heading Off the Fiscal Cliff?

    Judge Concludes Drywall Manufacturer Sold in Florida

    Limitations of Liability in Subcontractors’ Contracts May Not Be Enforceable in Colorado to Limit Claims by Construction Professionals.

    Construction Defect Not an Occurrence in Ohio

    Homeowner may pursue negligence claim for construction defect, Oregon Supreme Court holds

    Washington Supreme Court Sides with Lien Claimants in Williams v. Athletic Field
    Corporate Profile

    GROTTOES VIRGINIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 5500 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Grottoes, Virginia Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Grottoes' most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Grottoes Virginia general contracting OSHA expert witness constructionGrottoes Virginia general contracting construction defect expert witnessGrottoes Virginia general contracting civil engineer expert witnessGrottoes Virginia general contracting building code expert witnessGrottoes Virginia general contracting consulting architect expert witnessGrottoes Virginia general contracting expert witnesses fenestrationGrottoes Virginia general contracting expert witness windowsGrottoes Virginia general contracting construction expert witnessGrottoes Virginia general contracting architecture expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Grottoes, Virginia

    Court Will Not Compel Judge to Dismiss Construction Defect Case

    August 2, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The Fourteenth Court of Appeals of Texas has denied a petition for a writ of mandamus. The parties involved, Bonner Ball, Thomas Zenner, and Rallin Welch, are lmited partners of Black Diamond Builders, LLP. Black Diamond is the recipient of a lawsuit from Grier and Camille Patton, for whom Black Diamond built a home. The Pattons are alleging construction defects.

    The Black Diamond partners argue that Judge Jeff Shadwick, presiding judge of the 55th District Court of Harris County, Texas should have granted their motion to dismiss. They sought to have the Fourteenth Court of Appeals compel that action.

    The Black Diamond Partners claims that “the homowners failed to satisfy statutory prerequisites before filing suit, and dismissal of the suit was automatic under the applicable statues in effect at the time the Pattons noticed alleged defects in their home.”

    The court noted that “a trial court will be held to have abused its discretion only if the party requesting mandamus relief establishes that the trial court could have reached but one decision.” The court did not concur with this and denied the petition for a writ of mandamus.

    Read the court's decision…


    Homebuilders Go Green in Response to Homebuyer Demand

    May 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    McGrawHill Construction reports that 17 percent of new homes and remodels in 2011 were done with green building practices. Their report estimates that by 2016, this will rise to 29 to 38 percent of the market for home construction and remodeling.

    Consumers see the green buildings as more desirable, particularly where they are more energy efficient. Two thirds of builders noted their customers were interested in features that would lower the energy use of their homes. Consumers also feel that green building materials are more durable and see green homes as higher quality.

    Read the full story…


    Contractor Removed from Site for Lack of Insurance

    October 28, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    The MetroWest Daily News reports that a demolition firm was told to leave the construction site at Natick High School since their failure to have workers compensation insurance makes them unable to work on the project. The contractor, Atlantic Dismantling and Site Construction, Inc. may have been working illegally since September.

    The equipment that Atlantic had rented for the job was repossessed in August. Brait Builders Corp, the general contractor for the site had rented equipment so Atlantic could continue their work.

    Their lack of insurance was discovered when a worker had a minor job-related injury. The state had issued a stop-work order for the firm and they could not legally bid on public projects. The school system did not receive any notice of this, and the school’s facilities director said of the general contractor, “chances are Brait never heard of anything either.”

    Read the full story...


    Gilroy Homeowners Sue over Leaky Homes

    February 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Two years into a lawsuit against Shapell Homes, the builder of a subdivision called Eagle Ridge in Gilroy, California, homeowners have joined or left the lawsuit. About fifty homeowners are still in the suit, which contends that construction defects have lead to water intrusion in their homes. The lawyer for the homeowners contends that more than a hundred homes have construction defects.

    One homeowner said that soon after he joined the suit, Sharpell sent workers to his home who repaired problems to his satisfaction. “They came in within two weeks and fixed everything,” said Frank Lowry. Another homeowner, Wilson Haddow, said that he was “quite happy” after Shapell repaired problems.

    Others weren’t quite so happy. Greg Yancey said that problems had “been a nightmare” and that “it just doesn’t feel like home.” He said that his “house is possessed,” with problems that include walls that bow out and a balcony that drips rainwater to the front door. His home is currently worth far less than the $700,000 he paid in 2007.

    Read the full story…


    Construction Defects Lead to Demolition of Seattle’s 25-story McGuire Apartments Building

    March 16, 2011 — March 16, 2011 Construction Defect Journal Staff

    According to a story published last Thursday in Seattle PI: " The 25-story McGuire Apartments, at Second Avenue and Wall Street, would cost more to fix than the building is worth, according to its owners. Its most serious defect involves steel cables that are corroding inside of concrete slabs because the ends weren’t properly treated with a rust-proof coating and a pocket in the edge of the concrete that wasn’t properly sealed"

    The report by Aubrey Cohen outlines the demolition plans which are expected to take between 12 and 18 months, and will utilize robotic Brokk Machines. The demolition plan calls for one story at a time to be demolished, with the debris to be trucked offsite. Demolition plans aim to minimize disruption to residents and businesses in the area by Limiting work 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. on weekdays and 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. Saturdays with "impact and percussive activities" limited to 8 a.m to 5 p.m weekdays.

    Read More...


    Insurer Not Entitled to Summary Judgment on Construction Defect Claims

    February 10, 2012 — Tred Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    The insurer unsuccessfully moved for summary judgment, contending it had no obligation to defend two related underlying construction defect cases. Amerisure Ins. Co. v. R.L.Lantana Boatyard, Ltd., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2466 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 9, 2012).

    An engineering report noted design construction defects and deficiencies in visible, physical improvements at The Moorings at Lantana Condominium. In two lawsuits, The Moorings sued the developer, R.L. Lantana Boatyard ("RLLB"), and the contractor, Current Builders of Florida.

    Current Builders was insured by Amerisure. RLLB was named as an additional insured under the Amerisure policy.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    South Carolina Contractors Regain General Liability Coverage

    May 20, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    PR Newswire reports that the Carolinas Associated General Contractors (CAGC) have successfully persuaded the South Carolina legislature to pass a bill restoring commercial general liability (CGL) coverage. Governor Nikki Hartley signed the legislation on May 17.

    A South Carolina Supreme Court decision given on January 7, 2011, had ended commercial general liability coverage in the state. Senate Bill 431 addressed this decision, restoring the ability of home builders to obtain CGL coverage.

    PR Newswire quotes South Carolina homebuilder, Allen Amsler: “We have seen a lot of legislation with substantial impact to our business over the years. However, I would place this in the same level of importance with the original tort reform legislation. The effects of the Supreme Court’s ruling could have been catastrophic to our industry in South Carolina had it not been for this bill. Thanks to all those in the House, Senate and the Governor’s office who assisted us.”

    Read the full story…


    Tampa Condo Owners Allege Defects

    October 23, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Owners in the Bel Mare towers have filed a lawsuit alleging that the building have construction defects that could lead to problems during periods with high winds. The Tampa Bay Business Journal reports that the condo association has sued the developer, the general contractor, the architects, the structural engineers, and subcontractors.

    Read the full story…


    Exclusion Bars Coverage for Mold, Fungus

    October 23, 2012 — Tred Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    The court considered whether rain damage to a house was barred by the policy's mold exclusion. Stewart v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 2012 U.S. Dist LEXIS 127804 (D. S.D. Sept. 7, 2012).

    The insureds hired DJ Construction to build a new home. Before construction was completed, it was discovered that DJ Construction and some of its subcontractors had failed to protect the partially constructed house from the elements, which allowed melting snow and rain to intrude into the house. Soon after this discovery, DJ Construction abandoned the project. The house remained incomplete and uninhabitable.

    The insureds sued DJ Construction.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    New Construction Laws, New Forms in California

    July 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    New construction laws came into effect in California on July 1. Writing for the Martindale-Hubble Legal Library, Glenn Mau, J. Michael McGuire, and John Tonsing, all of Archer Norris, discuss these changes. They note that the most important part of the changes to California construction law is that “all mechanics liens, stop notices and bond claims recorded after July 1, 2012 must use the new standardized forms and follow the new definitions, notice prerequisites and statutory release form language.”

    Read the full story…


    Insurance Company Prevails in “Chinese Drywall” Case

    June 17, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    The Louisiana Court of Appeals rejected an appeal to reverse a summary judgment granted to Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Company. Terrence and Rhonda Ross contracted for a remodel of their home in which Chinese-made drywall was used. When the drywall emitted harmful gasses, the Rosses filed a claim under their insurance policy. This claim was rejected under four exclusions: for faulty materials, latent defect, loss by corrosion, and loss by pollution. After the claim was denied, the Rosses sued Louisiana Citizens.

    In April 2010, the lower court granted a summary judgment, followed by a May, 2010 order dismissing the Rosses’ claims against Louisiana Citizens. The Rosses appealed this decision. In the court’s review, they agreed with Louisiana Citizens and the lower court on all counts. Although the Rosses maintained that the drywall was not defective (as it still functioned as drywall), the court ruled that its emission of sulfuric gases was a defect. Further, as it was in place for two years before this became evident, it was also a latent defect. Damage to the Rosses’ home consisted of corrosion damage caused by the pollutants in the drywall.

    The Rosses made an additional claim that since their policy covered smoke damage, this should be covered, as the harm was done by sulfuric gases. The court noted that the contract specifies “fumes or vapors from a boiler, furnace, or related equipment,” none of which apply in this case.

    Read the court’s decision


    Housing Market on Way to Recovery

    October 23, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Bloomberg News reports that new home purchases neared a two-year high, with July sales being the strongest since April 2010. Economists polled by Bloomberg expected an annual pace of 380,000 sales, the current levels are at 373,000. Strongest sales gains were in the Northeast, with a 20 percent jump. The Midwest and Western regions had small gains, and the South saw a drop of 4.9 percent. As the Northeast’s home prices are highest and the South’s the lowest, the pattern of sales lead to a sharp increase in median sales price.

    Meanwhile, existing stocks of homes continued to deplete, reaching a record low of 38,000 completed homes on the market. In response, builders are constructing new homes at a pace not seen since April 2010, accord to the Commerce Department.

    Read the full story…


    Defect Claims as Occurrences? Check Your State Laws

    July 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Although four states have defined construction defect claims as occurrences, contractors are still dealing with “coverage gaps for faulty work construction,” says Mike Tsikoudakis in a piece at Business Insurance. He quotes Julian Ehrlich, the senior VP of claims for Aon Risk Services that “one of the interesting and compelling aspects of the issue of coverage for defective construction is that jurisdictions differ, so policyholders don’t know what they’re going to get.” He further notes that “in context of construction defect, the term ‘occurrence’ is ambiguous.”

    One problem, as noted by Jeffrey J. Vita, a partner at Saxe Doernberger & Vita, is that construction firms end up needing to simultaneously defend against defect claims and to also file suit to be certain their insurance firms will cover claims. Insurance for construction defect claims is described as “expensive and somewhat limited.” Mr. Vita expects more states to help this situation with new laws, clarifying what is an occurrence.

    Read the full story…


    School District Settles Construction Lawsuit

    November 7, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The Franklin County, Pennsylvania Public Opinion reports that an area school is coming to an end with its construction lawsuit. The school district was sued by its contractors for a combined $1.4 million, which the school district withheld when the project was not completed on schedule. Lobar Inc. claimed that the district additionally owed interest and should pay attorney fees. The school claimed that only $1.15 million was due under the contract. Under the settlement, they will be paying $1.136 million.

    Read the full story…


    North Carolina Exclusion j(6) “That Particular Part”

    February 10, 2012 — CDCoverage.com

    In Alliance Mutual Insurance Co. v. Dove, 714 S.E.2d 782 (N.C. Ct. App. 2011), claimant Murphy-Brown hired insured Dove to repair a broken elevator belt in a grain elevator in Murphy-Brown’s feed mill. The elevator was inside a metal duct and, to access the broken belt, Dove had to cut out a section of the duct. After replacing the belt, Dove welded the metal section back to the duct. Immediately after Dove completed the welding, dust inside the duct ignited, causing an explosion in the elevator, resulting in property damage to the elevator and other property. Murphy-Brown sued Dove for negligence seeking damages for the repair and replacement of the elevator, repair and replacement of the other property, increased grain handling costs during the repairs, and loss of use.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of CDCoverage.com


    Construction Workers Face Dangers on the Job

    November 18, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    OSHA calculates that for each 33,000 active construction workers, one will die on the job each year, making their risk over the course of their careers at one out of every 200 workers. This puts it many times over OSHA’s definition of “significant risk” of 1 death per 1,000 workers over the course of their careers. According to an article in People’s World, “the main risk of death is from falls.”

    At a talk at the American Public Health Association’s meeting, one expert noted that “construction workers make up 6 percent to 8 percent of all workers, but account for 20 percent of all deaths on the job every year.”

    Read the full story…


    Seven Tips to Manage Construction Defect Risk

    July 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Jody T. Wright looks at “seven strategies being used around the country to identify, manage and mitigate your exposures” in a piece in Business Insurance. Wright, Senior VP, Construction Department Manager for Lockton Companies in Denver, gives seven simple steps from the perspective of a insurer.

    His first step is to match your project to your insurance. He suggests keeping the riskier projects separate, noting that from an insurer’s point-of-view, “any project that creates a homeowners association carries a higher potential threat of future litigation.” This leads to his second point: you need to “determine what makes your liability insurer nervous.” In other words, talk with your insurer.

    His third point suggests that builders look back and see if there is a pattern of problems that have lead to payouts from your insurer. Keep your insurer happier by making sure these areas don’t continue to be problems. Nor should you look for new problems. He suggests against leading in new technologies.

    Three more points deal with being careful about with whom you associate. He tells builders to negotiate their contracts, avoiding clauses that would obligate a builder to “indemnify the owner for the negligent work of others that they did not control.” Avoid subcontractors “with loss patterns that might affect your project and reputation.” Builders should identify “owners with a pattern of suing contractors” adding that risk to the cost of the job. They should also identify “the most effective attorneys and expert witnesses” and get them involved before the litigation starts.

    Read the full story…


    The Flood Insurance Reform Act May be Extended to 2016

    April 7, 2011 — April 7, 2011 Beverley BevenFlorez - Construction Defect Journal

    The Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2011 (H. R. 1309) has been referred to the House Committee on Financial Services—the first step in the legislative process. The bill, if passed, would extend the program to September 30, 2016. It is currently slated to be terminated September 30 of this year. The bill also contains changes to premium rates, mapping protocols, and privatization initiatives.

    H. R. 1309 has garnered the support of several Insurance organizations. Leigh Ann Pusey, president and CEO of the American Insurance Association (AIA), sent a letter of support to the Chair and Ranking member of the House Financial Services Subcommittee. “AIA has advocated for a long term reauthorization of the NFIP to protect consumers and help increase stability for real estate transactions and policyholders,” Pusey said. “AIA believes the five-year extension contained in HR 1309, will provide certainty in the flood program thereby increasing consumer and business confidence in the NFIP.”

    Jimi Grande, senior vice president of federal and political affairs for the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies (NAMIC) spoke out in support of the bill. “For the NFIP to survive, the prices for flood insurance must reflect the actual costs of flood risk for a property,” Grande said. “HR 1309 will provide that transparency. In addition, the Technical Mapping Advisory Council will give communities a voice in the flood mapping process, fostering a better understanding of what flood maps represent and how they are made.”

    Read H. R. 1309...
    Read the American Insurance Association statement...
    Read the NAMIC Press Release...