BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    tract home Tynan Texas industrial building Tynan Texas casino resort Tynan Texas retail construction Tynan Texas concrete tilt-up Tynan Texas multi family housing Tynan Texas mid-rise construction Tynan Texas low-income housing Tynan Texas landscaping construction Tynan Texas hospital construction Tynan Texas custom home Tynan Texas Medical building Tynan Texas housing Tynan Texas custom homes Tynan Texas production housing Tynan Texas condominiums Tynan Texas structural steel construction Tynan Texas high-rise construction Tynan Texas institutional building Tynan Texas office building Tynan Texas Subterranean parking Tynan Texas townhome construction Tynan Texas
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Tynan, Texas

    Texas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 730 amended the Texas Property Code by adding Title 16 and amending chapter 27. Overseen by the Texas Residential Construction Commission (TRCC) the code asserts that a contractor is not liable for any percentage of damages caused by failure to take reasonable action to mitigate damages or take reasonable action to maintain the residence. It also limits damages, requires written notification and response for right of repair and defines warranty periods. Additionally, SB 754 states“(5-10 Sec. 27.107) a contractor may assert as an affirmative defense to an allegation of a defect made in a complaint filed under this subchapter that the defect is the result of abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modifications or alterations of the home.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Tynan Texas

    No state license is required, however, general contractors must get permits at the local level. Separate boards license HVAC, and plumbing trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Laredo Builders Association
    Local # 4593
    201 W Hillside Suite 3
    Laredo, TX 78041
    http://www.laredobuilders.org

    Builders Association of Corpus Christi
    Local # 4521
    5325 Yorktown Blvd
    Corpus Christi, TX 78413
    http://www.bacctexas.org/

    Builders Association of Victoria
    Local # 4572
    5105 E Airline Rd
    Victoria, TX 77904
    http://www.vctbuilders.org

    Galveston Area Builders & Remodelers Association
    Local # 4533
    P O Box 1037
    Santa Fe, TX 77517
    http://www.galvestonbuilders.org/

    Builders Association of Greater San Antonio
    Local # 4560
    3625 Paesanos Parkwary
    San Antonio, TX 78231
    http://www.sabuilders.com

    Greater New Braunfels Home Builders Association
    Local # 4503
    625 W San Antonio St
    New Braunfels, TX 78130
    http://www.newbraunfelshomebuilders.com

    Greater Houston Builders Association
    Local # 4536
    9511 W Sam Houston Pkwy N
    Houston, TX 77064
    http://www.ghba.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Tynan Texas

    Construction Defects as Occurrences, Better Decided in Law than in Courts

    History of Defects Leads to Punitive Damages for Bankrupt Developer

    No Coverage for Counterclaim Alleging Construction Defects Pled as Breach of Contract

    Construction Defects: 2010 in Review

    Lockton Expands Construction and Design Team

    Federal District Court Continues to Find Construction Defects do Not Arise From An Occurrence

    Colorado Senate Bill 12-181: 2012’s Version of a Prompt Pay Bill

    Arizona Supreme Court Confirms Eight-Year Limit on Construction Defect Lawsuits

    Ensuing Loss Provision Does Not Salvage Coverage

    Renovation Contractors: Be Careful How You Disclose Your Projects

    No Duty to Indemnify When Discovery Shows Faulty Workmanship Damages Insured’s Own Work

    State Farm Too Quick To Deny Coverage, Court Rules

    “Other Insurance” and Indemnity Provisions Determine Which Insurer Must Cover

    Going Green for Lower Permit Fees

    Pictorial Construction Terminology Dictionary — A Quick and Helpful Reference

    Ohio subcontractor work exception to the “your work” exclusion

    Delaware “occurrence” and exclusions j(5) and j(6)

    Late Filing Contractor Barred from Involving Subcontractors in Construction Defect Claim

    Unfinished Building Projects Litter Miami

    Florida Law: Defects in Infrastructure Improvements Not Covered in Home Construction Warranties

    Steps to Defending against Construction Defect Lawsuits

    Texas contractual liability exclusion

    Texas “Loser Pays” Law May Benefit Construction Insurers

    Repair of Part May Necessitate Replacement of Whole

    Construction Defect Journal Marks First Anniversary

    Construction Defects Are Occurrences, Says South Carolina High Court

    Restitution Unlikely in Las Vegas Construction Defect Scam

    Seller Cannot Compel Arbitration for Its Role in Construction Defect Case<

    Housing Market on Way to Recovery

    Court Rejects Anti-SLAPP Motion in Construction Defect Suit

    Manhattan Developer Breaks Ground on $520 Million Project

    Court Strikes Down Reasonable Construction Defect Settlement

    Nevada Assembly Sends Construction Defect Bill to Senate

    Condo Buyers Seek to Void Sale over Construction Defect Lawsuit

    Illinois Court Determines Insurer Must Defend Negligent Misrepresentation Claim

    Partial Settlement in DeKalb Construction Management Case

    Boyfriend Pleads Guilty in Las Vegas Construction Defect Scam Suicide

    Godfather Charged with Insurance Fraud

    Construction Defects Lead to Demolition of Seattle’s 25-story McGuire Apartments Building

    Joinder vs. Misjoinder in Colorado Construction Claims: Roche Constructors v. One Beacon

    Environment Decision May Expand Construction Defect Claims

    Plans Go High Tech

    New Apartment Tower on the Rise in Seattle

    Contractual Liability Exclusion Bars Coverage

    West Coast Casualty Promises Exciting Line Up at the Nineteenth Annual Conference

    An Upward Trend in Commercial Construction?

    Florida Chinese drywall, pollution exclusion, “your work” exclusion, and “sistership” exclusion.

    Limitations of Liability in Subcontractors’ Contracts May Not Be Enforceable in Colorado to Limit Claims by Construction Professionals.

    Insurer Has Duty to Defend Despite Construction Defects

    Quarter Four a Good One for Luxury Homebuilder

    Building Boom Leads to Construction Defect Cases

    California Supreme Court Finds Associations Bound by Member Arbitration Clauses

    New Construction Laws, New Forms in California

    Destruction of Construction Defect Evidence Leads to Sanctions against Plaintiff

    Contractor Convicted of Additional Fraud

    Fire Reveals Defects, Appeals Court Affirms Judgment against Builder

    Time to Repair Nevada’s Construction Defect Laws?

    State Audit Questions College Construction Spending in LA

    Are Construction Defects Covered by Your General Liability Policy?

    Insurer Must Defend Claims for Diminution in Value of Damaged Property

    Tampa Condo Owners Allege Defects

    Another Las Vegas Tower at the Center of Construction Defect Claims

    Colorado Court of Appeals Finds Damages to Non-Defective Property Arising From Defective Construction Covered Under Commercial General Liability Policy

    Condo Board May Be Negligent for not Filing Construction Defect Suit in a Timely Fashion

    Crane Dangles and So Do Insurance Questions

    Gilroy Homeowners Sue over Leaky Homes

    Insurers Reacting to Massachusetts Tornadoes

    Nevada Assembly Bill Proposes Changes to Construction Defect Litigation

    California Bill Would Notify Homeowners on Construction Defect Options

    Plaintiff Not Entitled to Further Damages over Defective Decking

    Statutes of Limitations May be the Colorado Contractors’ Friend

    Home Builder Doesn’t See Long Impact from Hurricane

    One to Watch: Case Takes on Economic Loss Rule and Professional Duties

    Construction Defect Litigation at San Diego’s Alicante Condominiums?

    Allowing the Use of a General Verdict Form in a Construction Defect Case Could Subject Your Client to Prejudgment Interest

    Park District Sues over Leaky Roof

    Arizona Contractor Designs Water-Repellant Cabinets

    School District Marks End of Construction Project by Hiring Lawyers

    Illinois Court Determines Insurer Must Defend Property Damage Caused by Faulty Workmanship

    One World Trade Center Due to Be America’s Tallest and World’s Priciest

    Damage During Roof Repairs Account for Three Occurrences

    Defense for Additional Insured Not Barred By Sole Negligence Provision

    Policyholder Fails to Build Adequate Record to Support Bad Faith Claim

    Unit Owners Have No Standing to Sue under Condominium Association’s Policy

    Safety Officials Investigating Death From Fall

    Tacoma Construction Site Uncovers Gravestones

    OSHA Extends Temporary Fall Protection Rules

    Construction Spending Dropped in July

    Negligent Construction an Occurrence Says Ninth Circuit

    Ceiling Collapse Attributed to Construction Defect
    Corporate Profile

    TYNAN TEXAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Tynan, Texas Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 5,500 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Tynan's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Tynan Texas general contracting reconstruction expert witnessTynan Texas general contracting expert witness structural engineerTynan Texas general contracting construction expertsTynan Texas general contracting building code expert witnessTynan Texas general contracting construction claims expert witnessTynan Texas general contracting construction forensic expert witnessTynan Texas general contracting civil engineering expert witnessTynan Texas general contracting expert witnesses fenestrationTynan Texas general contracting roofing and waterproofing expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Tynan, Texas

    Construction Law Client Alert: Hirer Beware - When Exercising Control Over a Job Site’s Safety Conditions, You May be Held Directly Liable for an Independent Contractor’s Injury

    April 6, 2011 — April 6, 2011 - By Mark VonderHaar and Yvette Davis in the Haight Brown & Bonesteel Blog

    On February 24, 2011, the California Court of Appeal held in Jeffrey Tverberg, et al v. Fillner Construction, Inc. that the imposition of direct liability on a hirer turns on whether the hirer exercised retained control of worksite safety in such a manner that affirmatively contributed to the independent contractor’s injury. Twice, Tverberg, an independent contractor hired by a general contractor's subcontractor, asked the general contractor to make the job site safe by covering up open holes created by another unrelated subcontractor while Tverberg was working at the site. After Tverberg was injured at the site by falling in a hole, he sued both the general contractor and the subcontractor which had hired him.

    The Court of Appeal reasoned that when the general contractor instructed another subcontractor to create a condition that was potentially dangerous (i.e., creating open and uncovered bollard holes), and simultaneously required Tverberg to perform unrelated work near the open holes, the general contractor s conduct may have constituted a negligent exercise of its retained control which affirmatively contributed to Tverberg’s injury. The Court also reasoned that the general contractor affirmatively assumed responsibility for the safety of the workers near the holes by only requiring stakes and safety ribbon, and negligently discharged that responsibility which resulted in injury.

    Read the full story...

    Reprinted courtesy of Mark VonderHaar and Yvette Davis of Haight Brown & Bonesteel. Mr. VonderHaar can be contacted at mvonderhaar@hbblaw.com and Ms. Davis at ydavis@hbblaw.com.


    Who Is To Blame For Defective — And Still LEED Certified — Courthouse Square?

    September 1, 2011 — Douglas Reiser, Builders Counsel

    Remember Courthouse Square? I sure do. We have talked about the closed and evacuated LEED certified building a couple of times here on Builders Counsel. Well, it’s back in the news. This time building professionals are pointing fingers — but there is some talk about a fix. Still, its LEED certification remains.

    If you read my past articles about Courthouse Square, you can get caught up on this mess. The short of it is that Salem, Oregon had the five-story government building and bus mall completed in 2000 for $34 Million. It was awarded LEED certification during the USGBC’s infancy. Last year, it became public that the building had significantly defective concrete and design. The Salem-Keizer Transit District worked with the City of Salem to shut the building down, and it has not been occupied since.

    Last fall, Courthouse Square failed thorough forensic testing leading to a lengthy bout with a number of insurers.  The contractors and designers had been hauled into court, but the Transit District was able to settle with the architect and contractors. The only remaining party involved in the lawsuit appears to be the engineering firm, Century West Engineering. Most expert reports have pinned the responsibility for the poor design and materials on Century West’s shoulders.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Douglas Reiser of Reiser Legal LLC. Mr. Reiser can be contacted at info@reiserlegal.com


    Homeowners Sue Over Sinkholes, Use Cash for Other Things

    January 6, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Quoting one homeowner as saying that his house “can fall in the ground for all I care, I made my money,” the Tampa Bay Times looks at the issue of sinkhole claims in Florida. Homeowners “have paid off mortgages, put in pools, replaced roofs, or otherwise used money from sinkhole claims to do something besides fix sinkhole damage.

    It’s been tough for insurance companies. Citizens Property Insurance took in $32 million in premiums for sinkhole coverage in 2010, but paid out $245 million in sinkhole claims. The Tampa Bay Times notes that some of those claims come from settling problems caused by their repairs, including one settlement of $350,000 for repairs to a house worth $39,000.

    One couple, after receiving $217,000 from Citizens, sold the house to a company that bought unrepaired sinkhole homes for $190,000. The home has been sold since and remains unrepaired.

    Sometimes the preferred solution by the insurance company isn’t the cheapest either. One couple was informed that Citizens was going to spend $150,000 to have the hole filled with grout. After they settled with the insurance company, they fixed the problem by installing steel piers, at a cost of about $45,000.

    Read the full story…


    Nevada Assembly Bill Proposes Changes to Construction Defect Litigation

    April 14, 2011 — April 14, 2011 Beverley BevenFlorez - Construction Defect Journal

    Assemblyman John Oceguera has written a bill that would redefine the term Construction Defect, set statutory limitations, and force the prevailing party to pay for attorney’s fees. Assembly Bill 401 has been referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

    Currently, the law in Nevada states that “a defect in the design, construction, manufacture, repair or landscaping of a new residence, of an alteration of or addition to an existing residence, or of an appurtenance, which is done in violation of law, including in violation of local codes or ordinances, is a constructional defect.” However, AB401 “provides that there is a rebuttable presumption that workmanship which exceeds the standards set forth in the applicable law, including any applicable local codes or ordinances, is not a constructional defect.”

    The Nevada courts may award attorney fees to the prevailing party today. However, AB401 mandates that attorney fees must be awarded, and the exact award is to be determined by the Court. “(1) The court shall award to the prevailing party reasonable attorney’s fees, which must be an element of costs and awarded as costs; and (2) the amount of any attorney’s fees awarded must be determined by and approved by the court.”

    AB401 also sets a three year statutory limit “for an action for damages for certain deficiencies, injury or wrongful death caused by a defect in construction if the defect is a result of willful misconduct or was fraudulently concealed.”

    This Nevada bill is in the early stages of development.

    Read the full story...

    Remodels Replace Construction in Redding

    September 9, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    The Record Searchlight reports that while new construction is down in Redding, California, residential and commercial remodel permits are up 17 percent. By August 2010, there had been 63 housing and commercial business starts in Redding, while this year has seen only 15.

    One such remodel, that of Parkview Market, will cost about $201,000. Safeway is planning on two $80,000 remodels of its grocery stores in Redding. In all, the 150 building permits for remodels are worth a total of $2.8 million.

    Read the full story…


    Construction Job Opening Rise in October

    December 20, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    There was a significant increase in the number of open construction jobs during October, according to a report for the National Association of Home Builders. Working from preliminary data provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the NAHB said that the number of open positions reached “levels and rates last seen in 2007.” As the data is still preliminary, the NAHB noted that the conclusions should be taken with caution.

    While there was a spike in job openings, the hiring of people to fill these positions hasn’t caught up with it, and there was a small decline in hires. But to return to the good news, there was also a drop in layoffs in that same period.

    Through October, about 8,000 people have been hired in the construction sector. The NAHB notes that this does not correspond with the recent increases with home construction. They suggest that “it may be the case that startups in the home building and remodeling sectors are being missed by the establishment survey.” Another possibility they raise is that already-employed construction workers are simply working more hours.

    Read the full story…


    Boston Tower Project to Create 450 Jobs

    November 18, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Continuing the development of Boston’s Theater District, Millennium Partners broke ground for the building of Hayward Place, a 15-story residential tower with street-level shops. The project is expected to take two years to complete and will employ about 450 construction workers.

    Thomas Menino, the mayor of Boston said that the “ground breaking of Hayward Place is another sign of economic growth and forward progress on the revitalization of this area.” The project will be built by Suffolk Construction. John Fish, their CEO, said they were “fortunate as a contractor to be the beneficiary of this.”

    The report in the Boston Herald notes that a few blocks away, the site of the former Filenes department store is still “an empty eyesore.” Menino joked, “anyone want to bid for it?” He promised that site would also be developed.

    Read the full story…


    Another Colorado District Court Refuses to Apply HB 10-1394 Retroactively

    October 28, 2011 — David M. McLain, Colorado Construction Litigation

    In Martinez v. Mike Wells Construction Company, 09CV227, Teller County District Court Judge Edward S. Colt refused to apply C.R.S. § 13-20-808 retroactively to provide coverage for the underlying construction defect allegations. According to the recitation of facts in Judge Colt’s March 2011 order, Martinez contracted with Mike Wells Construction to serve as the general contractor for the construction of a home. At that time, Mike Wells Construction was insured through ProBuilders Specialty Insurance Company, RRG. Disputes arose between Martinez and Mike Wells Construction, resulting in Martinez ordering it off of the project in mid-November 2007 and terminating its right to work there by letter dated November 28, 2007.

    Mike Wells, the owner of the corporation, subsequently died. Martinez sued Mike Wells Construction in July 2009 for breach of contract and various claims relating to alleged defecting workmanship. Martinez provided notice of the suit to the special administrator of the probate estate. No answer having been filed, the court entered a default judgment against Mike Wells Construction and Martinez sought to garnish Mike Wells Construction’s ProBuilders insurance policy.

    Read the full story...

    Reprinted courtesy of Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC. Mr. McClain can be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com


    Former New York Governor to Head Construction Monitoring Firm

    September 13, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    David Paterson, who succeeded Eliot Spitzer as Governor of New York, has started a new venture after leaving the Governor’s office in construction integrity monitoring. WNYC reports that Paterson will be the majority owner of Icon Compliance Services, LLC, which will both conduct investigations and work with law enforcement officials. Paterson says that in government projects “often concessions are made for political reasons in the public sector and then you never really get a product that you paid for.”

    Paterson will be working with a former vice president of Bovis Construction, Brian Aryai, who is also a former U.S. Treasury Agent. Aryai said that “it is astounding that some of the fraud that has come to the surface in the recent past,” and describes it as “almost laughable they were not detected.” Aryai tipped federal prosecutors that Bovis had been over billing on projects for at least a decade.

    Read the full story…


    Loss Caused by Seepage of Water Not Covered

    July 10, 2012 — Tred Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    The anti-concurrent clause in a homeowner’s policy barred coverage for damage caused by hidden seepage. Boazova v. Safety Ins. Co., 2012 Mass. LEXIS 462 (Mass. May 29, 2012).

    The insured had a concrete patio built along the rear wall of her house at a grade higher than the home’s foundation. Years later, severe deterioration was discovered in the floor joists, wall studs and other parts of the home. The insured held a homeowner’s policy with Safety. An inspector hired by Safety determined the deterioration was caused by the placement of the concrete patio slab adjacent to the wall of the house, allowing water to seep onto the top of the foundation.

    Safety denied coverage because the damage was caused by a combination of surface water, deterioration, settling and improper construction of the concrete patio.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Florida trigger

    August 4, 2011 — CDCoverage.com

    In Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Siena Home Corp., No. 5:08-CV-385-Oc-10GJK (M.D. Fla. July 8, 2011), insured residential real estate developer Siena was sued by homeowners seeking damages for moisture penetration property damage resulting from exterior wall construction defects. Siena’s CGL insurer Mid-Continent filed suit seeking a declaratory judgment of no duty to defend or indemnify in part on the basis that the alleged “property damage” did not manifest during the Mid-Continent policy period.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of CDCoverage.com


    Quarter Four a Good One for Luxury Homebuilder

    December 20, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Toll Brothers has announced that their fourth-quarter net income is $2.35 per share, which they attribute in part to an income tax benefit. Their revenue, at $632.8 million, easily exceeded analysts’ projections of $565.1 million. Additionally, their number of signed contracts jumped seventy percent while their cancellation rate dropped nearly half to 4.9 percent.

    Read the full story…


    Partial Settlement in DeKalb Construction Management Case

    July 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The DeKalb County School District has made a partial settlement in a lawsuit over their claims of mismanagement of construction projects. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports that the school board settled with E. R. Mitchell & Co., the smaller of two firms that they have sued. As part of the settlement, Mitchell will be testifying against their former partner. Claims from the other side of the lawsuit are that the school board improperly fired the Heery/Mitchell partnership. The superintendant who fired the company, Crawford Lewis, and his chief operations office, Pat Reid, have since been charged with criminal conspiracy to defraud the construction program. A lawyer for Heery said that “we believe that when presented to a jury, Heery will be vindicated.”

    Read the full story…


    Can Negligent Contractors Shift Blame in South Carolina?

    July 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Clay Olson looks back to a 1991 Carolina case, Nelson v. Concrete Supply Company. The court concluded in that case that “a plaintiff in South Carolina may recover only if his/her negligence does not exceed that of the defendant’s and amount of plaintiff’s recovery shall be reduced in proportion to amount of his or her negligence; if there is more than one defendant, plaintiff’s negligence shall be compared to combined negligence of all defendants.” In 2005, he reports, as part of tort reform in South Carolina, the legislature further addressed this.

    He then suggests a possible outcome of this is that negligent contractors may be able to shift some of the blame (and cost of the settlement) to other defendants who may not be to blame. He offers a scenario in which a contractor is sued for construction defects and a jury has to allocate responsibility for indivisible damage. “A jury need only find the two subcontractors to have each contributed 15% of the indivisible damage.” He adds in another 15% for claims against the architect. Minor blame is given to the manufacturers, and suddenly the negligent contractor is paying less than 50% of the total settlement.

    He notes that the previous system in place also had its problems, but notes that this one may not be “fair and equitable.”

    Read the full story…


    Nevada Bill Aims to Reduce Legal Fees For Construction Defect Practitioners

    March 21, 2011 — March 21, 2011 Construction Defect Journal Staff

    Assemblyman Ira Hansen and twelve additional members of Nevada’s Assembly are sponsoring Assembly Bill 285. AB 285 Revises provisions governing an award of attorney’s fees in causes of action for constructional defects. Existing law generally provides that a claimant may recover reasonable attorney’s fees as part of the claimant’s damages in a cause of action for constructional defects. (NRS 40.655)

    This bill removes this provision and instead authorizes a court to award reasonable attorney’s fees to a prevailing party involved in such a cause of action if an independent basis for the award exists pursuant to existing law which authorizes a court to award attorney’s fees in certain circumstances, or Rule 68 of the Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure, which provides for the payment of reasonable attorney’s fees by an offeree who rejects an offer and subsequently fails to obtain a more favorable judgment.

    In an AP report published in Business Week it is suggested that the target objective of legislators centers on what it refers to as Nevada’s "Rampant construction defect lawsuits".

    According to Business Week "The suits bring in hundreds of millions of dollars for lawyers and have put construction companies out of business. Hansen says fewer construction firms mean higher prices for Nevada consumers."

    Click Here To Read Full Text and Revisions of Assembly Bill 285


    Senate Committee Approves Military Construction Funds

    June 29, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    With a decrease in funding, as compared to the House bill, the Military Construction and Veteran’s Affairs subcommittee of the Senate moved on a $72 billion construction bill. The House version had approved an additional half billion dollars in funding. Senator Tim Johnson, Democrat of South Carolina, said that he expected easy reconciliation with the House version. The Senate bill will move to the full Senate Appropriations Committee on June 30.

    The bill, S 1255, includes funding for construction and remodeling of military housing, as well as construction and remodeling of base facilities.

    Read the full story…

    Read S1255


    Ambitious Building Plans in Boston

    November 18, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Although most are unlikely to change the Boston skyline, there are several large projects on the drawing boards. The site BostInnovation covered ten of them in a recent post. Downtown Boston will be the site of several of these large projects, including three towers to be added to the Christian Science Plaza, a 404-unit residential tower in the Theater District, and perhaps the largest of these projects, a 47-story tower to be built over Copley Plaza, which will tower over the adjacent buildings. None of the planned buildings will challenge the Hancock Tower’s 60 stories.

    Read the full story…


    Parking Garage Collapse May Be Due to Construction Defect

    November 7, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    A parking garage under construction at the Doral campus of Miami Dade College collapsed on October 9. Experts state that the collapse may have been due to errors in the construction process, either in the fabrication of the pre-cast components or in their assembly. The Bradenton Herald quotes Mark Santos, a structural engineer, who “would look at erection procedures ?Äì that’s probably the one question to ask first.”

    During the failure, floors separated from the south wall of the structure. The contractor responsible for the garage, Ajax Building Corp, said there was “no indication of any potential cause.”

    Read the full story…