BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Subterranean parking Chilcoot California Medical building Chilcoot California industrial building Chilcoot California tract home Chilcoot California retail construction Chilcoot California landscaping construction Chilcoot California parking structure Chilcoot California condominiums Chilcoot California housing Chilcoot California low-income housing Chilcoot California mid-rise construction Chilcoot California office building Chilcoot California structural steel construction Chilcoot California custom home Chilcoot California concrete tilt-up Chilcoot California institutional building Chilcoot California custom homes Chilcoot California multi family housing Chilcoot California townhome construction Chilcoot California condominium Chilcoot California casino resort Chilcoot California high-rise construction Chilcoot California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Chilcoot, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Chilcoot California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    North State Building Industry Association
    Local # 0540
    1536 Eureka Rd
    Roseville, CA 95661
    http://www.northstatebia.org

    California Building Industry Association
    Local # 0500
    1215 K Street Ste 1200
    Sacramento, CA 95814
    http://www.cbia.org

    Building Industry Association of the Bay Area - Northern Division
    Local # 0538
    PO Box 7100
    Santa Rosa, CA 95407


    Building Industry Association of the Delta
    Local # 0513
    315 N San Joaquin St Ste 2
    Stockton, CA 95202
    http://www.biadelta.org

    Building Industry Association of the Bay Area
    Local # 0538
    101 Ygnacio Valley Rd # 210
    Walnut Creek, CA 94596
    http://www.biabayarea.org

    Building Industry Association of the Bay Area - Eastern Division
    Local # 0538
    PO Box 5160
    San Ramon, CA 94583


    Building Industry Association of Central California
    Local # 0536
    900 H St Ste E2
    Modesto, CA 95354
    http://www.biacc.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Chilcoot California

    OSHA Cites Construction Firm for Safety Violations

    Insurer Has Duty to Defend Despite Construction Defects

    $5 Million Construction Defect Lawsuit over Oregon Townhomes

    No Coverage For Construction Defects When Complaint Alleges Contractual Damages

    Will They Blow It Up?

    Construction Defects as Occurrences, Better Decided in Law than in Courts

    Nevada Bill Aims to Reduce Legal Fees For Construction Defect Practitioners

    Appropriation Bill Cuts Military Construction Spending

    Architect Not Liable for Balcony’s Collapse

    Texas Law Bars Coverage under Homeowner’s Policy for Mold Damage

    Nevada Budget Remains at Impasse over Construction Defect Law

    Coverage Rejected Under Owned Property and Alienated Property Exclusions

    Construction Suit Ends with Just an Apology

    Insurance for Defective Construction Now in Third Edition

    Sometimes It’s Okay to Destroy Evidence

    Exclusions Bar Coverage for Damage Caused by Chinese Drywall

    Are Construction Defects Covered by Your General Liability Policy?

    A Loud Boom, But No Serious Injuries in World Trade Center Accident

    Construction Employment Rises in Half of the States

    Unlicensed Contractors Nabbed in Sting Operation

    When is a Construction Project truly “Complete”? That depends. (law note)

    Tacoma Construction Site Uncovers Gravestones

    Construction Defect Not Occurrences, Says Hawaii Court

    Gilroy Homeowners Sue over Leaky Homes

    No Choice between Homeowner Protection and Bankrupt Developers?

    Court finds subcontractor responsible for defending claim

    Homebuilders Go Green in Response to Homebuyer Demand

    Hospital Construction Firm Settles Defect Claim for $1.1 Million

    Construction Case Alert: Appellate Court Confirms Engineer’s Duty to Defend Developer Arises Upon Tender of Indemnity Claim

    El Paso Increases Surety Bond Requirement on Contractors

    Know the Minnesota Statute of Limitations for Construction Defect Claims

    Appeals Court Reverses Summary Judgment over Defective Archway Construction

    Important Information Regarding Colorado Mechanic’s Lien Rights.

    Mandatory Arbitration Provision Upheld in Construction Defect Case

    Safer Schools Rendered Unsafe Due to Construction Defects

    Judge Okays Harmon Tower Demolition, Also Calls for More Testing

    Landmark San Diego Hotel Settles Defects Suit for $6.4 Million

    South Carolina Contractors Regain General Liability Coverage

    After $15 Million Settlement, Association Gets $7.7 Million From Additional Subcontractor

    No Coverage for Negligent Misrepresentation without Allegations of “Bodily Injury” or “Property Damage”

    There Is No Non-Delegable Duty on the Part of Residential Builders in Colorado

    In Oregon Construction Defect Claims, “Contract Is (Still) King”

    Fourteen More Guilty Pleas in Las Vegas Construction Defect Scam

    Construction Law Alert: A Specialty License May Not Be Required If Work Covered By Another License

    Policing Those Subcontractors: It Might Take Extra Effort To Be An Additional Insured

    A Downside of Associational Standing - HOA's Claims Against Subcontractors Barred by Statute of Limitations

    Dust Infiltration Due to Construction Defect Excluded from Policy

    Fifth Circuit Reverses Insurers’ Summary Judgment Award Based on "Your Work" Exclusion

    District Court’s Ruling Affirmed in TCD v American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

    Contractor Convicted of Additional Fraud

    Construction Defect Journal Marks First Anniversary

    Fire Reveals Defects, Appeals Court Affirms Judgment against Builder

    Celebrities Lose Case in Construction Defect Arbitration

    New Apartment Tower on the Rise in Seattle

    Construction Defect Notice in the Mailbox? Respond Appropriately

    Foundation Arbitration Doesn’t Preclude Suing Over Cracks

    Eighth Circuit Remands to Determine Applicability of Collapse Exclusion

    Defect Claims as Occurrences? Check Your State Laws

    Builder to Appeal Razing of Harmon Tower

    State Farm Too Quick To Deny Coverage, Court Rules

    Appeals Court Upholds Decision by Referee in Trial Court for Antagan v Shea Homes

    Timing of Insured’s SIR Payment Has No Effect on Non-Participating Insurer’s Equitable Contribution to Co-Insurer

    Montrose Language Interpreted: How Many Policies Are Implicated By A Construction Defect That Later Causes a Flood?

    No Resulting Loss From Deck Collapsing Due to Rot

    “Details Matter” is the Foundation in a Texas Construction Defect Suit

    Residential Construction: Shrinking Now, Growing Later?

    New Washington Law Nixes Unfair Indemnification in Construction Contracts

    Environment Decision May Expand Construction Defect Claims

    Another Las Vegas Tower at the Center of Construction Defect Claims

    Louisiana Politicians Struggle on Construction Bills, Hospital Redevelopment

    Insurers Reacting to Massachusetts Tornadoes

    Homeowner Loses Suit against Architect and Contractor of Resold Home

    Contractor Manslaughter? Safety Shortcuts Are Not Worth It

    Construction Defects Lead to Demolition

    Battle of “Other Insurance” Clauses

    Manhattan Developer Breaks Ground on $520 Million Project

    Driver’s Death May Be Due to Construction Defect

    Water Drainage Case Lacks Standing

    Florida Contractor on Trial for Bribing School Official

    Construction Defect Exception Does Not Lift Bar in Payment Dispute

    Construction Defect Not an Occurrence in Ohio

    Although Property Damage Arises From An Occurrence, Coverage Barred By Business Risk Exclusions

    Counterpoint: Washington Supreme Court to Rule on Resulting Losses in Insurance Disputes

    Nevada Assembly Sends Construction Defect Bill to Senate

    California insured’s duty to cooperate and insurer’s right to select defense counsel

    Product Exclusion: The Big Reason Behind The Delay of LEED 2012

    Pictorial Construction Terminology Dictionary — A Quick and Helpful Reference

    San Diego Construction Defect Claim Settled for $2.3 Million

    Florida Law: Defects in Infrastructure Improvements Not Covered in Home Construction Warranties

    Construction Demand Unsteady, Gains in Some Regions
    Corporate Profile

    CHILCOOT CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 5500 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Chilcoot, California Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Chilcoot's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Chilcoot California general contracting roofing and waterproofing expert witnessChilcoot California general contracting architectural expert witnessChilcoot California general contracting hospital construction expert witnessChilcoot California general contracting construction project management expert witnessesChilcoot California general contracting construction cost estimating expert witnessChilcoot California general contracting construction code expert witnessChilcoot California general contracting defective construction expertChilcoot California general contracting architectural engineering expert witnessChilcoot California general contracting ada design expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Chilcoot, California

    Will They Blow It Up?

    March 28, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The issues concerning the Harmon Towers building in Las Vegas continue to make their way through the courts. As we noted in a previous piece, Cook County building officials stated that the building could be a hazard if Las Vegas were struck by an earthquake. The question of whether the building will continue to stand is just one of the issues in front of a judge.

    MGM Resorts International argued at a March 13 hearing for permission to implode the Harmon hotel building. They claim that more than 1,700 defects have been discovered in the building and that the building is a public safety hazard. Arguing against demolition, Perini Building Company, the general contractor for the hotel, and its subcontractors are claiming that imploding the building would destroy evidence and prejudice juries in the ongoing construction defect claims. They claim that MGM Resorts wishes to abandon the building due to the economic slowdown. Perini Corp, the contractor for the project, claims that the building can be fixed. Perini claims that MGM’s position in the construction trial would be improved if the building is demolished.

    After Judge Elizabeth Gonzalez heard the four days of testimony on the Harmon Towers building and whether it should be demolished, she scheduled more testimony, with two days in April and an entire week in July. Judge Gonzalez will be deciding whether the building will be torn down, imploded, or left in place.

    Read the full story…

    Read the full story…


    Washington Supreme Court Sides with Lien Claimants in Williams v. Athletic Field

    September 30, 2011 — Douglas Reiser, Builders Counsel

    The Washington Supreme Court issued their opinion today on Williams v. Athletic Field, perhaps the most talked about construction law case in the past few years. I have discussed this case exhaustively here on Builders Counsel. Today we have a resolution.

    In an unanimous opinion issued today, the high court sided with lien filers who followed a sample form provided in RCW 60.04.091. Additionally, the court found that a lien company - and presumably other persons - could sign the lien for the lien claimant, as an agent, without invalidating the lien.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Douglas Reiser of Reiser Legal LLC. Mr. Reiser can be contacted at info@reiserlegal.com


    Broker Not Liable for Failure to Reveal Insurer's Insolvency After Policy Issued

    March 28, 2012 — Tred Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    Faced with an issue of first impression in California, the Court of Appeals held that a broker was not liable for failing to reveal the insurer's insolvency occurring after issuance of the policy. Pacific Rim Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Aon Risk Ins. Serv. West, Inc., 2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 232 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 28, 2012).

    The developer for a construction project in downtown San Diego retained Aon as its broker to secure coverage. Aon procured a general liability policy for the project with Legion Indemnity Company. Legion was solvent when it issued the policy.

    The developer hired Pacific Rim (“PacRim”) as one of several subcontractors on the project. The parties entered into a contract in which the developer agreed to provide PacRim with liability insurance through an Owner Controlled Insurance Program (“OCIP”). Aon was not a party to the contract and PacRim was never its client. PacRim, however, enrolled in the OCIP by contacting Aon and providing all necessary paperwork.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    All Risk Policy Only Covers Repair to Portion of Dock That Sustains Damage

    January 6, 2012 — Tred Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    A portion of a dock on Lack Michigan operated by the Ports of Indiana suffered visible damage. See Ports of Indiana v. Lexington Ins. Co., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130979 (S.D. Ind. Nov. 14, 2011). Lexington Insurance Company insured the port. Lexington agreed that a portion of the dock was damaged and paid $1.2 million for repairs. A dispute arose, however, over whether additional sections of the dock were damaged and whether the damage was the result of more than one "occurrence."

    An expert report opined that a significant drop creating record lows in the water level of Lake Michigan in 2007 caused damage to the dock. Lexington maintained that only 128 feet of the dock was damaged; other portions of the dock did not sustain "direct physical loss or damage."

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Plaintiff Not Entitled to Further Damages over Defective Decking

    August 2, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The Court of Appeal of the State of California, Third Appellate District has rejected an appeal from the successful plaintiff of a construction defect case in Evilsizor v. Calaveras Lumber Company. John Evilsizor hired Scott Hunton to remove and replace the deck at the rear of his home. Subsequently, the deck, which had been constructed with a product called SmartDeck, a product of the subsequently bankrupt US Plastic Lumber, exhibited problems. Hunton made some repairs. Calaveras Lumber offered replacement decking if Evilsizor would pay the difference in price. Mr. Evilsizor hired another contractor to replace the decking and then sued for lost use and compensation for the amount he paid the second contractor. Replacing the deck a second time cost Mr. Evilsizor $113,065.44.

    During the trial, the defendant conceded that the planking was defective. It has been recalled by the manufacturer. Additionally, the jury heard testimony from a construction and building codes consultant, Lonne Haughton, however the trial court found that Mr. Haughton did not have sufficient expertise in wood-plastic composite materials. Further, Haughton had been a California contractor for only three years, and though he claimed a college degree, this was “‘a distance learning diploma’ that required no in-class work.” The appeals court upheld the decision that Mr. Haughton was not qualified to testify as an expert about wood-plastic materials.

    The court also upheld the trial court’s exclusion of two pieces of evidence. One was a list of SmartDeck sales. However, the witness asked about it was not able “to testify who prepared it or confirm that it had been prepared by a Cascade employee.” Further, “the fact defendant bought and sold SmartDeck was not disputed.” The other was an e-mail in which US Plastics said they had “some bad product in the field.” This e-mail went to Westmark & Associates, and the plaintiff did not establish that it was ever sent to the defendant.

    Though the defense has suggested an award of $18,000 plus loss-of-use damages for one year and an additional $4,000 if the jury believed that leftover material from the front deck was used in the rear. As the plaintiff requested $100 per month of loss of use, this would have totaled $34,000. The jury awarded the cost of the decking, $6,275,82. The court cites earlier decision that the amount of the award is “a question of fact to be determined by the jury.”

    In conclusion, Mr. Evilsizor was not only unable to receive a larger award, but the court ruled that he must pay the defendant’s cost on appeal.

    Read the court's decision…


    West Hollywood Building: Historic Building May Be Defective

    August 16, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The Sunset Lanai apartment building in West Hollywood, California has its fans, it also has its detractors. Designed by Edward H. Flickett and built in 1952 by George Alexander, the building isn’t wearing its years lightly. Its owner has opposed a move by the West Hollywood Preservation Commission that the building is a “local cultural resource.” Instead, Edwin Silver, the building’s owner says the group has overstated the building’s significance. His lawyer points to “design and construction flaws,” and says the building is prone to flooding and leaks. Repairs to the building have an estimated cost of $2.3 million, according to the L.A. Times.

    The West Hollywood City Council decided to table the question of a historical designation as that might impede repairs. However, they did decide that if Silver seeks to demolish the building, they will grant the protection.

    Read the full story…


    Florida Contractor on Trial for Bribing School Official

    October 28, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Lloyd Whann, an executive in M. M. Parrish Construction, a Gainesville, Florida firm, is going to trial over claims that he bribed a school district official with more than $50,000 in gifts. The trial has been pushed to March of 2012, in order for his defense to review documents.

    Bob Williams, the former school official, plead guilty to conspiracy to commit bribery. He agreed to testify against Whann and M.M. Parrish Construction.

    Read the full story...


    Florida “get to” costs do not constitute damages because of “property damage”

    August 11, 2011 — CDCoverage.com

    In Palm Beach Grading, Inc. v. Nautilus Ins. Co., No. 10-12821 (11th Cir. July 14, 2011), claimant general contractor Palm Beach Grading (?PBG?) subcontracted with insured A-1 for construction of a sewer line for the project.   A-1 abandoned its work and PBG hired another subcontractor to complete construction of the sewer line.   The new subcontractor discovered that A-1?s work was defective requiring repair and replacement of portions of the sewer line which also required the destruction and replacement of surrounding work.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of CDCoverage.com


    Harmon Towers Case to Last into 2014

    December 20, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Don’t expect a fast resolution to the Harmon Tower case in Las Vegas. The latest schedule sets trial for the construction defect claims in January 2014. Previously, these claims were going to be heard during the trial set to start in June 2013. Now the June trial will be over payment issues only.

    Don’t expect the building to come down soon either. While CityCenter claims the building could come down in an earthquake, Judge Elizabeth Gonzalez had determined that as the structural testing was not random; its results cannot be extrapolated through the entire structure. As a result, CityCenter has elected to do more testing, holding off on demolishing the building. They are appealing Gonzalez’s order to the Nevada Supreme Court.

    Read the full story…


    Construction on the Rise in Denver

    September 13, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    In another sign of a recovery in the housing industry, the Denver Business Journal reports that the pace of new home construction has accelerated in the Denver area. According to the article, in the first seven months of 2012, forty-eight percent more permits were issued than in the first seven months of 2011. In July, 2012, there were sixty-six percent more permits than a year previously. For the Denver metropolitan area, July was the sixteenth consecutive month in which permits were up from a year previously.

    Read the full story…


    A Performance-Based Energy Code in Seattle: Will It Save Existing Buildings?

    August 11, 2011 — Douglas Reiser, Builders Counsel

    The City of Seattle has one of the most stringent energy codes in the nation. Based upon the Washington State Energy Code (which has been embroiled in litigation over its high standards), the code demands a lot from commercial developers. But, does it prevent developers from saving Seattle?s classic and old buildings? Perhaps.

    The general compliance procedure requires buildings to be examined during the permitting process. This means that buildings are examined before they begin operating. The procedure is not malleable and is applicable to all buildings, old and new, big and small.

    The downside of this procedure is that it eliminates awarding compliance to those buildings exhibiting a number of passive features, such as siting, thermal mass, and renewable energy production. This problem has prevented a number of interesting and architecturally pleasing existing building retrofits from getting off the ground. The cost of complying with the current system can be 20% more, and it might prevent builders from preserving a building?s historical integrity.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Douglas Reiser of Reiser Legal LLC. Mr. Reiser can be contacted at info@reiserlegal.com

    Drug Company Provides Cure for Development Woes

    November 18, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Vertex Pharmaceuticals is poised to become the holder of Boston’s biggest commercial lease, paying $72.5 million for 1.1 million square feet on Boston’s waterfront. Vertex’s new buildings are still under construction, but the plans have spurred other development in the Fan Pier area, according to the New York Times. The Times quotes Mary A. Burke, a senior economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston that the Vertex project gives “a big push” to the “momentum for economic growth.”

    The Fallon Company is building Vertex’s new laboratory and office space. They are separately planning to build a high-rise with 150 luxury condominium units. According to Joseph Fallon, the chief executive and president of the Fallon Company, there is already a waiting list of 50 buyers for the condominiums.

    Across the street from the Vertex site, a group including Morgan Stanley and Boston Global Investors is planning a 23-block mixed use project that would include 1.2 million square feet of retail space. Additionally, the New England Development and the Hanover Group is building a 356-unit apartment building at the adjacent Pier 4.

    Read the full story…


    Local Government Waives Construction Fees to Spur Jobs

    June 19, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Warren Township in New Jersey has waived building and electrical permit fees, up to $5,000, for businesses that create at least five new jobs. The fee reductions are available for construction in areas zones under various designations. Buildings that have received a zoning variance are not eligible. The Echoes-Sentinel notes that other towns in Somerset County, New Jersey have adopted similar ordinances.

    Read the full story…


    Unfinished Building Projects Litter Miami

    November 18, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Buildings born in ambitious development plans that were never brought to completion form a grim reminder of the building bust in Miami, according to an article in the Miami Herald. One project started in 2007 as a residential project, later there were hopes to develop it as a hotel. These plans are ten months old with no work done.

    Another project was projected as a 30-story office and commercial tower. Four were built before the project was abandoned. The article describes the site as “squalid.” Another project completed the planned 17 stories, but no work has been done beyond constructing the shell. Once planned as luxury condos, the owner owes more than $30,000 in property taxes.

    Each of the three sites profiled in the Miami Herald have become dumping grounds for trash. The building skeletons have also become damaged by the elements. Some abandoned projects have been taken over by homeless people. Businesses near the abandoned properties have been hurt. The buildings also represent failed obligations to subcontractors who have put liens on the properties for work they performed but were never paid for.

    Read the full story…


    School District Marks End of Construction Project by Hiring Lawyers

    June 19, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    A school district in northeastern Pennsylvania has retained legal services as they approach the end of a construction project. The Mid Valley School Board cited concerns about the project’s budget, but Randy Parry, Superintendent of Mid Valley schools referenced “possible litigation at the end of the project.” Mr. Parry told the Scranton Times Tribune that construction delays could be a reason for litigation.

    In addition to approving an additional $20,000 for legal representation, the board also approved $21,579 for additional project costs.

    Read the full story…


    Good and Bad News on Construction Employment

    February 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The construction industry hit a two-year high in January, with 21,000 jobs added that month. The mild winter is assumed to have helped. According to the General Contractors of America, the construction industry currently employs about 5.57 million people. This is a 21 percent gain over January 2010. Ken Simonson, the chief economist of GCA, noted that “the unemployment rate in construction is still double that of the overall economy.” He said it was not currently clear if “the recent job growth reflects a sustained pickup or merely acceleration of homebuilding and highway projects that normally halt when the ground freezes in December and January.”

    Stephen Sandherr, the chief executive officer of the GCA, said that the federal government had to make infrastructure funding a top priority. “Without adequate long-term funding for infrastructure, competitive tax rates and fewer costly regulatory hurdles, the construction industry may lose some of the jobs it gained in the last year.”

    Read the full story…


    New Buildings in California Soon Must Be Greener

    June 19, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The California Energy Commission has approved new energy efficiency standards for new homes and commercial buildings. The 2013 Building Energy Efficiency Standards are set to go into effect on January 1, 2014, and will require 30% more energy efficiency for non-residential construction and 25% more for homes. The standards do not affect hospitals, nursing homes, or prisons.

    Buildings covered under the standard will have to have roofs that ready for the installation of solar panels. Additionally, non-residential buildings will require high-performance windows, advanced lighting controls, and cool-roof technologies. Residential requirements include insulated hot-water pipes, whole house fans, and more efficient windows.

    The new standards are expected to add 3,500 new building industry jobs. One thing these construction workers won’t be building are power plants, since over the next thirty years, the standards are expected to save as much as six power plants.

    Read the full story…


    Construction Job Opening Rise in October

    December 20, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    There was a significant increase in the number of open construction jobs during October, according to a report for the National Association of Home Builders. Working from preliminary data provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the NAHB said that the number of open positions reached “levels and rates last seen in 2007.” As the data is still preliminary, the NAHB noted that the conclusions should be taken with caution.

    While there was a spike in job openings, the hiring of people to fill these positions hasn’t caught up with it, and there was a small decline in hires. But to return to the good news, there was also a drop in layoffs in that same period.

    Through October, about 8,000 people have been hired in the construction sector. The NAHB notes that this does not correspond with the recent increases with home construction. They suggest that “it may be the case that startups in the home building and remodeling sectors are being missed by the establishment survey.” Another possibility they raise is that already-employed construction workers are simply working more hours.

    Read the full story…