BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Subterranean parking expert witness Anaheim California hospital construction expert witness Anaheim California retail construction expert witness Anaheim California parking structure expert witness Anaheim California production housing expert witness Anaheim California industrial building expert witness Anaheim California landscaping construction expert witness Anaheim California concrete tilt-up expert witness Anaheim California townhome construction expert witness Anaheim California condominiums expert witness Anaheim California high-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California condominium expert witness Anaheim California office building expert witness Anaheim California mid-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California institutional building expert witness Anaheim California low-income housing expert witness Anaheim California structural steel construction expert witness Anaheim California multi family housing expert witness Anaheim California tract home expert witness Anaheim California housing expert witness Anaheim California custom homes expert witness Anaheim California Medical building expert witness Anaheim California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211
    http://www.desertchapter.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501


    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biasc.org

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biaoc.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Baldy View Chapter
    Local # 0532
    8711 Monroe Ct Ste B
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
    http://www.biabuild.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - LA/Ventura Chapter
    Local # 0532
    28460 Ave Stanford Ste 240
    Santa Clarita, CA 91355


    Building Industry Association Southern California - Building Industry Association of S Ca Antelope Valley
    Local # 0532
    44404 16th St W Suite 107
    Lancaster, CA 93535



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Anaheim California

    ASCE Statement on The Partial Building Collapse in Surfside, Florida

    Construction Defects Survey Results Show that Warranty Laws Should be Strengthened for Homeowners & Condominium Associations

    Time To “Construct” New Social Media Policies

    Dispute Over Exhaustion of Primary Policy

    Amos Rex – A Museum for the Digital Age

    Coverage Denied for Ensuing Loss After Foundation Damage

    No Duty To Defend Additional Insured When Bodily Injury Not Caused by Insured

    Zero-Energy Commercial Buildings Increase as Contractors Focus on Sustainability

    CGL, Builders Risk Coverage and Exclusions When Construction Defects Cause Property Damage

    SunCal Buys Oak Knoll Development for the Second Time

    Seventh Circuit Confirms Additional Insured's Coverage for Alleged Construction Defects

    GE to Repay $87 Million for Scaled-Back Headquarters Plan

    From Shale to Salt: Texas Supreme Court Applies Uniform Rule for Ownership of Subsurface Caverns

    Connecticut Expands Construction Wage-Theft Liability and Prevailing Wage Recordkeeping Requirements

    Be Careful When Requiring Fitness for Duty Examinations

    Another Las Vegas Tower at the Center of Construction Defect Claims

    How to Survive the Insurance Claim Process Before It Starts –Five Tips to Keep Your Insurance Healthy

    Massachusetts Business Court Addresses Defense Cost Allocation and Non-Cumulation Provisions in Long-Tail Context

    Duuers: Better Proposals with Less Work

    White House Proposal Returns to 1978 NEPA Review Procedures

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (02/15/23) – Proptech Solutions, Supply Chain Pivots, and the Inflation Reduction Act

    It’s Getting Harder and Harder to be a Concrete Supplier in California

    What to do about California’s Defect-Ridden Board of Equalization Building

    The Pitfalls of Oral Agreements in the Construction Industry

    Making Construction Innovation Stick

    White and Williams Announces Partner and Counsel Promotions

    Contractual Fee-Shifting in Litigation: Who Pays the Price?

    Haight Welcomes New Attorneys to Los Angeles, Sacramento and San Francisco

    Consider The Limited Warranty from Your Homebuilder

    Workarounds for Workers' Comp Immunity: How to Obtain Additional Insured Coverage when the Named Insured is Immune from Suit

    Stacking of Service Interruption and Contingent Business Interruption Coverages Permitted

    Michigan Court Waives Goodbye to Subrogation Claims, Except as to Gross Negligence

    When is Forum Selection in a Construction Contract Enforceable?

    Rent Increases During the Coronavirus Emergency Part II: Avoiding Violations Under California’s Anti-Price Gouging Statute

    Hawaii Supreme Court Finds Excess Can Sue Primary for Equitable Subrogation

    At the Intersection of Indemnity and Prevailing Wages

    Your Bad Faith Jury Instruction Against an Insurer is Important

    Should I Pull the Pin? Contractor and Subcontractor Termination for Cause

    Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court Limits The Scope Of A Builder’s Implied Warranty Of Habitability

    Workers Compensation Immunity and the Intentional Tort Exception

    Maximizing Contractual Indemnity Rights: Problems with Common Law

    Keeping Up With Fast-moving FAA Drone Regulations

    The Deadline to File Suit on a Public Works Payment Payment Bond is Triggered by a Claimant’s Work on a Project Not by a Claimant’s Work Under a Contract

    Employer’s Liability Exclusion Bars Coverage

    Retaining Wall Contractor Not Responsible for Building Damage

    Protecting Your Business From Liability Claims Stemming From COVID-19 Exposure

    California Appellate Court Holds “Minimal Causal Connection” Satisfies Causation Requirement in All Risk Policies

    Focusing on Design Elements of the 2014 World Cup Stadiums

    Construction Estimation: From Manual Takeoff to the AI Future

    New ANSI Requirements for Fireplace Screens
    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through more than four thousand engineering, construction, and builders standard of care related expert designations, the Anaheim, California Construction Expert Directory delivers a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides construction claims investigation and expert services to the building industry's most recognized companies, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, risk managers, and a variety of municipalities. Employing in house resources which comprise registered architects, professional engineers, licensed general and specialty contractors, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Anaheim and the surrounding areas.

    Anaheim California construction expert witness public projectsAnaheim California expert witness windowsAnaheim California contractor expert witnessAnaheim California building envelope expert witnessAnaheim California construction expert testimonyAnaheim California expert witness structural engineerAnaheim California defective construction expert
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight Is Pleased to Announce Our Recognition in the 2027 Edition of Best Law Firms®

    November 09, 2026 —
    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight is pleased to announce our recognition in the 2027 edition of Best Law Firms®, ranked by Best Lawyers. ACS received a Tier 1 ranking in Seattle for both Construction Law and Construction Litigation; and a Tier 2 national ranking in the same areas. Best Law Firms® rankings are assessed through analyzing feedback provided by clients and professional references, information supplied by the firm, industry leader interviews, and lawyer evaluations collected through the Best Lawyers research process. For the 2027 edition, more than 110,000 client references were submitted as part of the Best Law Firms research process. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC

    The Drawing Changed. Did You Catch It? A Hard Lesson for Contractors About Revised Plans

    November 09, 2026 —
    Every contractor has seen it. A revised drawing hits your inbox. You open the sheet, look for the clouds, figure out what changed, and move on. But what if something changed outside the cloud? That seemingly simple question became a very expensive problem in Young Contracting/SE, Inc. v. Pitt Excavating, LLC, (Oct. 30, 2026), a recent Tennessee Court of Appeals decision involving a general contractor and its excavation subcontractor. The subcontract required Pitt to perform its work in accordance with the project drawings and specifications, “as amended from time to time.” During the project, Young sent Pitt a revised drawing. Pitt’s owner testified that his practice was to look at the clouded areas because he understood those areas to identify what had changed. He explained that he presumed the rest of the drawing remained the same. Guess what? That assumption did not work out well. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Matthew J. Devries, Buchalter
    Mr. Devries may be contacted at mdevries@buchalter.com

    Data Center Construction: Contractors Must Step Up

    May 26, 2026 —
    I attended the Datacenter Forum 2026 in Helsinki last week. Over 400 people packed the room. Walking out, I had one overriding thought: Is construction operating in a different century from the technology it is being asked to house? Is Our Industry on Par? Ciarán Forde, Senior Vice President at CTS Nordics, opened the forum with a statement that set the tone for everything that followed: data centers are no longer just a technical challenge; they are a national strategy. Before AI, Ciarán had worked in telecoms, where data centers were already complex. But now, he said flatly, everything has changed, and the industry must rethink everything. The numbers behind the claim are staggering. Current AI data center racks run at 40 to 100 kW. In three years, 800 kW per rack is on the roadmap. And the development cycle for a new chip is roughly one year, which means deployments begin aging out almost as soon as they are commissioned. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Key Person Provisions in Construction Contracts: Because People, Not Companies, Build Projects

    October 27, 2026 —
    In construction, the person running your job matters: the project manager who sat in your preconstruction meetings, who understands the phasing, who knows why the MEP coordination sequence was set up the way it was, who has relationships with your team and the owner’s team. That person is not interchangeable. And if they disappear six weeks into the job and get replaced by someone who’s never read the drawings, you have a problem. This happens all the time. A contractor or consultant sells the A-team—the experienced project manager; the sharp superintendent; the people who won the job—during the proposal and interview. Then, once the contract is signed, those people quietly get moved to a larger project, not out of anything nefarious, but usually out of a necessity. A fire happens on another project and they are needed to put it out. By the time you realize those working on your project aren’t the ones you originally signed on, you’re three months in and the damage is already underway. Reprinted courtesy of Nate Simon, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...
    Mr. Simon may be contacted at nate@simonlawky.com

    Kahana Feld Announces Key Partner Additions Coast to Coast

    June 22, 2026 —
    IRVINE, CA – June 10, 2026 – Kahana Feld is pleased to announce Yvette Davis, Evan Kalooky, Beth Obra-White, Sean Paden, Michael Parme, Jeffrey Schmid, and Julieanne Yanez have joined the firm as partners. Four of these partners are joining the San Diego office, which further strengthens the firm’s General Liability and Construction Litigation practices and enhances Kahana Feld’s ability to serve clients across a broad range of complex matters in the region. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kahana Feld

    ACEC Research Institute Report: Real Risk of AI Isn’t Technology. It’s the Org Chart.

    September 01, 2026 —
    WASHINGTON (August 19, 2026) – The ACEC Research Institute today released Leading Through AI Risk: The Enterprise Framework for Engineering Firm Leaders, a new study finding that the most significant risks artificial intelligence poses to engineering firms are organizational rather than technological, and that firms treating AI as an IT initiative are managing the wrong issue. The report, part of the Institute’s yearslong Firm of the Future initiative, combines an extensive literature review with in-depth interviews of 21 leaders drawn from engineering firms, public infrastructure owners, technology vendors, insurance and legal professionals, licensing and regulatory agencies, and AI consultants. The report groups AI risk into eight interconnected domains:
    • technical reliability and model risk
    • professional liability and standard of care risk
    • data governance, privacy, and intellectual property risk
    • organizational and workforce risk
    • ethical, regulatory, and reputational risk
    • operational and cybersecurity risk
    • financial and business model risk
    • strategic leadership and enterprise governance risk
    The last serves as the integrating domain through which firms coordinate responsible AI adoption enterprise wide. The report stresses that firms do not experience these risks one at a time. Weak oversight may create legal liability. Workforce gaps may affect quality assurance. “Understanding these interactions,” the study notes, “is often more important than understanding individual risks independently.” About the ACEC Research Institute The ACEC Research Institute is the independent research arm of the American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC). Its mission is to fund and deliver research to equip the engineering industry with actionable intelligence on the issues critical to its success. Learn more at www.acecresearchinstitute.org.

    U.S. Supreme Court Decision Alters Course of $745M Louisiana Coastal Damage Judgment

    June 15, 2026 —
    The U.S. Supreme Court has issued a unanimous decision allowing oil and gas companies to move Louisiana coastal erosion lawsuits from state court to federal court under the federal officer removal statute. While the ruling is procedural, it carries significant implications for environmental- and energy-related risks. The case, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana, Slip Op. 24-813 (April 17, 2026), addressed a threshold jurisdictional question but has broader significance for environmental and climate related litigation. State courts are often viewed as more favorable forums for plaintiffs asserting environmental damage claims, particularly those brought by governmental entities. The opinion issued on April 17, 2026 is the latest development in long-running Louisiana coastal litigation that began more than a decade ago. Starting in 2013, Louisiana parishes filed 42 lawsuits against oil and gas companies alleging environmental damage related to historic oil field operations. The parishes alleged that oil and gas companies violated state coastal management laws by failing to properly restore impacted areas. Chevron sought to remove the cases from state court under 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1), known as federal officer removal, which provides federal jurisdiction over “any person acting under [an] officer” of the United States "for or relating to any act under color of such office." The Fifth Circuit rejected the argument and remanded the case, and others like it, to state court. Trial began in March 2025 in Point à la Hache, Louisiana. On April 4, 2025, the jury awarded a total of $745 million to compensate for land loss, contamination and abandoned equipment. On June 16, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review the question of whether a federal contractor can remove to federal court when sued for oil-production activities undertaken to fulfill a federal oil-refinement contract. Reprinted courtesy of Jennifer Kretschmann, Lewis Brisbois and Jennifer E. Michel, Lewis Brisbois Ms. Kretschmann may be contacted at Jennifer.Kretschmann@lewisbrisbois.com Ms. Michel may be contacted at Jenny.Michel@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...

    Newmeyer Dillion Partner Jeff Masters Recognized by Chambers USA for Representation of Insurance Policyholders

    June 08, 2026 —
    NEWPORT BEACH, Calif. – June 4, 2026 – Newmeyer Dillion is proud to announce that litigation partner Jeffrey D. Masters has been ranked among a select group of California lawyers representing insurance policyholders in the 2026 edition of Chambers USA. This marks two consecutive years of recognition for Masters by this prestigious international attorney rating resource. "This recognition by Chambers and Partners is a testament to Jeff’s dedication to our clients," said Managing Partner, Paul Tetzloff. "We are thrilled to see his hard work acknowledged and the level of passion and care that he delivers to clients fully recognized." Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Newmeyer Dillion