BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Medical building expert witness Anaheim California housing expert witness Anaheim California multi family housing expert witness Anaheim California concrete tilt-up expert witness Anaheim California condominium expert witness Anaheim California structural steel construction expert witness Anaheim California low-income housing expert witness Anaheim California industrial building expert witness Anaheim California hospital construction expert witness Anaheim California landscaping construction expert witness Anaheim California high-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California institutional building expert witness Anaheim California townhome construction expert witness Anaheim California Subterranean parking expert witness Anaheim California mid-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California tract home expert witness Anaheim California retail construction expert witness Anaheim California parking structure expert witness Anaheim California casino resort expert witness Anaheim California custom home expert witness Anaheim California production housing expert witness Anaheim California custom homes expert witness Anaheim California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211
    http://www.desertchapter.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501


    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biasc.org

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biaoc.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Baldy View Chapter
    Local # 0532
    8711 Monroe Ct Ste B
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
    http://www.biabuild.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - LA/Ventura Chapter
    Local # 0532
    28460 Ave Stanford Ste 240
    Santa Clarita, CA 91355


    Building Industry Association Southern California - Building Industry Association of S Ca Antelope Valley
    Local # 0532
    44404 16th St W Suite 107
    Lancaster, CA 93535



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Anaheim California

    Amazon’s Latest Response to AI Data Center Backlash: $1 Billion

    Boston-area Asbestos-Abatement Firms Face Wage and Safety Complaints

    Bronx Public Housing Tower Partially Collapses

    Commerce City Enacts Reform to Increase For-Sale Multifamily Housing

    Ensuring Efficient Arbitration of Construction Disputes Involving Mechanic’s Liens

    Sometimes It’s Okay to Destroy Evidence

    Measure Twice, Cut (the Check) Once: Liability for Cybercrime and How to Avoid It

    Toronto Contractor Bondfield Wins Court Protection as Project Woes Mount

    Where Parched California Is Finding New Water Sources

    Boston Nonprofit Wants to Put Grown-Ups in Dorms

    Insurer Dispenses with Bad Faith Claim on Summary Judgment

    Construction Calamity: Risk Transfer Tips for Contractors After a Catastrophic Loss

    SFAA Commends U.S. House for Passage of Historic Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill

    Washington Supreme Court Sides with Lien Claimants in Williams v. Athletic Field

    Hunton Insurance Partner Syed Ahmad Serves as Chair of the ABA Minority Trial Lawyer Committee’s Programming Subcommittee

    Build Me A Building As Fast As You Can

    Commercial Construction in the Golden State is Looking Pretty Golden

    Out of Sight, Out of Mind: Texas Court Finds Construction Defect Claims Were Inherently Undiscoverable, Tolls Statute of Limitations

    Insurance Measures Passed by 2015 Hawaii Legislature

    Assignment Endorsement Requiring Consent of All Insureds, Additional Insureds and Mortgagees Struck Down in Florida

    Colorado Homes Approved Despite being Too Close Together

    New Safety Standards Issued by ASSE and ANSI

    Law Firm Settles Two Construction Defect Suits for a Combined $4.7 Million

    Motion to Dismiss Insureds' Counterclaim on the Basis of Prior Knowledge Denied

    Court Addresses Damages Under Homeowners Insurance Policy

    No Coverage for Construction Defects Under Arkansas Law

    Landmark Towers Association, Inc. v. UMB Bank, N.A. or: One Bad Apple Spoils the Whole Bunch

    Lienor Dealing With “Show Cause” Summons by Condominium Unit Owner

    Construction-Industry Clients Need Well-Reasoned and Clear Policies on Recording Zoom and Teams Meetings

    GRSM Secures Complete Judgment for Defense in Years-Long Dispute Spanning Multiple Venues

    CDJ’s #9 Topic of the Year: Nevada Supreme Court Denies Class Action Status in Construction Defect Case

    Latosha Ellis Selected for 2019 Leadership Council on Legal Diversity Pathfinder Program

    You Cannot Arbitrate Claims Not Covered By The Arbitration Agreement

    Meet Orange County Bar Associations 2024 Leaders

    Montrose Language Interpreted: How Many Policies Are Implicated By A Construction Defect That Later Causes a Flood?

    Facing Manslaughter Charges In Worker's 2021 Trench Collapse Death, Colorado Contractor Who Willfully Ignored Federal Law Surrenders To Police

    No Duty to Defend Under Renter's Policy

    Negligent Misrepresentation Claim Does Not Allege Property Damage, Barring Coverage

    FEMA, Congress Eye Pre-Disaster Funding, Projects

    Mississippi exclusions j(5) and j(6) “that particular part”

    California Contractors Get a Much-Needed Break: SB 342 Softens the Harsh Consequences of Contractor License Lapses

    N.J. Appellate Court Applies Continuous Trigger Theory in Property Damage Case and Determines “Last Pull” for Coverage

    Constructive Changes – A Primer

    The Architecture of Tomorrow Mimics Nature to Cool the Planet

    Construction Defects in Home a Breach of Contract

    Just a House That Uses 90 Percent Less Energy Than Yours, That's All

    Lien Claimant’s Right to Execute against Bond Upheld in Court of Appeals

    Do Engineers Owe a Duty to Third Parties?

    Colorado Mayors Should Not Sacrifice Homeowners to Lure Condo Developers

    A Loud Boom, But No Serious Injuries in World Trade Center Accident
    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 4500 construction and design related expert witness designations, the Anaheim, California Construction Expert Directory delivers a wide range of trial support and consulting services to attorneys and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction claims evaluation, testimony, and support services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with in house assets which include construction cost and scheduling experts, registered design professionals, forensic engineers, certified professional estimators, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Anaheim region.

    Anaheim California building code compliance expert witnessAnaheim California forensic architectAnaheim California construction scheduling expert witnessAnaheim California consulting engineersAnaheim California construction project management expert witnessAnaheim California construction cost estimating expert witnessAnaheim California civil engineer expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    White and Williams LLP Secures Trio of Cyber Coverage Wins

    May 12, 2026 —
    Three weeks, three jurisdictions, three cyber wins. White and Williams picked up the first victory on March 9, 2026, in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, where the court granted summary judgment to their client enforcing a Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. See Perry & Perry Builders, Inc. v. Cowbell Cyber and Obsidian Specialty Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49409 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 9, 2026). In Perry, the insured was deceived into transferring money intended for a vendor to an unintended third party. The insurer acknowledged that the loss was covered and paid the insured the policy’s Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. Discontent with a single sublimit, the insured argued that because it wired the money to the fraudster in separate transfers, it was entitled to a second Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. Reprinted courtesy of Gabriel Darwick, White and Williams LLP and Sean Elman, White and Williams LLP Mr. Darwick may be contacted at darwickg@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Elman may be contacted at elmans@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    New York Team Secures Dismissal of Premises Liability Action Against Client

    May 26, 2026 —
    New York Associate Nicole Koch and Partner Jennine Gerrard recently secured a complete dismissal of a plaintiff’s claims for injuries following a fall in front of a client’s business at an outdoor mall. The plaintiff alleged that she was walking on the sidewalk outside of the client's hair care supply store in the Bronx in May 2024 when she tripped and fell on a broken/defective portion of the sidewalk. As a result of the accident, the plaintiff suffered injuries to her spine, hip, wrist, and both knees. She proceeded to file suit in New York County Supreme Court against Lewis Brisbois’ client and the landlord for the property. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Structural Concerns Force Emergency Closure of Maryland Office Building

    August 16, 2026 —
    A 10-story Baltimore-area office building was evacuated after an underground parking structure was compromised during construction work. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jim Parsons, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Owner Taking Assignment of General Contractor’s Claims Against a Subcontractor(s)

    September 21, 2026 —
    Here’s a scenario that occurs in construction defect cases. An owner sues a general contractor and subs for construction defects. The owner settles with a number of parties and takes an assignment of the general contractor’s claims against some or all of the subs and pursues the remaining parties for indemnity based on the assignment of the general contractor’s claims. This was the scenario in Craftsman Plastering and Lath, Inc. v. Rath Mor, LLC, 2026 WL 2328032 (Fla. 4th DCA 2026). The owner settled with the general contractor and all subs except one. The owner took an assignment of the general contractor’s claim against the sub, and really the indemnity claim. The owner was then substituted as the real party in interest as it relates to the general contractor’s claims against the sub. The owner sought roughly $780,000 in attorney’s fees and costs in connection with the dispute claiming the sub was liable for such fees. The jury didn’t buy the argument and awarded the owner about $55,000. Basically, the jury seemingly prorated the fees by the number of parties, at least, that’s how the math worked out. The owner didn’t like that and moved for an additur to increase the jury’s verdict which the trial court granted. This was reversed on appeal despite the fact that a trial court has broad discretion to grant a motion for additur. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Not Every Job Is Worth Winning: Contract Risk Questions Contractors Should Ask Before They Bid

    September 29, 2026 —
    Introduction Winning the work is not the same as winning the project, at least financially. Consider a contractor that commits to procure custom or long-lead materials before receiving complete construction documents. Depending on the language of the contract, if the final design is altered after those materials have been ordered, the contractor may be left responsible for replacement costs, procurement delays, or both. Alternatively, a subcontractor that accepts a pay-if-paid provision without investigating the owner’s financing, or prematurely waives lien rights, potentially risks nonpayment for properly performed work. Such concessions can quickly transform an apparently profitable project into a significant financial burden. A successful bid can therefore become an unsuccessful project if the contractor accepts contractual “red flags” without evaluating their consequences and the long-term financial impacts that they may have. The significance of each risk will depend on the project, the parties, the proposed contract, applicable law, and the contractor’s business objectives. Although not comprehensive, this article identifies several key considerations for that process to help mitigate certain risks. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jack Mayo, Jones Walker LLP
    Mr. Mayo may be contacted at jmayo@joneswalker.com

    Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Earns Prestigious Band One Ranking in the Chambers USA 2026 Guide

    June 22, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP's Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Group is pleased to share that it has received a Band One ranking in the Chambers USA 2026 Guide for Insurance, Pennsylvania. Additionally, Patricia B. Santelle, Chair Emeritus, Randy Maniloff, Partner, and Robert Walsh, Partner have all been individually ranked on the Chambers USA 2026 Guide in Insurance in Pennsylvania. The Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice's consistent focus on their clients and handling of complex claims were just two of the attributes contributing to their elite Band One ranking, after 11 years on the Chambers USA list. When asked about their experience working with White and Williams’ Pennsylvania Insurance Practice, one client stated, “What distinguishes White and Williams is the high level of service and accountability. The team is responsive, organized and reliable, which allows our internal teams to move quickly and make informed decisions with confidence.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    Credibility Matters…Even in Delay Claims

    September 29, 2026 —
    Credibility matters. Here’s another example involving a delay claim on public private partnership delivery method. The project agreement required claims to be tried by a hearing examiner. The public private partnership developer (for lack of a better term) submitted delay claims that it contended were caused by Miami-Dade County. The hearing examiner awarded the developer delay time and compensation. On appeal, the County argued that the delays awarded by the hearing examiner were concurrent critical path delays with other delays caused by the developer’s team (the developer’s contractor). This was demonstrated by the fact that in an attempt to mitigate the County delay, the contractor’s incorporated a schedule fragnet into its schedule to mitigate delay that showed the critical path was driven by events deemed caused by the contractor. This was also reported in the contractor’s monthly updates. The developer argued that its mitigation plan did not work and, thus, the schedules showed a hypothetical delay caused by the contractor when, in actuality, it was the County-caused delay that drove the critical path. The hearing officer agreed with the contractor. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Cuomo Bridge Lawsuit Adversaries Weigh Mediated Settlement

    July 06, 2026 —
    Rival legal teams have reached a critical juncture as they consider a mediated settlement in one of two major payment lawsuits pending between a design-build contracting team and the New York State Thruway Authority over construction of the more than $3-billion Mario M. Cuomo Bridge north of New York City. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com