Segal McCambridge Shareholders and Associates Recognized in 2027 Best Lawyers in America®
September 01, 2026 —
Segal McCambridgeSegal McCambridge is pleased to announce that 24 firm shareholders and associates have been recognized in the 2027 editions of the Best Lawyers in America® and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America. Best Lawyers® is an elite global network of legal professionals recognized through a trusted, peer-reviewed distinction. For more than four decades, its Purely Peer Review® methodology has upheld the principle that recognition should be earned through the opinions of fellow attorneys, not marketing influence or paid listings. No fees are accepted for consideration or inclusion.
"This Best Lawyers recognition is especially meaningful because it reflects the caliber of advocacy our attorneys bring to clients every day, across a wide range of practice areas," said Jason P. Eckerly, Segal McCambridge Managing Shareholder. "We are proud to see so many of our colleagues honored for their legal skills, dedication, and professionalism. This continued recognition underscores the strength of our national platform and the depth of talent across our firm."
Segal McCambridge's attorneys named in Best Lawyers in America® include:
Jason P. Eckerly; Chicago, IL; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants
Scott R. Emery; New York, NY; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants
Jay Evans; Pittsburgh, PA; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants
Richard H. Glucksman; Los Angeles, CA; Construction Law
Nathan R. Horne; Austin, TX; Construction Law; Litigation - Construction
Alice Sacks Johnston; Pittsburgh, PA; Commercial Litigation; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants
Patrick M. Kemp; Austin, TX; Litigation - Insurance
Mitchell P. Morinec; Chicago, IL; Commercial Litigation
Anthony J. Sbarra, Jr.; Milton, MA; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants
Alan J. Taylor; Southfield, MI; Litigation - Construction; Real Estate Law
Kenneth P. Williams; Southfield, MI; Insurance Law; Litigation - Insurance; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants
David J. Yates; Southfield, MI; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants
Segal McCambridge's attorneys named in Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America® include:
Masood Syed Ali; Chicago, IL; Labor and Employment Law - Management
Mari Bryn Dowdy; Austin, TX; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants
Chaniece M. Hill; Chicago, IL; Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants
Mandy Kolodkin; Indianapolis, IN; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants
Jeffrey M. Marchese; New York, NY; Litigation - Construction
Courtney C. McLaren; Memphis, TN; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants
Benjamin J. Nellans; Chicago, IL; Commercial Litigation
Christopher P. Norton; Los Angeles, CA; Commercial Litigation
Nelson T. Rainey; Memphis, TN; Family Law; Health Care Law; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants
Nicholas E. Richardson; Tampa, FL; Insurance Law
Jordan B. Rosenberg; Philadelphia, PA; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants
Ian M. Sadler; Austin, TX; Commercial Litigation; Insurance Law
About Best Lawyers®
Best Lawyers® is an elite global network of legal professionals recognized through trusted, peer-reviewed distinction. For over four decades, its Purely Peer Review® methodology has upheld the principle that recognition should be earned through the opinions of fellow attorneys, not marketing influence or paid listings. Each year, millions of confidential evaluations are collected worldwide, contributing to one of the legal industry's most rigorous and trusted vetting processes. Only about 5% of lawyers in the United States and 3% globally are recognized, reflecting the selectivity and credibility of the results. No fees are accepted for consideration or inclusion, maintaining the integrity and independence of all recognitions. For more information, visit: www.bestlawyers.com.
About Segal McCambridge
Segal McCambridge has built a reputation as a national law firm of accomplished trial attorneys for almost four decades. Founded in 1986, the firm has grown from a four-lawyer shop in Chicago to a firm with more than 20 offices nationwide. The firm routinely counsels and defends clients, including Fortune 500 companies, corporations, and individuals, across the United States in complex litigation matters including, but not limited to: asbestos, class action, construction, employment, environmental, food and beverage, insurance coverage and bad faith, life sciences, product liability, professional liability, technology and cyber risk, transportation, and warranty. For more information, visit: www.segalmccambridge.com.
Insurer Cannot Raise Issues on Appeal that Were Not Presented to the Trial Court
June 15, 2026 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiThe Florida Court of Appeals affirmed a judgment on a collapse claim for the insured, rejecting the insurer’s arguments that were not presented to the trial court. Homeowner’s Choice Prop. & Cas. Ins, Co. v. Oakes, 2026 Fl. App. LEXIS 2086 (Fl. Ct. App. March 18, 2026).
The insured’s ceiling collapsed in the secondary home on the insured’s property. The claim was reported to the insurer, but coverage was denied after its investigation.
The insured sued the insurer for breach of contract. Under the Additional Coverage provisions of the policy, collapse was covered if it was “abrupt.” An abrupt collapse was not covered, however, if exclusions for “Fungi, Wet or Dry Rot” and “faulty, inadequate or defective design, specifications, workmanship, repair, construction, renovation, remodeling, materials or maintenance” applied. The collapse provisions contained no language stating that the coverage granted in the provision was also subject to all the other exclusions in the policy.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak HastertMr. Eyerly may be contacted at
te@hawaiilawyer.com
Bad Faith Claim Survives Summary Judgment
June 08, 2026 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiThe court denied the insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment on the insured’s bad faith claim, but granted the motion on the insured’s claim for punitive damages. Serbian Orthodox Church v. Brotherhood Mut. Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58234 (S.D. Cal. March 19, 2026).
On February 1, 2023, the Church filed a claim for water damage with Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company (BMIC). The claim was based on rain and wind that caused extensive water intrusion into the Sanctuary, damaging its plaster walls and ceilings and fresco paintings. The claim was assigned to Patrick Hurley. Hurley sent a letter discussing potential bars to coverage and requesting further information and documents from the Church.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak HastertMr. Eyerly may be contacted at
te@hawaiilawyer.com
The Great Escape: Non-Invalidation Clauses and Property Damage Claims
October 20, 2026 —
Abigail Smith & Kaarthiga Manimaran - SDV FenchurchAt their core, non-invalidation clauses (“NICs”) recognise an important commercial reality: an insured cannot control everything that happens at its premises.
In the event that an insured finds itself in breach of a condition or warranty owing to events that have increased the risk of damage to its property, but which were outside its authority, knowledge or beyond its control, a NIC may prevent the insurer from avoiding the claim. For that reason, they’re an important tool in an insured’s coverage arsenal.
Although there is relatively little caselaw on NICs, their purpose was recognised in The Seashell of Lisson Grove Ltd v Aviva Insurance Ltd [2011] EWHC 1761 (Comm) (on which we wrote a previous article –
The Good, the Bad & the Ugly: #26 The Good: The Seashell of Lisson Grove Ltd v Aviva)
Reprinted courtesy of
Abigail Smith, SDV Fenchurch and
Kaarthiga Manimaran, SDV Fenchurch
Ms. Smith may be contacted at abigail.smith@sdvfenchurch.uk
Ms. Manimaran may be contacted at kaarthiga.manimaran@sdvfenchurch.uk
Read the full story...
Potential Gap in Workers Compensation Immunity Statutory Framework
June 02, 2026 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesWorkers compensation insurance is important. As an owner, you want to ensure the contractors you hire have workers compensation insurance. Assuming you hire a contractor that is statutorily exempt from workers compensation, you want to make sure, no exception, that any subcontractor that is hired has workers compensation insurance. (Regardless, you always want subcontractors to have workers compensation insurance.). In construction, the prime contractor serves as the “
statutory employer” for purposes of workers compensation insurance.
With workers compensation comes
workers compensation immunity.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
FERC Issues Show-Cause Orders: Impacts on California and Other Regional Power MarketsBad News for Buyers: U.S. Mortgage Rates Hit Highest Since 2014“Pay No Attention to the Man Behind the Curtain!”Ahead of the Storm: Preparing for IrmaSnell & Wilmer’s San Diego Office Recognized as One of the “Best Places to Work” by the San Diego Business JournalBest Practices: Commercial Lockouts in ArizonaTexas “your work” exclusionConstruction Managers, Are You Exposing Yourselves to Labor Law Liability?Construction Litigation Roundup: “Based on New Information …”Preparing the Next Generation of Skilled Construction Workers: AGC Workforce Development PlanSouth Caroline Holds Actual Cash Value Can Include Depreciation of Labor CostsAvoiding 'E-trouble' in Construction LitigationWalkability Increases Real Estate ValuesBusiness and Professions Code Section 7031, Demurrers, and Just How Much You Can Dance Solar and Wind Just Passed Another Big Turning PointIn Florida, Exculpatory Clauses Do Not Need Express Language Referring to the Exculpated Party's NegligenceLA’s Wildfire Recovery Shifts to Costly and Chaotic RebuildingCase Dispositive Motion for Summary Judgment Granted for BWB&O’s Client in Wrongful Death Case!Stadium Intended for the 2010 World Cup Still Not ReadyBarratt Said to Suspend Staff as Contract Probe ContinuesProposed Bill Provides a New Federal Tax Credit for the Conversion of Office BuildingsOregon Duty to Defend Triggered by Potential Timing of DamageLatosha Ellis Joins The National Black Lawyers Top 40 Under 40Fatal Boston Garage Demolition Leaves Long Road to RecoveryProposed Florida Construction Defect ActIs Equipment Installed as Part of Building Renovations a “Product” or “Construction”?Gilbert’s Plan for Downtown Detroit Has No Room for JailHow to Build a Coronavirus Hospital in Ten DaysBremer Whyte Sets New Precedent in Palos Verdes Landslide LitigationKaboom! Illinois Applies the Anti-Subrogation Rule to Require a Landlord’s Subrogating Property Insurer to Defend a Third-Party Complaint Against Tenants2021 California Construction Law UpdateConstruction Problems May Delay Bay Bridge"Decay" Found Ambiguous in Collapse CaseAnother Guilty Plea In Nevada Construction Defect Fraud CaseLis Pendens – Recordation and DissolutionCGL Policy May Not Cover Cybersecurity and Data-Related LossesOklahoma Limits Claims for Construction CasesBanks Loosening U.S. Mortgage Standards: Chart of the DayCeiling Collapse Attributed to Construction DefectContractors and Force Majeure: Contractual Protection from Hurricanes and Severe WeatherConstruction Law Job Opps and How to Create ThemFor Urban Walkers, a Patchy Dilemma: Who Owns the Sidewalk?Blockbuster Breakwater: Alternative Construction Method Put to the Test in Tampa BayInspired by Filipino Design, an Apartment Building Looks HomewardA Look at Business and Professions Code Section 7031Motion to Dismiss COVID Claim Granted in Part, Denied in PartRather Than Limit Decision to "That Particular Part" of Developer's Policy Necessary to Bar Coverage, 10th Circuit Renders Questionable Decision on Exclusion j(6)Attempt to Overrule Trial Court's Order to Produce Underwriting Manual FailsCertificate of Merit to Sue Architects or Engineers Bill ProposedWashington, DC’s COVID-19 Eviction Moratorium ExpiresDevelopment in CBF Green Building Case in MarylandThe 2019 ISO Forms: Additions, Revisions, and PitfallsInsurer Entitled to Reimbursement of Defense Costs Under Unjust Enrichment TheoryPresident Trump’s Infrastructure Plan Requires a Viable Statutory Framework (PPP Statutes)[i]Illinois Supreme Court Announces Time Standards for Closing Out CasesKahana Feld Receives 2024 OCCDL Top Legal Organizations for DEI AwardBailout for an Improperly Drafted Indemnification ProvisionMTA’S New Debarment Powers Pose an Existential RiskNew American Home Construction Nears Completion Despite ObstaclesNext Steps for Policyholders in the Aftermath of the California WildfiresWhen Licensing Lapses: How One Contractor Lost a $1 Million DisputeThe Godfather of Solar Predicts Its FutureRoots of Las Vegas Construction Defect Scam Reach Back a DecadeMore (and Simpler) Options Under New Oregon Retention LawSometimes It’s Okay to Destroy EvidenceInsurance Litigation Roundup: “Post No Bills!”Colorado’s New Mechanics’ Lien Protections: What S.B. 26-074 Means for Your Next ProjectIndiana Court Enforces Contract Provisions rather than Construction Drawing MarkingsNader Eghtesad v. State Farm General Insurance CompanyThe Credibility of Your Expert (Including Your Delay Expert) Matters in Construction DisputesInsurer Motion to Intervene in Underlying Case DeniedThe Looming Housing Crisis and Limited Government Relief—An Examination of the CDC Eviction Moratorium Two Months InLien Law Change in IdahoConstruction Litigation Roundup: “D’Oh!”Where Breach of Contract and Tortious Interference CollideCOVID-19 Could Impact Contractor Performance BondsAre Mechanic’s Liens the Be All End All of Construction Collections?Construction Law Alert: Concrete Supplier Botches Concrete Mix, Gets Thrashed By Court of Appeal for Trying to Blame Third PartyTop 10 Take-Aways from the 2024 Fall Forum Meeting in Pittsburgh
