BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    structural steel construction expert witness Anaheim California tract home expert witness Anaheim California low-income housing expert witness Anaheim California multi family housing expert witness Anaheim California office building expert witness Anaheim California condominium expert witness Anaheim California hospital construction expert witness Anaheim California high-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California custom homes expert witness Anaheim California mid-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California retail construction expert witness Anaheim California production housing expert witness Anaheim California parking structure expert witness Anaheim California Subterranean parking expert witness Anaheim California Medical building expert witness Anaheim California landscaping construction expert witness Anaheim California concrete tilt-up expert witness Anaheim California institutional building expert witness Anaheim California housing expert witness Anaheim California condominiums expert witness Anaheim California townhome construction expert witness Anaheim California industrial building expert witness Anaheim California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211
    http://www.desertchapter.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501


    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biasc.org

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biaoc.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Baldy View Chapter
    Local # 0532
    8711 Monroe Ct Ste B
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
    http://www.biabuild.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - LA/Ventura Chapter
    Local # 0532
    28460 Ave Stanford Ste 240
    Santa Clarita, CA 91355


    Building Industry Association Southern California - Building Industry Association of S Ca Antelope Valley
    Local # 0532
    44404 16th St W Suite 107
    Lancaster, CA 93535



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Anaheim California
    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately 5000 engineering, construction, and builders standard of care related expert designations, the Anaheim, California Construction Expert Directory delivers a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to construction claims professionals seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides building claims investigation and expert services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with regional assets which comprise construction delay claims experts, registered design professionals, professional engineers, and credentailed construction consultants, the construction experts group brings national experience and local capabilities to Anaheim and the surrounding areas.

    Anaheim California architectural expert witnessAnaheim California window expert witnessAnaheim California civil engineer expert witnessAnaheim California construction defect expert witnessAnaheim California ada design expert witnessAnaheim California construction expert witness public projectsAnaheim California structural concrete expert
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    Celebrating BWB&O’s 2026 Super Lawyers Rising Stars in San Diego!

    March 31, 2026 —
    Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP is proud to announce that Partners Jocelyn Russo, Christina Matian, and Associate Angelo Perillo have been named to the Super Lawyers 2026 San Diego Rising Stars list. This recognition highlights their outstanding dedication and distinguished service in Family Law, Civil Litigation, and Personal Injury Litigation.
    SUPER LAWYERS Jocelyn Russo: 2023-2026 Christina Matian: 2024-2026 Angelo Perillo: 2024-2026
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP

    Damage from Frozen Pipes Excluded from Coverage

    March 31, 2026 —
    Applying Texas law, the federal district court found there was no coverage for damage to the insured’s commercial building due to the bursting of frozen pipes. Barona v. State Farm Lloyds, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 257379 (S.D. Texas Dec. 12, 2025). Freezing weather froze Barona’s plumbing fixtures, causing significant water damage to the commercial property when the plumbing eventually expanded and burst. State Farm sent an inspector. During the inspection, Barona stated that he turned off the heat to his building but did not shut off the water supply or drain the pipes. State Farm denied covered based on the policy’s exclusion for frozen plumbing. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Delay Matters: Florida’s Fourth DCA Reverses Hurricane Irma Dismissal

    June 08, 2026 —
    The mantra “delay, deny, defend” is frequently referenced in discussions of insurance claims handling, though insurers will invariably disavow these tactics. While it would be facially improper for an insurer to delay a coverage decision to gain a tactical advantage, empirical examples nonetheless exist. This very dynamic was addressed by Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeals when it handed policyholders a win in Hypoluxo Mariner’s Cay Condo. Assoc’n, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd’s London, No. 4D2024‑2250 (Fla. 4th DCA Apr. 1, 2026), reversing a trial court order dismissing a condominium association’s Hurricane Irma coverage lawsuit against its property insurer. Delay to Run the Statute of Limitations Following Hurricane Irma, a condominium association suffered roof and exterior envelope damage, reported an insurance claim, and submitted a sworn proof of loss to its property insurer in compliance with Florida Statute § 627.70132 (2020). The statute establishes a timeframe within which a policyholder must submit a claim for hurricane damage. Reprinted courtesy of Andrea DeField, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, Machaella Reisman, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Cary D. Steklof, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Ms. DeField may be contacted at adefield@hunton.com Ms. Reisman may be contacted at reismanm@hunton.com Mr. Steklof may be contacted at csteklof@hunton.com Read the full story...

    The Deadline to File Suit on a Public Works Payment Payment Bond is Triggered by a Claimant’s Work on a Project Not by a Claimant’s Work Under a Contract

    June 02, 2026 —
    California law requires that prime contractors furnish a payment bond – providing for payment to lower-tiered subcontractors and suppliers – on state and local public works projects with a value in excess of $25,000. There are three conditions that must be satisfied when a claimant makes a claim against a payment bond on a public works project in California:
    1. First, generally, the claimant must have served a preliminary notice, unless the claimant is a first-tier subcontractor or supplier;
    2. The claimant must have “ceased to provide work” on the project; and
    3. The claimant must file suit against the payment bond no later than six (6) months after the period in which a stop payment notice must be given or, in other words, the earlier of 270 days after completion of the public works project or 210 days after a notice of completion or cessation was recorded on a public works project.
    In Tarlton & Sons, Inc. v. Great American Insurance Company, 111 Cal.App.5th 376 (2025), the 2nd District Court of Appeal examined whether a subcontractor timely filed a claim against a payment bond when a prime contractor was terminated and replaced by another prime contractor who the subcontractor continued to perform work for. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    We Won’t Permit That Excuse!

    June 23, 2026 —
    A Texas appellate court recently ruled that a building permit wasn’t a condition precedent for a construction project. That caught our attention. Can you build a commercial project without a permit? But as we read the case, we see the court’s reasoning. And it reminds us of an important legal principle that should inform our contract drafting and negotiation. The case was a civil suit brought by the project owner against its tenant improvement contractor for work on a medical spa. The owner claimed that the contractor didn’t perform the work properly and didn’t finish construction. The contractor argued that delays and problems were caused by the owner, alleging numerous failures, including the owner’s failure to secure a building permit. Reprinted courtesy of Curt Martin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Richard Eiszner, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Martin may be contacted at cmartin@pecklaw.com Mr. Eiszner may be contacted at reiszner@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Georgia HB 676: A Bill Property Owners and Contractors Should Watch

    March 24, 2026 —
    Property owners, contractors, and others dealing with mechanics and materialmen’s liens in Georgia should keep an eye on HB 676, which is currently making its way through the Georgia General Assembly. The bill aims to curb misuse of the lien process and provide additional remedies to those challenging a frivolous lien filing. What HB 676 Would Do HB 676 would add a new Code section (O.C.G.A. § 44-14-366.6) to the mechanics and materialmen’s lien statutes. If a lien is filed “without substantial justification or that is not made in good faith or that is made with malice or a wrongful purpose,” this new Code section would impose a fine of $1,500 per lien on the lien claimant, in addition to any attorney’s fees or court costs incurred by the party challenging the lien. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Robert Lafayette, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Mr. Lafayette may be contacted at rlafayette@seyfarth.com

    $356 Million Judgement Against Developer for Defective Construction of DC Condominium

    August 16, 2026 —
    On July 31, 2026, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia entered a $356,085,513.00 judgment against developers JBG Smith for defective construction and renovation of the Wardman Tower Residential Condominium in Washington, D.C. The case is Wardman Tower Residential Condominium Unit Owners Association v. JBG Smith Properties, et al., No. 2020 CA 004807 B (D.C. Super. Ct.). In a 148-page Trial Order, the D.C. Superior Court awarded $118,695,171.00 in damages in favor of the condominium association and against the condominium developers, including JBG Smith. The Court trebled those damages pursuant to the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act (“CPPA”) to reach an ultimate judgment of $356,085,513.00. See Cowie Law Group: DC Condominium Construction Defects: Recovering Att
    Surplus Lines Carriers Cannot Compel Arbitration in Louisiana

    One Way Arbitration Provisions are Enforceable in Virginia

    Brazil’s Former President Turns Himself In to Police

    Professional Liability Insurance Considerations When Design Professionals are Involved

    GIS and BIM Integration Will Transform Infrastructure Design and Construction

    GRSM Named “Powerhouse in Litigation” in 2026 Industry Report

    A Primer on Insurance for Construction Projects

    Providing Notice of Claims Under Your Construction Contract

    California Court of Appeal Holds That the Right to Repair Act Prohibits Class Actions Against Manufacturers of Products Completely Manufactured Offsite

    Mid-Session Overview of Colorado’s 2017 Construction Defect Legislation

    Construction Defects and Warranties in Maryland

    Court Grants Motion to Dismiss Negligence Claim Against Flood Insurer

    Construction Law Job Opps and How to Create Them

    HHMR Joins Forces with HBF at 2025 Blitz Build: Building More Than Just Ramps

    School for Building Trades Helps Fill Need for Skilled Workers

    Federal Judge Rips Shady Procurement Practices at DRPA

    Insurance Lawyers Recognized by JD Supra 2020 Readers' Choice Awards

    Arizona
    The Evolution of Construction Defect Trends at West Coast Casualty Seminar

    Uniform Rules Governing New York’s Supreme and County Courts Get An Overhaul

    Finding Insurer's Declaratory Relief Action Raises Unsettled Questions of State Law, Case is Dismissed

    Meet the Forum's Neutrals: MATTHEW W. ARGUE

    Florida Court Gives Parties Assigned a Subrogation Claim a Math Lesson

    America’s Infrastructure Gets a C-. It’s an Improvement Though

    (Don’t) Go Fish

    Construction Law Job Opps and How to Create Them

    Counter the Rising Number of Occupational Fatalities in Construction

    Year in Review: Top Insurance Cases of 2024

    Why Should Businesses Seek Legal Help Early On?

    Developers Celebrate Arizona’s Opportunity Zones

    Want to Build Affordable Housing in the Heart of Paris? Make It Chic.

    Next Steps for Policyholders in the Aftermath of the California Wildfires

    New LA Home Designs, Reimagined By Fire

    No Alerts Heard in Deadly Texas Flash Flood as 161 Still Missing

    What Makes a Great Lawyer?

    DEP Plan to Deal with Noxious Landfill Fumes Met with Criticism

    Contract Void Ab Initio: Key Insights into the KBR vs. Corps of Engineers Affirmative Defense

    West Coast Casualty’s Construction Defect Seminar Returns to Anaheim May 15th & 16th

    White and Williams LLP is Proud to Host the 20th Anniversary Virginia Barton Wallace Award and Reception

    Inability to Confirm Coverage Supports Setting Aside Insured’s Default Judgment on Grounds of Extrinsic Mistake

    Insurer Prohibited from Bringing Separate Contribution Action in Subrogation to Rights of Suspended Insured

    Wage Theft Investigations and Citations in the Construction Industry

    The ARC and The Covenants

    The Year 2010 In Review: Design And Construction Defects Litigation

    Mediation in the Zero Sum World of Construction

    Quick Note: Not In Contract With The Owner? Serve A Notice To Owner.

    Delaware Settlements with Minors and the Uniform Transfer to Minor Act

    Why Employees Are Taking Ownership of Their Architecture Firms

    That’s Common Knowledge! Failure to Designate an Expert Witness in a Professional Negligence Case is Not Fatal Where “Common Knowledge” Exception Applies

    Remote Trials Can Control Prejudgment Risk

    Tesla Finishes First Solar Roofs—Including Elon's House

    N.J. Appellate Court Confirms that AIA Construction Contract Bars Insurer's Subrogation Claim

    U.S. Home Prices Rose More Than Estimated in February

    The Benefits of Incorporating AI Into the Construction Lifecycle

    Bridging the Gap at Alaska’s Juneau Creek

    GRSM Attorneys Recognized in The Best Lawyers in America® 2026

    Illinois Court Determines Insurer Must Defend Negligent Misrepresentation Claim

    Construction Problems May Delay Bay Bridge

    Can an Architect, Hired by an Owner, Be Sued by the General Contractor?

    LEEDigation: A Different Take

    Public Works Bid Protests – Who Is Responsible? Who Is Responsive?

    County Elects Not to Sue Over Construction Defect Claims

    Venue for Miller Act Payment Bond When Project is Outside of Us

    2026 Construction Outlook: Dampening Outlook With Some Potential Bright Spots

    Lumber Liquidators’ Home-Testing Methods Get EPA Scrutiny

    The Secret to an OSHA Inspection

    Court Throws Wet Blanket On Prime Contractor's Attorneys' Fees Request In Prompt Payment Case

    The Law Clinic Paves Way to the Digitalization of Built Environment Processes