BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    industrial building Huntingdon Tennessee Medical building Huntingdon Tennessee condominiums Huntingdon Tennessee housing Huntingdon Tennessee Subterranean parking Huntingdon Tennessee office building Huntingdon Tennessee production housing Huntingdon Tennessee mid-rise construction Huntingdon Tennessee concrete tilt-up Huntingdon Tennessee parking structure Huntingdon Tennessee casino resort Huntingdon Tennessee condominium Huntingdon Tennessee hospital construction Huntingdon Tennessee retail construction Huntingdon Tennessee multi family housing Huntingdon Tennessee low-income housing Huntingdon Tennessee custom home Huntingdon Tennessee tract home Huntingdon Tennessee institutional building Huntingdon Tennessee landscaping construction Huntingdon Tennessee structural steel construction Huntingdon Tennessee townhome construction Huntingdon Tennessee
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Huntingdon, Tennessee

    Tennessee Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2787/SB2931 & HB 2771/SB 2201; Title 66, Chptr 36) Homeowners must serve written notice of a defect 15 days after its discovery; Contractors, upon receipt of the notice, have 10 business days to inspect the residence and inform any subcontractors it believes are reasonably responsible on the defect. Within 10 business days after notice of the claim, the subcontractor must serve a written response to contractor. Within 30 days after receipt of notice of a defect, the contractor must provide written notice of intention (repair, replace, monetarily compensate or reject) to the homeowner.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Huntingdon Tennessee

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Greater Knoxville
    Local # 4455
    221 Clark St
    Knoxville, TN 37921
    http://www.hbaknoxville.com

    Home Builders Association of Middle Tennessee
    Local # 4477
    9007 Overlook Blvd Suite 201
    Brentwood, TN 37027
    http://www.hbamt.net/

    Home Builders Association of Cumberland Co
    Local # 4410
    PO Box 507
    Crossville, TN 38557
    http://www.cumberlandcountyhomebuilders.com

    Home Builders Association of Dyer Co
    Local # 4425
    1075 Cooper Dr
    Dyersburg, TN 38024


    Home Builders Association of Rutherford Cty
    Local # 4490
    730-A Middle Tennessee Blvd Suite 5
    Murfreesboro, TN 37129
    http://www.rchba.info/

    Home Builders Association of Sevier Co
    Local # 4486
    PO Box 4653
    Sevierville, TN 37864
    http://www.seviercountyhba.com

    Home Builders Association of Upper Cumberland
    Local # 4491
    PO Box 243
    Cookeville, TN 38503
    http://www.uchba.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Huntingdon Tennessee

    Colorado Statutes of Limitations and Repose, A First Step in Construction Defect Litigation

    Homeowners May Not Need to Pay Lien on Defective Log Cabin

    Continuous Trigger of Coverage Adopted for Loss Under First Party Policy

    Will They Blow It Up?

    Construction Firm Charged for Creating “Hail” Damage

    Environment Decision May Expand Construction Defect Claims

    Avoid Gaps in Construction Defect Coverage

    Construction Law: Unexpected, Fascinating, Bizarre

    Summary Judgment in Construction Defect Case Cannot Be Overturned While Facts Are Still in Contention in Related Cases

    Construction Delayed by Discovery of Bones

    Instant Hotel Tower, But Is It Safe?

    Tacoma Construction Site Uncovers Gravestones

    Construction Defects Are Occurrences, Says Georgia Supreme Court

    Fifth Circuit Reverses Insurers’ Summary Judgment Award Based on "Your Work" Exclusion

    Allowing the Use of a General Verdict Form in a Construction Defect Case Could Subject Your Client to Prejudgment Interest

    Vegas Hi-Rise Not Earthquake Safe

    Construction Jobs Expected to Rise in Post-Hurricane Rebuilding

    Town Files Construction Lawsuit over Dust

    No-Show Contractor Can’t Hide from Construction Defect Claim

    Oregon agreement to procure insurance, anti-indemnity statute, and self-insured retention

    Architectural Firm Disputes Claim of Fault

    Massachusetts Couple Seek to Recuse Judge in Construction Defect Case

    Restitution Unlikely in Las Vegas Construction Defect Scam

    $5 Million Construction Defect Lawsuit over Oregon Townhomes

    The Year 2010 In Review: Design And Construction Defects Litigation

    Recent Case Brings Clarity and Questions to Statute of Repose Application

    Firm Sued For Construction Defects in Parking Garage

    Mandatory Arbitration Provision Upheld in Construction Defect Case

    Ensuing Loss Found Ambiguous, Allowing Coverage

    Ceiling Collapse Attributed to Construction Defect

    Reference to "Man Made" Movement of Earth Corrects Ambiguity

    The King of Construction Defect Scams

    Death of Construction Defect Lawyer Ruled a Suicide

    Delaware “occurrence” and exclusions j(5) and j(6)

    Supreme Court of New York Denies Motion in all but One Cause of Action in Kikirov v. 355 Realty Assoc., et al.

    Insurer Beware: Failure to Defend Ends with Hefty Verdict

    Minnesota Starts Wide-Ranging Registration of Contractors

    Surveyors Statute Trumps Construction Defect Claim in Tennessee

    Federal District Court Predicts Florida Will Adopt Injury In Fact Trigger

    California Construction Bill Dies in Committee

    No Coverage for Property Damage That is Limited to Work Completed by Subcontractor

    Alabama “occurrence” and subcontractor work exception to the “your completed work” exclusion

    Ghost Employees Steal Jobs from Legit Construction Firms

    Nevada Senate Rejects Construction Defect Bill

    Tucson Officials to Discuss Construction Defect Claim

    Who Is To Blame For Defective — And Still LEED Certified — Courthouse Square?

    Federal Judge Dismisses Insurance Coverage Lawsuit In Construction Defect Case

    Loss Caused by Seepage of Water Not Covered

    Harmon Tower Construction Defects Update: Who’s To Blame?

    Consumer Protection Act Whacks Seattle Roofing Contractor

    The U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals Rules on Greystone

    One World Trade Center Due to Be America’s Tallest and World’s Priciest

    Analysis of the “owned property exclusion” under Panico v. State Farm

    Construction Defect Not a RICO Case, Says Court

    Good Signs for Housing Market in 2013

    Underpowered AC Not a Construction Defect

    El Paso Increases Surety Bond Requirement on Contractors

    Texas Windstorm Insurance Agency Under Scrutiny

    Amerisure Case to be Heard by Texas Supreme Court

    Safe Harbors- not just for Sailors anymore (or, why advance planning can prevent claims of defective plans & specs) (law note)

    Georgia Supreme Court Rules Construction Defects Can Constitute an Occurrence in CGL Policies

    Construction Defect Journal Seeks Article Submissions Regarding SB800 and Other Builders Right to Repair Laws

    Defective Shingle Claims Valid Despite Bankruptcy

    LEED Certified Courthouse Square Negotiating With Insurers, Mulling Over Demolition

    FHA Lists Bridges and Overpasses that May Have Defective Grout

    Insurers Reacting to Massachusetts Tornadoes

    Crane Dangles and So Do Insurance Questions

    There Is No Non-Delegable Duty on the Part of Residential Builders in Colorado

    All Risk Policy Only Covers Repair to Portion of Dock That Sustains Damage

    Insurer Settles on Construction Defect Claim

    Housing Prices Up through Most of Country

    Colorado statutory “property damage” caused by an “occurrence”

    Builder Cannot Receive Setoff in Construction Defect Case

    Official Tried to Influence Judge against Shortchanged Subcontractor

    Lower Court “Eminently Reasonable” but Wrong in Construction Defect Case

    West Hollywood Building: Historic Building May Be Defective

    Contractor Manslaughter? Safety Shortcuts Are Not Worth It

    OSHA Extends Temporary Fall Protection Rules

    When Does a Claim Against an Insurance Carrier for Failing to Defend Accrue?

    The Hidden Dangers of Construction Defect Litigation

    Orange County Home Builder Dead at 93

    Limiting Plaintiffs’ Claims to a Cause of Action for Violation of SB-800

    Lockton Expands Construction and Design Team

    Counterpoint: Washington Supreme Court to Rule on Resulting Losses in Insurance Disputes

    OSHA Extends Delay of Residential Construction Fall Protection Requirements

    New OSHA Fall Rules to Start Early in Minnesota

    Florida trigger

    Florida Property Bill Passes Economic Affairs Committee with Amendments

    Statute of Limitations Upheld in Construction Defect Case

    Increased Expenditure on Injuries for New York City School Construction
    Corporate Profile

    HUNTINGDON TENNESSEE CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Huntingdon, Tennessee Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 5,500 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Huntingdon's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.









    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Huntingdon, Tennessee

    Legislatures Shouldn’t Try to Do the Courts’ Job

    March 1, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    David Thamann, writing in Property Casualty 360, argues that current actions by legislatures on insurance coverage amount to “legislative interference or overreach.” He notes that under current Colorado law, “a court shall presume that the work of a construction professional that results in property damage — including damage to the work itself or other work — is an accident unless the property damage is intended and expected by the insured.” He argues that here legislators are stepping into the role of the courts. “Insureds and insurers are not always going to be pleased with a court ruling, but that is the system we have.”

    Read the full story…


    Ensuing Losses From Faulty Workmanship Must be Covered

    May 10, 2012 — Tred Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    Coverage for damages resulting from faulty workmanship in the construction of an apartment complex was at issue in The Bartram, LLC v. Landmark Am. Ins. Co., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44535 (N.D. Fla. March 30, 2012).

    The owner of the apartments, Bartram, had primary coverage and three layers of excess coverage. Each contract excluded loss from faulty workmanship. The policies provided, however, "if loss or damage by a Covered Cause of Loss results, we will pay for that resulting loss or damage."

    Bartram contended water intrusion occurred because of faulty workmanship, which caused damage to the buildings’ exterior and interior finishes, wood sheathing, framing, balcony systems, drywall ceilings and stucco walls. This damage was separate from the work needed to simply fix the faulty workmanship. Therefore, Bartram argued, the ensuing losses that resulted from the water intrusion was covered.

    The insurer argued the ensuing loss exception was not applicable if the ensuing loss was directly related to the original excluded loss.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Housing Prices Up through Most of Country

    December 20, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Home prices in October were up more than six percent compared with prices in October 2011. The LA Times noted that some of the strongest gains were in California and Arizona. The Phoenix metropolitan area saw a 24.5% rise in home prices. In California, Riverside and Los Angeles were just above the national average, at 7.3% and 6.4%, contributing to the state’s overall nine percent increase.

    The news wasn’t good throughout the entire country, as five states did not see any price increases. Mark Fleming, the chief economist at CoreLogic, a research firm in Irvine, California said that “the housing recovery that started earlier in 2012 continues to gain momentum.

    Read the full story…


    California Bill Would Notify Homeowners on Construction Defect Options

    October 23, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The California Building Industry Association supported Assembly Bill 1892, but its goals of informing homeowners of their rights under SB800 have been accomplished through the administrative process. The Department of Consumer Affairs has now posted text on its web site noting that “prior to pursuing legal action or responding to a construction defect solicitation, you must first contact your home builder.” The text goes on to note that “if the homebuilder fails to follow any of the procedures, the homeowner is entitled to proceed with the filing of an action.”

    Read the full story…


    Federal District Court Continues to Find Construction Defects do Not Arise From An Occurrence

    May 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Coverage for construction defects continues to be hotly contested in Hawaii state and federal courts. In a recent decision, Judge Mollway felt bound to follow the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Burlington Ins. Co. v. Oceanic Design & Constr., Inc., 383 F.3d 940, 944 (9th Cir. 2004), where the court found construction defect claims arise from breach of contract, not from an occurrence. Judge Mollway’s most recent decision on the issue is Illinois Nat. Ins. Co. v. Nordic PCL Constr., Inc., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58464 (D. Haw. April 26, 2012).

    Nordic constructed a grocery store for Safeway. In addition to the grocery store, Nordic built a 165-space rooftop parking deck, retail shops and related improvements. After opening for business in 2007, Safeway experienced significant leaks. Safeway demanded that Nordic repair the parking deck. Nordic sent the demand letter to the insurer, who agreed to appoint counsel subject to a reservation of rights.

    Safeway filed suit against Nordic in state court alleging, among other things, breach of contract and negligence. The insurer provided Nordic with a defense, but Nordic hired independent counsel.

    The insurer filed for declaratory relief in federal district court.

    Read the full story…


    Insurers Reacting to Massachusetts Tornadoes

    August 11, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    The Patriot-Ledger reports that insurers could pay out as much as $200 million to cover homes damaged or destroyed in the tornadoes that hit central and southern Massachusetts in June, 2011. Joseph Murphy, Commissioner of the State Division of Insurance didn?t foresee problems with insurers covering these claims. “At this point, there doesn’t seem to be any one company overexposed in that area,” he told the Patriot-Ledger.

    Insurance executives did not think the tornadoes would cause them to raise rates. Steve Chevalier, CEO of NLC Companies, said, “it’s a major event for those impacted by it, but it’s not close to a financial hit to us.”

    One insurer noted that the winter weather generated more claims; however the cumulative value of those claims was $15 million.

    Read the full story…


    Virginia Chinese Drywall “property damage” caused by an “occurrence” and number of “occurrences”

    August 4, 2011 — CDCoverage.com

    In Dragas Management Corp. v. Hanover Insurance Co., No. 2:10cv547 (E.D. Va. July 21, 2011), claimant residential home general contractor and developer DMC filed for arbitration against insured drywall supply and install subcontractor Porter-Blaine seeking damages for (1) the replacement of defective Chinese drywall, and (2) the repair of resulting property to other components of the DMC homes and homeowners’ personal property in seventy-four homes. Porter-Blaine’s CGL insurer Citizens and excess insurer Hanover defended Porter-Blaine in the DMC arbitration.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of CDCoverage.com


    After Construction Defect Case, Repairs to Austin Building

    August 2, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The Austin Business Journal reports that remediation is about to begin on Met Center 10, a building that was “at the center of a complex structural defect case.” Claims were made that Grubb & Ellis failed to disclose known structural defects to a group of investors who purchased the building. The brokerage was ordered to pay $6.75 million. Repairs will take an estimated six months at a cost of $3.7 million.

    Read the full story…


    Delaware “occurrence” and exclusions j(5) and j(6)

    June 10, 2011 — CDCoverage.com

    In Goodville Mut. Cas. Co. v. Baldo, No. 09-338 (D. Del. June 2, 2011), claimants condominium association and unit owners sued project developer Rehoboth and general contractor Capano seeking damages because of moisture penetration property damage to common elements and individual units resulting from construction defects. Rehoboth and Capano filed a third party complaint against insured property manager Baldo alleging that, if Rehoboth and Capano were liable to claimants, Baldo was also liable because of Baldo’s failure to properly manage, maintain, and repair the property

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of CDCoverage.com


    South Carolina Law Clarifies Statue of Repose

    July 11, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    A new law in South Carolina, H 3375, fixes a loophole in that state’s statute of repose. State law puts a cap of eight years on construction defects, but the 2008 law that set that limit had a loophole that would allow for construction defect claims to start thirteen years after construction. The law also provides a cap on punitive damages.

    The measure was backed by the Carolinas Association of General Contractors. Their spokesperson said that the legislation “increases our state’s ability to be economically competitive and helps protect our members from frivolous lawsuits.”

    Read the full story…

    Read South Carolina H 3375…


    Arizona Supreme Court Confirms Eight-Year Limit on Construction Defect Lawsuits

    July 18, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Acting on the case of Albano v. Shea Homes Ltd. Partnership, the Arizona Supreme Court has ruled that Arizona’s eight-year statute of repose applies. The case was referred to the court by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals which had asked for a clarification of Arizona law. The case focused on three questions:

    1. Does the filing of a motion for class certification in an Arizona court toll the statute of limitations for individuals, who are included within the class, to file individual causes of action involving the same defendants and the same subject matter? 2. If so, does this class-action tolling doctrine apply to statutes of repose, and more specifically, to the statute of repose for construction defects set forth in Arizona Revised Statutes ("A.R.S.") § 12-552? 3. If the doctrine applies to statutes of repose, and specifically § 12-552, may a court weigh the equities of the case in determining whether, and to what extent, an action is tolled?

    The litigation at hand has a lengthy history, starting with a case referred to as “Hoffman” in 2003. The Albano plaintiffs were not able to join in Hoffman, and they filed their own lawsuit in 2006. An additional lawsuit was filed by the Albano plaintiffs in 2007. The courts decided that the Albano plaintiffs’ lawsuit was untimely.

    The Arizona Supreme Court concluded that the statute of repose was the appropriate standard for this case. They noted that “the eight-year statute of repose period began to run on November 6, 1997, the date of the Town of Gilbert’s final inspection. Albano II was filed on November 5, 2007.”

    The court found that the plaintiffs had waited too long for start their suit. As a result, they found it unnecessary to answer the first or third questions. Justice A. John Pelander of the Arizona Supreme Court wrote the opinion, dated June 30, 2011.

    Read the court’s decision…


    Lockton Expands Construction and Design Team

    July 19, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Lockton Companies, LLC, the largest privately held independent insurance broker, has announced that it is expanding its construction and design team with the hiring of Karen Erger and Tom Miller.

    Ms. Erger will provide professional liability practice management, loss prevention, contract and complex claims management consulting services to Lockton's architectural, engineering and construction clients in her role as Vice President, Director of Practice Management. Her background includes construction litigation at a leading construction law firm, professional liability claims defense and claims consulting for major professional liability underwriters.

    Miller joins Lockton as a Senior Vice President within the Design and Construction Unit. His role will be dedicated to serving the needs of engineering, architecture and construction firms performing services around the globe. He has spent more than 15 years concentrating on professional liability for design professionals and contractors in multiple roles. He previously managed the professional liability underwriting of one of the largest construction insurers and has developed numerous manuscript insurance products as well as focused on strategic planning to enhance business unit opportunities.

    Read the full story…


    Another Guilty Plea In Nevada Construction Defect Fraud Case

    April 25, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The eleventh defendant has entered a guilty plea in the ongoing federal investigation of construction defect fraud in the Las Vegas area. Mahin Quintero plead guilty to producing a false authentication feature, a misdemeanor. Ms. Quintero’s part in the scheme was to falsely authenticate signatures on loan documents for straw buyers. Ms. Quintero stated in court that she had been ordered to destroy her notary book three years ago. According to her plea bargain, the straw buyers did not appear in front of her when she notarized their signatures. As part of the scheme, the straw buyers would take control of homeowners associates, sending construction defect complaints and repairs to favored firms.

    Read the full story…


    School Sues over Botched Pool

    October 23, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The Daily American reports that the Somerset Area School District has alleged that the contractor who repaired and renovated the district’s swimming pool “botched” the job. Now the school has filed a civil case in the Somerset County Court of Common Pleas. The contractor, Wilson Construction Co. would prefer the matter to be settled in binding arbitration.

    The school district alleges that the surface installed by Wilson Construction cracked and bubbled due to improper installation. The manufacturer of the waterproofing system, Dryvit Systems, tested the installation and concluded it was an installation failure instead of a product defect. Dryvit told the district that the exterior walls would have be removed.

    The school district paid Wilson Construction $591,081 for their work. In their lawsuit, they are seeking $594,596 to cover the cost of draining the pool and repairing it.

    Read the full story…


    Hawaii Building Codes to Stay in State Control

    March 1, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The Hawaii State Senate voted down Senate Bill 2692. Had it been passed, the State Building Code Council would have been abolished and building codes would have become the responsibility of county governments. The bill was opposed by the Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety. Their director of code development, Wanda Edwards said that the bill “would have undermined key components that are essential to an effective state building code regime.”

    Read the full story…


    Nebraska Man Sentenced for Insurance Fraud in Construction Projects

    July 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Thomas Herink has been ordered to repay more than $5 million to his victims and will be serving three years of probation after 18 months in jail for defrauding banks and insurance companies, according to a report in the Insurance Journal. Herink falsified financial statements to lenders and insurers so that his company, Golf Services Group Inc. could participate in construction projects.

    Read the full story…


    Texas Law Bars Coverage under Homeowner’s Policy for Mold Damage

    July 13, 2011 — Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    Although the insurer paid for some of the mold damage at the insured’s home, the Fifth Circuit eventually determined the homeowner’s policy did not cover such damage. Rooters v. State Farm Lloyds, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 12306 (5th Cir. June 15, 2011).

    The policy excluded loss caused by hail to personal property unless the direct force of wind or hail made an opening in the roof allowing rain to enter. Further, the policy excluded loss caused by mold or other fungi.

    In 1999, hail and rain caused water damage to the roof and interior of the residence. State Farm paid $19,000 to repair the roof. Another $1,800 was paid for repairs to the interior of the building. In 2002, the insured noticed black mold. State Farm issued an additional check for $4,402 for mold abatement.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Good and Bad News on Construction Employment

    February 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The construction industry hit a two-year high in January, with 21,000 jobs added that month. The mild winter is assumed to have helped. According to the General Contractors of America, the construction industry currently employs about 5.57 million people. This is a 21 percent gain over January 2010. Ken Simonson, the chief economist of GCA, noted that “the unemployment rate in construction is still double that of the overall economy.” He said it was not currently clear if “the recent job growth reflects a sustained pickup or merely acceleration of homebuilding and highway projects that normally halt when the ground freezes in December and January.”

    Stephen Sandherr, the chief executive officer of the GCA, said that the federal government had to make infrastructure funding a top priority. “Without adequate long-term funding for infrastructure, competitive tax rates and fewer costly regulatory hurdles, the construction industry may lose some of the jobs it gained in the last year.”

    Read the full story…