BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    retail construction expert witness Anaheim California housing expert witness Anaheim California structural steel construction expert witness Anaheim California parking structure expert witness Anaheim California tract home expert witness Anaheim California multi family housing expert witness Anaheim California hospital construction expert witness Anaheim California industrial building expert witness Anaheim California Medical building expert witness Anaheim California condominiums expert witness Anaheim California townhome construction expert witness Anaheim California custom home expert witness Anaheim California institutional building expert witness Anaheim California mid-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California high-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California production housing expert witness Anaheim California office building expert witness Anaheim California landscaping construction expert witness Anaheim California custom homes expert witness Anaheim California concrete tilt-up expert witness Anaheim California casino resort expert witness Anaheim California condominium expert witness Anaheim California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211
    http://www.desertchapter.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501


    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biasc.org

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biaoc.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Baldy View Chapter
    Local # 0532
    8711 Monroe Ct Ste B
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
    http://www.biabuild.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - LA/Ventura Chapter
    Local # 0532
    28460 Ave Stanford Ste 240
    Santa Clarita, CA 91355


    Building Industry Association Southern California - Building Industry Association of S Ca Antelope Valley
    Local # 0532
    44404 16th St W Suite 107
    Lancaster, CA 93535



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Anaheim California
    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over four thousand construction claims related expert witness designations, the Anaheim, California Construction Expert Directory delivers a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to legal professionals and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction claims investigation and expert services to the nation's most recognized builders, risk managers, legal professionals, owners, state and local government agencies. Employing in house assets which comprise design experts, civil / structural engineers, ICC Certified Inspectors, ASPE certified professional estimators, the firm brings specialized expertise and local capabilities to the Anaheim region.

    Anaheim California building expertAnaheim California construction expert witness public projectsAnaheim California expert witnesses fenestrationAnaheim California architecture expert witnessAnaheim California eifs expert witnessAnaheim California concrete expert witnessAnaheim California reconstruction expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    No Ink, No Problem: When Employees and Agents Can Enforce Arbitration Agreements

    August 11, 2026 —
    Arbitration is a fundamental component of modern construction contracting. Many in the industry recognize the potential benefits and protections arbitration can provide to the business in the event of a dispute. But an important question many contracts do not address is: who does the arbitration agreement cover? Does it include the business entity only, or the individuals acting on behalf of the entity? As courts have long recognized, entities can generally only act through their employees, representatives, or agents.[1] This article discusses the circumstances in which an agent may rely on an arbitration provision entered by its employer. This is known as the agency doctrine. Reprinted courtesy of Jordan Heath, Associate, Jones Walker LLP and Jacob Morrison, Law Student University of Georgia, Jones Walker LLP Read the full story...
    Mr. Heath may be contacted at jheath@joneswalker.com

    Preventing Common and Costly Water Intrusion Events in Construction

    July 13, 2026 —
    Water leaking into a building is a leading cause of damage and loss in the construction industry. On one jobsite, heavy rains flooded a sub-basement, damaging a new electrical transformer—all because a roof drain was not property connected. On another jobsite, a drinking-fountain supply line broke in a multistory building that was undergoing renovation, causing water to run—undetected—for an entire weekend, resulting in water damage to all lower floors, where construction had been finished. Those loss scenarios could have been prevented with a comprehensive and effective water damage prevention plan (WDPP). This includes routine site inspections to identify uncontrolled water damage exposures and basic maintenance to make sure drains are clean of debris and divert them to a catch basin or low point away from the building. An effective WDPP plan also incorporates technology such as backflow preventers on sewer connections and water sensing technology to monitor the most vulnerable exposures. Reprinted courtesy of Andrew Swift, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Owner Taking Assignment of General Contractor’s Claims Against a Subcontractor(s)

    September 21, 2026 —
    Here’s a scenario that occurs in construction defect cases. An owner sues a general contractor and subs for construction defects. The owner settles with a number of parties and takes an assignment of the general contractor’s claims against some or all of the subs and pursues the remaining parties for indemnity based on the assignment of the general contractor’s claims. This was the scenario in Craftsman Plastering and Lath, Inc. v. Rath Mor, LLC, 2026 WL 2328032 (Fla. 4th DCA 2026). The owner settled with the general contractor and all subs except one. The owner took an assignment of the general contractor’s claim against the sub, and really the indemnity claim. The owner was then substituted as the real party in interest as it relates to the general contractor’s claims against the sub. The owner sought roughly $780,000 in attorney’s fees and costs in connection with the dispute claiming the sub was liable for such fees. The jury didn’t buy the argument and awarded the owner about $55,000. Basically, the jury seemingly prorated the fees by the number of parties, at least, that’s how the math worked out. The owner didn’t like that and moved for an additur to increase the jury’s verdict which the trial court granted. This was reversed on appeal despite the fact that a trial court has broad discretion to grant a motion for additur. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    USDOT’s DBE Interim Final Rule: How It Affects Current and Out-to-Bid DOT and Airport Projects

    June 15, 2026 —
    In our April 16, 2026 post, we discussed the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Interim Final Rule (IFR) concerning Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Airport Concession Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (ACDBE) certification, specifically as it concerns transportation and airport projects in California. This post addresses a broader question: What does the IFR mean for current and out-to-bid DOT projects operating under pre-existing DBE goals? The answer is that the IFR did more than change who qualifies as a DBE. It also changed how federally funded transportation and airport projects must be handled during the re-evaluation period. This affects active contracts, pending procurements, airport projects, design-build teams, and anyone relying on old assumptions about DBE goals and counting of DBE and ACDBE credit. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Zachary F. Jacobson, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Mr. Jacobson may be contacted at zjacobson@seyfarth.com

    Pay-If-Paid: What You Need to Know Before Signing on the Dotted Line

    August 03, 2026 —
    Buried deep in the fine print of a subcontract, a pay-if-paid clause may be looming. If you are a subcontractor or supplier, misreading these clauses can put your cash flow at risk. If you are an owner or general contractor, drafting them incorrectly can leave you with obligations you never intended — or unenforceable protections you were counting on. It is more important than ever to understand when pay-if-paid clauses hold up and when they do not, as well as recent litigation and drafting trends. Whether you are negotiating a new agreement, reviewing your standard form contracts, or staring down a payment dispute, understanding how Arizona law treats pay-if-paid clauses is essential. In this article, we break down key considerations, walk through the legal standards Arizona courts apply, and offer practical tips to consider to help you protect your payment rights on the next project. Reprinted courtesy of Christian Fernandez, Snell & Wilmer and Matthew Racioppo, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Fernandez may be contacted at cfernandez@swlaw.com Mr. Racioppo may be contacted at mracioppo@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Hidden Risks Behind Today’s Stadium Construction Boom

    July 20, 2026 —
    After a decade-plus lull, professional sports leagues, universities and municipalities are once again spending heavily on new stadiums and major renovations. In the NFL alone, multiple marquee projects are underway or planned, representing more than $10 billion in facilities and mixed-use entertainment districts, rivaling or exceeding the scale of development during the last stadium-build cycle of the early 2000s. Beneath the excitement of architectural ambition and civic pride lies a risk landscape that has fundamentally changed since the last wave of stadium construction. Teams, cities and contractors that rely on outdated assumptions may find themselves exposed to cost overruns, schedule delays and liabilities that are far more difficult to unwind once construction is underway. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    What Prevents Innovation in Construction from Taking Off

    September 15, 2026 —
    In construction, we have the knowledge, technology, and innovative people to radically improve our performance, yet we’re still stuck in old ways. Why is that? I attended an annual gathering for real estate and construction professionals at Rakennustieto Oy, Finland’s leading building information provider. The day before, a half-day seminar was held at the same venue. During both events, we discussed the need for change in the construction sector. Everyone agreed that we need to radically improve how we produce and share information. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business

    AI Adoption in Construction: A UK Practitioner’s View

    April 20, 2026 —
    I recently talked with Chris Brady, an AI adoption consultant based in Birmingham,
    Quick Note: Don’t Spoil Evidence!!!!

    New Zealand Using Plywood Banned Elsewhere

    Formal Request for Time Extension Not Always Required to Support Constructive Acceleration

    Oregon Condo Owners Make Construction Defect Claim

    Are Mechanic’s Liens the Be All End All of Construction Collections?

    Claim Against Broker Survives Motion to Dismiss

    Stay of Coverage Case Appropriate While Court Determines Arbitrability of Dispute

    Green Construction Claims: More of the Same

    Crossrail Audit Blames Busted Budget and Schedule on Mismanagement

    Bats, Water, Soil, and Bridges- an Engineer’s dream

    Does a No-Damage-for-Delay Clause Also Preclude Acceleration Damages?

    OSHA Finalizes PPE Fitting Requirement for Construction Workers

    There's No Place Like Home

    Calling the Shots

    HHMR Celebrates 20 Years of Service!

    Warranty of Workmanship and Habitability Cannot Be Disclaimed or Waived Under Any Circumstance

    Party Loses Additional Insured Argument by Improper Pleading

    Athletic Trainers Help Workers Get Back to the Jobsite and Stay Healthy After Injury

    Crane Firm Pulled Off NYC Projects Following Multiple Incidents

    Court of Appeal Puts the “Equity” in Equitable Subrogation

    Quick Note: Include Key Time Related Facts in Contract to Avoid an Ambiguity

    Bert Hummel Appointed to Chief Justice’s Commission on Professionalism

    Global Insurer Agrees to Pay COVID-19 Business Interruption Claims

    Florida Supreme Court Adopts Federal Summary Judgment Standard, Substantially Conforming Florida’s Rule 1.510 to Federal Rule 56

    Ohio Court of Appeals: Absolution Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage for Workplace Coal-Tar Pitch Exposure Claims

    Congress Relaxes Several PPP Loan Requirements

    Private Statutory Cause of Action Under Florida’s Underground Facility Damage Prevention and Safety Act

    Los Angeles Warehousing Mecca Halts Expansion Just as Needs Soar

    Wall Street’s Favorite Suburban Housing Bet Is Getting Crowded

    Construction Defects Up Price and Raise Conflict over Water Treatment Expansion

    Why Biden’s Infrastructure Plan Is a Green Jobs Plan

    Insured Cannot Sue to Challenge Binding Appraisal Decision

    Construction Mezzanine Financing

    End of an Era: Los Angeles County Superior Court Closes the Personal Injury Hub

    Welcome to SubTropolis: The Massive Business Complex Buried Under Kansas City

    Louisiana Couple Sues over Defects in Foreclosed Home

    How Robotics Can Improve Construction and Demolition Waste Sorting

    Should CGL Insurer have Duty to Defend Insured During Chapter 558 Notice of Construction Defects Process???

    Montana Trial Court Holds That Youths Have Standing to Bring Constitutional Claims Against State Government For Alleged Climate Change-Related Harms

    Walmart and Alquist 3D Set New Standards with 3D Printed Supercenter Expansion

    Lumber Liquidators’ Home-Testing Methods Get EPA Scrutiny

    Condos Down in Denver Due to Construction Defect Litigation

    Construction Termination Part 3: When the Contractor Is Firing the Owner

    CGL Policy May Not Cover Cybersecurity and Data-Related Losses

    Insurance Company Prevails in “Chinese Drywall” Case

    Don’t Breach Your Contract, but If You Do, Don’t Breach First

    Insurer's Quote on Coverage for Theft by Hacker Creates Issue of Fact

    Insurance Firm Defends against $22 Million Claim

    Unqualified Threat to Picket a Neutral is Unfair Labor Practice

    Midwest Team Secures Resolution of Matter for Homeowners’ Association Client, Recovery of Attorneys’ Fees

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s 2024 Southern California Super Lawyers!

    A Court-Side Seat: Waters, Walls and Pipelines

    Client Alert: Naming of Known and Unknown Defendants in Initial Complaints: A Cautionary Tale

    LEED Certified Courthouse Square Negotiating With Insurers, Mulling Over Demolition

    Bremer Whyte Congratulates Nicole Nuzzo on OCBA Professionalism and Ethics Committee Appointment

    Know What You’ve Built: An Interview with Timo Makkonen of Congrid

    Flawed Welding Faulted in Mexico City Subway Collapse

    We Won’t Permit That Excuse!