ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

Insufficient Notice of Commencement and Construction Lien Rights

August 03, 2026 — David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal Updates
When a party is preserving their construction lien rights, the party will look to the recorded Notice of Commencement. This is the recorded document that provides the lienor with the information for purposes of preserving construction lien rights. A Notice to Owner company will typically rely on the Notice of Commencement to serve Notices to Owners from lower tiers not in contract with the owner. However, when it comes to preparing the lien, a lienor should look beyond just the Notice of Commencement and also look to the property appraiser’s website as a backstop. In a recent case, a window company had the homeowner sign the Notice of Commencement and then filled in the information. The company naturally did this for the convenience of the homeowner that probably was unfamiliar with the Notice of Commencement process. Regardless, information in the Notice of Commencement was inaccurate. It failed to include all the real property owners. Thus, when a payment dispute arose and a construction lien was prepared, it did not identify all of the real property owners. All of the real property owners were added later during the pendency of a lien foreclosure lawsuit. The trial court denied the lien because of the defective / insufficient Notice of Commencement — the lienor assumed the risk of error by filling out the information in the Notice of Commencement. The trial court further denied the lien holding that because the work did not commence within 90 days of the Notice of Commencement, the Notice of Commencement is void. Read the full story...
Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

---

Pay-If-Paid: What You Need to Know Before Signing on the Dotted Line

August 03, 2026 — Christian Fernandez & Matthew Racioppo - Snell & Wilmer
Buried deep in the fine print of a subcontract, a pay-if-paid clause may be looming. If you are a subcontractor or supplier, misreading these clauses can put your cash flow at risk. If you are an owner or general contractor, drafting them incorrectly can leave you with obligations you never intended — or unenforceable protections you were counting on. It is more important than ever to understand when pay-if-paid clauses hold up and when they do not, as well as recent litigation and drafting trends. Whether you are negotiating a new agreement, reviewing your standard form contracts, or staring down a payment dispute, understanding how Arizona law treats pay-if-paid clauses is essential. In this article, we break down key considerations, walk through the legal standards Arizona courts apply, and offer practical tips to consider to help you protect your payment rights on the next project. Reprinted courtesy of Christian Fernandez, Snell & Wilmer and Matthew Racioppo, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Fernandez may be contacted at cfernandez@swlaw.com Mr. Racioppo may be contacted at mracioppo@swlaw.com Read the full story...

---

$356 Million Judgement Against Developer for Defective Construction of DC Condominium

August 16, 2026 — Nicholas D. Cowie - Cowie Law Group
On July 31, 2026, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia entered a $356,085,513.00 judgment against developers JBG Smith for defective construction and renovation of the Wardman Tower Residential Condominium in Washington, D.C. The case is Wardman Tower Residential Condominium Unit Owners Association v. JBG Smith Properties, et al., No. 2020 CA 004807 B (D.C. Super. Ct.). In a 148-page Trial Order, the D.C. Superior Court awarded $118,695,171.00 in damages in favor of the condominium association and against the condominium developers, including JBG Smith. The Court trebled those damages pursuant to the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act (“CPPA”) to reach an ultimate judgment of $356,085,513.00. See Cowie Law Group: DC Condominium Construction Defects: Recovering Attorney’s Fees, Litigation Expenses & Treble Damages Under the Consumer Protection Procedures Act. Cowie Law Group, P.C. filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Association in 2020. The firm represented the Association throughout years of pretrial discovery and ultimately served as trial counsel with Williams & Connolly LLP during a lengthy bench trial before the Honorable Yvonne Williams. The Cowie Law Group team included attorneys, George A. Bealefeld, III, Albert G. McCarraher, Stanford L. Kimmel, III and Nicholas D. Cowie. Read the full story...
Reprinted courtesy of Nicholas D. Cowie, Cowie Law Group
Mr. Cowie may be contacted at ndc@cowielawgroup.com

---

EPA Expands PFAS Reporting Requirements with Addition of New Chemical to Toxics Release Inventory, Published by Law360

June 08, 2026 — Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) addition of sodium perfluorohexanesulfonate (PFHxS-Na) to the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) introduces new federal reporting requirements for businesses that manufacture, process, or use the chemical. Because reporting obligations apply retroactively to the start of the year, affected facilities must quickly evaluate their compliance and recordkeeping practices. In a recent Law360 article, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Senior Counsel, Ayodeji Ayolola, explains why PFHxS-Na was automatically added to the TRI, how the EPA’s public reporting system works, and which businesses may be affected by the new rule. The article also touches upon key compliance considerations, including supply chain reviews, reporting thresholds for chemicals of special concern, and preparation for public disclosure requirements. Read the full story...
Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

---

Louisiana Enacts Important Tort Reform Legislation

May 12, 2026 — Lee M. Peacocke & Benjamin Perkins - Lewis Brisbois
The Louisiana legislature enacted tort reform legislation in 2025 to address the increasing cost of insurance in Louisiana and to provide some predictability to the Louisiana legal system. While our colleagues, Jenny Michel and Jennifer Kretschmann, have provided an excellent and comprehensive analysis of the legislation in their article entitled “Louisiana State Legislature 2025 Regular Session: Tort Reform - Acts & Vetoed Insurance Bill,” which can be found here, this article examines the anticipated impact of the tort reform legislation on personal injury trials in federal and state courts in Louisiana. The most significant reform involves the institution of a modified defense of contributory negligence, which went into effect on January 1, 2026. Since 1996, Louisiana had operated as a pure comparative fault state; the liability of each party whose fault caused damages was to be allocated among the respective parties based upon their appropriate percentage of fault, regardless of the legal theory of liability asserted against each party. Thus, a plaintiff 55 percent at fault could recover 45 percent of their damages from the liable defendants. The 2025 Tort Reform Amendments now prohibit a plaintiff in a personal injury action from recovering any damages if they are found to be 51 percent or more at fault for their damages. The 55 percent at-fault party in the example above is now prohibited from recovering any damages from any party. Importantly, this new legislation now requires the trial court to instruct the jury that if they find a plaintiff to be more than 50 percent at fault, then the plaintiff will not recover any damages. Reprinted courtesy of Lee M. Peacocke, Lewis Brisbois and Benjamin Perkins, Lewis Brisbois Mr. Peacocke may be contacted at Lee.Peacocke@lewisbrisbois.com Mr. Perkins may be contacted at Benjamin.Perkins@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...

---

Insurer Granted Summary Judgment on Claim for Roof Damage Caused by Windstorm

May 26, 2026 — Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law Hawaii
The insurer successfully moved for summary judgment, eliminating the insured’s claim for roof damage due to windstorm. Mulas v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20537 (Jan. 30, 2026). The insureds’ commercial property sustained windstorm damage during Hurricane Ian. Westchester denied the claim. The insureds believed Westchester wrongfully denied coverage for roof damage and various interior damage to property. The insureds also argued that Westchester’s actual cash value (ACV) payment did not reflect the fully insured loss. The insureds sued and Westchester moved for summary judgment. Westchester argued the roof damage was not covered because Hurricane Ian did not cause the damage. Westchester hired an engineer who determined the roof damage was not caused by wind from Hurricane Ian. Westchester pointed out that the insureds’ expert also found no wind damage on the roof. The insureds offered no other evidence suggesting the hurricane caused roof damage. Therefore, the insure
Thoughts on New Pay if Paid Legislation

Question of Parties' Intent Prevents Summary Judgment for Insurer

Congress Considers Pandemic Risk Insurance Act to Address COVID-19 Business Interruptions Losses

Let the 90-Day Countdown Begin

Wildfires, Silica Exposures and ESG-Friendly Solutions

New OSHA Regulations on Confined Spaces in Construction

Sales of New U.S. Homes Slump to Lowest Level Since November

Speculative Luxury Homebuilding on the Rise

HHMR is pleased to announce that David McLain has been selected as a 2020 Super Lawyer

Florida Court of Appeals Holds Underlying Tort Case Must Resolve Before Third-Party Spoliation Action Can Be Litigated

Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized as 2023 Illinois Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars

Environmental Update: Regulatory Notes – April 2025

Insurance Policy’s “No Voluntary Payment” Clauses Lose Some Bite in Colorado

#7 CDJ Topic: Truck Ins. Exchange v. O'Mailia

Mercury News Editorial Calls for Investigation of Bay Bridge Construction

Roof's "Cosmetic" Damage From Hail Storm Covered

Eleventh Circuit Rules That Insurer Must Defend Contractor Despite “Your Work” Exclusion, Where Damage Timing Unclear

Insurance Client Alert: Mere Mailing of Policy and Renewals Into California is Not Sufficient Basis for Jurisdiction Over Bad Faith Lawsuit

Newmeyer & Dillion Partner Aaron Lovaas & Casey Quinn Recognized by Super Lawyers

“Rip and Tear” Damage Remains Covered Under CGL Policy as “Accident”—for Now.

SB800 Not the Only Remedy for Construction Def
Barratt Said to Suspend Staff as Contract Probe Continues

Three Reasons Late Payments Persist in the Construction Industry

Withdrawal of an Admission in California May Shift Costs—Including Attorneys’ Fees—Incurred in Connection with the Withdrawal

Undocumented Debris at Mississippi Port Sparks Legal Battle

Anatomy of an Indemnity Provision

Contracts and Fraud Don’t Mix (Even for Lawyers!)

Appeals Court Affirms Civil Engineer Owes No Duty of Care to General Contractor

WCC and BHA Raised Thousands for Children’s Cancer Research at 25th West Coast Casualty CD Seminar

Homebuyers Get Break as Loan Rates Defy Fed Tapering: Mortgages

Another Guilty Plea in Las Vegas HOA Scandal

Turkey Digs Out From a Catastrophe

Trends in Project Delivery Methods in Construction

The Starter Apartment Is Nearly Extinct in San Francisco and New York

Google Advances Green Goal With AES Deal for Carbon-Free Power

Construction Law Firm Welin, O'Shaughnessy + Scheaf Merging with McDonald Hopkins LLC

Whose Lease Is It Anyway: Physical Occupancy Not Required in Landlord-Tenant Dispute

A Lot of Cheap Housing Is About to Get Very Expensive

New York Enacts First-in-the-Nation Statewide Data Center Moratorium

Housing Starts Plunge by the Most in Four Years

NYC Design Firm Executives Plead Guilty in Pay-to-Play Scheme

You Can Now Build a Multi-Million Dollar Home via Your iPad

AEC Business Is a Top 25 Podcast in Construction Tech

Verdict In Favor Of Insured Homeowner Reversed For Improper Jury Instructions

Duty to Defend Construction Defect Case Triggered by Complaint's Allegations

No Coverage For Construction Defect Under Illinois Law

Yes, Indeedy. Competitive Bidding Not Required for School District Lease-Leasebacks

No Alerts Heard in Deadly Texas Flash Flood as 161 Still Missing

Buy Clean California Act Takes Effect on July 1, 2022

Philadelphia Enacts Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy (C-PACE) Program

Partners Nicole Whyte and Karen Baytosh are Selected for Inclusion in Best Lawyers 2021 and Nicole Nuzzo is Selected for Inclusion in Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch

Security on Large Construction Projects. The Payment Remedy You Probably Never Heard of

The California Legislature Passes SB 496 Limiting Design Professional Defense and Indemnity Obligations

The Salt Lake Tribune Names Snell & Wilmer a Winner of the Top Workplaces 2025 Award

Federal Bid Protest Standard of Review and Disparate Treatment with Ratings

White and Williams Celebrates Chambers 2024 Rankings

San Francisco Airport’s Terminal 1 Aims Sky High

Coverage Denied for Ensuing Loss After Foundation Damage

Illinois Legislature Passes Bill Allowing Punitive Damages In Most Wrongful Death Actions

California Supreme Court Holds that Design Immunity Does Not Protect a Public Entity for Failure to Warn of Dangerous Conditions

Hiring the Right Expert For Your Construction Dispute

San Francisco Half-Built Apartment Complex Destroyed by Fire

Construction Litigation Roundup: “Just Hanging Around”

The Burden of Betterment

Subcontractors Have a Duty to Clarify Ambiguities in Bid Documents

South Carolina Supreme Court Finds that Consequential Damage Arise From "Occurrence"

2017 Legislative Changes Affecting the Construction Industry

Biden’s Solar Plans Run Into a Chinese Wall

US Court Disputes $1.8B AECOM Damage Award in ‘Remarkable Fraud’ Suit

California’s High Speed Rail Project. Are We Done With the Drama?

A New Lawsuit Might Change the Real Estate Industry Forever