Why Travelers Fought a Fire Claim for Invisible Smoke Damage
February 23, 2026 —
Elaine Silver - Engineering News-RecordJust 40 minutes after midnight on Sept. 27, 2018, the sky lit up over Birmingham, Ala. A fire engulfed an apartment building under construction—the last-to-be completed section of a wood-framed complex called the Metropolitan. It fueled one of the largest recorded blazes in the city’s history.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Elaine Silver, Engineering News-RecordENR may be contacted at
enr@enr.com
Consider The Limited Warranty from Your Homebuilder
July 06, 2026 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesWhen purchasing a home from a homebuilder, there is an important consideration when it comes to the limited warranty you receive around the time you close on the home. That limited warranty likely includes an arbitration provision requiring you to arbitrate your disputes, such as construction defect claims, against the homebuilder. That arbitration provision will most likely include all claims, including statutory claims (such as a statutory violation of a building code claim), requiring you to arbitrate, as opposed to litigate, your disputes against the homebuilder. This is an important consideration. If the arbitration provision does not allow you to arbitrate all of your claims, and eliminates your rights to legitimate statutory claims, the arbitration provision could be unenforceable.
By way of example, in a residential construction defect dispute, Anderson v. Taylor Morrison of Florida, Inc., 223 So.3d 1088 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017), the appeal turned on whether the arbitration provision in the homebuilder’s limited warranty was valid. The homeowners took possession of their home in 2009. In 2015, the homeowners served a Florida Statutes Chapter 558 notice of construction defects that included a statutory violation of a building code claim under Florida Statute §553.84. The limited warranty included an arbitration provision that specified it was the “exclusive remedy” for all disputes arising out of or related to the warranty or issues with the home and property. When read together with the warranty’s disclaimer that precluded claims not covered by the warranty “whether in contract, tort, or otherwise,” the statutory building code violation claim could not be remedied through arbitration because it fell outside the warranty’s coverage.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin NorrisMr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
Elliott Backed Venture Sues Lloyds Over Avant Cladding, Times Reports
February 17, 2026 —
Eamon Farhat - BloombergElliott Investment Management and British housing tycoon Jeff Fairburn, joint-venture partners in UK homebuilder
Avant Homes Group, are suing
Lloyds Banking Group Plc over who should pay to fix properties that fail to meet post-Grenfell fire-safety standards, the Times reported.
Avant, which faces remediation costs of at least £107 million ($146 million) for potentially dangerous cladding, argues that Lloyds should shoulder part of the bill because most of the developments were built before 2014, when the homebuilder was under the bank’s ownership, the Times reported.
Cladding has become a contentious issue in the UK following the Grenfell Tower fire in June 2017, in which dozens died after flames spread rapidly through flammable exterior cladding on the West London high-rise, laying bare deep failures in Britain’s building safety regulations.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Eamon Farhat, Bloomberg
Builders Support Most of Bipartisan Housing Reform Bill in Congress
March 31, 2026 —
Esther D'Amico - Engineering News-RecordSeveral homebuilding groups say they support most of the massive housing reform bill making its way through Congress but want to see certain provisions including those related to build-to-rent and manufactured homes changed before it advances any further.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Esther D'Amico, Engineering News-RecordENR may be contacted at
enr@enr.com
Parking Garage Partially Collapses in Dearborn, Mich., Trapping One
March 31, 2026 —
Annemarie Mannion - Engineering News-RecordA multi-level parking garage that partially collapsed in Dearborn, Mich., is fenced off and the city has started the legal process allowed under state law to demolish the privately-owned structure due to alleged dangerous conditions.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Annemarie Mannion, Engineering News-RecordMs. Mannion may be contacted at
manniona@enr.com
That’s a Wrap! Pennsylvania Court Holds Arbitration Clause in Online Agreement Unenforceable
May 14, 2026 —
Gus Sara - The Subrogation StrategistIn Duffy v. Tatum, 2026 Pa. Super. LEXIS 112, 2026 PA Super 41, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania (Superior Court) considered whether an arbitration provision contained in the online Terms of Service on the defendant’s website were enforceable. The plaintiff, Daniel Duffy (Duffy), visited the website of defendant, Dolly, Inc. (Dolly), to purchase moving services. Duffy selected the number of movers, items to be moved and the type of vehicle needed. To complete the booking, the website required Duffy to checkmark a box labeled “By checking this box I accept the Dolly Terms of Service.” Duffy did not have to open the link or scroll to the bottom of the agreement before being able to click on the checkmark box. The Terms of Service included an arbitration provision requiring that any dispute related to the moving services to be resolved by arbitration in accordance with the American Arbitration Association. The Terms of Service did not include any statement that the user was waiving the right to a jury trial. The Superior Court found the internet Terms of Service unenforceable.
During the moving process, an accident occurred and injured Duffy. In May 2024, Duffy and his wife sued Dolly and other related entities alleging negligence and loss of consortium. Dolly filed preliminary objections alleging that the parties agreed to alternative dispute resolution. The lower court overruled the preliminary objections, finding that Dolly’s website did not provide reasonably obvious notice of its Terms of Service to Duffy and, as such, Duffy never agreed to waive his constructional right to a jury trial. Dolly filed an appeal to the Superior Court.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Gus Sara, White and Williams LLPMr. Sara may be contacted at
sarag@whiteandwilliams.com
Ball Janik LLP Welcomes Construction Defect Attorney and U.S. Air Force Veteran Jake Scott to its Fort Lauderdale Office
June 02, 2026 —
Ball Janik LLPBall Janik LLP, a leading construction defect and insurance recovery law firm, has welcomed Jake Scott as an associate in its Fort Lauderdale office. Scott joins the Construction Defect Practice Group, bringing experience across construction litigation that includes construction defect, contract dispute, and negligence matters, along with a track record of representing construction professionals through depositions, court appearances, and trial preparation to support the firm's steady growth and client service statewide.
"We're excited to welcome Jake Scott to our Fort Lauderdale office and Construction Defect Practice Group," said James C. Prichard, Managing Partner at Ball Janik LLP. "We look forward to the fresh perspectives and legal solutions he will provide for community associations across South Florida."
Scott is a results-driven attorney dedicated to providing strategic counsel for complex legal challenges. He has experience managing all phases of a case, from early investigation and discovery through trial preparation and settlement negotiations.
Prior to joining Ball Janik, Scott served as an associate attorney in Fort Lauderdale, where he represented clients in construction litigation matters, handled depositions and court appearances, conducted legal research, and drafted pleadings, motions, and briefs. He also worked as an attorney in Tampa, where he represented contractors, subcontractors, and construction firms in defending claims involving construction defects, contractual disputes, and negligence, and worked closely with expert witnesses, engineers, and consultants to develop and present technical evidence.
Scott's experience representing the development and building sides of construction disputes provides a valuable, contrast-driven perspective that supports the strategic evaluation of claims and practical approaches to resolution for Ball Janik's clients.
A proud veteran, Scott served in the United States Air Force for eight years, including roles as an Airspace Control Officer and in Space Systems Operations, supporting safe space flight operations and satellite communications.
Carrying the discipline of airborne operations, Scott worked in the aerospace sector as a Satellite Engineer and Orbital Analyst. He also held a role in the housing sector, supporting marketing and business development initiatives.
Scott received his law degree from Stetson University College of Law. He attended American Military University, where he earned degrees in marketing, business management, and related support services.
About Ball Janik LLP
Ball Janik LLP is a Florida-based law firm offering construction defect, construction law, insurance recovery, and commercial litigation counsel to its local and national clients. The firm was founded in 1982 and has expanded its capabilities, professionals, and geographic footprint. What started as a small firm focused on real property, land use, and litigation (known then as Ball Janik & Novack) has grown to a team of 50-plus attorneys and paralegals in 5 offices in Florida, with centuries of combined experience and capabilities. The firm has been recognized by Chambers USA, U.S. News & World Repo
Illinois Court Addresses Rip-And-Tear Coverage And Existence Of An “Occurrence” In Defective Product SuitClass Action Certification by Association for “Matters of Common Interest”Is Privity of Contract with the Owner a Requirement of a Valid Mechanic’s Lien? Not for GC’sLand Planners Not Held to Professional Standard of CareSometimes a General Damages Assessment is Enough. . .4 Lessons Contractors Can Learn From The COVID-19 CrisisA Couple of Mechanic’s Lien Bills in VA [UPDATED]Coverage for Injury to Insured’s Employee Not CoveredPayment Bond Surety Entitled to Award of Attorneys’ Fees Although Defended by PrincipalThe Double-Breasted DilemmaBest Lawyers Honors 43 Lewis Brisbois Attorneys, Recognizes Three Partners as 'Lawyers of The Year'Building the Secondary Market for Reclaimed Building MaterialsU.S. Department of Justice Settles against Days InnWes Payne Receives Defense Attorney of the Year AwardRhode Island Finds Pollution Exclusion Ambiguous, Orders Coverage for Home Heating Oil Leak#5 CDJ Topic: David Belasco v. Gary Loren Wells et al. (2015) B254525SB 721 – California Multi-Family Buildings New Require Inspections of “EEEs”Project Team Upgrades Va. General AssemblyOfficial Tried to Influence Judge against Shortchanged SubcontractorHunton Insurance Coverage Partner Lawrence J. Bracken II Awarded Emory Public Interest Committee’s 2024 Lifetime Commitment to Public Service AwardWhether Subcontractor's Faulty Workmanship Is an Occurrence Creates Ambiguity Colorado Supreme Court Rules that Developers Retain Perpetual Control over Construction Defect CovenantsOut of the BlackPresident Trump’s Infrastructure Plan Requires a Viable Statutory Framework (PPP Statutes)[i]Mega-Consulate Ties U.S. to Convicted Billionaire in NigeriaNew Florida Bill Shortens Time for Construction-Defect LawsuitsRecent Developments Involving Cedell v. Farmers Insurance Company of WashingtonPayne & Fears Recognized by Best Lawyers in 2026 Best Law Firms®Amazon Urged to Review Emergency Plans in Wake of Deadly TornadoToll Plans to Boost New York Sales With Pricing, IncentivesThat Boilerplate Language May Just Land You in Hot WaterHawaii Federal District Court Compels AppraisalNew Jersey Condominium Owners Sue FEMAConditional Judgment On Replacement Costs AwardedGet to Know BJ Siegel: Former Apple Executive and Co-Founder of JunoWhen Every Drop Matters, Cities Turn to WatertechInsurance Alert: Insurer Delay Extends Time to Repair or Replace Damaged PropertyAdditional Insured is Loss Payee after Hurricane DamageFreight Train Carrying Hot Asphalt, Molten Sulfur Plunges Into Yellowstone River as Bridge FailsSt. Mary & St. John Coptic Orthodox Church v. SBS Insurance Services, Inc.General Release of Contractor Upheld Despite Knowledge of Construction DefectsGRSM Women Attorneys Named Finalists in Three Categories at 2025 Women, Influence & Power in Law AwardsColorado General Assembly Sets Forth Prerequisites for an Insurance Company to Use Failure to Cooperate as a Defense to a Claim for First Party Insurance BenefitsThe Hazards of Carrier-Specific Manuscript Language: Ohio Casualty's Off-Premises Property Damage and Contractors' E&O EndorsementsRitzy NYC Tower Developer Says Residents’ Lawsuit ‘Ill-Advised’Tests Find Pollution From N.C. Coal Ash Site Hit by Florence Within Acceptable LevelsWhen “Normal Cracking” Isn’t So Normal: Parra v. Gillaspie Construction and the Two-Year Clock on Construction Defect ClaimsNeed and Prejudice: An Eleventh-Hour Trial Continuance Where A Key Witness Is Unexpectedly UnavailableChambers USA 2019 Ranks White and Williams as a Leading Law FirmHaight’s Sacramento Office Has MovedUpdate Coverage for Construction Defect Claims in ColoradoNewmeyer Dillion Announces New PartnersSupreme Court Finds Insurance Coverage for Intentional (and Despicable) Act of Contractor’s EmployeeBuilders FirstSource to Buy ProBuild for $1.63 BillionModernist Houses Galore! [visual candy for architects]Employee Handbooks—Your First Line of DefenseNew York Developers Facing Construction Defect LawsuitThe Connecticut Appellate Court Decides That Construction Contractor Was Not Obligated To Continue Accelerated Schedule to Mitigate Its Damages Following Late Delivery of Materials by SupplierA Closer Look at an HOA Board Member’s Duty to Homeowners
