Allegations in Insured’s Complaint Sufficient to Survive Motion to Dismiss
November 09, 2025 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiThe insured’s complaint sufficiently pled breach of contract and bad faith to survive the insurer’s motion to dismiss. Macias v. Am. Family Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148628 (D. Colo. Aug. 1, 2025).
A hailstorm damaged the insureds’ property, including the roof. The insureds filed a claim (Claim One) with American Family. An adjuster assigned by American Family found storm-related damage to the gutters, window screens and lattice work, but only non-storm-related damage to other items, such as the roof. American Family determined the losses amounted to $1,104.97, which was below the deductible.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak HastertMr. Eyerly may be contacted at
te@hawaiilawyer.com
Newark Team Obtains Appellate Ruling Affirming Summary Judgment for Lawyer and Firm in Professional Negligence Lawsuit
April 14, 2026 —
Lewis Brisbois NewsroomNewark Partner Meredith Kaplan Stoma and Associate Anthony Doss recently secured a decision from the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, affirming summary judgment for their clients, a lawyer and her firm, in a lawsuit alleging professional negligence in connection with the administration of a commercial loan.
The circumstances giving rise to the lawsuit date back to September 2020, when the plaintiff was approached by members of a real estate investment company regarding a short-term loan opportunity whereby he would loan the company $200,000.
The company provided the plaintiff with a “bridge loan package,” which stated that the requested funds would be held in the escrow account of their counsel and her firm (Lewis Brisbois’ clients), and returned to him with interest within six months once the company was “capitalized” by a senior lender. The company subsequently prepared two notes, each for $100,000, in connection with the agreement.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Lewis Brisbois
PSA: Be Sure to Document (Even When Time is Short)
April 14, 2026 —
Christopher G. Hill - Construction Law MusingsWritten
change orders are a big deal. Almost all construction contracts (at least
the well drafted ones) require written contracts. Written change orders are even important enough that Virginia law
requires these provisions in residential construction contracts.
Why are they so important? Because they are a “mini-contract” of sorts. They
set the expectations, price, time, and work to be performed; work that was not included in the original price or scope for the project. Without this in writing, there will be no record of what the parties agreed to do. Does this sound familiar? Sound like its own contract? It should.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
The Law Office of Christopher G. HillMr. Hill may be contacted at
chrisghill@constructionlawva.com
Maryland Enacts Climate-Cost Study Over Veto, New Jersey Advances Climate Superfund Proposal as Earlier State Laws Face Ongoing Court Challenges
January 21, 2026 —
Amanda G. Halter, Ashleigh Myers & Jillian Marullo - Gravel2Gavel Construction & Real Estate Law BlogMaryland lawmakers have overridden the governor’s veto to enact legislation directing a statewide assessment of climate-related costs, while New Jersey lawmakers are preparing a January committee hearing for the State’s pending Climate Superfund Act. Together, these actions underscore continued state-level interest in both study-based and liability-focused climate-cost attribution frameworks, even as four separate lawsuits challenging state climate superfund statutes in New York and Vermont proceed in federal court.
Maryland Legislature Overrides Veto to Advance Climate-Cost Assessment
On December 16, the Maryland General Assembly voted to override Governor Wes Moore’s veto of S.B. 149 / H.B. 128, the “Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation – Total Assessed Cost of Greenhouse Gas Emissions – Study and Reports” Act. The vote followed the Governor’s announcement, just days earlier, that his administration would fully fund the study mandated by the bill, effectively reversing his prior veto.
Reprinted courtesy of
Amanda G. Halter, Pillsbury,
Ashleigh Myers, Pillsbury and
Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury
Ms. Halter may be contacted at amanda.halter@pillsburylaw.com
Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com
Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com
Read the full story...
Idaho Contractor Registration: Lessons from the Ward v. Bishop Decision
April 20, 2026 —
Tara Martens Miller - Snell & WilmerThe Idaho Supreme Court’s recent decision in Ward v. Bishop Constr., Ltd. Liab. Co., No. 51118, 2025 Ida. LEXIS 143 (Dec. 31, 2025) offers valuable guidance for contractors and construction attorneys navigating the Idaho Contractor Registration Act (ICRA). The December 2025 ruling clarifies critical questions about when and how defendants may raise contractor registration defenses, the weight of pretrial stipulations, and the consequences of procedural missteps in construction litigation. This article examines the key takeaways from the decision and offers practical actions for consideration by those working in Idaho’s construction industry.
The Facts Behind the Dispute
The case arose from a long-standing working relationship between cousins Joel Ward and Ren Bishop dating to the 1990s. Ward performed general construction work for Bishop Construction, LLC, including building, plumbing, electrical, framing, roofing, and siding work on projects in Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming. Bishop agreed to pay Ward $10 per hour, later increased to $12 per hour, plus one-way travel expenses. Between 2017 and 2019, Ward worked over 1,100 hours but was never paid, totaling $12,443.54 in claimed damages.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tara Martens Miller, Snell & WilmerMs. Miller may be contacted at
tmmiller@swlaw.com
Ownership and Licensing in Design Agreements
April 14, 2026 —
Abby Dvorkin - Snell & WilmerThe ownership and licensing of design documents in professional services agreements play a significant role in protecting the interests of the design professional and the project owner during and after project completion. The ownership or licensing of the drawings provision typically outlines who owns the drawings and specifications, who can use the documents, and how the documents can be used during and after the project.
Project owners and developers should understand that payment for design services does not automatically transfer ownership or an exclusive right to use the professional design. Under U.S. copyright law, the default rule is that the design professional retains ownership of the instruments of service absent a contractual provision transferring ownership or a license. See 17 U.S.C. § 101, et seq. The Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act provides that copyright protection applies to “pictorial, graphic and sculptural works” and includes “architectural works.” 17 U.S.C. § 102. A design professional may only transfer copyright ownership in writing. 17 U.S.C. § 204(a).
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Abby Dvorkin, Snell & WilmerMs. Dvorkin may be contacted at
advorkin@swlaw.com
Eleventh Circuit Permits Florida Restrictions on Property Ownership by Certain Foreign Nationals to Go Forward
January 13, 2026 —
Minyao Wang - Lewis Brisbois NewsroomNew York, N.Y. (December 4, 2025) - On November 4, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued a long-anticipated decision in
Shen v. Simpson, upholding the constitutionality of a Florida
law, SB 264, which restricts ownership of or investment in Florida real estate by individuals “domiciled” in the People’s Republic of China and to a lesser extent, other countries of concern (which are identified in the statute as Russia, North Korea, Iran, Cuba, Venezuela and Syria) who are not American citizens or green card holders. The restriction encompasses residential, commercial and agricultural real estate. Oral argument in the case was held on April 19, 2024, and it took the court almost one year and seven months to issue its opinion, an unusually long turn-around time.
This Update follows previous Lewis Brisbois alerts on Florida’s law and legal challenges to it.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Minyao Wang, Lewis BrisboisMr. Wang may be contacted at
Minyao.Wang@lewisbrisbois.com
The Single Source of Truth in Construction Projects: Reality or Myth?
March 24, 2026 —
Aarni Heiskanen - AEC BusinessThe idea of a single source of truth has been a fundamental part of the digital vision in the AEC industry for many years. From centralized CAD storage to BIM collaboration platforms and, more recently, Common Data Environments, the goal stays the same. Project teams want a reliable place where everyone can access the latest information.
The phrase “single source of truth” comes from database and information management practices in the IT world, where the goal was to maintain one authoritative record of data and eliminate data redundancy. As the AEC industry began adopting digital tools, the same idea was applied to project information and workflows.
Despite decades of technological progress, the question remains whether “one ring that rules them all” can actually be implemented in real construction projects.
Indiana Appellate Court Allows Third-Party Spoliation Claim to ProceedFoundation Arbitration Doesn’t Preclude Suing Over CracksFairness is Relative. Workers Compensation and the Dreaded Section 7031No Duty to Defend Suit That Is Threatened Under Strict Liability StatuteWilke Fleury Attorneys Featured in 2021 Best Lawyers in America and Best Lawyers: Ones To Watch!2019 Legislative Changes Affecting the Construction IndustryMotion to Dismiss Insurer's Counterclaim for Construction Defects Is GrantedUpdate – Property Owner’s Defense Goes up in Smoke in Careless Smoking CaseCalifornia Contractors: Amended Section 7141.5 Provides Important License Renewal Safety NetSan Francisco Airport’s Terminal 1 Aims Sky HighState Farm Unsuccessful In Seeking Dismissal of Qui Tam CaseTwo New Developments in Sanatoga, PennsylvaniaPayment Bond Claim Notice Requires More than MailingMontrose Language Interpreted: How Many Policies Are Implicated By A Construction Defect That Later Causes a Flood?Why You May Not Want a Mandatory Mediation Clause in Your Construction ContractSecond Circuit Affirms Win for General Contractor on No Damages for Delay ProvisionBen L. Aderholt Joins Coats Rose Construction Litigation GroupWest Virginia Wild: Crews Carve Out Corridor H Through the Appalachian MountainsSeven Kahana Feld Attorneys Selected to 2025 New York Metro Super Lawyers ListsA Claim for Constructive Suspension Does ExistCalifornia Court of Appeal Holds a Tenant Owes No Duty to Protect a Social Guest From a Defective Sidewalk Leading to a Condominium UnitInsurer Sued for Altering Policies after ClaimEmerging World Needs $1.5 Trillion for Green Buildings, IFC SaysIn Kansas City, a First-Ever Stadium Designed for Women’s Sports Takes the FieldMeet the Forum's In-House Counsel: SONYA SEEDERHomebuilder Confidence Takes a BeatingCalifornia Committee Hosts a Hearing on Deadly Berkeley Balcony CollapseBeing deposed—not just for dictators! Depositions in the construction lawsuit (Law & Order: Hard Hat files Part 5)Reminder: A Little Pain Now Can Save a Lot of Pain LaterFifth Circuit Affirms District Court's Grant of Summary Judgment to Insurer on Property Loss ClaimTime is Money. Unless You’re an Insurance CompanyGot Licensing Questions? CSLB Licensing Workshop November 17th and December 15thNinth Circuit Clears the Way for Review of Oregon District Court’s Rulings in Controversial Climate Change CaseWater Seepage, Ensuing Mold Damage Covered by Homeowner's PolicyA Court-Side Seat: Clean Air, Clean Water, Endangered Species and Deliberative Process PrivilegeNew Jersey Appellate Decision Reminds Bid Protestors to Take Caution When Determining Where to File an ActionCourt Extends Insurer Rights to Equitable ContributionConstruction Law Alert: Unlicensed Contractors On Federal Projects Entitled To Payment Under The Miller ActLenders Facing Soaring Costs Shutting Out U.S. HomebuyersBuyer Beware: Insurance Agents May Have No Duty to Sell Construction Contractors an Insurance Policy Covering Likely ClaimsMexico Settles With Contractors for Canceled Airport TerminalLease-Leaseback Fight ContinuesWhen to use Arbitration to Resolve Construction DisputesMargins May Shrink for Home BuildersReal Estate & Construction News Roundup (10/04/23) – NFL Star Gets into Real Estate, DOJ Focuses on “Buyer-Broker Commissions”, and the Auto Workers’ Strike Continues2026 Southern California Super Lawyers Recognizes 14 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys Neither Designated Work Exclusion nor Pre-Existing Damage Exclusion Defeat Duty to DefendCalifornia Supreme Court Holds “Notice-Prejudice” Rule is “Fundamental Public Policy” of California, May Override Choice of Law Provisions in PoliciesThe Top 10 Changes to the AIA A201: What You Need to KnowA Couple of Mechanic’s Lien Bills in VA [UPDATED]>
Certifying Claim Under Contract Disputes ActHow Mushrooms Can Be Used To Make Particle Board Less Toxic
