BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    institutional building expert witness Anaheim California condominium expert witness Anaheim California Medical building expert witness Anaheim California production housing expert witness Anaheim California office building expert witness Anaheim California retail construction expert witness Anaheim California mid-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California structural steel construction expert witness Anaheim California concrete tilt-up expert witness Anaheim California housing expert witness Anaheim California high-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California Subterranean parking expert witness Anaheim California custom home expert witness Anaheim California townhome construction expert witness Anaheim California low-income housing expert witness Anaheim California multi family housing expert witness Anaheim California condominiums expert witness Anaheim California industrial building expert witness Anaheim California tract home expert witness Anaheim California custom homes expert witness Anaheim California hospital construction expert witness Anaheim California casino resort expert witness Anaheim California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211
    http://www.desertchapter.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501


    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biasc.org

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biaoc.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Baldy View Chapter
    Local # 0532
    8711 Monroe Ct Ste B
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
    http://www.biabuild.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - LA/Ventura Chapter
    Local # 0532
    28460 Ave Stanford Ste 240
    Santa Clarita, CA 91355


    Building Industry Association Southern California - Building Industry Association of S Ca Antelope Valley
    Local # 0532
    44404 16th St W Suite 107
    Lancaster, CA 93535



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Anaheim California

    Resilience: Transforming the Energy Sector – Navigating Land Issues in Solar and Storage Projects | Episode 3 (11.14.24)

    Toolbox Talk Series Recap – Arbitration Motion Practice

    Killer Subcontract Provisions

    Is A Miller Act Payment Bond Surety Bound by A Default or Default Judgment Against Its Principal?

    Sochi Construction Unlikely to be Completed by End of Olympic Games

    How I Prevailed on a Remote Jury Trial

    Will Superusers Future-Proof the AEC Industry?

    Court Denies Insured's Motion to Dismiss Complaint Seeking to Compel Appraisal

    Texas Shortens Cut-Off Date for Suits Against Homebuilders Who Provide a 6-Year Written Warranty

    After 15 Years, Settlement Arrested at San Francisco's Millennium Tower

    Environmental Justice: A Legislative and Regulatory Update

    Lessee Deemed Statutory Employer, Immune from Tort Liability by Pennsylvania Court

    Colorado’s Federal District Court Finds Carriers Have Joint and Several Defense Duties

    Trump Budget Would Slash Some Construction Spending, Boost Transportation Projects

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (03/08/23) – Updates on U.S. Mortgage Applications, the Inflation Reduction Act, and Multifamily Sector

    Seyfarth’s Construction and Government Contracts Teams Named 2024 Practice Groups of the Year by Law360

    Supreme Court Addresses Newly Amended Statute of Repose for Construction Claims

    City Covered From Lawsuits Filed After Hurricane-Damaged Dwellings Demolished

    Estimate Tops $5.5B for Cost of Rebuilding After Maui Fires

    Exculpatory Provisions in Business Contracts

    Contractor Gets Benched After Failing to Pay Jury Fees

    California Supreme Court Holds that Design Immunity Does Not Protect a Public Entity for Failure to Warn of Dangerous Conditions

    Recognize: A Construction Safety Week Technical Bulletin

    What You Need to Know About the Recently Enacted Infrastructure Bill

    Heat Exposure Safety and Risk Factors

    ASCE Statement on House Passage of the Water Resources Development Act of 2024

    Fort Lauderdale Partner Secures Defense Verdict for Engineering Firm in High-Stakes Negligence Case

    San Diego’s NFL Stadium Dream Counts on Munis for Chargers’ Home

    Texas Enacts Landmark Restrictions on Foreign Land Ownership Under SB 17

    Singapore Unveils Changes to Make Public Housing More Affordable

    OSHA COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing ETS Unveiled

    Pulte’s Kitchen Innovation Throw Down

    Blackstone Said to Sell Boston Buildings for $2.1 Billion

    Allocating Covered and Uncovered Damages in Jury Verdict

    Professional Malpractice Statute of Limitations in Construction Context

    A Sample Itinerary to get the Most out of West Coast Casualty’s Construction Defect Seminar

    Mitigate Construction Risk Through Use of Contingency

    KF-103 v. American Family Mutual Insurance: Tenth Circuit Upholds the “Complaint Rule”

    Hawaiian Electric Finalizes $2 Billion Maui Fire Settlement

    New York Court Enforces Construction Management Exclusion

    FTC Issues Warning Letters to Property Management Software Providers on Price Transparency

    Home Prices Up in Metro Regions

    Pre-Covid Construction Contracts Unworkable as Costs Surge, Webuild Says

    Although Property Damage Arises From An Occurrence, Coverage Barred By Business Risk Exclusions

    Maui Wildfire Cleanup Could Cost $1B and Take One Year

    Illinois Favors Finding Construction Defects as an Occurrence

    Microsoft Urges the Construction Industry to Deliver Lifecycle Value

    The Construction Lawyer as Problem Solver

    San Francisco Airport’s Terminal 1 Aims Sky High

    The Word “Estimate” in a Contract Matters as to a Completion Date
    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 4500 building and claims related expert witness designations, the Anaheim, California Construction Expert Directory offers a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to builders and construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides construction related trial support and expert consulting services to the construction industry's leading builders and developers, legal professionals, and owners, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies. Employing in house assets which include testifying architects, design engineers, construction cost and standard of care experts, licensed general and specialty contractors, the firm brings regional experience and flexible capabilities to the Anaheim construction industry.

    Anaheim California window expert witnessAnaheim California construction cost estimating expert witnessAnaheim California reconstruction expert witnessAnaheim California construction code expert witnessAnaheim California civil engineering expert witnessAnaheim California construction forensic expert witnessAnaheim California consulting engineers
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    AI Data Centers Become City-Scale Infrastructure, Prompting New Industry Playbook

    August 11, 2026 —
    AI data centers are no longer just buildings. They are increasingly reaching power-demand levels more commonly associated with municipalities, prompting industry groups to launch a new framework they say is needed to keep pace with rapidly changing power, cooling and reliability requirements. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Thomson Reuters Construction Law (Virginia Practice Series)

    March 31, 2026 —
    P&A Partners Michael A. Branca and Jennifer L. Harris have authored the most recent edition (2025) of Construction Law (Virginia Practice Series), part of Thomson Reuters’ ProView legal reference library. Associate Julia Loudenburg also provided substantial assistance for this edition. Construction Law includes summaries and analysis of statutes, regulations, and cases. It covers all major legal issues, including:
    • Licensing
    • Building code compliance
    • Public-private partnerships
    • Public contract bidding and performance
    • Dispute resolution
    • Damages
    • Third-party liability
    • Liens and bonds
    Reprinted courtesy of Jennifer L. Harris, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Michael A. Branca, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Ms. Harris may be contacted at jharris@pecklaw.com Mr. Branca may be contacted at mbranca@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Chambers USA Recognizes Hunton’s Insurance Coverage Practice in 2026 Guide

    June 29, 2026 —
    Hunton is pleased to announce that its insurance coverage practice was recognized nationally for Insurance: Dispute Resolution – Policyholder in the recently released 2026 Chambers USA guide. The team also received state rankings in Florida (Insurance: Dispute Resolution), Georgia (Insurance), the District of Columbia (Insurance: Policyholder), and Massachusetts (Insurance). In addition to the insurance team’s group recognition across multiple states, the 2026 guide included individual rankings for Lorelie “Lorie” S. Masters (USA Nationwide and District of Columbia), Latosha M. Ellis (District of Columbia), Michael S. Levine (District of Columbia), Koorosh “KT” Talieh (District of Columbia), Walter J. Andrews (Florida), Andrea DeField (Florida), Cary D. Steklof (Florida), Lawrence J. Bracken II (Georgia), and Geoffrey B. Fehling (Massachusetts). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    Defend Now, Allocate Later? An Unresolved Tension in Colorado Construction Law

    August 16, 2026 —
    For decades, Colorado law has recognized an important distinction between the duty to defend and the duty to indemnify. The former ordinarily arises at the beginning of litigation; the latter generally cannot be determined until the underlying liability is known. That distinction makes intuitive sense. A defense that becomes due only after litigation concludes is not much of a defense. But Colorado’s construction anti-indemnity statute, C.R.S. § 13-21-111.5(6), raises an interesting question about how that familiar rule operates in construction disputes. The statute expressly regulates contractual obligations not only to indemnify, but also to insure and defend, and it reflects a legislative policy that construction businesses should bear financial responsibility for their own negligence. Those principles have developed along separate tracks. At some point, a Colorado appellate court may have to decide precisely how they fit together. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    Differing Site Conditions Claim Requires a Misrepresentation

    May 14, 2026 —
    If you are entertaining a differing site conditions claim, consider this Third District Court of Appeals case from the mid-90s. In Hendry Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 648 So.2d 140 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), a contractor was hired by Dade County to demolish the old Rickenbacker Causeway in Miami. The original 1941 plans of the causeway were made available to contractors. The lowest bidding contractor that was awarded the project based its bid “on its conclusion that the pilings supporting the old bridge were made of concrete.” Hendry, supra at 141. The contractor based this conclusion on the original plans, its visual observation, and experience. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    PSA: Be Sure to Document (Even When Time is Short)

    April 14, 2026 —
    Written change orders are a big deal. Almost all construction contracts (at least the well drafted ones) require written contracts. Written change orders are even important enough that Virginia law requires these provisions in residential construction contracts. Why are they so important? Because they are a “mini-contract” of sorts. They set the expectations, price, time, and work to be performed; work that was not included in the original price or scope for the project. Without this in writing, there will be no record of what the parties agreed to do. Does this sound familiar? Sound like its own contract? It should. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    SDNY Ruling Highlights Privilege Risks in Client Use of Generative AI

    March 03, 2026 —
    Artificial intelligence is quickly becoming a go‑to tool for aggregating and summarizing large volumes of data, formulating and testing arguments, and even sketching litigation strategies. But a recent ruling from the Southern District of New York serves as a stark warning: when clients turn to generative AI for legal strategy, they may be unknowingly turning privileged information over to a third party and then creating documents that may later be discoverable in litigation. In a closely watched bench decision, Judge Rakoff ruled that AI‑generated documents created by the target of a criminal investigation using Anthropic’s Claude were not privileged despite being generated with information learned from his attorneys to support his potential legal defense and then shared with his counsel. The decision highlights the unresolved and increasingly consequential intersection of AI, privilege, and discovery. Facts Bradley Heppner received a grand jury subpoena and hired attorneys at Quinn Emanuel to represent him. After learning he was a target of the investigation, but before he was arrested, he created 31 documents with Claude using information from his attorneys to outline a potential defense strategy. He was later arrested on charges of securities and wire fraud, and federal agents seized his electronic devices, which contained the 31 documents that had been provided to his attorneys. Mr. Heppner argued that the documents were created to prepare his potential defense strategy in anticipation of an indictment, but he conceded that he made the decision to prepare the reports on his own, i.e., not at the direction of counsel. He nevertheless claimed the documents were protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine; the government moved to overrule the objections. Reprinted courtesy of Christopher J. Olsen, Peckar & Abramson, P.C., Freddy X. Muñoz, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Gary M. Stein, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Olsen may be contacted at colsen@pecklaw.com Mr. Muñoz may be contacted at fmunoz@pecklaw.com Mr. Stein may be contacted at gstein@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Structural Concerns Force Emergency Closure of Maryland Office Building

    August 16, 2026 —
    A 10-story Baltimore-area office building was evacuated after an underground parking structure was compromised during construction work. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jim Parsons, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com