4th Department Narrowly Interprets Professional Services
August 11, 2026 —
Craig Rokuson - Traub LiebermanIn the recent case of Cty. of Erie v. Selective Ins. Co. of Am., 2026 NY Slip Op 04092 (App. Div. 4th Dept.), New York’s Appellate Division, Fourth Department held that a general liability carrier for a construction manager owed additional insured coverage to the County of Erie, notwithstanding an exclusion in the construction manager’s policy for injuries arising out of professional services.
The underlying case involved injuries sustained when the underlying plaintiff fell off of her bicycle at a park owned by the County when she transitioned from the pavement edge to grass.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Craig Rokuson, Traub LiebermanMr. Rokuson may be contacted at
crokuson@tlsslaw.com
Insured is Third Party Beneficiary of Forced-Place Policy
October 26, 2026 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiThe court denied the insurer’s motion to dismiss the insured’s fire damage claims under a forced-place policy because the insured was a third-party beneficiary of the policy. Fredericks v. Assurant Specialty, et al., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179779 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 12, 2026).
The insureds’ home burned down on the same day their homeowner’s policy expired. The expiration automatically triggered a forced-placed policy issued by American Security Insurance Company (ASIC) to the insureds’ mortgage company, Rocket Mortgage Company, LLC.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak HastertMr. Eyerly may be contacted at
te@hawaiilawyer.com
Wilke Fleury Attorneys Recognized by 2026 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars!
July 20, 2026 —
Wilke FleuryWilke Fleury is pleased to announce that 18 of the firm’s attorneys have been selected for inclusion on the 2026 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars lists.
The annual Super Lawyers and Rising Stars selections recognize attorneys across a wide range of practice areas. This year’s honorees reflect the depth of Wilke Fleury’s litigation, business, healthcare, employment, bankruptcy, appellate, real estate, construction, and estate planning practices.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Wilke Fleury
Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027
September 28, 2026 —
Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLCContinuing the trend from last year, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC is excited to announce that thirteen members of our firm have received recognition from Best Lawyers® in America for 2027.
The Best Lawyers in America® has been an annual publication since 1983 and focuses on the top legal talent across the United States and the globe. Through its rankings, Best Lawyers® provides a comprehensive guide to legal representation for individuals and businesses alike. Over time, Best Lawyers® has been recognized as one of the leading publications for attorney achievements and references.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC
Function Over Form: Eighth Circuit Narrows Application of Cosmetic Damage Exclusion
October 12, 2026 —
Ali Jamwal - SDV FenchurchIntroduction
In a significant decision for policyholders, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit adopted a narrow interpretation of an exclusion for cosmetic roof damage caused by wind or hail.
[1] The court held that for a cosmetic damage exclusion to apply, an insurer must prove that the roof’s ability to function as a barrier to the elements is not impaired as compared to its functionality prior to the loss or damage.
Background
In April 2022, a hailstorm struck the insured school buildings causing indentations in the buildings’ metal roofs. The hail did not puncture the roofs’ metal, and no leaks were reported. The insurer denied the claim based on the policy’s cosmetic damage exclusion, which precluded coverage for “cosmetic damage to roof surfacing caused by wind and/or hail.” Cosmetic damage was defined as “superficial damage that altered the appearance of the roof surfacing, but such damage does not prevent the roof from continuing to function as a barrier to entrance of the elements to the same extent as it did before.”
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Ali Jamwal, SDV FenchurchMr. Jamwal may be contacted at
ali.jamwal@sdvfenchurch.us
Ball Janik LLP Welcomes Construction Defect Attorney and U.S. Air Force Veteran Jake Scott to its Fort Lauderdale Office
June 02, 2026 —
Ball Janik LLPBall Janik LLP, a leading construction defect and insurance recovery law firm, has welcomed Jake Scott as an associate in its Fort Lauderdale office. Scott joins the Construction Defect Practice Group, bringing experience across construction litigation that includes construction defect, contract dispute, and negligence matters, along with a track record of representing construction professionals through depositions, court appearances, and trial preparation to support the firm's steady growth and client service statewide.
"We're excited to welcome Jake Scott to our Fort Lauderdale office and Construction Defect Practice Group," said James C. Prichard, Managing Partner at Ball Janik LLP. "We look forward to the fresh perspectives and legal solutions he will provide for community associations across South Florida."
Scott is a results-driven attorney dedicated to providing strategic counsel for complex legal challenges. He has experience managing all phases of a case, from early investigation and discovery through trial preparation and settlement negotiations.
Prior to joining Ball Janik, Scott served as an associate attorney in Fort Lauderdale, where he represented clients in construction litigation matters, handled depositions and court appearances, conducted legal research, and drafted pleadings, motions, and briefs. He also worked as an attorney in Tampa, where he represented contractors, subcontractors, and construction firms in defending claims involving construction defects, contractual disputes, and negligence, and worked closely with expert witnesses, engineers, and consultants to develop and present technical evidence.
Scott's experience representing the development and building sides of construction disputes provides a valuable, contrast-driven perspective that supports the strategic evaluation of claims and practical approaches to resolution for Ball Janik's clients.
A proud veteran, Scott served in the United States Air Force for eight years, including roles as an Airspace Control Officer and in Space Systems Operations, supporting safe space flight operations and satellite communications.
Carrying the discipline of airborne operations, Scott worked in the aerospace sector as a Satellite Engineer and Orbital Analyst. He also held a role in the housing sector, supporting marketing and business development initiatives.
Scott received his law degree from Stetson University College of Law. He attended American Military University, where he earned degrees in marketing, business management, and related support services.
About Ball Janik LLP
Ball Janik LLP is a Florida-based law firm offering construction defect, construction law, insurance recovery, and commercial litigation counsel to its local and national clients. The firm was founded in 1982 and has expanded its capabilities, professionals, and geographic footprint. What started as a small firm focused on real property, land use, and litigation (known then as Ball Janik & Novack) has grown to a team of 50-plus attorneys and paralegals in 5 offices in Florida, with centuries of combined experience and capabilities. The firm has been recognized by Chambers USA, U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®, The Best Lawyers in America©, and Corporate International. Read more here: https://www.balljanik.com.
Managing Rising Costs and Shifting Legal Risk for Florida High-Rise and Condominium Projects
May 05, 2026 —
Stephen Hauptman - Ball Janik LLPFlorida's construction defect landscape is experiencing a major shift. The convergence of material and labor cost volatility, regulatory tightening, and increasingly complex litigation strategies is forcing associations, developers, and their counsel to rethink how they approach risk management and dispute resolution. For those managing large-scale condo and high-rise projects, the stakes have never been higher.
The Cost Volatility Trap
Construction material prices rose at a "staggering" 12.6% annualized rate during the first two months of 2026, according to
recent industry analysis. Tariff impacts are projected to lead to more increases of 5.4% to 6.8%, depending on property type. For associations facing construction defect claims, this volatility creates a cascading problem: repair scopes defined two years ago are now dramatically underpriced, and damage calculations that appeared reasonable at discovery are obsolete by the time of settlement.
Courts and mediators are increasingly scrutinizing how cost estimates were developed and whether they account for existing market circumstances. Associations must now commission updated repair assessments more frequently, a practice that increases investigation costs but strengthens the credibility of damage claims. Conversely, defendants are weaponizing cost inflation as a defense, arguing that claimed damages are speculative or inflated. The practical result: repair sequencing and phasing strategies have become critical litigation tools. Associations that can demonstrate a rational, cost-effective repair plan tied to current market data are more favorably placed in settlement negotiations.
Regulatory Pressure and Deliberate Timing
Florida's 2026 condo compliance regime has significantly changed the defect claims landscape. Elevated transparency requirements, stricter reserve funding mandates, and tightened building safety inspection protocols mean that associations now face dual pressures: Comply with new regulations while simultaneously handling construction defect exposure.
This regulatory environment is changing investigation and documentation strategy. Associations that delay defect investigation to avoid triggering reserve funding obligations or disclosure requirements are taking on considerable legal risk. Recent case law such as the Third District Court of Appeal's reaffirmation of Chapter 558's pre-suit mediation requirements, underscores Florida's intent to resolve disputes early. Associations that move deliberately and record carefully during the pre-suit phase gain leverage in mediation and reduce the risk of expensive litigation.
Timing also intersects with repair sequencing. Associations must now balance the urgency of compliance inspections against the strategic advantage of phased repairs. Some associations are using compliance deadlines as a forcing mechanism to accelerate settlement discussions, while others are sequencing repairs to demonstrate good-faith remediation efforts before litigation commences.
The Emerging Risk Transfer Challenge
As construction defect claims grow more complex and costly, the traditional r
Why Do Construction Companies Fail?Enforcement Of Contractual Terms (E.G., Flow-Down, Field Verification, Shop Drawing Approval, And No-Damage-For-Delay Provisions)Float-In of MassDOT Span Sails, But Delay Dispute LingersNo Rest for the Weary: Project Completion Is the Beginning of LitigationTodd Ehrenreich Inducted as Fellow of International Academy of Trial LawyersArkansas Federal Court Fans the Product Liability Flames Utilizing the Malfunction TheoryTrust, But Verify: Addressing Risk of Non-Payment by OwnersAnother Case Highlighting the Difference Between CGL Policies and Performance BondsSubmitting Claims on Government Projects Can Be TrickyAlaska Supreme Court Finds Insurer Owes No Independent Duty to Injured PartyCalifornia Homeowners Can Release Future, Unknown Claims Against BuildersGeorgia Court of Appeals Holds That Policyholder Can “Stack” the Limits of Each Primary Policy After Asbestos ClaimMeet the Forum's In-House Counsel: ERIN CANNON-WELLSBasement Foundation Systems’ Getting an OverhaulBuilding Safety Month Just Around the CornerCase Remanded for Application of Efficient Proximate Cause DoctrineThe Impact of the Russia-Ukraine Conflict on the Insurance Industry, Part One: Coverage, Exposure, and LossesGranting Stay, Federal Court Reviews Construction Defect Coverage in HawaiiOhio: Are Construction Defects Covered in Insurance Policies?No Ink, No Problem: When Employees and Agents Can Enforce Arbitration AgreementsHere's How Much You Can Make by Renting Out Your HomeA Win for Policyholders: Court Finds Flood Exclusion Inapplicable to Plumbing Leaks Caused by Hurricane RainfallFalls Requiring Time Off from Work are IncreasingSubcontractor Not Liable for Defending Contractor in Construction Defect CaseNorth Dakota Court Determines Inadvertent Faulty Workmanship is an "Occurrence"Excess Insurer On The Hook For Cleanup Costs At Seven Industrial SitesCincinnati Team Secures Summary Judgment for Paving Company in Trip-and-Fall CaseHow Artificial Intelligence Can Transform ConstructionBuilding Resiliency: Withstanding Wildfires and Other Natural DisastersConstruction Litigation—Battles on Many FrontsFlorida Contractor on Trial for Bribing School OfficialPolicy's One Year Suit Limitation Does Not Apply to Challenging the Insurer's Claims HandlingFederal Arbitration Act Preempts Pennsylvania Payment ActBurden to Prove Exception to Exclusion Falls on InsuredUnable To Afford an Appellate Bond? You May Be “Indigent” And Qualify for a Discretionary Waiver or Reduction of the Bond Amount.Viva La France! 2024 Summer Olympics Construction Features Sustainable Design, Including, Simply Not Building at AllEnsuing Loss Provision Salvages Coverage for Water Damage ClaimArbitration is Waivable (Even If You Don’t Mean To)Labor Shortage Confirmed Through AGC PollNYPD Investigating Two White Flags on Brooklyn BridgeNo Retrofit without Repurposing in Los AngelesNew York Court Holds Insurer Can Recover Before Insured Is Made WholeRenters ‘Sold Out’ by NYC Pensions Press Mayor on HousingConstruction Executives Expect Improvements in the Year AheadWe've Surveyed Video Conferencing Models to See Who Fits the CCPA Bill: Here's What We FoundConstruction Law Alert: A Specialty License May Not Be Required If Work Covered By Another LicenseRecent Changes in the Law Affecting Construction Defect LitigationProvidence Partner Monica R. Nelson Helps Union Carbide Secure Defense Verdict in 1st Rhode Island Asbestos Trial in Nearly 40 YearsWhere Breach of Contract and Tortious Interference CollideWill the Hidden Cracks in the Bay Bridge Cause Problems During an Earthquake?Blog: Congress Strikes a Blow to President Obama’s “Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces” Executive Order 13673Two Paths to Industrialized Construction: Lessons from ChinaBiden’s Solar Plans Run Into a Chinese WallLargest Dam Removal Program in US History Reaches MilestoneSkanska Will Work With Florida on Barge-Caused Damage to Pensacola Bay BridgeSafe Commercial Asbestos-Removal PracticesOhio “property damage” caused by an “occurrence.”Best Practices in Construction– What are Yours?Insurer's Failure to Settle Does Not Justify Multiple Damages under Unfair Claims Settlement LawThe Importance of Engaging Design Professional Experts Early, with a Focus on Massachusetts LawMeasures Landlords and Property Managers Can Take in Response to a Reported COVID-19 InfectionCalifornia Supreme Court Holds “Notice-Prejudice” Rule is “Fundamental Public Policy” of California, May Override Choice of Law Provisions in PoliciesMatthew Graham Named to Best Lawyers in AmericaAmerica’s Infrastructure Gets a C-. It’s an Improvement ThoughBe Proactive Now: Commercial Construction Quickly Joining List of Industries Vulnerable to Cyber AttacksSeventh Circuit Finds “Additional Insured” Requirements Met Where Non-Party Subcontractor Was Proximate Cause of Underlying InjuriesPanama Weighs Another Canal Expansion at Centennial MarkYes, Indeedy. Competitive Bidding Not Required for School District Lease-LeasebacksHurricane Harvey: Understanding the Insurance Aspects, Immediate Actions for Risk ManagersGru Was Wrong About the Money: Court Concludes that Lender Owes Contractor “Contractually, Factually and Practically”You Are on Notice: Failure to Comply With Contractual Notice Provisions Can Be Fatal to Your ClaimNegligent Misrepresentation Claim Does Not Allege Property Damage, Barring CoverageLost in Translation: AEC Tech’s Missing Role
